Practice patterns in choice of left double-lumen tube size for thoracic surgery

Feasibility study of intubation in lateral position using Viva-sight double-lumen tube combined with video laryngoscope in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in lateral decubitus position is rarely reported. We designed this study to evaluate the feasibility of VivaSight double-lumen tube (VDLT) intubation assisted by video laryngoscope in lateral decubitus patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy were assessed for eligibility between January 2022 and December, 2022. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into supine intubation group (group S) and lateral intubation group (group L) by a computer-generated table of random numbers. The prime objective was to observe whether the success rate of VDLT intubation in lateral position with the aid of video laryngoscope was not inferior to that in supine position.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were assessed, and 88 eligible patients were randomly divided into group L (n = 44) and group S (n = 44). The success rate of the first attempt intubation in the L group was 90.5%, lower than that of S group (97.7%), but there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups were intubated with VDLT for no more than 2 attempts. The mean intubation time was 91.98 ± 26.70 s in L group, and 81.39 ± 34.35 s in S group (p > 0.05). The incidence of the capsular malposition in the group L was 4.8%, less than 36.4% of group S (p < 0.001). After 24 h of follow-up, it showed a higher incidence of sore throat in group S, compared to that in group L (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the comprehensive success rate of intubation in lateral decubitus position with VDLT assisted by video laryngoscope is not inferior to that in supine position, with less risk of intraoperative tube malposition and postoperative sore throat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trail Register (ChiCTR2200062989).

Research and development of the sOLVe Tube™ dual lumen endobronchial tube: from concept to construct

Introduction

Dual lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) are frequently used for lung isolation and one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery and other specialized clinical scenarios. Modern DLTs are large and rigid, and account for half of all tracheobronchial injuries. Their 70 year old design has numerous flaws which limit their safety and clinical utility. Our research team set out to design a new and improved DLT to mitigate these shortcomings, and then test the proposed device to ensure proper function.

Methods

Using published airway anatomy data and computed tomography imaging from 195 thoracic surgery patients, we designed a new DLT with a single size/configuration that would fit into adult surgery patients. This single "Universal design" was intended to replace both left and right sided 35Fr-41Fr DLTs (8 total products), while remaining small in diameter (35Fr). Other design goals included: 1) making intubation easier and safer, 2) allowing full sized therapeutic bronchoscopes to fit into this tube, 3) making the DLT more resistant to dislodgement. After design process completion the proposed dimensions were tested against 195 patients' left and right mainstem bronchi for radiographic fit. Once production prototypes were manufactured, they were tested in large adult Yorkshire pigs and fresh human cadavers for anatomic fit and performance.

Results

The proposed design passed the radiographic fit test in all 195 patients for both left and right mainstem endobronchial placement. Intubation was successful and deemed atraumatic in all pigs and cadavers, and the device appropriately fit in both the right and left mainstem bronchi. Lung isolation was successfully achieved and the device proved resistant to axial force dislodgement.

Conclusion

We propose a new design for a novel DLT meant to replace 8 currently supplied adult configurations with a single, one size/configuration fits all product that allows for large bore bronchoscopy and resists axial force dislodgement.

Choosing the correct-sized adult double-lumen tube: Quest for the holy grail

Appropriate size selection of double-lumen tubes (DLTs) for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in adults is still a humongous task. Several important factors are to be considered like patient height, gender, tracheal diameter, left main bronchial diameter, and cricoid cartilage transverse diameter. In addition to radiological assessment of the airway diameters, the manufacturing details of the particular DLT being used also play a significant role in size selection. Optimal positioning of the appropriately sized DLT is indispensable to avoid complications like airway trauma, cuff rupture, hypoxemia, and tube displacement. It is imperative to know whether the one-size-fits-all dictum holds for DLT size selection as claimed by certain studies. Further randomized studies are required for crystallizing standard protocols ascertaining the correct DLT size. This systematic review article highlights the various parameters employed for DLT size selection and explores the newer DLTs used for adult OLV.

Compatibility of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes with tracheal and bronchial dimensions: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLT) continue to be the most widely used method for obtaining lung isolation during anesthesia. We compared recommendations for DLT size selection with radiologically assessed lower airway dimensions gathered from a large patient population.

METHODS

For this retrospective comparative study, we assessed computed tomography (CT) scans of 150 adults with no known airway pathologies. Using these scans, we measured the diameter and length of the trachea and the diameter of the mainstem bronchi. These airway dimensions were then compared to the dimensions of left-sided DLTs of three different manufacturers. Size selection was based on one standard textbook's recommendations.

RESULTS

We found the recommended DLT sizes were occasionally too small but more often too large, particularly in the endobronchial airway. With the DLT Vivasight-DL®, mismatching occurred in 28.7% (43/150) of the patients at the distal mainstem bronchus and 8% (12/150) at the tracheal level. This mismatching happened most often in females (left distal mainstem bronchus 34/68, 50%; trachea 9/68, 13.2%). Conversely, the DLT was more often too small for male patients in both the left main bronchus (SHER-I-BRONCH®: 8/82, 9.8%) and the trachea (SHER-I-BRONCH®: 2/82, 2.4%). The endobronchial tube portion was more often too long in females (Vivasight® DLT: 11/68, 16%) than males (9/82, 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of the recommended DLT sizes from all three manufacturers was incompatible with individual patient's lower airway dimensions.

Comparison of different size left-sided double-lumen tubes for thoracic surgery

Study Objective

The aim of this study is to see if there are any clinical differences between using 35 F DLT for all patients versus using patient height regardless of gender to estimate appropriate DLT size.

Design

Prospective randomized study.

Setting

University Hospital.

Patients

50 patients age ≤18 years, undergoing lung or esophageal surgery requiring OLV.

Interventions

Patients randomized to two groups (group-35F, group -DLT based on height).

Measurements and Main Results

Data collected include demographics, ASA status, airway assessment, number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane grade, number of times DLT repositioned, incidence of sore throat, oxygen saturation at induction and oxygen saturation at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after OLV. There was no statistically significant difference in demographics, ASA classification, Mallampati score, number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane grade, number of times DLT was repositioned, and incidence of sore throat. In height based DLT group the odds were higher for the incidence of sore throat in 37-41 F group. Oxygen saturation at induction, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after OLV are not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the majority of patients receive unnecessarily large DLTs for thoracic surgery, which not only makes intubation inherently more difficult but also increases their risk of postoperative sore throat.

Comparison between computerized tomography-guided bronchial width measurement versus conventional method for selection of adequate double lumen tube size

Background:

Selection of adequate size double lumen tube (DLT) is complicated by marked inter-individual variability in morphology and dimensions of tracheobronchial tree. Computerized tomography (CT)-guided left bronchus width measurement has been used to predict adequate size DLT in European and Singapore population; however, no such data exist for Indian population who are racially different. We compared the effect of DLT size selection based on CT-guided bronchial width measurement to the conventional method of DLT selection on the adequacy of both lungs isolation and on the safety margin of right-sided DLT.

Methods:

Fifty-five adults scheduled to undergo thoracotomy were enrolled in this prospective observational study. An appropriate size left- or right-sided DLT with outer diameter 0.5–1 mm smaller than the CT-measured bronchial width was selected for the isolation of lungs. Adequacy of separation was checked using fiberoptic bronchoscope. The safety margin of selected right-sided DLT size was calculated from CT-measured right upper lobe bronchus width and diameter of right upper lobe ventilation slot of the DLT.

Results:

Adequate separation of lungs was achieved in 92.7% of studied population, 90.9% in males, and 95.4% in females. Among these, 54.9% patients required different sized DLT as compared to conventional method. Overall safety of margin of right-sided DLTs was comparable between two methods of DLT selection (median [IQR] 4.8 (3.5–6.8) vs. 6.59 (3.5–7.8), P = 0.317). DLT size with adequate isolation of lung correlated with height, tracheal width (TW) on chest X-ray, and age of the patients. A formula to calculate DLT size based on these variable was derived.

Conclusion:

CT-measured bronchial width predicts the appropriate DLT size better than conventional method. In the absence of CT scan facility, patient height, age, and chest X-ray TW may be used to predict DLT size with reasonable accuracy.

Practice patterns of left-sided double-lumen tube: Does it match recommendation from literature - A single-centre observational pilot study

Context:

Choosing appropriate-size double-lumen tube (DLT) has always been a challenge as it depends on existing guidelines based on gender, height, tracheal diameter (TD), or personal experience. However, there are no Indian data to match these recommendations.

Aim:

To find out whether the size of DLT used correlates with height, weight, TD, or left main stem bronchus diameter (LMBD). We also documented clinical consequences of any of our current practice.

Setting and Design:

Single-center observational pilot study.

Subjects and Methods:

Prospective, observational study of 41 patients requiring one-lung ventilation with left-side DLT. The choice of DLT was entirely on the discretion of anesthesiologist in charge of the case. Data were collected for TD, LMBD, height, weight, age, sex, and amount of air used in the tracheal and bronchial cuff. Any intraoperative complications and difficulty in isolation were also noted.

Statistical Analysis:

The statistical analysis was done with the National Council of Statistical Software version 11.

Results:

Average TD and LMBD were 16.5 ± 0.9 and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm for males and 14.2 ± 1.1 and 9.4 ± 1.1 mm for females, respectively. There was a weak correlation between DLT size and height (R² = 0.0694), TD (R² = 0.3396), and LMBD (R² = 0.2382) in the case of males. For females, the correlation between DLT size and height (R² = 0.2656), TD (R² = 0.5302), and LMBD (R² = 0.5003) was slightly better.

Conclusion:

Although there was a weak correlation between DLT size and height, TD, and LMBD, the overall intraoperative outcome and lung isolation were good.

Airway management in anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a "real life" observational study

BACKGROUND

One-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic anesthesia is required to provide good surgical exposure. OLV is commonly achieved through a double lumen tube (DLT) or a bronchial blocker (BB). Malposition is a relevant issue related to these devices use. No prospective studies with adequately large sample size have been performed to evaluate the malposition rate of DLTs and BBs.

METHODS

A total of 2,127 patients requiring OLV during thoracic surgery were enrolled. The aim of this multicenter prospective observational study performed across 26 academic and community hospitals is to evaluate intraoperative malposition rate of DLTs and BBs. We also aim to assess: which device is the most used to achieve OLV, the frequency of bronchoscope (BRO) use, the incidence rate of desaturation during OLV and the role of other factors that can correlate to this event, and incidence of difficult airway.

RESULTS

Malposition rate for DLTs was 14%, for BBs 33%. DLTs were used in 95% of patients and BBs in 5%. Mean positioning time was shorter for DLT than BB (156±230 vs. 321±290 s). BRO was used in 54% of patients to check the correct positioning of the DLT. Desaturation occurred in 20% of all cases during OLV achieved through a DLT. Predicting factors of desaturation were dislocation (OR 2.03) and big size of DLT (OR 1.15). BRO use (OR 0.69) and left surgical side (OR 0.41) proved to be protective factors. Difficult airway prevalence was 16%; 10.8% predicted and 5.2% unpredicted.

CONCLUSIONS

DLT has a low malpositioning rate and is the preferred device to achieve OLV. BRO use recorded was unexpectedly low. The possibility of encountering a difficult airway is frequent, with an overall prevalence of 16%. Risk factors of desaturation are malposition and increased size of DLT. Left procedures and BRO use could lead to fewer episodes of desaturation.

Difficulty in inserting left double-lumen endobronchial tubes at the cricoid level in small-statured women: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Left double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) sizes are selected using tracheal diameters and left mainstem bronchial diameters (LMBDs) determined from chest radiographs or computed tomography (CT) scans. In Western women, 35-Fr or 37-Fr DLTs are often selected. However, difficulties can be encountered when inserting 32-Fr or 35-Fr DLTs in Japanese women. We investigated success rates for 32-Fr or 35-Fr DLT insertion in Japanese women and determined the causes of unsuccessful DLT insertion.

METHODS

We searched anaesthesia records of Japanese women aged ≥20 years who underwent thoracic surgery with 32-Fr or 35-Fr DLTs between April 2010 and March 2015 in our hospital. In the successful group (SG), patients were intubated using the initially selected DLTs. By contrast, in the unsuccessful group (UG), the DLT size had to be changed. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

The SG included 149 (96.1%) of 155 cases of 32-Fr DLT use and 119 (95.2%) of 125 cases of 35-Fr DLT use. Patient height was significantly lower in the UG than in the SG for the 35-Fr DLT (P = 0.0036). In seven of 12 UG patients (three for 32-Fr and four for 35-Fr), the transverse diameters of cricoid cartilages were smaller than the DLTs' tracheal diameters, thereby preventing passage through the cricoid cartilages.

CONCLUSION

Along with LMBDs, transverse diameters of cricoid cartilages based on CT scans or ultrasonogram findings may help in selecting the appropriate left DLT size.

How to choose the double-lumen tube size and side: the eternal debate

Although disposable double-lumen tubes have been used for many years, there is still controversy regarding what size and which side to use for thoracic procedures requiring lung isolation. Thoracic and nonthoracic anesthesiologists often debate performance, efficiency, and outcome of small and large double-lumen tubes, and left- and right-sided tubes. This article focuses on current data in the literature and expert opinion on the topic.