Prognostic value of troponin I levels for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes in postmenopausal women undergoing cardiac surgery

E, Jones J, Li J. Evaluation of Age and Sex Differences in Contemporary versus High-Sensitivity Troponin I Measurement in Hospitalized Patients

Background: With the transition from the contemporary (cTnI) to high-sensitivity troponin assay (hs-cTnI), concerns have arisen regarding the diagnostic differences between these two assays due to analytical distinctions. This study aims to evaluate the age and sex differences between these two assays, as well as the differences resulting from using two different 99th percentile values of the high-sensitivity troponin assay. Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted at an academic medical center, encompassing a total of 449 lithium heparin plasma samples included in the dataset. Both contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin were simultaneously measured using Siemens ADVIA Centaur analyzers. Two sets of sex-specific 99th percentile URLs from the Siemens study (cutoff-1) and Universal Sample Bank data (cutoff-2) were used for the data analysis. Results: The use of cutoff-1 or cutoff-2 had a negligible impact on troponin classification. Troponin elevation significantly increased in individuals > 50 years old for males and >40 years old for females, with both troponin assays. A receiver operating characteristic analysis did not find significant differences between the two assays. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in survival in cTnI according to the non-sex-specific 99th URL or hs-cTnI (cutoff-2) but showed a slight difference in survival in hs-cTnI (cutoff-1). Conclusions: Overall, there were no significant differences in age and sex in the diagnostic performance between the contemporary and high-sensitivity troponin assays. Selection criteria for the establishment of the 99th percentile URL should be standardized to avoid the misinterpretation of the troponin results.

Modern View on the Role of Sex-Specific Levels of High-Sensitive Cardiospecific Troponins T and I in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction

It is well known that the molecules of cardiospecific troponins T and I are localized in the troponin-tropomyosin complex of the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes and, due to the specific localization, these cardiospecific troponins are widely used as diagnostic biomarkers of myocardial infarction. Cardiospecific troponins are released from the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes as a result of irreversible cell damage (for example, ischemic necrosis of cardiomyocytes in myocardial infarction or apoptosis of cardiac myocytes in cardiomyopathies and heart failure) or reversible damage (for example, intense physical exertion, hypertension, the influence of stress factors, etc.). Current immunochemical methods for determining cardiospecific troponins T and I have extremely high sensitivity to subclinical (minor) damage to myocardial cells and, thanks to modern high-sensitive methods, it is possible to detect damage to cardiac myocytes in the early (subclinical) stages of a number of cardiovascular pathologies, including myocardial infarction. So, recently, leading cardiological communities (the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, etc.) have approved algorithms for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction based on the assessment of serum levels of cardiospecific troponins in the first 1 - 3 h after the onset of pain syndrome. An important factor that may affect early diagnostic algorithms of myocardial infarction are sex-specific features of serum levels of cardiospecific troponins T and I. This manuscript presents a modern view on the role of sex-specific serum levels of cardiospecific troponins T and I in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the mechanisms of formation of sex-specific serum levels of troponins.

Gender Specificities of Cardiac Troponin Serum Levels: From Formation Mechanisms to the Diagnostic Role in Case of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiac troponins T and I are the main (most sensitive and specific) laboratory indicators of myocardial cell damage. A combination of laboratory signs of myocardial cell damage (elevated levels of cardiac troponins T and I) with clinical (severe chest pain spreading to the left side of the human body) and functional (rise or depression of the ST segment, negative T wave or emergence of the Q wave according to electrocardiography and/or decrease in the contractility of myocardial areas exposed to ischemia according to echocardiography) signs of myocardial ischemia is indicative of the ischemic damage to cardiomyocytes, which is characteristic of the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Today, with early diagnostic algorithms for ACS, doctors rely on the threshold levels of cardiac troponins (99th percentile) and on the dynamic changes in the serum levels over several hours (one, two, or three) from the moment of admission to the emergency department. That said, some recently approved highly sensitive methods for determining troponins T and I show variations in 99th percentile reference levels, depending on gender. To date, there are conflicting data on the role of gender specificities in the serum levels of cardiac troponins T and I in the diagnostics of ACS, and the specific mechanisms for the formation of gender differences in the serum levels of cardiac troponins T and I are unknown. The purpose of this article is to analyze the role of gender specificities in cardiac troponins T and I in the diagnostics of ACS, and to suggest the most likely mechanisms for the formation of differences in the serum levels of cardiac troponins in men and women.

Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Women

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays have become the gold standard for diagnosing acute and chronic myocardial injury. The detection of troponin levels beyond the 99th percentile is included in the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction, specifically recommending the use of sex-specific thresholds. Measurable concentrations below the proposed diagnostic thresholds have been shown to inform prognosis in different categories of inpatients and outpatients. However, clinical investigations from the last twenty years have yielded conflicting results regarding the incremental value of using different cut-offs for men and women. While advocates of a sex-specific approach claim it may help reduce gender bias in cardiovascular medicine, particularly in acute coronary syndromes, other groups question the alleged incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of sex-specific thresholds, ultimately asserting that less is more. In the present review, we aimed to synthesize our current understanding of sex-based differences in cardiac troponin levels and to reappraise the available evidence with regard to (i) the prognostic significance of sex-specific diagnostic thresholds of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays compared to common cut-offs in both men and women undergoing cardiovascular disease risk assessment, and (ii) the clinical utility of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for cardiovascular disease prevention in women.

Gender-specific differences in biomarkers responses to acute coronary syndromes and revascularization procedures

A growing body of gender-related research in coronary artery disease is beginning to gradually elucidate differences between women and men. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), these sex differences include varying risk factor profiles, accuracy of diagnostic testing, clinical presentations, treatment practices and outcomes. There is also a differential expression of cardiac biomarkers by sex, which remains unexplained. This paper reviews all the available information on the effect of gender on cardiac biomarkers by search of MEDLINE using the terms gender differences, biomarkers, ACS and revascularization procedures. A better understanding of the sex disparities in biomarkers along with all other clinical information is essential to optimal management and patient care in the future.

Multicenter analytical evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin T assay

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays are being introduced clinically for earlier diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the analytical performance of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay (hscTnT, Roche Diagnostics) in a multicenter, international trial.

METHODS

Three US and 5 European sites evaluated hscTnT on the Modular® Analytics E170, cobas® 6000, Elecsys 2010, and cobas® e 411. Precision, accuracy, reportable range, an inter-laboratory comparison trial, and the 99th percentile of a reference population were assessed.

RESULTS

Total imprecision (CVs) were 4.6-36.8% between 3.4 and 10.3 ng/L hscTnT. Assay linearity was up to 10,000 ng/L and the limit of blank and detection were 3 and 5 ng/L, respectively. The 99th percentile reference limit was 14.2 ng/L (n=533). No significant differences between specimen types, assay incubation time, or reagent lots existed. A substantial positive bias (76%) exists between the 4th generation and hscTnT assays at the low end of the measuring range (<50 ng/L). hscTnT serum pool concentrations were within 2SD limits of the mean of means in the comparison trial, indicating comparable results across multiple platforms and laboratories.

CONCLUSION

The Roche hscTnT assay conforms to guideline precision requirements and will likely identify additional patients with myocardial injury suspicious for AMI.

Troponin testing after cardiac surgery

Single biomarker measurements can predict outcome after cardiac surgery. and may assist in decision making about diagnostic and therapeutic steps following surgery. Although comparative data are relatively lacking some data exist to suggest that among markers of myocardial necrosis, results from cardiac troponin (cTn) measurement may be superior for risk prediction after cardiac surgery to those from the MB isoenzyme of CK (CK-MB). Loss of cardiac troponins from necrotic myocardium is not replenished through re-expression of genes that might increase protein synthesis, and release of cTn appears to represent irreversibly damaged myocardium. Not every cardiac surgical procedure is associated with the same degree of cTn elevation and forms of cardioprotection may im-portantly affect concentrations of cTn after coronary artery bypass grafting. Similarly, less cardiac injury may occur depending on the form of anesthesia used during surgery. Great caution must be exercised when utilizing cTnT or cTnI for diagnosis of post-cardiac surgery regional acute myocardial infarction: in this context clinical factors must be applied at the risk of a false diagnosis. On the other hand, concentrations of both cTnT and cTnI have repeatedly and unequivocally been shown to be prognostic for delayed recov-ery, intensive care unit utilization, as well as short- and longer-term mortality following cardiac surgery.