Conversion of hemiblock to complete heart block by intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring

Second-degree atrioventricular block induced by electrical stimulation of transcranial motor-evoked potential: a case report

BACKGROUND

Although several complications of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) have been reported, reports of arrhythmias during Tc-MEP are very rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old woman underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under general anesthesia, with intraoperative Tc-MEP monitoring. Preoperative electrocardiography showed an incomplete right bundle branch block but no cardiovascular events in her life. After induction of anesthesia, Tc-MEP was recorded prior to the surgery. During the Tc-MEP monitoring, electrocardiography and arterial blood pressure showed a second-degree atrioventricular block, but it improved rapidly at the end of the stimulation, and the patient was hemodynamically stable. Tc-MEP was recorded seven times during surgery; the incidence of P waves without QRS complexes was significantly higher than before stimulation. The surgery was uneventful, and she was discharged eight days postoperatively without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case suggests that electrical stimulation for Tc-MEP can cause arrhythmia. Electrocardiography and blood pressure must be closely monitored during Tc-MEP monitoring.

Hemodynamically significant cardiac arrhythmias during general anesthesia for spine surgery: A case series and literature review

•

Although multiple factors have been implicated, our case series highlights SSEP stimulation as a common etiology of arrhythmia.

•

Significant bradycardia and CA during spine surgery does not always require termination of the surgical procedure.

•

Decision making should be undertaken in each case individually based on patient condition and circumstances of each event.

•

Surgeons and anesthesiologists should be aware of and prepared to treat significant cardiac arrhythmias during spine surgery even in otherwise healthy patients without known risk factors.

Background context

Hemodynamically significant bradycardia and cardiac arrest (CA) are rare under general anesthesia (GA) for spine surgery. Although patient risks are well defined, emerging data implicate surgical, anesthetic and neurologic factors which should be considered in the immediate management and decision to continue or terminate surgery.

Purpose

To characterize causes and contributors to significant arrhythmias during spine surgery. We also provide an updated literature review to inform spine care teams and aid in the management of intraoperative bradycardia and CA.

Study design

Case series and literature review

Patient sample

Six patients who underwent spine surgery from 03/2016 to 01/2020 at a single institution and developed unexpected hemodynamically significant arrhythmia

Outcome measures

Our primary outcome was to identify potential risk factors of interest for significant arrhythmia during spine surgery.

Methods

Medical records of patients who underwent spine surgery from 03/2016 to 01/2020 at a single institution and developed unexpected hemodynamically significant arrhythmia during spine surgery were identified from a departmental Quality Assurance Database. We evaluated the presence/absence of patient, surgical, anesthetic and neurologic risk factors and estimated the most likely etiology of the event, immediate and subsequent management, whether surgery was postponed or continued and outcomes.

Results

We found a temporal relationship of bradyarrhythmia and CA after somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) stimulation in 4/6 cases and pharmacy/polypharmacy in 2/6. Surgery was completed in 4/6 patients, and terminated in 2/6 (subsequently completed in both). We found no adverse outcomes in any patients. Our literature review predominately identified case reports for guidance to support decision making. New literaure suggests peripheral nerve blocks and opioid-sparing anesthetic agents should also be considered.

Conclusions

Significant bradycardia and CA during spine surgery does not always require termination of the surgical procedure. Decision making should be undertaken in each case individually, with an updated awareness of potential causes. The study also suggests the need for large prospective studies to adequately assess incidence, risk factors and outcomes.

Bradycardic Arrest During Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring: A Case Report

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring involves electrical stimulation of nerve pathways and is used to assess the integrity of both motor and sensory pathways. Whereas motor pathway monitoring involves transcranial stimulation and peripheral nerve monitoring, somatosensory monitoring involves peripheral nerve stimulation and cranial monitoring. Arrhythmias are a known complication of motor-evoked potential monitoring but have not been reported with somatosensory monitoring. We describe a case of bradycardic arrest with somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring using median nerve electrodes in a patient with no previous rhythm abnormality. Clinicians caring for patients receiving somatosensory monitoring should be aware of the potential for severe arrhythmias.