1
|
Tait M, Pando C, McGuire C, Perez-Sanz S, Baum L, Fowler E, Gollust S. Picturing the populations who could benefit from health insurance access expansions: An analysis of US health insurance television ads airing in 2018. WORLD MEDICAL & HEALTH POLICY 2023; 15:336-355. [PMID: 38106846 PMCID: PMC10722961 DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Efforts to expand access to health insurance in the United States are key to addressing health inequities and ensuring that all individuals have access to health care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Yet, attempts to expand public insurance programs, including Medicaid, continue to face opposition in state and federal policymaking. Limited policy success raises questions about the health insurance information environment and the extent that available information signals both available resources and the need for policy reform. In this study, we explore one way that consumers and policymakers learn about health insurance-television advertisements-and analyze content in ads that could contribute to an understanding of who needs health insurance or who deserves to benefit from policies to expand insurance access. Specifically, we implement a content analysis of health insurance ads airing throughout 2018 on broadcast television or national cable, focusing on the depictions of people in those ads. Our findings indicate that individuals depicted in ads for Medicaid plans differ from those in ads for non-Medicaid plans. Groups that comprise large populations of current Medicaid enrollees, children and pregnant people, were more likely to appear in ads for non-Medicaid plans than in ads for Medicaid plans. This has implications for potential enrollees' understanding of who is eligible as well as the general public's and policymakers' perspectives on who should be targeted for current or future policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Tait
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cynthia Pando
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cydney McGuire
- Indiana University Paul H. O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Laura Baum
- Wesleyan Media Project, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Erika Fowler
- Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah Gollust
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haeder SF, Sylvester SM, Callaghan T. More Than Words? How Highlighting Target Populations Affects Public Opinion about the Medicaid Program. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2023; 48:713-760. [PMID: 36995367 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10637708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The Medicaid program provides health insurance coverage to a diverse set of demographics. We know little about how the policy community describes these populations (e.g., on Medicaid-related websites or in public opinion polls and policy writings) or whether and how these descriptions may affect perceptions of the program, its beneficiaries, and potential policy changes. METHODS To investigate this issue, we developed and fielded a nationally representative survey of 2,680 Americans that included an experiment for priming respondents by highlighting different combinations of target populations of the Medicaid program as found in the Medicaid policy discourse. FINDINGS Overall, we find that Americans view Medicaid and its beneficiaries rather favorably. However, there are marked differences based on partisanship and racial animosity. Emphasizing citizenship and residency requirements at times improved these perceptions. CONCLUSIONS Racial perceptions and partisanship are important correlates in Americans' views about Medicaid and its beneficiaries. However, perceptions are not immutable. In general, the policy community should shift toward using more comprehensive descriptions of the Medicaid population that go beyond the focus on low income and that include citizenship and residency requirements. Future research should expand this work by studying descriptions in the broader public discourse.
Collapse
|
3
|
Pando C, Tait ME, McGuire CM, Perez-Sanz S, Baum L, Fowler EF, Gollust SE. Health Insurance Ad Messages Targeted to English- and Spanish-Speaking Populations in a Period of Limited Federal Investment in Marketplace Outreach. Med Care Res Rev 2022; 79:798-810. [PMID: 35708017 PMCID: PMC10339780 DOI: 10.1177/10775587221101295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Federal funding cuts to enrollment outreach and marketing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace options in 2017 has raised questions about the adequacy of the information the public has received, especially among populations vulnerable to uninsurance. Using health insurance ads aired from January 1, 2018, through December 21, 2018, we conducted a content analysis focused on (a) the messaging differences by ad language (English vs. Spanish) and (b) the messaging appeals used by nonfederally sponsored health insurance ads in 2018. The results reveal that privately sponsored ads focused on benefit appeals (e.g., prescription drugs), while publicly sponsored ads emphasized financial assistance subsidies. Few ads, regardless of language, referenced the ACA explicitly and privately sponsored Spanish-language ads emphasized benefits (e.g., choice of doctor) over enrollment-relevant details. This study emphasizes that private-sponsored television marketing may not provide specific and actionable health insurance information to the public, especially for the Spanish-speaking populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Pando
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA
| | | | | | - Sarah Perez-Sanz
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Laura Baum
- Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA
| | | | - Sarah E. Gollust
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carrasco-Aguilar A, Galán JJ, Carrasco RA. Obamacare: A bibliometric perspective. Front Public Health 2022; 10:979064. [PMID: 36033824 PMCID: PMC9416003 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.979064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Obamacare is the colloquial name given to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) signed into law by President Obama in the USA, which ultimately aims to provide universal access to health care services for US citizens. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the political-legal, economic, social, management (or administrative), and medical (or health) repercussions of this law, using a bibliometric methodology as a basis. In addition, the main contributors to research on ACA issues have been identified in terms of authors, organizations, journals, and countries. The downward trend in scientific production on this law has been noted, and it has been concluded that a balance has not yet been reached between the coexistence of private and public health care that guarantees broad social coverage without economic or other types of barriers. The law requires political consensus to be implemented in a definitive and global manner for the whole of the United States.
Collapse
|
5
|
Myerson R, Anderson DM, Baum LM, Fowler EF, Gollust SE, Shafer PR. Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2224651. [PMID: 35913740 PMCID: PMC9344363 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Many individuals eligible for coverage in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace remain unenrolled because of information barriers. Whether the private sector or the public sector should conduct outreach to address these barriers is a topic of active debate. Objective To determine whether cuts to the funding of the ACA navigator program were associated with changes in the volume of private sector advertising. Design, Setting, and Participants Using data from the 2015 to 2019 open enrollment periods, this economic evaluation analyzed the changes in advertising associated with 2017 to 2019 cuts to navigator program funding. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to compare outcomes before and after the cuts in counties with higher and lower exposure to the navigator program. Health insurance advertising was measured using data from Kantar/Campaign Media Analysis Group in collaboration with the Wesleyan Media Project, the most comprehensive data available on local broadcast and national cable advertising. The data set included all counties that met the eligibility criteria for the navigator program from 2015 through 2019. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to May 2022. Exposures Counties were classified as having higher or lower exposure to the navigator program according to the intensity of program activity in 2016, before the funding cuts. Counties served only by statewide navigator programs were categorized as lower exposure, while those also served by local navigator programs were categorized as higher exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures Number of privately sponsored television advertisement airings for the ACA individual health insurance marketplace during the 2015 to 2019 open enrollment periods in each county, adjusted for population. Results All counties in 33 states that met the eligibility criteria for the navigator program from 2015 through 2019 were included in the analysis (2435 counties). Cuts to the navigator program were not associated with changes in the number of privately sponsored health insurance advertisements aired. Results were similar under several alternative approaches including an event study specification. Conclusions and Relevance In this study of the association between television advertising and navigator funding in the ACA marketplaces, private sector entities did not increase their advertising to compensate for declines in government-sponsored navigator activity. This finding can inform policy debates about the extent to which the private sector adjusts in response to changes in government outreach, and thus improve the design of state waivers and federal funding allocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Myerson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
| | - David M. Anderson
- Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Laura M. Baum
- Wesleyan Media Project, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut
| | - Erika Franklin Fowler
- Wesleyan Media Project, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut
- Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut
| | - Sarah E. Gollust
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Paul R. Shafer
- Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ndumele CD, Cohen MS, Solberg M, Lollo A, Wallace J. Characterization of US Hospital Advertising and Association With Hospital Performance, 2008-2016. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2115342. [PMID: 34213558 PMCID: PMC8254134 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Hospital advertising has been touted as a tool to improve consumer decision-making, but little is known about its association with objective measures of hospital quality. OBJECTIVE To document recent trends in hospital advertising in the US and examine the association between concurrent measures of hospital advertising and quality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cross-sectional study of all general acute care hospitals operating in the US between January 2008 and December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 6, 2019, to July 15, 2020. EXPOSURE Annualized advertising spending for each hospital as measured by a market research firm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Four composites of hospital performance from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare database were used: risk-standardized mortality rate, risk-standardized readmission rate, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Overall Patient Experience Rating (scale of 1-5; higher scores indicate a more positive patient experience rating), and overall 5-star rating. Linear models adjusted for hospital bed size, hospital revenue, and geographic census region. RESULTS The study sample included, on average, 4569 general acute care hospitals per year between 2008 and 2016. During this time, approximately half of acute care hospitals (2239 of 4569 [49%]) advertised their services to consumers and spent a total of $3.39 billion. Relative to hospitals that never advertised, advertising hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit facilities (mean [SD], 66% [47%] vs 51% [50%]; P < .001), had larger bed sizes (mean [SD], 234.3 [210.7] beds vs 84.8 [110.6] beds; P < .001), and had higher net incomes (mean [SD], $17 800 000 [$49 000 000] vs $134 099 [$51 600 000]; P < .001). There was no observed association between hospital advertising and performance. For example, hospitals that advertised had a mean (SD) CAHPS 5-star rating of 3.2 (0.9) stars compared with 3.3 (1.0) stars among hospitals that did not advertise, an insignificant difference (P = .92). We observed no difference in performance between advertising and nonadvertising hospitals in 30-day readmission rates (mean [SD], 15.5% [0.8%] vs 15.6% [1.0%]; P = .25), mortality rates (mean [SD], 12.7% [4.0%] vs 12.0% [4.1%]; P = .46), and overall 5-star hospital ratings (mean [SD], 3.1 [0.8] stars vs 3.0 [0.9] stars; P = .50). A significant difference was observed in adjusted mortality rates across terciles of advertising spending, with lower mortality rates for the hospitals with higher ad spending (2016, mean [SD] mortality composite for hospitals in the highest tercile, 11.2% [4.2%] vs hospitals in the middle tercile, 12.0% [3.8%], and for hospitals in the lowest tercile, 12.7% [4.1%]; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the amount hospitals spent on direct-to-consumer advertising was not associated with publicly reported measures of hospital quality; instead, hospital advertising spending was higher for financially stable hospitals with higher net incomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chima D. Ndumele
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Anthony Lollo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jacob Wallace
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gollust SE, Fowler EF, Niederdeppe J. Ten Years of Messaging about the Affordable Care Act in Advertising and News Media: Lessons for Policy and Politics. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2020; 45:711-728. [PMID: 32589219 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-8543210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Messaging about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has seemingly produced a variety of outcomes: millions of Americans gained access to health insurance, yet much of the US public remains confused about major components of the law, and there remain stark and persistent political divides in support of the law. Our analysis of the volume and content of ACA-related media (including both ads and news) helps explain these phenomena, with three conclusions. First, the information environment around the ACA has been complex and competitive, with messaging originating from diverse sponsors with multiple objectives. Second, partisan cues in news and political ads are abundant, likely contributing to the crystallized politically polarized opinion about the law. Third, partisan discussions of the ACA in political ads have shifted in volume, direction, and tone over the decade, presenting divergent views regarding which party is accountable for the law's successes (or failures). We offer evidence for each of these conclusions from longitudinal analyses of the volume and content of ACA messaging, also referencing studies that have linked these messages to attitudes and behavior. We conclude with implications for health communication, political science, and the future outlook for health reform.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pintor JK, Alberto CK, Arnold KT, Bandara S, Baum LM, Fowler EF, Gollust SE, Niederdeppe J, Barry CL. Targeting of Enrollment Assistance Resources in Health Insurance Television Advertising: A Comparison of Spanish- Vs. English-Language Ads. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:605-612. [PMID: 33317426 PMCID: PMC7905836 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1818150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Latinx adults, especially immigrants, face higher uninsurance and lower awareness of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) provisions and resources compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Television advertising of ACA health plans has directed many consumers to application assistance and enrollment, but little is known about how ads targeted Latinx consumers. We used Kantar Media/CMAG data from the Wesleyan Media Project to assess Spanish- vs. English-language ad targeting strategies and to assess which enrollment assistance resources (in person/telephone vs. online) were emphasized across three Open Enrollment Periods (OEP) (2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16). We examined differences in advertisement sponsorship and volume of Spanish- versus English-language ads across the three OEPs. State-based Marketplaces sponsored 47% of Spanish-language airings; insurance companies sponsored 55% of English-language airings. The proportion of Spanish-language airings increased over time (8.8% in OEP1, 11.1% in OEP2, 12.0% in OEP3, p <.001). Spanish-language airings had 49% lower (95%CI: 0.50,0.53) and 2.20 times higher odds (95%CI: 2.17,2.24) of mentioning online and telephone/in-person enrollment assistance resources, respectively. While there was a significant decrease in mention of telephone/in-person assistance over time for English-language airings, these mentions increased significantly in Spanish-language airings. Future research should examine the impact of the drastic federal cuts to ACA outreach and marketing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Kemmick Pintor
- Department of Health Management & Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cinthya K. Alberto
- Department of Health Management & Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kimberly T. Arnold
- Penn Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Laura M. Baum
- Wesleyan Media Project, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT
| | | | - Sarah E. Gollust
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Colleen L. Barry
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|