The effects of propofol anesthesia on transcortical electric evoked potentials in the rat

Basic Principles and Recent Trends of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), which are muscle action potentials elicited by transcranial brain stimulation, have been the most popular method for the last decade to monitor the functional integrity of the motor system during surgery. It was originally difficult to record reliable and reproducible potentials under general anesthesia, especially when inhalation-based anesthetic agents that suppressed the firing of anterior horn neurons were used. Advances in anesthesia, including the introduction of intravenous anesthetic agents, and progress in stimulation techniques, including the use of pulse trains, improved the reliability and reproducibility of TcMEP responses. However, TcMEPs are much smaller in amplitude compared with compound muscle action potentials evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation, and vary from one trial to another in clinical practice, suggesting that only a limited number of spinal motor neurons innervating the target muscle are excited in anesthetized patients. Therefore, reliable interpretation of the critical changes in TcMEPs remains difficult and controversial. Additionally, false negative cases have been occasionally encountered. Recently, several facilitative techniques using central or peripheral stimuli, preceding transcranial electrical stimulation, have been employed to achieve sufficient depolarization of motor neurons and augment TcMEP responses. These techniques might have potentials to improve the reliability of intraoperative motor pathway monitoring using TcMEPs.

Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are widely used to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. Improvements in transcranial stimulation techniques and general anesthesia have made it possible to record reliable and reproducible potentials. However, TcMEPs are much smaller in amplitude compared with compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation. In this study, multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation (mt-TES) was introduced to enhance TcMEPs, and the optimal setting of mt-TES was investigated. In 30 patients undergoing surgical correction of spinal deformities (4 males and 26 females with normal motor status; age range 11-75 years), TcMEPs from the abductor hallucis (AH) and quadriceps femoris (QF) were analyzed. A multipulse (train) stimulus with an individual pulse width of 0.5 ms and an inter-pulse interval of 2 ms was delivered repeatedly (2-7 times) at different rates (2, 5, and 10 Hz). TcMEP amplitudes increased with the number of train stimuli for AH, with the strongest facilitation observed at 5 Hz. The response amplitude increased 6.1 times on average compared with single-train transcranial electrical stimulation (st-TES). This trend was also observed in the QF. No adverse events (e.g., seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, scalp burns, accidental injury resulting from patient movement) were observed in any patients. Although several facilitative techniques using central or peripheral stimuli, preceding transcranial electrical stimulation, have been recently employed to augment TcMEPs during surgery, responses are still much smaller than CMAPs. Changing from conventional st-TES to mt-TES has potential to greatly enhance TcMEP responses.

Quantification of the proportion of motor neurons recruited by transcranial electrical stimulation during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are widely used to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. However, they are much smaller and more variable in amplitude than responses evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation, suggesting that a limited number of spinal motor neurons to the target muscle are excited by transcranial stimulation. The aim of this study was to quantify the proportion of motor neurons recruited during TcMEP monitoring under general anesthesia. In twenty patients who underwent thoracic and/or lumbar spinal surgery with TcMEP monitoring, the triple stimulation technique (TST) was applied to the unilateral upper arm intraoperatively. Total intravenous anesthesia was employed. Trains of four stimuli were delivered with maximal intensity and an inter-pulse interval of 1.5 ms. TST responses were recorded from the abductor digiti minimi muscle, and the negative peak amplitude and area were measured and compared between the TST test (two collisions between transcranial and proximal and distal peripheral stimulation) and control response (two collisions between two proximal and one distal peripheral stimulation). The highest degree of superimposition of the TST test and control responses was chosen from several trials per patient. The average ratios (test:control) were 17.1 % (range 1.8-38 %) for the amplitudes and 21.6 % (range 2.9-40 %) for the areas. The activity of approximately 80 % of the motor units to the target muscle cannot be detected by TcMEP monitoring. Therefore, changes in evoked potentials must be interpreted cautiously when assessing segmental motor function with TcMEP monitoring.

Warning thresholds on the basis of origin of amplitude changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential (TCE-MEP: compound muscle action potentials) monitoring during cervical spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To divide the warning threshold of TCE-MEP amplitude changes on the basis of origin into the spinal tract and spinal segments and decide warning thresholds for each.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The parameter commonly used for the warning threshold in TCE-MEP monitoring is wave amplitude, but amplitude changes have not been examined by anatomical origin.

METHODS

Intraoperative TCE-MEP amplitude changes were reviewed for 357 patients with cervical myelopathy. Most of the patients were monitored by transcranial electrical stimulated spinal-evoked potential combined with TCE-MEP. The warning threshold of TCE-MEP was taken as waveform disappearance. For each patient, amplitude changes were separated, according to origin, into the spinal tract and spinal segments and compared with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Assessable TCE-MEP waves were obtained in 350 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEP waves, which were innervated by the spinal levels exposed to the surgical invasion, was seen in 11 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEPs, which were innervated by the spinal levels inferior to them, was seen in 43 cases. There was no postoperative motor deficit in those cases. However, such deficits caused by spinal segment injury were seen in 2 cases, which showed that intraoperative amplitude decreased to 4.5% and 27%.

CONCLUSION

If we had established the warning threshold as 30% of the control amplitude, we would likely have prevented both cases of postoperative motor deficits, but 106 (30.3%) cases would have become positive cases. If we had established the warning threshold separately as wave disappearance for the spinal tract and 30% of the control amplitude for the spinal segments, sensitivity and specificity would have been 100% and 83.7%, respectively. Dividing the warning threshold on the basis of origin of amplitude changes could reduce false-positive cases and prevent intraoperative injuries.

A new method for measuring motor evoked potentials in the awake rat: effects of anesthetics

The goal of this investigation was to develop a method to study the neurophysiological integrity of the central motor tract using motor evoked potentials in the awake rat and assess the effects of different anesthetics in this model. Rats were implanted with six subcutaneous electrodes (pediatric myocardial pacing leads) and one cranial screw. Motor evoked potentials of the hind limb were elicited after cranial and sciatic nerve stimulation. Experiments were repeated on different days during three weeks studying the effect of three different anesthetics (propofol, ketamine/xylazine, pentobarbital) at three different doses. Stimulation of motor evoked potentials in the awake rat was well tolerated with no effects on behavior. The electrodes could be kept chronically in place without signs of infection. The repeated recordings on different days showed high reproducibility after the fourth day following implantation of the electrodes. All three anesthetics induced an increase in the latency and a decrease in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials which were dose dependent. Propofol (up to 1 mg/kg x min(1)) affected motor evoked potentials to a lesser extent than the other anesthetics. Based upon these findings, we believe that our approach provides a new method of chronically implanting electrodes in the rat to assess the neurophysiological function of the motor tract without the need of anesthetics. This model may prove useful in the investigation of various diseases that affect the motor pathways without the confounding effects of anesthesia.

Prolonged loss of leg myogenic motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, without postoperative paraplegia

No postoperative paraplegia occurred in a patient whose leg myogenic motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) disappeared during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A 69-year-old man underwent resection and repair of a type III (Crawford classification) thoracoabdominal aneurysm. An epidural catheter was placed into the epidural space for epidural cooling, and a Swan-Ganz catheter was placed into the subarachnoid space for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. Continuous CSF pressure and temperature measurement was carried out the day before surgery. The mMEPs gradually disappeared 10 min after proximal double aortic clamping and complete aortic transection. Selective perfusion of intercostal arteries was started about 20 min after the loss of the mMEPs, but the mMEPs were not restored. Possibly, spinal cord hyperemia, induced by selective perfusion of the intercostal vessels, narrowed the subarachnoid space so that CSF could not be satisfactorily drained during surgery. The spinal cord hyperemia may have decreased spinal function and suppressed the leg mMEPs. The persistence of the loss of mMEPs was undeniably due to the influence of the anesthetic agent or a perfusion disorder in the lower-extremity muscles. Of note, moderate spinal cord hypothermia and postoperative CSF drainage probably resulted in improved lower-limb motor function.

Relationships between the changes in compound muscle action potentials and selective injuries to the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots

OBJECTIVE

Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation have been widely introduced to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. They may reflect segmental injuries as well as injuries to motor-related tracts in the spinal cord. However, we have experience with some patients who developed postoperative segmental motor weakness without any potential changes during surgery. To evaluate the efficacy of this method, we used a cat model to observe the relationships between potential changes and selective injuries to the white and gray matters of the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots.

METHODS

Ten CMAPs were obtained before and after injury to the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots in 20 cats. Changes in the amplitude, latency, and duration of CMAPs were analyzed.

RESULTS

CMAPs decreased in amplitude significantly after the insult to the motor-related tracts in the spinal cord in all cats, while the potentials did not always change when the insult was restricted to a limited area in the anterior horn of the spinal cord or to the single spinal nerve root.

CONCLUSIONS

CMAPs may not exactly reflect segmental injury, and careful attention should be paid to the interpretation of CMAPs.

Discrepancy between decreases in the amplitude of compound muscle action potential and loss of motor function caused by ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord

We examined the relationship between decreases in the amplitude of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP), caused by ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord, and postoperative motor deficits. Results were compared with those for other evoked potentials commonly used for multimodal monitoring of the spinal cord. CMAP was more sensitive than the other evoked potentials employed to ischemic and compressive insults to the spinal cord, although the disappearance of CMAP did not always result in a residual motor deficit. A decrease of more than 50% in the amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) from the spinal cord correlated well with the postoperative motor deficit. CMAP is a sensitive tool for the early detection of spinal cord impairment caused by ischemic or compressive insults to the spinal cord. The time after the disappearance of the CMAP amplitude was important for predicting postoperative motor deficit, but it is also necessary to employ CMAP concomitantly with other conductive potentials in spinal cord monitoring.

The influence of nitrous oxide to supplement fentanyl/low-dose propofol anesthesia on transcranial myogenic motor-evoked potentials during thoracic aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation (tc MEPs) is a new method to assess the integrity of the motor pathways. The authors studied the effects of 50% nitrous oxide (N2O) and a low-dose propofol infusion on tc MEPs paired electrical stimulation during fentanyl anesthesia with partial neuromuscular blockade.

DESIGN

Cross-over study.

SETTING

St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten patients scheduled to undergo surgery on the thoracoabdominal aorta were studied; 6 women aged 54 to 69 years and 4 men aged 68 to 77 years.

INTERVENTIONS

After achieving a stable anesthetic state and before surgery, tc MEPs were recorded during four 15-minute periods: (I) air/oxygen (O2; F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 0.5 microg/mL; (II) N2O/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 0.5 microg/mL; (III) N2O/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%; propofol target blood concentration, 1.0 microg/mL; and (IV) air/O2 (F(I)O2 = 50%); propofol target blood concentration, 1.0 microg/mL.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Tc MEPs were recorded from the right extensor digitorum communis muscle and the right tibialis anterior muscle. The right thenar muscle was used for recording the level of relaxation; the T1 response was maintained at 40% to 70% of the control compound muscle action potential. There was no significant difference in onset latency among the four phases. The addition of N2O and doubling the target propofol infusion to 1.0 microg/mL resulted in a 40% to 50% reduction of tc MEP amplitude recorded in the extensor digitorum communis muscle and tibialis anterior muscle (p < 0.01). During each phase, tc MEPs could be elicited and interpreted, except in one patient, in whom no tc MEPs could be elicited in the leg because of technical problems.

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that tc MEP monitoring is feasible during low-dose propofol, fentanyl/50% N2O in 02 anesthesia and partial neuromuscular blockade.

Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation

The goal of this study was to test the influence of two widespread techniques of general anesthesia on motor evoked potentials (MEP) in response to transcranial and direct cortical high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) based on propofol and alfentanil was examined in 17 patients (group A), and balanced anesthesia (BA), based on nitrous oxide, isoflurane and fentanyl, was studied in 13 patients (group B). Distinct motor responses were available in 15 of 17 patients (88%) of group A, and in one of 13 patients (8%) of group B. Amplitudes increased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity and number of pulses under conditions of TIVA. At the same time, latencies decreased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity and decreasing interstimulus interval, but not with increasing number of pulses. It is hypothesized that propofol suppresses corticospinal I-waves at the cortical level, resulting in a conduction block at the level of the alpha-motoneuron, and that this effect may be overcome by high frequency repetitive stimulation. In contrast, nitrous oxide and isoflurane seem to have an additional suppressive effect on corticospinal D-waves, which may be overcome by higher stimulation intensity. In conclusion, transcranial high frequency repetitive stimulation and TIVA provide a feasible setting for intraoperative MEP monitoring, while higher doses of nitrous oxide and isoflurane are not compatible with recording of muscular activity elicited by the stimulation technique as described.