1
|
Faust A, DeMartini SJ, Carey-Ewend A, Crock LW, Buday SK, Brogan DM, Dy CJ. Concepts of Pain Management Following Nerve Injuries: Multidisciplinary Approach. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY GLOBAL ONLINE 2024; 6:749-755. [PMID: 39381396 PMCID: PMC11456641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose A systematic review to identify treatment approaches for the management of pain following peripheral nerve injury. Methods A published literature search was performed for the concepts of peripheral nerve injury and pain management with related synonyms. The strategies were created using a combination of controlled vocabulary terms and keywords and were executed in Embase.com, Ovid-Medline All, and Scopus from database inception. Database searches were completed on August 22, 2023. Results The initial search resulted in a total of 1,793 citations. In total, 724 duplicates were removed, leaving 1,069 unique citations remaining for analysis. This review excluded all papers that were not specific to pain following peripheral nerve injury. Case and cohort studies (n < 5) were also excluded. Thirty-two articles on pain management strategies after peripheral nerve injury remained, with years of publication ranging from 1981 to 2023. An additional four articles were identified by manual search. Of the 36 articles reviewed, 15 articles reported on the approach to the treatment of pain after a peripheral nerve injury, and the other 22 articles consisted of cohort and case series studies. Conclusions There is a lack of literature describing efficacy of various treatment strategies for pain following peripheral nerve injuries. Few studies provide clear, stepwise clinical guidance for practicing physicians and other health care providers on the treatment of these complicated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Faust
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Stephen J. DeMartini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Abigail Carey-Ewend
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Lara W. Crock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Sarah K. Buday
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - David M. Brogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Christopher J. Dy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rasulić L, Nikolić Ž, Lepić M, Savić A, Vitošević F, Novaković N, Radojević S, Mićić A, Lepić S, Mandić-Rajčević S. Useful functional recovery and quality of life after surgical treatment of peroneal nerve injuries. Front Surg 2022; 9:1005483. [PMID: 36451682 PMCID: PMC9702062 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed injuries to the peroneal nerve recover spontaneously in about a third of patients, but surgery may be needed in the remaining 2/3. The recovery after surgery is not always satisfactory and the patients may need an orthosis or a walking aid to cope with regular daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate the useful functional recovery and quality of life (QoL) in surgically treated patients with peroneal nerve (PN) injuries. The study involved 51 patients who have undergone surgical treatment due to PN injury in our department, within a 15-year period (2006-2020). Thirty patients (59%) were treated with neurolysis, 12 (23%) with nerve repair techniques, and 9 (18%) with tendon transfer (TT). Neurolysis is employed in the least extensive nerve injuries when nerve continuity is preserved and yields a motor recovery ratio of almost 80%. Nerve repairs were followed by 58.33% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, while 41.66% recovered to the useful functional state (M4 or M5) With the use of TTs, all patients recovered to the M3+, while 66.7% recovered to M4. All our results correspond to the results of previous studies. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the QoL of the groups. There is an apparent advantage of neurolysis, over nerve repair, over TT procedure, both in terms of useful functional recovery, and foot-drop-related QoL. However, when involving all aspects of QoL, these advantages diminish. The individual approach leads to optimal results in all groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Rasulić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Živan Nikolić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Clinic for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milan Lepić
- Clinic for Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Andrija Savić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Filip Vitošević
- Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Nenad Novaković
- Clinic for Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
- Medical Faculty of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Aleksa Mićić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sanja Lepić
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Institute of Hygiene, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Stefan Mandić-Rajčević
- School of Public Health and Health Management and Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jack AS, Chan VKY, Mehta V, Jacques L. Resident peripheral nerve surgery competence: An assessment of procedural exposure, self-reported competence and technical ability. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 219:107312. [PMID: 35716455 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying peripheral nerve surgery procedure (PNSP) competencies is crucial to ensure adequate resident training. We examine PNSP training at neurosurgical centers in the US and Canada to compare resident-reported competence, PNSP exposure, and resident technical abilities in performing 3 peripheral nerve coaptations (PNC). METHODS Resident-reported PNSP competence and PNSP exposure data were collected using questionnaires from neurosurgical residents at North American neurosurgical training centers. Exposure and self-reported competency were correlated with technical skills. Technical PNC variables collected included: time-to-completion, nerve-handling from video-analysis, independent and blinded visual-analog-scale (VAS) PNC quality grading by 3 judges, and training level. RESULTS A total of 40 neurosurgical residents participated in the study. Although self-reported competency scores correlated with procedural exposure (P < 0.01, rs = 0.88), a discrepancy was found between the degree of self-reported competency and amount of exposure. The discrepancy was greater in senior residents. A significant VAS difference was found between PNC types with the direct-suture and connector-assister groups scoring higher than connector-only (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, respectively). No difference was observed between training level and VAS grading, nor time-to completion (P = 0.33 and 0.25, respectively). No correlation was found between self-reported competency performing PNSPs and PNC VAS scores, nor nerve handling. CONCLUSIONS Despite more exposure and a higher self-reported PNSP competency in senior residents, no difference was seen between senior/junior residents in PNC quality. A discrepancy in PNSP exposure and self-reported competency exists. This information will provide guidance for the direction of resident PNS training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Jack
- Division of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122, USA; Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G-2B7, Canada.
| | - Vivien K-Y Chan
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G-2B7, Canada
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G-2B7, Canada
| | - Line Jacques
- Division of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morgan R, Elliot I, Banala V, Dy C, Harris B, Ouellette EA. Pain Relief after Surgical Decompression of the Distal Brachial Plexus. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2020; 15:e22-e32. [PMID: 33082844 PMCID: PMC7567639 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Brachial plexopathy causes pain and loss of function in the affected extremity. Entrapment of the brachial plexus terminal branches within the surrounding connective tissue, or medial brachial fascial compartment, may manifest in debilitating symptoms. Open fasciotomy and external neurolysis of the neurovascular bundle in the medial brachial fascial compartment were performed as a surgical treatment for pain and functional decline in the upper extremity. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain outcomes after surgery in patients diagnosed with brachial plexopathy.
Methods
We identified 21 patients who met inclusion criteria. Documents dated between 2005 and 2019 were reviewed from electronic medical records. Chart review was conducted to collect data on visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SWMT), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength. Pre- and postoperative data was obtained. A paired sample
t
-test was used to determine statistical significance of pain outcomes.
Results
Pain severity in the affected arm was significantly reduced after surgery (pre: 6.4 ± 2.5; post: 2.0 ± 2.5;
p
< 0.01). Additionally, there was an increased response to SWMT after the procedure. More patients achieved an MRC rating score ≥3 and ≥4 in elbow flexion after surgery. This may be indicative of improved sensory and motor function.
Conclusion
Open fasciotomy and external neurolysis at the medial brachial fascial compartment is an effective treatment for pain when nerve continuity is preserved. These benefits were evident in patients with a prolonged duration elapsed since injury onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Morgan
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Iain Elliot
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Vibhu Banala
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States
| | - Christopher Dy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Briana Harris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute, Baptist Health Medical Group South Florida, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Elizabeth Anne Ouellette
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Miami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute, Baptist Health Medical Group South Florida, Miami, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rasulić L, Simić V, Savić A, Lepić M, Kovačević V, Puzović V, Vitošević F, Novaković N, Samardžić M, Rotim K. MANAGEMENT OF BRACHIAL PLEXUS MISSILE INJURIES. Acta Clin Croat 2018; 57:487-496. [PMID: 31168182 PMCID: PMC6536276 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY – Missile injuries are among the most devastating injuries in general traumatology. Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are the most difficult injuries in peripheral nerve surgery, and most complicated to be surgically treated. Nevertheless, missile wounding is the second most common mechanism of brachial plexus injury. The aim was to evaluate functional recovery after surgical treatment of these injuries. Our series included 68 patients with 202 nerve lesions treated with 207 surgical procedures. Decision on the treatment modality (exploration, neurolysis, graft repair, or combination) was made upon intraoperative finding. Results were analyzed in 60 (88.2%) patients with 173 (85.6%) nerve lesions followed-up for two years. Functional recovery was evaluated according to functional priorities. Satisfactory functional recovery was achieved in 90.4% of cases with neurolysis and 85.7% of cases with nerve grafting. Insufficient functional recovery was verified in ulnar and radial nerve lesions after neurolysis, and in median and radial nerve lesions when graft repair was done. We conclude that the best time for surgery is between two and four months after injury, except for the gunshot wound associated with injury to the surrounding structures, which requires immediate surgical treatment. The results of neurolysis and nerve grafting were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vesna Simić
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Andrija Savić
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Milan Lepić
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Vojin Kovačević
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Vladimir Puzović
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Filip Vitošević
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Nenad Novaković
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Miroslav Samardžić
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| | - Krešimir Rotim
- 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; 2Department of Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Functional Neurosurgery and Pain Management Surgery, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 3Section for Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ćuprija General Hospital, Ćuprija, Serbia; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; 5Department of Neurosurgery, Kragujevac Clinical Center, Kragujevac, Serbia; 6Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia; 7Neuroradiology Department, Center for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 9University of Applied Health Sciences
| |
Collapse
|