Stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of nonacoustic schwannomas

Schwannomas of Brain and Spinal Cord

Schwannomas are benign tumors originating from the Schwann cells of cranial or spinal nerves. The most common cranial schwannomas originate from the eight cranial nervevestibular schwannomas (VS). VS account for 6-8% of all intracranial tumors, 25-33% of the tumors localized in the posterior cranial fossa, and 80-94% of the tumors in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Schwannomas of other cranial nerves/trigeminal, facial, and schwannomas of the lower cranial nerves/are much less frequent. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), intracranial and intraspinal schwannomas are classified as Grade I. Some VS are found incidentally, but most present with hearing loss (95%), tinnitus (63%), disequilibrium (61%), or headache (32%). The neurological symptoms of VSs are mainly due to compression on the surrounding structures, such as the cranial nerves and vessels, or the brainstem. The gold standard for the imaging diagnosis of VS is MRI scan. The optimal management of VSs remains controversial. There are three main management options-conservative treatment or "watch-and-wait" policy, surgical treatment, and radiotherapy in all its variations. Currently, surgery of VS is not merely a life-saving procedure. The functional outcome of surgery and the quality of life become issues of major importance. The most appropriate surgical approach for each patient should be considered according to some criteria including indications, risk-benefit ratio, and prognosis of each patient. The approaches to the CPA and VS removal are generally divided in posterior and lateral. The retrosigmoid suboccipital approach is a safe and simple approach, and it is favored for VS surgery in most neurosurgical centers. Radiosurgery is becoming more and more available nowadays and is established as one of the main treatment modalities in VS management. Radiosurgery (SRS) is performed with either Gamma knife, Cyber knife, or linear accelerator. Larger tumors are being increasingly frequently managed with combined surgery and radiosurgery. The main goal of VS management is preservation of neurological function - facial nerve function, hearing, etc. The reported recurrence rate after microsurgical tumor removal is 0.5-5%. Postoperative follow-up imaging is essential to diagnose any recurrence.

Orbito-cranial schwannoma-a multicentre experience

OBJECTIVES

To describe the features, management approaches, and outcomes of orbito-cranial schwannomas.

METHODS

Retrospective review of ten patients with orbito-cranial schwannomas managed in six orbital services over 22 years. Data collected included demographics, presenting features, neuroimaging characteristics, histology, management approach, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 41.4 ± 19.9 years, and 6 (60%) were females. The majority presented with proptosis (90%), limited extraocular motility (80%), eyelid swelling (60%), and optic neuropathy (60%). Most lesions (80%) involved the entire anterior-posterior span of the orbit, with both intra- and extraconal involvement. All tumours involved the orbital apex, the superior orbital fissure, and extended at least to the cavernous sinus. Surgical resection was performed for all. Seven (70%) of the tumours were completely or subtotally resected combining an intracapsular approach by an orbital-neurosurgical collaboration, with no recurrence on postoperative follow-up (6-186 months). Three underwent tumour debulking. Of these, two remained stable on follow-up (6-34 months) and one showed progression of the residual tumour over 9 years (cellular schwannoma on histology) necessitating stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for local control. Adjuncts to the orbito-cranial resection included perioperative frozen section (n = 5), endoscopic transorbital approach (n = 2), and image-guided navigation (n = 1). Post-surgical adjuvant SRT was used in three subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the possibility of successful surgical control in complex orbito-cranial schwannomas. A combined neurosurgical/orbital approach with consideration of an intracapsular resection is recommended. Recurrence may not occur with subtotal excision and observation may be reasonable. Adjunctive SRT for progression or residual tumour can be considered.

The Treatment Outcome of CyberKnife-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Intracranial and Extracranial Nonvestibular Schwannomas: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Data on the outcomes of CyberKnife-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) for intracranial and extracranial nonvestibular schwannomas (nVSs) are not sufficient.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hSRS for nVSs between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients with 39 nVSs were identified. The mean age was 53 (±18) years, and 20 patients (51%) were women. Twenty-five patients (64%) had previous surgeries. Seventeen patients (44%) had nVSs extending outside the cranium. The mean prescribed dose covering 95% of the planning target volume was 22 Gy (±3.7 Gy), the mean fractionation was 4 (±2), and the mean target volume was 13 cm³ (±16 cm³). The radiological tumor control rate was 100% during the mean follow-up period of 67 months (±37 months). Thirty-seven patients (95%) were clinically stable during the mean follow-up period of 72 months (±35 months). Nine patients (23%) suffered from transient adverse radiation effects (AREs), including transient tumor expansion, and 2 (5%) suffered from permanent AREs.

CONCLUSIONS

We summarized the treatment outcomes of hSRS for nVSs. Although all patients achieved radiological tumor control, the risk of either transient or permanent ARE was high. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor patients for clinical deterioration due to AREs.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been deemed as the gold standard stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) mode for the treatment of intracranial tumors, cerebrovascular diseases and brain functional diseases. Our study was aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complications of gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with trigeminal schwannomas treated primarily or adjunctly with GKRS. We searched two databases, Pubmed and Embase, for studies published before January 1, 2021, using GKRS for trigeminal schwannomas. Studies reporting treatment of other schwannomas, or other forms of SRS such as linear accelerator and Cyberknife were excluded to reduce its heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our search achieved 351 studies, of which 35 were assessed for full-text eligibility. 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 456 of 504 patients (0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.96, I² = 3.02%, p < 0.01) from 18 studies had local control, and 278 of 489 patients (0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.78, I² = 88.75%, p < 0.01) from 16 studies experienced tumor regression or disappearance. 231 of 499 patients (0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.62; I² = 83.89%, P < 0.01) from 17 studies had clinical symptoms improved. There was no significant difference in tumor control between those treated with GKRS as either primary treatment or adjuvant to surgery(p = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

GKRS is an efficacious primary and adjuvant method of treating trigeminal schwannomas, with reliable tumor control rates. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further and comprehensively evaluate the benefit-to-risk ratio of gamma knife radiosurgery.

Parasellar Schwannomas: Extradural vs Extra-Intradural Surgical Approach

BACKGROUND

Schwannomas of the parasellar region may arise from the trigeminal, oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves.

OBJECTIVE

To define the tumor origin, location, and dural relationship (extradural vs extra-intradural vs cisternal) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to plan the best surgical approach (purely extradural vs extra-intradural).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with parasellar schwannomas who underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty arose from the trigeminal nerve (7 intracavernous and 13 within the Meckel's cave), 3 from the oculomotor nerve, and 1 from the abducens nerve. The preoperative identification of the tumor location (extradural vs extra-intradural vs cisternal) and the nerve of origin was defined on MR sequences. All patients were operated on through a pterional approach (extradural or extra-intradural route).

RESULTS

The tumor location was correctly defined on MRI in 22 out of 24 cases (92%) and the nerve of origin in 22 (92%). An extradural approach without intradural exploration was performed in all 5 intracavernous trigeminal schwannomas, in 11 out of 13 of the Meckel's cave, and in 2 schwannomas of the oculomotor nerve. Two schwannomas of the Meckel's cave with transgression of the medial dural wall, 1 of the oculomotor nerve, and the abducens nerve schwannoma required an extra-intradural approach. Complete tumor resection was obtained in 19 out of 24 cases (80%).

CONCLUSION

The pterional extradural approach is sufficient for Dolenc type I and II trigeminal schwannomas, excepting for those transgressing the inner dural layer. Schwannomas of the oculomotor and abducens nerves with cisternal location require an extradural-intradural approach.

Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Benign Nonacoustic Schwannomas

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the outcomes of patients with benign nonacoustic schwannomas treated with fractionated radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Between October 1987 and March 2013, 11 patients with benign nonacoustic schwannomas diagnosed radiographically (n=3) or pathologically (n=8) were treated with fractionated RT with curative intent at the University of Florida. We reviewed patients' medical records to assess outcomes and toxicities from treatment.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 8.2 years (range, 2.2 to 22.7 y) and 8 years for all living patients (range, 2.2 to 22.7 y). Of the 11 patients included in the analysis, 8 (73%) were treated solely with RT, 1 (9%) was treated with postoperative RT after subtotal resection, and 2 (18%) were treated with postoperative RT after recurrence following initial surgical resection. The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 100%. There were no grade 2 to 5 treatment toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

RT for benign nonacoustic schwannoma may be effective when used alone or in addition to surgery. Irradiation should be considered in patients for whom resection is likely to result in one or more neurological deficits. Fractionated RT to a total dose of 50 Gy provides excellent local control and minimal morbidity.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for jugular foramen schwannomas

Jugular foramen schwannomas are very rare tumors. Advances in skull base surgery have led to more aggressive resection of these tumors, but surgery may associate with development of new neurological deficits. In this report, we analyze the long-term results for 17 patients with newly diagnosed or residual/recurrent jugular foramen schwannoma who underwent gamma-knife treatment. During a mean 64 months of follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging revealed reduced tumor size in 13 cases and no size change in four cases. The tumor growth control rate was 100% and only one patient had transient hoarseness. For patients who have small- to moderate-sized jugular foramen schwannomas, gamma-knife radiosurgery is associated with good tumor control and carries minimal risk of adverse radiation effects.

Gamma Knife surgery for nonvestibular schwannomas: radiological and clinical outcomes

OBJECT

Most intracranial schwannomas arise from cranial nerve (CN) VIII. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a mainstay of treatment for vestibular schwannomas. Intracranial schwannomas arising from other CNs are much less common. We evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery on nonvestibular schwannomas including trigeminal, hypoglossal, abducent, facial, trochlear, oculomotor, glossopharyngeal, and jugular foramen tumors.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with nonvestibular schwannomas were treated at the University of Virginia Gamma Knife center from 1989 to 2008. The median patient age was 48 years (mean 45.6 years, range 10-72 years). Schwannomas arose from the following CNs: CN III (in 1 patient), CN IV (in 1), CN V (in 25), CN VI (in 2), CN VII (in 1), CN IX (in 1), and CN XII (in 3). In 2 patients, tumors arose from the jugular foramen. The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm(3) (mean 3.3 cm(3), range 0.07-8.8 cm(3)). The median margin dose was 13.5 Gy (range 9.3-20 Gy); the median maximum dose was 30 Gy (range 21.7-50.0 Gy).

RESULTS

The mean and median follow-up times of 36 patients were 54 and 37 months, respectively (range 2-180 months). At the last radiological follow-up, the tumor size had decreased in 20 patients, remained stable in 9 patients, and increased in 7 patients. The 2-year actuarial progression-free survival was 91%. Higher maximum dose was statistically related to tumor control (p = 0.027). Thirty-three patients had adequate clinical follow-up. Among them, 21 patients had improvement in their presenting symptoms, 8 patients were stable after treatment with no worsening of their presenting symptoms, 2 patients developed new symptoms, and 1 patient experienced symptom deterioration. Notably, 1 patient with neurofibromatosis Type 2 developed new symptoms that were unrelated to the tumor treated with Gamma Knife surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife surgery is a reasonably effective treatment option for patients with nonvestibular schwannomas. Patients require careful follow-up for tumor progression and signs of neurological deterioration.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Cranial Nonvestibular Schwannomas: Results of Single- and Multisession Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND:

Surgical resection of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas carries a considerable risk of postoperative complications. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a non-invasive treatment alternative. The efficacy and safety of multi-session SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the results of single- and multi-session SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas.

METHODS:

From 2001 to 2007, 42 lesions in 40 patients were treated with SRS at Stanford University Medical Center, targeting schwannomas of cranial nerves IV (n = 1), V (n = 18), VII (n = 6), X (n = 5), XII (n = 2), jugular foramen (n = 8), and cavernous sinus (n = 2). SRS was delivered to a median marginal dose of 18 Gy (range, 15-33 Gy) in 1 to 3 sessions, targeting a median tumor volume of 3.2 cm3 (range, 0.1-23.7 cm3). The median doses for treatments in 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 9), and 3 (n = 15) sessions were 17.5, 20, and 18 Gy, respectively.

RESULTS:

With a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 6-84 months), tumor control was achieved in 41 of the 42 lesions. Eighteen of 42 lesions (43%) decreased in size; 23 tumors (55%) remained stable. There were 2 cases of new or worsening cranial nerve deficits in patients treated in single session; no patient treated with multi-session SRS experienced any cranial nerve toxicity (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSION:

SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas provides excellent tumor control with minimal risk of complications. There was a trend towards decreased complications with multi-session SRS.

Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery for Nonvestibular Schwannomas

BACKGROUND:

Nonvestibular schwannomas are uncommon tumors of the brain often treated by surgical resection. Surgery may be associated with high morbidity.

OBJECTIVE:

We present a series of nonvestibular schwannomas treated with linear accelerator radiosurgery during a 19-year period.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent treatment of nonvestibular schwannomas at the University of Florida with linear accelerator radiosurgery between August 1989 and February 2008. Forty-nine patients underwent treatment during the study period, and 6 were lost to follow up. The mean age was 51 years (range, 17-82 years), 39% had previous surgical resection, and 67% presented with preradiosurgery cranial nerve deficits. There were 25 trigeminal, 18 jugular foramen, 2 facial, 2 oculomotor, 1 hypoglossal, and 1 high cervical schwannomas. The median tumor volume was 5.3 mL (range, 0.3-24.5 mL), treated with a median dose of 1250 cGy (range, 1000-1500 cGy). Study endpoints were actuarial local tumor control and neurological outcome.

RESULTS:

Forty-three patients were available for a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 6-210 months). Actuarial local tumor control was 97% at 1 year, 91% at 4.5 years, and 83% at 5 years. There were 4 new cranial nerve deficits (9%) including facial numbness (2 patients), anesthesia dolorosa (1 patient), and facial weakness (1 patient). Thirty-nine percent had documented clinical and/or symptomatic improvement. There were no other morbidity and no mortality with treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Radiosurgery for nonvestibular schwannomas offers good actuarial local tumor control and has superior morbidity compared with surgical resection. This is the largest linear accelerator radiosurgical series, and the second largest radiosurgical series reported to date.

Nonvestibulocochlear cranial nerve schwannomas

OPINION STATEMENT

Nonvestibulocochlear cranial nerve schwannomas traditionally have been managed by surgical excision. Although debulking surgery is still considered the first treatment option for larger tumors, stereotactic radiosurgery is now preferred for smaller tumors because of its high tumor control rate and low treatment-related morbidity. Furthermore, an initial period of radiologic and clinical observation following the diagnosis should be strongly considered for smaller tumors because some may not grow or may grow at a slow rate. Medical management of tumor-associated symptoms (when present) should not be ignored. Most importantly, the time has come to embark on the first randomized controlled trials comparing clinical and radiologic observation, surgery, and radiosurgery in the management of cranial nerve schwannomas.

Surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas

OBJECT

The authors provide a detailed review of the surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas (TSs) and also discuss the best surgical approach based on the surgical anatomy and tumor extension.

METHODS

A series of 17 patients with TSs who were surgically treated between 1987 and 2008 at the authors' institution is reported. The lesions were small (< 3 cm) in 2, medium (between 3 and 4 cm) in 5, large (> 4 cm) in 6, and giant (> 5 cm) in 4 cases. Preoperative symptoms included trigeminal hypesthesia (53%), facial pain (53%), headaches (35.3%), hearing impairment (17.6%), seizures (17.6%), diplopia (11.8%), ataxia (11.8%), and hemiparesis and increased intracranial pressure with papilledema (5.9%). The mean follow-up duration was 10.5 years (121.6 months), with an average of 0.8 patients per year.

RESULTS

Total tumor excision was possible in 16 patients, with no surgery-related deaths. Postoperative trigeminal anesthesia was observed in 7; trigeminal motor function was preserved in 7. Two developed cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 2 presented with mild facial palsy, and 1 patient with neurofibromatosis Type 2 had recurrence of the tumor, which was uneventfully removed. Of the 9 who reported facial pain, only 1 remained symptomatic postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The best treatment for TSs is complete microsurgical removal. Postoperative preservation of trigeminal nerve function is possible when resection of the lesion is performed at well-established skull base neurosurgical centers. Although good results have been reported with radiosurgery, no cure can be obtained with this therapeutic modality. Instead, this treatment should be reserved only for nonresectable and residual tumors within the cavernous sinus.

Current concepts in stereotactic radiosurgery - a neurosurgical and radiooncological point of view

Stereotactic radiosurgery is related to the history of "radiotherapy" and "stereotactic neurosurgery". The concepts for neurosurgeons and radiooncologists have been changed during the last decade and have also transformed neurosurgery. The gamma knife and the stereotactically modified linear accelerator (LINAC) are radiosurgical equipments to treat predetermined intracranial targets through the intact skull without damaging the surrounding normal brain tissue. These technical developments allow a more precise intracranial lesion control and offer even more conformal dose plans for irregularly shaped lesions. Histological determination by stereotactic biopsy remains the basis for any otherwise undefined intracranial lesion. As a minimal approach, it allows functional preservation, low risk and high sensitivity. Long-term results have been published for various indications. The impact of radiosurgery is presented for the management of gliomas, metastases, brain stem lesions, benign tumours and vascular malformations and selected functional disorders such as trigeminal neuralgia. In AVM's it can be performed as part of a multimodality strategy including resection or endovascular embolisation. Finally, the technological advances in radiation oncology as well as stereotactic neurosurgery have led to significant improvements in radiosurgical treatment opportunities. Novel indications are currently under investigation. The combination of both, the neurosurgical and the radiooncological expertise, will help to minimize the risk for the patient while achieving a greater treatment success.