Validity Evidence for the Neuro-Endoscopic Ventriculostomy Assessment Tool (NEVAT)

Neuroendoscopy Training

Neuroendoscopy can be learnt by assisting or doing live human surgery, cadaver dissection with or without augmented pulsatile vessel and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) perfusion, and practicing on live animal, dead animal model, synthetic models, three-dimensional printing model with or without augmentation with animal, cadaver tissue, pulsatile vessel and reconstructed CSF model, virtual reality (VR) simulator, and hybrid simulators (combined physical model and VR model). Neurosurgery skill laboratory with basic and advanced learning should be there in all teaching hospitals. Skills can be transferred from simulation model or VR to cadaver to live surgery. Staged learning (first with simple model to learn basic endoscopic technique, then animal model, and then augmented cadavers) is the preferred method of learning. Although most surveys favor live surgery and practice on animal models and cadavers as the most preferred training model now, in future VR may also become a favored method of learning. This article is based on our experience in over 10,000 neuroendoscopic surgeries, and feedback from over 950 neuroendoscopic fellows or consultants who attended workshops conducted every 6 monthly since 2010. A literature search was done on PubMed and Google Scholar using (neuroendoscopy) AND (learning), and (neuroendoscopy) AND (training), which resulted in 121 and 213 results, respectively. Out of them, 77 articles were finally selected for this article. Most of the training programs typically focus on microneurosurgical training. There is lack of learning facilities for neuroendoscopy in most centers. Learning of neuroendoscopy differs greatly from microneurosurgery; switching from microneurosurgery to neuroendoscopy can be challenging. Postgraduate training centers should have well-equipped neuroendoscopy skill laboratory and the surgical educational curriculum should include neuroendoscopy training. Learning endoscopy is about taking advantages of the technique and overcoming the limitations of endoscopy by continuous training.

History of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Neurosurgical Training

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are rapidly growing technologies. Both have been applied within neurosurgery for presurgical planning and intraoperative navigation, but VR and AR technology is particularly promising for the education of neurosurgical trainees. With the increasing demand for high impact yet efficient educational strategies, VR- and AR-based simulators allow neurosurgical residents to practice technical skills in a low-risk setting. Initial studies have confirmed that such simulators increase trainees' confidence, improve their understanding of operative anatomy, and enhance surgical techniques. Knowledge of the history and conceptual underpinnings of these technologies is useful to understand their current and future applications towards neurosurgical training. The technological precursors for VR and AR were introduced as early as the 1800s, and draw from the fields of entertainment, flight simulation, and education. However, computer software and processing speeds are needed to develop widespread VR- and AR-based surgical simulators, which have only been developed within the last 15 years. During that time, several devices had become rapidly adopted by neurosurgeons, and some programs had begun to incorporate them into the residency curriculum. With ever-improving technology, VR and AR are promising additions to a multi-modal training program, enabling neurosurgical residents to maximize their efforts in preparation for the operating room. In this review, we outline the historical development of the VR and AR systems that are used in neurosurgical training and discuss representative examples of the current technology.

Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance

At a time of significant global unrest and uncertainty surrounding how the delivery of clinical training will unfold over the coming years, we offer a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric analysis of global studies showing the crucial role simulation will play in training. Our aim was to determine the types of simulators in use, their effectiveness in improving clinical skills, and whether we have reached a point of global acceptance. A PRISMA-guided global systematic review of the neurosurgical simulators available, a meta-analysis of their effectiveness, and an extended analysis of their progressive scholarly acceptance on studies meeting our inclusion criteria of simulation in neurosurgical education were performed. Improvement in procedural knowledge and technical skills was evaluated. Of the identified 7405 studies, 56 studies met the inclusion criteria, collectively reporting 50 simulator types ranging from cadaveric, low-fidelity, and part-task to virtual reality (VR) simulators. In all, 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 7 randomised controlled trials. A random effects, ratio of means effects measure quantified statistically significant improvement in procedural knowledge by 50.2% (ES 0.502; CI 0.355; 0.649, p < 0.001), technical skill including accuracy by 32.5% (ES 0.325; CI - 0.482; - 0.167, p < 0.001), and speed by 25% (ES - 0.25, CI - 0.399; - 0.107, p < 0.001). The initial number of VR studies (n = 91) was approximately double the number of refining studies (n = 45) indicating it is yet to reach progressive scholarly acceptance. There is strong evidence for a beneficial impact of adopting simulation in the improvement of procedural knowledge and technical skill. We show a growing trend towards the adoption of neurosurgical simulators, although we have not fully gained progressive scholarly acceptance for VR-based simulation technologies in neurosurgical education.

Low-Cost Stereotactic Brain Biopsy Simulation Model

OBJECTIVE

Simulation training improves technical skills in a safe environment. Stereotactic techniques are widely used in neurosurgery for different kinds of procedures. The objective of the study was to describe a combined cadaveric and synthetic low-cost stereotactic simulation model and its validation by neurosurgeons.

METHODS

The brain was made using self-supporting gel with solid and cystic lesions. We used imaging scans to calculate x, y, and z target coordinates. A standard frame needle biopsy was performed. We calculated the number of mistakes and time needed to accomplish the task, and we evaluated the frame assembly and biopsy performance. Wilcoxon signed rank was used to analyzed the data; we considered a P value <0.05 as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median initial number of mistakes was 32 (interquartile range [IQR]: 27.5-37) and after repeated training and feedback the final median number was 3.5 (IQR: 2-6) (P < 0.001). The median time needed to finish the exercises before training was 1020.5 seconds (IQR: 908-1125.5) and after using the model the final median time was 479 seconds (IQR: 423-503) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a stereotactic simulation model with immediate haptic feedback. The model can be easily handmade in any neurosurgical laboratory. This model allows neurosurgeons in training to acquire and improve stereotactic techniques, reducing the number of surgical mistakes and time needed to finish the task.

Development and validation of a synthetic 3D-printed simulator for training in neuroendoscopic ventricular lesion removal

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendoscopic surgery using an ultrasonic aspirator represents a valid tool with which to perform the safe resection of deep-seated ventricular lesions, but the handling of neuroendoscopic instruments is technically challenging, requiring extensive training to achieve a steep learning curve. Simulation-based methods are increasingly used to improve surgical skills, allowing neurosurgical trainees to practice in a risk-free, reproducible environment. The authors introduce a synthetic, patient-specific simulator that enables trainees to develop skills for endoscopic ventricular tumor removal, and they evaluate the model’s validity as a training instrument with regard to realism, mechanical proprieties, procedural content, and handling.

METHODS

The authors developed a synthetic simulator based on a patient-specific CT data set. The anatomical features were segmented, and several realistic 1:1 skull models with all relevant ventricular structures were fabricated by a 3D printer. Vascular structures and the choroid plexus were included. A tumor model, composed of polyvinyl alcohol, mimicking a soft-consistency lesion, was secured in different spots of the frontal horn and within the third ventricle. Neurosurgical trainees participating in a neuroendoscopic workshop qualitatively assessed, by means of a feedback survey, the properties of the simulator as a training model that teaches neuroendoscopic ultrasonic ventricular tumor surgery; the trainees rated 10 items according to a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Participants appreciated the model as a valid hands-on training tool for neuroendoscopic ultrasonic aspirator tumor removal, highly rating the procedural content. Furthermore, they mostly agreed on its comparably realistic anatomical and mechanical properties. By the model’s first application, the authors were able to recognize possible improvement measures, such as the development of different tumor model textures and the possibility, for the user, of creating a realistic surgical skull approach and neuroendoscopic trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

A low-cost, patient-specific, reusable 3D-printed simulator for the training of neuroendoscopic ultrasonic aspirator tumor removal was successfully developed. The simulator is a useful tool for teaching neuroendoscopic techniques and provides support in the development of the required surgical skills.

A review of virtual reality simulators for neuroendoscopy

Neurosurgery is a challenging surgical specialty that demands many technical and cognitive skills. The traditional surgical training approach of having a trainee coached in the operating room by the faculty is time-consuming, costly, and involves patient risk factors. Simulation-based training methods are suitable to impart the surgical skills outside the operating room. Virtual simulators allow high-fidelity repeatable environment for surgical training. Neuroendoscopy, a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique, demands additional skills for limited maneuverability and eye-hand coordination. This study provides a review of the existing virtual reality simulators for training neuroendoscopic skills. Based on the screening, the virtual training methods developed for neuroendoscopy surgical skills were classified into endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endonasal transsphenoidal surgery trainers. The study revealed that a variety of virtual reality simulators have been developed by various institutions. Although virtual reality simulators are effective for procedure-based skills training, the simulators need to include anatomical variations and variety of cases for improved fidelity. The review reveals that there should be multi-centric prospective and retrospective cohort studies to establish concurrent and predictive validation for their incorporation in the surgical educational curriculum.

Development of synthetic simulators for endoscope-assisted repair of metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted repair of craniosynostosis is a safe and efficacious alternative to open techniques. However, this procedure is challenging to learn, and there is significant variation in both its execution and outcomes. Surgical simulators may allow trainees to learn and practice this procedure prior to operating on an actual patient. The purpose of this study was to develop a realistic, relatively inexpensive simulator for endoscope-assisted repair of metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis and to evaluate the models' fidelity and teaching content. METHODS Two separate, 3D-printed, plastic powder-based replica skulls exhibiting metopic (age 1 month) and sagittal (age 2 months) craniosynostosis were developed. These models were made into consumable skull "cartridges" that insert into a reusable base resembling an infant's head. Each cartridge consists of a multilayer scalp (skin, subcutaneous fat, galea, and periosteum); cranial bones with accurate landmarks; and the dura mater. Data related to model construction, use, and cost were collected. Eleven novice surgeons (residents), 9 experienced surgeons (fellows), and 5 expert surgeons (attendings) performed a simulated metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis repair using a neuroendoscope, high-speed drill, rongeurs, lighted retractors, and suction/irrigation. All participants completed a 13-item questionnaire (using 5-point Likert scales) to rate the realism and utility of the models for teaching endoscope-assisted strip suturectomy. RESULTS The simulators are compact, robust, and relatively inexpensive. They can be rapidly reset for repeated use and contain a minimal amount of consumable material while providing a realistic simulation experience. More than 80% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the models' anatomical features, including surface anatomy, subgaleal and subperiosteal tissue planes, anterior fontanelle, and epidural spaces, were realistic and contained appropriate detail. More than 90% of participants indicated that handling the endoscope and the instruments was realistic, and also that the steps required to perform the procedure were representative of the steps required in real life. CONCLUSIONS Both the metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis simulators were developed using low-cost methods and were successfully designed to be reusable. The simulators were found to realistically represent the surgical procedure and can be used to develop the technical skills required for performing an endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis repair.