Prediction of Shunt Responsiveness in Suspected Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using the Lumbar Infusion Test: A Machine Learning Approach

Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a reversible cause of dementia, typically treated with shunt surgery, although outcomes vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements could improve predictions of shunt response (SR) by analyzing extensive datasets.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to assess AI's effectiveness in predicting SR in iNPH. Studies using AI or machine learning algorithms for SR prediction were identified through searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to September 2023, adhering to Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 3541 studies identified, 33 were assessed for eligibility, and 8 involving 479 patients were included. Study sample sizes varied from 28 to 132 patients. Common data inputs included imaging/radiomics (62.5%) and demographics (37.5%), with Support Vector Machine being the most frequently used machine learning algorithm (87.5%). Two studies compared multiple algorithms. Only 4 studies reported the Area Under the Curve values, which ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. The results highlighted inconsistency in outcome measures, data heterogeneity, and potential biases in the models used.

CONCLUSIONS

While AI shows promise for improving iNPH management, there is a need for standardized data and extensive validation of AI models to enhance their clinical utility. Future research should aim to develop robust and generalizable AI models for more effective diagnosis and management of iNPH.

From bed to bench and back again: Challenges facing deployment of intracranial pressure data analysis in clinical environments

Introduction

Numerous complex physiological models derived from intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring data have been developed. More recently, techniques such as machine learning are being used to develop increasingly sophisticated models to aid in clinical decision-making tasks such as diagnosis and prediction. Whilst their potential clinical impact may be significant, few models based on ICP data are routinely available at a patient's bedside. Further, the ability to refine models using ongoing patient data collection is rare. In this paper we identify and discuss the challenges faced when converting insight from ICP data analysis into deployable tools at the patient bedside.

Research question

To provide an overview of challenges facing implementation of sophisticated ICP models and analyses at the patient bedside.

Material and methods

A narrative review of the barriers facing implementation of sophisticated ICP models and analyses at the patient bedside in a neurocritical care unit combined with a descriptive case study (the CHART-ADAPT project) on the topic.

Results

Key barriers found were technical, analytical, and integrity related. Examples included: lack of interoperability of medical devices for data collection and/or model deployment; inadequate infrastructure, hindering analysis of large volumes of high frequency patient data; a lack of clinical confidence in a model; and ethical, trust, security and patient confidentiality considerations governing the secondary use of patient data.

Discussion and conclusion

To realise the benefits of ICP data analysis, the results need to be promptly delivered and meaningfully communicated. Multiple barriers to implementation remain and solutions which address real-world challenges are required.

Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus by MR Elastography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a treatable cause of dementia associated with distinct mechanical property signatures in the brain as measured by MR elastography. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that specific anatomic features of normal pressure hydrocephalus are associated with unique mechanical property alterations. Then, we tested the hypothesis that summary measures of these mechanical signatures can be used to predict clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR elastography and structural imaging were performed in 128 patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus and 44 control participants. Patients were categorized into 4 subgroups based on their anatomic features. Surgery outcome was acquired for 68 patients. Voxelwise modeling was performed to detect regions with significantly different mechanical properties between each group. Mechanical signatures were summarized using pattern analysis and were used as features to train classification models and predict shunt outcomes for 2 sets of feature spaces: a limited 2D feature space that included the most common features found in normal pressure hydrocephalus and an expanded 20-dimensional (20D) feature space that included features from all 4 morphologic subgroups.

RESULTS

Both the 2D and 20D classifiers performed significantly better than chance for predicting clinical outcomes with estimated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66 and 0.77, respectively (P < .05, permutation test). The 20D classifier significantly improved the diagnostic OR and positive predictive value compared with the 2D classifier (P < .05, permutation test).

CONCLUSIONS

MR elastography provides further insight into mechanical alterations in the normal pressure hydrocephalus brain and is a promising, noninvasive method for predicting surgical outcomes in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus.