Targeting Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes of Awake Vs Asleep Interventional MRI-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The UCSF Experience

A Meta-Analysis of Medication Reduction and Motor Outcomes After Awake Versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There remains significant debate regarding the performance of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures for Parkinson disease (PD) under local or general anesthesia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between "asleep" DBS (general anesthesia) and "awake" DBS (local anesthesia) for PD.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review of all published studies on DBS for PD following PRISMA guideline on PubMed and Cochrane library from January 2004 to April 2023. Inclusion criteria included cohort ≥15 patients, clinical outcomes data which included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD), and ≥3 months of follow-up. Analysis was conducted using Stata software.

RESULTS

There were 18 articles that met inclusion criteria. On meta-analysis, there were no significant differences between awake or asleep DBS with regard to percent change in UPDRS III "off" med/"on" DBS condition ( P = .6) and LEDD score ( P = .99). On subgroup analysis, we found that the choice of target had no significant effect on improvement of UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD ( P = .99) change for the asleep vs awake operative approach. There were also no statistically significant differences between microelectrode recording (MER) use and no MER use in postoperative UPDRS III ( P = 1.0) or LEDD improvement ( P = .90) between awake and asleep surgery.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the primary motor outcomes and LEDD improvement between asleep vs awake DBS. The variables of target selection and MER use had no statistically significant impact on outcome. We find that asleep techniques are both safe and effective compared with the awake technique.

Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation under General Anaesthesia for Parkinson's Disease: Institutional Experience and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) has remarkably impacted the patient's experience throughout the surgery and the overall logistics of the procedure. When the individualised plan is co-registered with a 3D image acquired intraoperatively, the electrodes can be safely placed under general anaesthesia. How this applies to a general practice scenery (outside clinical trials and in a moderate caseload centre) has been scarcely reported.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre study of patients treated with asleep subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease between January 2021 and December 2022. Clinical, motor, medication-dependence, and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated after optimal programming (6 months). Wilcoxon test was used to compare pre- versus post-repeated measures. Surgical-related parameters were also analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients primarily operated for DBS were included in the study. Intraoperative electrode replacement was not necessary. Mean surgical duration was 217 (SD 44) minutes, including the implantation of the generator; and mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1) days. There was one surgical-related complication (delayed infection). Significant and clinically relevant improvement was seen in UPRS III (mean decrease 62%) (p < 0.001) and PDQ-8 (50% increase) (p < 0.001) after 6 months. Daily doses of medication were decreased by a mean of 68%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DBS can be safely performed under general anaesthesia in a pragmatic clinical environment, provided a multidisciplinary committee for patient selection and a dedicated surgical and anaesthetic team are available. The effectiveness in ameliorating motor symptoms, the ability to reduce the drug load, and the improvement in quality of life demonstrated in clinical trials could be reproduced under more generalised conditions as in our centre. The need for a team learning curve and the progressive evolution in, and adaptation to, trajectory planning software, anaesthetic management, intraoperative imaging, DBS device upgrades, and programming schemes should be contemplated in the transition process to direct targeting.

INTRODUCTION

Direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) has remarkably impacted the patient's experience throughout the surgery and the overall logistics of the procedure. When the individualised plan is co-registered with a 3D image acquired intraoperatively, the electrodes can be safely placed under general anaesthesia. How this applies to a general practice scenery (outside clinical trials and in a moderate caseload centre) has been scarcely reported.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre study of patients treated with asleep subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease between January 2021 and December 2022. Clinical, motor, medication-dependence, and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated after optimal programming (6 months). Wilcoxon test was used to compare pre- versus post-repeated measures. Surgical-related parameters were also analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients primarily operated for DBS were included in the study. Intraoperative electrode replacement was not necessary. Mean surgical duration was 217 (SD 44) minutes, including the implantation of the generator; and mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1) days. There was one surgical-related complication (delayed infection). Significant and clinically relevant improvement was seen in UPRS III (mean decrease 62%) (p < 0.001) and PDQ-8 (50% increase) (p < 0.001) after 6 months. Daily doses of medication were decreased by a mean of 68%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DBS can be safely performed under general anaesthesia in a pragmatic clinical environment, provided a multidisciplinary committee for patient selection and a dedicated surgical and anaesthetic team are available. The effectiveness in ameliorating motor symptoms, the ability to reduce the drug load, and the improvement in quality of life demonstrated in clinical trials could be reproduced under more generalised conditions as in our centre. The need for a team learning curve and the progressive evolution in, and adaptation to, trajectory planning software, anaesthetic management, intraoperative imaging, DBS device upgrades, and programming schemes should be contemplated in the transition process to direct targeting.

Commentary to the controversy: Should asleep deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease be preferred over the awake approach?

No abstract available.

Asleep versus awake GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) who receive either asleep image-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) or the traditional awake technique have comparable motor outcomes. However, there are fewer studies regarding which technique should be chosen for globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the accuracy of lead placement and motor outcomes of asleep versus awake GPi DBS PD population.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing asleep vs. awake GPi DBS lead placement in patients with PD. Outcomes were spatial accuracy of lead placement, measured by radial error between intended and actual location, motor improvement measured using (UPDRS III), and postoperative stimulation parameters. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.1.7. and OpenMeta [Analyst].

RESULTS

Three studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 247 patients. Asleep DBS was used to treat 192 (77.7 %) patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months. Radial error was not statistically different between groups (MD -0.49 mm; 95 % CI -1.0 to 0.02; I2 = 86 %; p = 0.06), with a tendency for higher target accuracy with the asleep technique. There was no significant difference between groups in change on motor function, as measured by UPDRS III, from pre- to postoperative (MD 8.30 %; 95 % CI -4.78 to 21.37; I2 = 67 %, p = 0.2). There was a significant difference in postoperative stimulation voltage, with the asleep group requiring less voltage than the awake group (MD -0.27 V; 95 % CI -0.46 to - 0.08; I2 = 0 %; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicates that asleep image-guided GPi DBS presents a statistical tendency suggesting superior target accuracy when compared with the awake standard technique. Differences in change in motor function were not statistically significant between groups.

Awake versus Asleep Anesthesia in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for patients with Parkinsons' Disease (PD). Traditionally, DBS surgery for PD is performed under local anesthesia, whereby the patient is awake to facilitate intraoperative neurophysiological confirmation of the intended target using microelectrode recordings. General anesthesia allows for improved patient comfort without sacrificing anatomic precision and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis on patients undergoing DBS for PD. Published randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case series which compared asleep and awake techniques for patients undergoing DBS for PD were included. A total of 19 studies and 1,900 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed the (i) clinical effectiveness - postoperative UPDRS III score, levodopa equivalent daily doses and DBS stimulation requirements. (ii) Surgical and anesthesia related complications, number of lead insertions and operative time (iii) patient's quality of life, mood and cognitive measures using PDQ-39, MDRS, and MMSE scores. There was no significant difference in results between the awake and asleep groups, other than for operative time, for which there was significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of newer technology, there is likely to have narrowing differences in outcomes between awake or asleep DBS. What would therefore be more important would be to consider the patient's comfort and clinical status as well as the operative team's familiarity with the procedure to ensure seamless transition and care.

Shape-constrained deformable brain segmentation: Methods and quantitative validation

MRI-guided neuro interventions require rapid, accurate, and reproducible segmentation of anatomical brain structures for identification of targets during surgical procedures and post-surgical evaluation of intervention efficiency. Segmentation algorithms must be validated and cleared for clinical use. This work introduces a methodology for shape-constrained deformable brain segmentation, describes the quantitative validation used for its clinical clearance, and presents a comparison with manual expert segmentation and FreeSurfer, an open source software for neuroimaging data analysis. ClearPoint Maestro is software for fully-automatic brain segmentation from T1-weighted MRI that combines a shape-constrained deformable brain model with voxel-wise tissue segmentation within the cerebral hemispheres and the cerebellum. The performance of the segmentation was validated in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated with respect to training data and independently traced ground truth. Segmentation reproducibility was quantified and compared with manual expert segmentation and FreeSurfer. Quantitative reproducibility analysis indicates superior performance compared to both manual expert segmentation and FreeSurfer. The shape-constrained methodology results in accurate and highly reproducible segmentation. Inherent point based-correspondence provides consistent target identification ideal for MRI-guided neuro interventions.