Association Between Pseudoprogression of Vestibular Schwannoma After Radiosurgery and Radiological Features of Solid and Cystic Components

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma - A Case-Based Practice Guide From the Radiosurgery Society

PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are the most common benign intracranial nerve sheath tumors. Surgery and radiation therapy - particularly stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) - are the primary treatment options. SRS is the dominant treatment for small- and medium-sized VS and selected larger tumors due to its excellent local control rates and favorable safety profile compared with surgery. However, careful treatment planning is essential, taking into account patient preferences, tumor location and size, symptoms, and anticipated treatment-related toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four clinical VS scenarios have been selected to illustrate the use of SRS, including a unilateral small intracanalicular VS, a large VS with cystic components, reirradiation with SRS after local tumor recurrence, and bilateral VS in the setting of neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis.

RESULTS

SRS is an effective and safe treatment modality for the majority of VS cases, requiring careful treatment planning and a thorough understanding of potential limitations and challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

This case-based practice guide aims to provide a concise overview of the treatment of VS with SRS. We present and discuss 4 different clinical scenarios of VS to highlight the pitfalls and best practice recommendations.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment option for Koos stage I-III vestibular schwannomas (VS), often used as the first line of treatment or after subtotal resection. However, the optimal treatment for Koos-IV VS remains unclear. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SRS as a primary treatment for large VS classified as Koos-IV.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on December 28th, 2022, based on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus according to the PRISMA statement. The review was updated on September 7th, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. The R software (ver. 4.3.2) was used for all quantitative analyses and preparation of the forest plots. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the reliability of the obtained results.

RESULTS

Among 2941 screened records, ten studies (1398 patients) have been included in quantitative synthesis. The overall tumor control rate was 90.7% (95%CI 86.3-94.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of tumor control at 2, 6, and 10 years were 96.0% (95% CI 92.9-97.6%), 88.8% (95% CI 86.9-89.8%), and 84.5% (95% CI, 81.2-85.8%), respectively. The overall hearing preservation rate was 56.5% (95%CI 37-75.1). Kaplan-Meier estimates of hearing preservation rate at 2, 6, and 10 years were 77.1% (95% CI 67.9-82.5%), 53.5% (95% CI 44.2-58.5%), and 38.1% (95% CI 23.4-40.7%), respectively. The overall facial nerve preservation rate was 100% (95%CI 99.9-100.0). The overall trigeminal neuropathy rate reached 5.7% (95%CI 2.9-9.2). The overall rate of new-onset hydrocephalus was 5.6% (95%CI 3-9). The overall rates of worsening or new-onset tinnitus and vertigo were 6.8% (95%CI 4.2-10.0) and 9.1% (95%CI 2.1-19.6) respectively. No publication bias was detected according to the used methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a high overall tumor control rate, excellent facial nerve preservation, and low incidence of new-onset or worsened tinnitus and vertigo. However, several drawbacks associated with SRS should be noted, such as the presence of post-SRS hydrocephalus risk, mediocre long-term hearing preservation, and the lack of immediate tumor decompression. Nevertheless, the use of SRS may be beneficial in appropriately selected cases of Koos-IV VS. Moreover, further prospective studies directly comparing SRS with surgery are necessary to determine the optimal treatment for large VS and verify our results on a higher level of evidence. Registration and protocol: CRD42023389856.