Predictive factors for successful vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy: real-life insights from a multicenter study

Introduction

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is an established treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy that reduces seizure frequency by at least 50% in approximately half of patients; however, the characteristics of the patients with the best response have not yet been identified. Thus, it is important to identify the profile of patients who would have the best response to guide early indications and better patient selection.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as an adjuvant therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy from six epilepsy centers in Brazil. Data from 192 patients aged 2-66 years were analyzed, and all patients received at least 6 months of therapy to be included.

Results

Included patients were aged 2-66 years (25.6 ± 14.3), 105 (54.7%) males and 87 (45.8%) females. Median follow-up interval was 5 years (range, 2005-2018). Overall, the response rate (≥50% seizure reduction) after VNS implantation was 65.6% (126/192 patients). Most patients had 50-90% seizure reduction (60.9%) and nine patients became seizure-free. There were no serious complications associated with VNS implantation. The rate of a ≥ 50% seizure reduction response was significantly higher in patients with no history of neurosurgery. The presence of focal without generalized seizures and focal discharges on interictal EEG was associated with better response. Overall, etiological predictors of a better VNS response profile were tumors while a worse response to VNS was related to the presence of vascular malformations and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

Discussion

We observed an association between a better response to VNS therapy no history of neurosurgery, focal interictal epileptiform activity, and focal seizure pattern. Additionally, it is important to highlight that age was not a determinant factor of the response, as children and adults had similar response rates. Thus, VNS therapy should be considered in both adults and children with DRE.

Patient-Specific Characteristics Associated with Favorable Response to Vagus Nerve Stimulation

OBJECTIVE

The expansion in treatments for medically refractory epilepsy heightens the importance of identifying patients who are likely to benefit from vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Here, we identify predictors with a positive VNS response.

METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis of 158 patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Patients were categorized as VNS responders or nonresponders. Baseline characteristics and time to VNS response were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to identify predictors of response. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to identify likely VNS responders.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine (56.3%) patients achieved ≥50% seizure frequency reduction. Left-hand dominance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.703, P = 0.038), age at epilepsy onset ≥15 years (HR 2.029, P = 0.005), duration of epilepsy ≥8 years (HR 1.968, P = 0.007) and age at implantation ≥35 years (HR 1.809, P = 0.020), and baseline seizure frequency <5/month (HR 1.569, P = 0.044) were significant univariate predictors of VNS response. Following multivariate Cox regression, left-hand dominance, age at epilepsy onset ≥15 years, and duration of epilepsy ≥8 years remained significant. With recursive partitioning analysis, patients with either age at epilepsy onset ≥15 years, left-hand dominance, or baseline seizure frequency <5/month were stratified into Group A and had a 73.9% responder rate; the remaining patients stratified into Group B had a 43.8% responder rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with age at epilepsy onset ≥15 years, left-hand dominance, or baseline seizure frequency <5/month are ideal candidates for VNS.

Vagus nerve stimulation: a 20-year Australian experience

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy was first approved in the mid-1990s in the USA, Europe and Australia, with demonstrable efficacy in paediatric populations. Benefit in seizure frequency reduction can be observed up to 2 years post-intervention; however, few studies assess outcomes beyond this period. Furthermore, paediatric cohort sizes are small, limiting generalisability of outcome assessments. We evaluate VNS insertion outcomes and complications or side-effects in a large paediatric cohort, over a 20-year period from Queensland's first VNS insertion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all paediatric VNS insertions at the Queensland Children's Hospital (QCH) and the Mater Children's Hospital/Mater Children's Private Hospital (MCH/MCPH) Brisbane. A minimum of 1-year follow-up from 1999 to 2020 was required for inclusion. Patients were assessed on demographics, epilepsy details, seizure outcomes and complications or side-effects.

RESULTS

In this extended follow-up cohort (76 patients, 7.2 ± 5.3 years), 51.3% of patients had ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction, while 73.7% experienced an Engel III outcome (worthwhile benefit) or better. Eleven patients (14.9%) were seizure-free at follow-up, and 81.6% retained long-term therapy. Stimulation-related side-effects are common (17.1%) but rarely result in stimulation cessation (3.9%). Cessation occurred in 14 patients (18.4%) and most commonly related to minimal benefit (13.2%). Demographics, aetiology, seizure nature and surgical factors did not influence outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Over extended treatment periods, a large proportion of patients will benefit significantly from VNS therapy. Approximately 4 of 5 patients will retain VNS therapy, and in cases of cessation, this is most commonly related to minimal benefit. Underlying demographics, aetiology or seizure nature do not influence outcomes. This 20-year Queensland assessment of VNS therapy outcomes informs long-term expectation of VNS therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy induced by tuberous sclerosis complex

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the dynamic and long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) induced by tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). In addition, the impact of VNS on cognition and emotion after a one-year follow-up was evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients diagnosed with DRE induced by TSC were retrospectively recruited between 2008 and 2019. Dynamic changes in seizure frequency were observed in the responders (≥50% reduction of seizure frequency at last follow-up) and non-responders. Clinical characteristics and seizure outcomes were comprehensively analyzed to determine factors associated with seizure outcomes. The Wechsler intelligence scale was applied in a subgroup of six pediatric patients, whereas the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were assessed in a subgroup of nine patients to determine the impact of VNS therapy on cognitive performance and emotional state.

RESULTS

The follow-up duration for the 17 patients who underwent VNS treatment ranged from 0.5 to 10 years (mean ± SD: 4.1 ± 3.2 years). Monthly seizures decreased significantly from three months to four years post-treatment (p < 0.05). At the last follow-up, 70.6% of the patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency, and three patients were completely seizure free. Comparatively, non-responder patients experienced deterioration of seizure frequency after the first year. Notably, after one-year follow-up the mean standard score of full-scale intelligence quotient increased from 67.33 to 69.5 (p = 0.078) while the mean, standard score of SDS decreased from 49.22 to 45.67 (p = 0.003) compared to preoperative neuropsychological evaluation results.

CONCLUSION

VNS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with DRE caused by TSC. Although early outcomes were encouraging, a follow-up of at least one-year was required to predict long-term outcomes in patients receiving VNS treatment. Moreover, VNS may improve depressive mood in patients with DRE caused by TSC. Further investigations are needed to validate the present results.

Vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients with failed epilepsy surgery

Adequate control of pharmacoresistant epilepsy continues to be a challenge. Multiple studies have reported the benefits of epilepsy surgery and vagus nerve stimulation for children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Little is known about the role of vagus nerve stimulation for children with failed epilepsy surgeries. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of vagus nerve stimulation on seizure frequency reduction for children with failed epilepsy surgeries. We retrospectively reviewed 85 children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy who underwent vagus nerve stimulation. Six of these patients underwent epilepsy surgery before vagus nerve stimulation (group I) and 79 patients received only vagus nerve stimulation (group II). We recorded seizure frequency at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after vagus nerve stimulator implantation. Both groups had reduced seizure frequencies at the 3-, 12-, 24- and 36-month follow-up (p = 0.044 for group I trends and 0.008 for group II trends). Vagus nerve stimulator implantations significantly improve seizure frequency for children with or without previous epilepsy surgery at 3, 12, 24 and 36 months. These findings suggest that vagus nerve stimulation should be considered an alternative therapy for pediatric patients with previous failed surgeries.

Advantages of magnetoencephalography, neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI in epilepsy surgery re-operations

Objective: Management of patients after failed epilepsy surgery is still challenging. Advanced diagnostic and intraoperative tools including magneto-encephalography (MEG) as well as neuronavigation and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iopMRI) may contribute to a better postoperative seizure outcome in this patient group.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients after reoperation of failed epilepsy surgery for medically refractory epilepsy at the University of Erlangen between 1988 and 2017. Inclusion criteria for patients were available MEG, neuronavigation and iopMRI data. The Engel scale was used to categorize seizure outcome.Results: We report on 27 consecutive patients (13 female/14 male mean age at first surgery 29.4 years) who had operative revision of the first resection after failed epilepsy surgery. An improved seizure outcome postoperatively was observed in 78% of patients (p < 0.001) with 55% seizure free (Engel I) patients after a mean follow-up time of 4.9 years. In detail, 80% of lesional cases were seizure free compared to 59% of MRI negative patients. Localizing MEG spike activity in the vicinity of the first resection cavity was present in 12 of 27 patients (44%) corresponding to 83% (10/12) of MEG localizing spike patients having advanced seizure outcome after operative revision.Conclusion: Re-operation after failed surgery in refractory epilepsy may lead to a better seizure outcome in the majority of patients. Preoperative MEG may support the decision for surgery and may facilitate targeting epileptogenic tissue for re-resection by employing navigation and iopMR imaging.

Can we predict response to vagus nerve stimulation in intractable epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Since vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A number of studies show that VNS was effective to reduce seizure frequency. However, there was still some patients treated with VNS having poor or even no clinical effect.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present review was to identify factors predicting the effect of VNS therapy and to select patients suitable for VNS treatment.

METHOD

PubMed and Medline was searched with this terms "epilepsy," "vagus nerve stimulation," "vagal nerve stimulation," "VNS," "intractable," and "refractory".We selected studies by predefining inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

the effectiveness of VNA was confirmed by a number of studies. We find many studies exploring the predictive factors to VNS. However there was no any study finding factors correlating clearly with the outcome of VNS. Although, we find these factors, such as post-traumatic epilepsy, temporal lobe epilepsy and focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), were favorable for the treatment of VNS, while comprehensive IEDs and neuronal migration disorders were indicative of the poor effect. Also, temporal lobe epilepsy was generally effectively controlled by this therapy and yougers seemed to get more benefit from VNS. Additionally, other indexes, such as cytokine profile, slow cortical potential (SCP) shift, preoperative heart rate variability (HRV), EEG reactivity and connectomic profiling, maybe predict the results of VNS.

CONCLUSION

In summary, these conventional and other new factors should be analyzed further by more science and rigorous experimental design to identify the clear correlation with the outcome of VNS therapy.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy update

Epilepsy affects millions of people worldwide. Approximately one-third have pharmacoresistant epilepsy, and of these, the majority are not candidates for epilepsy surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been an option to treat pharmacoresistant seizures for 30 years. In this update, we will review the clinical data that support the device's efficacy in children, adolescents, and adults. We will also review its side-effect profile, quality of life and cost benefits, and the impact the device has on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We will then discuss candidate selection and provide guidance on dosing and future models. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy is an effective treatment for many seizure types and epilepsy syndromes with a predictable and benign side-effect profile that supports its role as the most commonly prescribed device to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy. "This article is part of the Supplement issue Neurostimulation for Epilepsy."

Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Medically refractory epilepsy is a debilitating disorder that is particularly challenging to treat in patients who have already failed a surgical resection. Evidence regarding outcomes of further epilepsy surgery is limited to small case series and reviews. Therefore, our group performed the first quantitative meta-analysis of the literature from the past 30 years to assess for rates and predictors of successful reoperations.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for studies reporting outcomes of repeat epilepsy surgery. Studies were excluded if they reported fewer than five eligible patients or had average follow-ups < 1 year, and patients were excluded from analysis if they received a nonresective intervention. Outcomes were stratified by each variable of interest, and quantitative meta-analysis was performed to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty-two patients who received repeat resective epilepsy surgery from 36 studies were included. Engel I outcome was observed in 47% (n = 369) of patients. Significant predictors of seizure freedom included congruent over noncongruent electrophysiology data (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.6-8.2), lesional over nonlesional epilepsy (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.9-5.3), and surgical limitations over disease-related factors associated with failure of the first surgery (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.3-5.3). Among patients with at least one of these predictors, seizure freedom was achieved in 58%. Conversely, the use of invasive monitoring was associated with worse outcome (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9). Temporal lobe over extratemporal/multilobe resection (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.8-3.0) and abnormal over normal preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 0.6-5.4) showed nonsignificant trends toward seizure freedom.

SIGNIFICANCE

This analysis supports considering further resection in patients with intractable epilepsy who continue to have debilitating seizures after an initial surgery, especially in the context of factors predictive of a favorable outcome.

Effectiveness of vagal nerve stimulation in medication-resistant epilepsy. Comparison between patients with and without medication changes

BACKGROUND

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) response is not immediate. A progressive decline in seizure frequency is usually found during a period of 12-18 months after implantation. During this time, the patient's medication is usually modified, which can create doubts about whether their clinical improvement is due to medication changes or to VNS itself. Our goal is to compare two groups of patients treated with VNS, with and without changes in their medication.

METHODS

We prospectively analyze 85 patients who were treated with VNS in our hospital between 2005 and 2014. In 43 patients, changes in the antiepileptic drugs (EAD) were not allowed during the postoperative follow-up and they were compared with 42 patients who were left at the option of neurologist make changes in medication. We analyzed the clinical situation at 18 months and compared the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 54.1% of patients had a reduction in seizures of 50% or higher (responders). In the group with no changes in medication, responders reached 63%, while in the group in which changes in medication were allowed, 45.2% were responders. Between responders and non-responders, there were no statistical differences in type of epilepsy, frequency, previous surgery, or intensity of stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a statistical difference in seizure frequency reduction between patients with or without changes in medication during their follow-up, so changes in medication did not improve the outcome. Furthermore, the absence of changes in AED can help to optimize the parameters of the stimulator in order to improve its effectiveness.

Long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes of vagus nerve stimulation for intractable epilepsy

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a widely used adjunctive treatment option for intractable epilepsy. Most studies have demonstrated short-term seizure outcomes, usually for up to 5 years, and thus far, none have reported psychosocial outcomes in adults. We aimed to assess long-term seizure and psychosocial outcomes in patients with intractable epilepsy on VNS therapy for more than 15 years. We identified patients who had VNS implantation for treatment of intractable epilepsy from 1997 to 2013 at our Comprehensive Epilepsy Program and gathered demographics including age at epilepsy onset and VNS implantation, epilepsy type, number of antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs) and seizure frequency before VNS implantation and at the last clinic visit, and the most recent stimulation parameters from electronic medical records (EMR). Phone surveys were conducted by research assistants from May to November 2014 to determine patients' current seizure frequency and psychosocial metrics, including driving, employment status, and use of antidepressants. Seizure outcomes were based on modified Engel classification (I: seizure-free/rare simple partial seizures; II: >90% seizure reduction (SR), III: 50-90% SR, IV: <50% SR; classes I to III (>50% SR)=favorable outcome). A total of 207 patients underwent VNS implantation, 15 of whom were deceased at the time of the phone survey, and 40 had incomplete data for medical abstraction. Of the remaining 152, 90 (59%) were contacted and completed the survey. Of these, 51% were male, with the mean age at epilepsy onset of 9.4 years (range: birth to 60 years). There were 35 (39%) patients with extratemporal epilepsy, 19 (21%) with temporal, 18 (20%) with symptomatic generalized, 5 (6%) with idiopathic generalized, and 13 (14%) with multiple types. Final VNS settings showed 16 (18%) patients with an output current >2 mA and 14 (16%) with rapid cycling. Of the 80 patients with seizure frequency information, 16 (20%) had a modified Engel class I outcome, 14 (18%) had class II, 24 (30%) had class III, and 26 (33%) had class IV. Eighty percent said having VNS was worthwhile. Among the 90 patients, 43 patients were ≥ 18 years old without developmental delay in whom psychosocial outcomes were further analyzed. There was a decrease in the number of patients driving (31% vs 14%, p=0.052) and working (44% vs 35%, p=0.285) and an increase in the number of patients using antidepressant medication (14% vs 28%, p=0.057) at the time of survey compared to before VNS. In this subset, patients with >50% SR (60%) were taking significantly fewer AEDs at the time of survey compared to patients with unfavorable outcomes (median: 3 vs 4, p=0.045). The associations of >50% SR with the psychosocial outcomes of driving, employment, and antidepressant use were not significant, although 77% of this subset said VNS was worthwhile. This is the first study that assesses both seizure and psychosocial outcomes, and demonstrates favorable seizure outcomes of >50% SR in 68% of patients and seizure freedom in 20% of patients. A large majority of patients (80%) considered VNS therapy worthwhile regardless of epilepsy type and psychosocial outcomes.

[Neuronavigation in the surgical planning of callosotomy]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the usefulness of 3D computer-assisted preoperative neuronavigation for stereoscopic location of the venous sinuses, arterial branches, and corpus callosum, to extrapolate anatomical landmarks on the surgical field and make decisions before the intervention.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was performed on patients with refractory epilepsy who underwent neuronavigation-assisted callosotomy (BRAIN LAB Dual).

RESULTS

A total of 10 neuronavigation-assisted callosotomies were performed in the year 2014. The ages of the patients (4 males and 6 females) were between 4 and 13 years (mean 7; SD 3.02). The most common indication for callosotomy in our sample was Lennox Gastoux (5 patients). A right parasagittal craniotomy was performed in 8 patients. An anterior two-thirds callosotomy was performed in 8 patients and anterior three-quarters in 2 patients. The mean accuracy of the neuronavigation procedure was less than 2mm. In no cases were there significant intraoperative surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

Callosotomy using frameless guided neuronavigation is an accurate and safe technique in patients with epilepsy refractory to surgical resection.

Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients who were classified as Engel IV one year after resective epilepsy surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment options and to examine the reasons that the patients did not undergo resective reoperation.

METHODS

Our study was designed as a retrospective open-label investigation of the long-term outcomes of 34 patients (12% of all surgically treated patients) who were classified as Engel IV one year after epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up visit (average of 7.6 ± 4.2 years after surgery), 12 of the 34 examined patients (35.3%) were still classified as Engel IV; 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) were improved (Engel I-III). Of the 34 patients, 8 (23.5%) achieved an excellent outcome, classified as Engel I, 3 patients (8.8%) were classified as Engel II, and 11 patients (32.4%) as Engel III. The seizure outcome in the patients classified as Engel I was achieved by resective reoperation in 4; by a change in antiepileptic medication in 3 patients; and by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 1 patient. The seizure outcome of Engel II was achieved by a change in antiepileptic medication in all 3 patients. Of the 34 patients, a total of 6 (17.6%) underwent resective reoperation only. The major reasons for this were the absence of a plausible hypothesis for invasive re-evaluation, the risk of postoperative deficit, and multifocal epilepsy in the rest of patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the reoperation rate was relatively low in our series, we can achieve better or even excellent seizure outcomes using other procedures in patients for whom resective surgery initially failed.

Efficacy and safety of a new robot-assisted stereotactic system for radiofrequency thermocoagulation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed robot-assisted frameless stereotactic system for deep electrode implantation and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC). Deep-electrode implantation was performed in the bilateral mesial temporal lobes of seven patients. Following the implantation of the deep electrodes through the monitored designed path, the epileptogenic zones were determined with the assistance of a robot system. Deep electrode electroencephalograms were recorded prior to and following RFTC. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by computed tomography scans and Engel classification criteria. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients with no patients suffered from severe permanent complications. After follow-ups for 34–62 months, four patients achieved Engel class I, including three patients with Ia classification, two patients were classified as Engel class IVa and one patient was classified as Engel class IVc. Therefore, robot-assisted frameless stereotaxy for deep electrode implantation and RFTC is indicated to be a safe and effective method that may be used effectively in clinical practice.

Combination of corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Palliative techniques such as partial corpus callosotomy (CC) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may be effective for adequate control of seizures in pharmacoresistant patients who are not candidates for resective surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of the combination of these two techniques in patients where the first surgery had not achieved adequate control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 6 patients with refractory epilepsy in which both types of surgery were performed, CC and VNS. We analyzed variables such as age, sex, age at onset of epilepsy, seizure types, electroencephalogram and magnetic resonance imaging results, and number of pre- and postoperative seizures.

RESULTS

Three patients first underwent VNS and then CC, and 3 patients were treated in reverse order. All patients had some improvement after the first surgery, but they continued to experience persistent falls, so a second palliative technique was used. The mean improvement after both surgeries was 89% (90% in patients first receiving CC and 87% in patients who first underwent VNS).

CONCLUSIONS

In adequately studied patients who are not optimal candidates for resective surgery, palliative surgery is a choice. The combination of VNS and CC shows good results in our series, although the right order to perform both procedures has not been defined. These results should be confirmed in a larger group of patients.

Vagus nerve stimulation may be a sound therapeutic option in the treatment of refractory epilepsy

INTRODUCTION: Refractory epilepsy accounts for 20 to 30% of epilepsy cases and remains a challenge for neurologists. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an option for palliative treatment. OBJECTIVE: It was to study the efficacy and tolerability of VNS in patients implanted with a stimulator at the Curitiba Institute of Neurology (INC). METHODS: A case study of six patients with refractory epilepsy submitted to a VNS procedure at the INC in the last four years was described and discussed. RESULTS: Mean age at time of implantation was 29 years. Mean follow-up was 26.6 months. Seizure frequency decreased in all patients (40-50% (n=2) and >80% (n=4)). Three patients no longer required frequent hospitalizations. Two patients previously restricted to wheelchairs started to walk, probably because of improved mood. CONCLUSION: In this population, VNS proved to be a sound therapeutic option for treating refractory epilepsy.