Microsurgical Tubular Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors With 3-Dimensional-Navigated Localization

Strategies for Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has transformed spinal surgery by minimizing tissue disruption, reducing recovery times, and lowering complication rates compared with traditional open procedures. MISS uses smaller incisions, specialized tools, and advanced imaging to treat conditions such as degenerative disk disease, trauma, and tumors. Techniques such as endoscopic spine surgery and tubular retractors have expanded its applications, enabling effective treatment with less postoperative pain and faster mobilization. Patient selection is crucial to the success of MISS, requiring detailed imaging analysis and consideration of overall health and pathology. Although MISS provides significant benefits, it is less effective for complex spinal deformities that require extensive sagittal or coronal corrections. Technological advancements, including robotic assistance and augmented reality, are enhancing surgical precision and expanding the scope of MISS. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, when combined with MISS, improve outcomes by reducing hospital stays and postoperative pain. Complications such as dural tears and hardware misplacement, although less common than in open surgery, require careful management, with techniques such as intraoperative imaging and robotic navigation aiding in complication prevention. Continued innovation in MISS will broaden its application and improve safety and patient outcomes across various spinal pathologies.

Systematic Review Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Intradural Extramedullary Tumours (IDEM)

Background/Objectives: Intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal tumours are relatively rare and predominantly benign. Gross total resection (GTR) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment, with increasing evidence supporting the use of minimally invasive techniques to achieve GTR. This study reviews the current surgical management options for IDEM tumours and their outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search without meta-analysis was conducted by two independent reviewers in December 2024. The population of interest comprised patients who underwent surgical treatment for IDEM tumours. Outcomes assessed included the extent of resection, postoperative neurological function, and complications. Results: Fifty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, providing data on 4695 IDEM cases, of which 3495 were managed through open surgery and 750 via minimally invasive surgery. The extent of resection was high, with a mean GTR > 90% across studies. Open laminectomy and unilateral minimally invasive hemilaminectomy were the most common surgical approaches. Complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks, were less frequent following minimally invasive procedures vs. open surgery (11.1% vs. 14.3%). Minimally invasive surgery also led to improved postoperative functional outcomes (mean McCormick score change -1.30 vs. -0.64) and a lower recurrence rate (1.4% vs. 10.0%). Conclusions: Whilst open surgery yields acceptable rates of resection and neurological improvement, there is growing evidence that minimally invasive surgery can achieve comparable, if not superior, rates of resection with fewer complications, leading to lower costs and shorter hospital stays.

Minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma - a case series of 49 patients and review of the literature

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma. In this single-centre study, we retrospectively analysed 49 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive removal of a total of 51 benign spinal nerve sheath tumors using a non-expandable (n = 18) or expandable tubular retractor (n = 33) retractor system between June 2007 and December 2019. The extent of resection, surgical complications, neurological outcome, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Histopathology revealed 41 schwannomas and 10 neurofibromas. After a mean follow-up of 30.8 months, postoperative MRI showed gross total resection in 93.7%, and subtotal resection in 6.3% of the tumors. Three patients were lost to follow up. Of the subtotal resections, one was a schwannoma (2.4% subtotal resections in schwannomas) and two were neurofibromas (20.0% subtotal resections in neurofibromas). Intraspinal and paraspinal tumor localizations were equally accessible by minimally invasive tubular surgery. Conversion to open surgery was not required in any case. The mean operative time was 167 ± 68 min, and estimated blood loss was 138 ± 145 ml. We observed no major surgical complications. Spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma can be removed effectively and safely using a minimally invasive tubular approach, with satisfying extent of tumor resection comparable to the conventional open surgical technique and no increased risk for neurological deterioration.

A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Unilateral Hemilaminectomy and Bilateral Laminectomy in the Resection of Spinal Meningiomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The primary treatment modality for spinal meningiomas (SM) is surgical resection. In recent years, minimal invasive spine surgery has gained considerable popularity, attributing its growth to advancements in surgical technologies and improved training of surgeons. Nonetheless, the suitability and effectiveness of minimal invasive spine surgery for intradural spinal tumor resection remain a subject of debate. In this cohort study, we aimed to compare the extent of resection of the unilateral hemilaminectomy approach, a less invasive technique, with the more traditional and invasive bilateral laminectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with SM who underwent surgery at our department between 1996 and 2020. Cohorts included patients who underwent tumor resection through bilateral laminectomy and patients who underwent a unilateral hemilaminectomy. The primary end point was extent of resection according to the Simpson classification.

RESULTS

Of 131 with SM, 36 had a bilateral laminectomy and 95 were operated through a unilateral hemilaminectomy. In both groups, gross total resection, Simpson grades 1 and 2, was achieved in 94.44% and 94.74%, respectively ( P = .999). The neurological outcome was also comparable in both cohorts ( P = .356). Both length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss were significantly lower in the unilateral cohort ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the unilateral hemilaminectomy yields comparable results in both oncological and neurological outcome when compared with the bilateral laminectomy. Thus, unilateral hemilaminectomy may serve as a viable and safe alternative for the surgical removal of SM.

Image-Guided Spine Surgery

The realm of spine surgery is undergoing a transformative shift, thanks to the integration of image-guided navigation technology. This innovative system seamlessly blends real-time imaging data with precise location tracking. While the indispensable expertise of experienced spine surgeons remains irreplaceable, navigation systems bring a host of valuable advantages to the operating room. By offering a comprehensive view of the surgical anatomy, these systems empower surgeons to conduct procedures with accuracy, while minimizing radiation exposure for both patients and medical professionals. Moreover, image-guided navigation paves the way for integration of other state-of-the-art technologies, such as augmented reality and robotics. These innovations promise to further revolutionize the field, providing greater precision and expanding the horizons of what is possible in the world of spinal procedures. This article explores the evolution, classification, and impact of image-guided spine surgery, underscoring its pivotal role in enhancing efficacy and safety while setting the stage for the incorporation of future technological advancements.

Minimally invasive tubular approach for lumbar extraforaminal disc herniation: how I do it

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgical resection of extraforaminal disc herniation is challenging. The anatomical landmarks are varying from common interlaminar approach. The main risk is to damage the exiting nerve root as it is not yet protected by any bony structure.

METHOD

Here, we present the different steps of the minimally invasive approach to resect a lumbar extraforaminal disc herniation, using tubular retractor under microscopy.

CONCLUSION

Once the key steps of tubular placements are well known, minimally invasive approach for such extraforaminal resection affords appropriate exposure, while reducing blood loss and muscle injury.