Newly Diagnosed Adult Basal Ganglia Gliomas Treated With Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy: A Comparative Cohort With Needle Biopsy

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive treatment option for recurrent brain metastases, especially for patients who have previously undergone Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Despite its growing use, additional research is needed to explore its utility and safety in this population.

METHODS

This systematic review evaluates the literature on LITT for recurrent brain metastases post-SRS, including patient selection, treatment protocols, outcomes, and complications. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024577899) and followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, encompassing 694 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) across these studies was 14.4 months with an average 12-month OS of 60.1%. Notably, median OS was 5.9 months after LITT alone and 12.7 months when LITT was followed by adjuvant SRS. The pooled local control rate was 75.6% at 6 months and 72.2% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

LITT is a minimally invasive treatment option that has shown potential in managing recurrent brain metastases after prior SRS, particularly when biopsy is required to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis. However, data on the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LITT versus alternative treatments such as repeat SRS or craniotomy remain limited.

Contemporary Applications of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive modality for addressing intracranial pathology. LITT is recognized as a primary therapeutic option for a range of intracranial pathologies, particularly in inaccessible lesions. In the present study, we systematically review the evidentiary base supporting contemporary applications of LITT. Three databases were queried according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies presenting primary data on contemporary applications of LITT. Studies were screened to determine eligibility according to predefined eligibility criteria. Thirty-nine studies featuring 1533 patients were included. Across all uses, including treatment of brain tumors, radiation necrosis (RN), mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), epilepsy secondary to hypothalamic hamartomas, and cavernous malformations, LITT is safe and efficacious, especially in patients who are ineligible for or not amenable to craniotomy. LITT is particularly useful in treating recurrent brain metastases and glioblastomas, with an increased overall survival in the latter of up to 26 months. In the management of RN (pseudo-progression), studies show faster steroid cessation in patients treated with LITT compared to medical management while also pre-empting the need for open craniotomy and stereotactic biopsy in the workup of suspected recurrence. In MTLE, LITT offers comparable rates of seizure freedom and reduction compared to anterior temporal lobectomy with potentially improved neuropsychiatric outcomes. LITT is an advantageous option for treating brain tumors, RN, and MTLE, among other pathologies. Continued investigation in emerging LITT applications can help clinicians expand the use of magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic laser ablation technology into the treatment of a broad spectrum of central nervous system pathologies.

The Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes With 250 Laser Ablations for Brain Tumors: A Pathway to Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive technique for treating brain tumors. Despite its proven safety profile, LITT is not yet widely available, and there is a lack of data on the learning curve required to achieve proficiency. This study analyzes a 250-patient cohort of laser-ablated tumors to describe changes in patient selection and clinical outcomes over time and experience, with the aim of providing insight into the learning curve for incorporating LITT into a neuro-oncology program and identifying a cutoff point that distinguishes novice from expert performance.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 250 patients with brain tumor who underwent LITT between 2013 and 2022. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Kaplan Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Operative time was evaluated using exponential curve-fit regression analysis to identify when consistent improvement began.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into quartiles (Q) based on their date of surgery. Mean tumor volume increased over time (Q1 = 5.7 and Q4 = 11.9 cm 3 , P = .004), and newly diagnosed lesions were more frequently ablated ( P = .0001). Mean operative time (Q1 v Q4 = 322.3 v 204.6 min, P < .0001) and neurosurgical readmission rate (Q1 v Q4 = 7.8% v 0%, P = .03) were reduced over time. The exponential curve-fit analysis showed a sustained decay in operative time after case #74. The extent of ablation ( P = .69), the recurrence ( P = .11), and the postoperative complication rate ( P = .78) did not vary over time.

CONCLUSION

After treating 74 patients, a downward trend in the operative time is observed. Patient selection is broadened as experience increases.

Safety and Efficacy of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy as Upfront Therapy in Primary Glioblastoma and IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma: A Meta-Analysis

Although primary studies have reported the safety and efficacy of LITT as a primary treatment in glioma, they are limited by sample sizes and institutional variation in stereotactic parameters such as temperature and laser power. The current literature has yet to provide pooled statistics on outcomes solely for primary brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5). In the present study, we identify recent articles on primary CNS neoplasms treated with LITT without prior intervention, focusing on relationships with molecular profile, PFS, and OS. This meta-analysis includes the extraction of data from primary sources across four databases using the Covidence systematic review manager. The pooled data suggest LITT may be a safe primary management option with tumor ablation rates of 94.8% and 84.6% in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and IDH-mutant astrocytoma, respectively. For IDH-wildtype GBM, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. Similar to rates reported in the prior literature, the neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates for IDH-wildtype GBM were 10.3% and 4.8%, respectively. The neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates were somewhat higher in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma cohort at 33% and 8.3%, likely due to a smaller cohort size.