1
|
Hisler V, Bardot P, Detilleux D, Stierle M, Sanchez EG, Richard C, Arab LH, Ehrhard C, Morlet B, Hadzhiev Y, Jung M, Gras SL, Négroni L, Müller F, Tora L, Vincent SD. RNA polymerase II transcription with partially assembled TFIID complexes. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.27.567046. [PMID: 38076793 PMCID: PMC10705246 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.27.567046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
The recognition of core promoter sequences by the general transcription factor TFIID is the first step in the process of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription initiation. Metazoan holo-TFIID is composed of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and of 13 TBP associated factors (TAFs). Inducible Taf7 knock out (KO) results in the formation of a Taf7-less TFIID complex, while Taf10 KO leads to serious defects within the TFIID assembly pathway. Either TAF7 or TAF10 depletions correlate with the detected TAF occupancy changes at promoters, and with the distinct phenotype severities observed in mouse embryonic stem cells or mouse embryos. Surprisingly however, under either Taf7 or Taf10 deletion conditions, TBP is still associated to the chromatin, and no major changes are observed in nascent Pol II transcription. Thus, partially assembled TFIID complexes can sustain Pol II transcription initiation, but cannot replace holo-TFIID over several cell divisions and/or development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Hisler
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Paul Bardot
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Dylane Detilleux
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Matthieu Stierle
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Emmanuel Garcia Sanchez
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Claire Richard
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Lynda Hadj Arab
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Cynthia Ehrhard
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Bastien Morlet
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Proteomics platform
| | - Yavor Hadzhiev
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B152TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthieu Jung
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- GenomEast
| | - Stéphanie Le Gras
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- GenomEast
| | - Luc Négroni
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Proteomics platform
| | - Ferenc Müller
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, B152TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - László Tora
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| | - Stéphane D. Vincent
- Université de Strasbourg, IGBMC UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- CNRS, UMR 7104, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1258, F-67400 Illkirch, France
- IGBMC, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, F-67400 Illkirch, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sloutskin A, Shir-Shapira H, Freiman RN, Juven-Gershon T. The Core Promoter Is a Regulatory Hub for Developmental Gene Expression. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:666508. [PMID: 34568311 PMCID: PMC8461331 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.666508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of multicellular organisms and the uniqueness of each cell are achieved by distinct transcriptional programs. Multiple processes that regulate gene expression converge at the core promoter region, an 80 bp region that directs accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). In recent years, it has become apparent that the core promoter region is not a passive DNA component, but rather an active regulatory module of transcriptional programs. Distinct core promoter compositions were demonstrated to result in different transcriptional outputs. In this mini-review, we focus on the role of the core promoter, particularly its downstream region, as the regulatory hub for developmental genes. The downstream core promoter element (DPE) was implicated in the control of evolutionarily conserved developmental gene regulatory networks (GRNs) governing body plan in both the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes. Notably, the composition of the basal transcription machinery is not universal, but rather promoter-dependent, highlighting the importance of specialized transcription complexes and their core promoter target sequences as key hubs that drive embryonic development, differentiation and morphogenesis across metazoan species. The extent of transcriptional activation by a specific enhancer is dependent on its compatibility with the relevant core promoter. The core promoter content also regulates transcription burst size. Overall, while for many years it was thought that the specificity of gene expression is primarily determined by enhancers, it is now clear that the core promoter region comprises an important regulatory module in the intricate networks of developmental gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sloutskin
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Hila Shir-Shapira
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Richard N. Freiman
- Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Tamar Juven-Gershon
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koutelou E, Farria AT, Dent SYR. Complex functions of Gcn5 and Pcaf in development and disease. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2020; 1864:194609. [PMID: 32730897 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2020.194609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A wealth of biochemical and cellular data, accumulated over several years by multiple groups, has provided a great degree of insight into the molecular mechanisms of actions of GCN5 and PCAF in gene activation. Studies of these lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) in vitro, in cultured cells, have revealed general mechanisms for their recruitment by sequence-specific binding factors and their molecular functions as transcriptional co-activators. Genetic studies indicate that GCN5 and PCAF are involved in multiple developmental processes in vertebrates, yet our understanding of their molecular functions in these contexts remains somewhat rudimentary. Understanding the functions of GCN5/PCAF in developmental processes provides clues to the roles of these KATs in disease states. Here we will review what is currently known about the developmental roles of GCN5 and PCAF, as well as emerging role of these KATs in oncogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Koutelou
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, TX 78957, United States of America; Center for Cancer Epigenetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Aimee T Farria
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, TX 78957, United States of America; Center for Cancer Epigenetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Sharon Y R Dent
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, TX 78957, United States of America; Center for Cancer Epigenetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paraiso KD, Blitz IL, Zhou JJ, Cho KWY. Morpholinos Do Not Elicit an Innate Immune Response during Early Xenopus Embryogenesis. Dev Cell 2020; 49:643-650.e3. [PMID: 31112700 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
It has recently been reported that a common side effect of translation-blocking morpholino antisense oligonucleotides is the induction of a set of innate immune response genes in Xenopus embryos and that splicing-blocking morpholinos lead to unexpected off-target mis-splicing events. Here, we present an analysis of all publicly available Xenopus RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data in a reexamination of the effects of translation-blocking morpholinos on the innate immune response. Our analysis does not support the authors' general conclusion, which was based on a limited number of RNA-seq datasets. Moreover, the strong induction of an immune response appears to be specific to the tbxt/tbxt2 morpholinos. The more comprehensive study presented here indicates that using morpholinos for targeted gene knockdowns remains of considerable value for the rapid identification of gene function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kitt D Paraiso
- Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ira L Blitz
- Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Jeff J Zhou
- Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ken W Y Cho
- Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suzuki N, Hirano K, Ogino H, Ochi H. Arid3a regulates nephric tubule regeneration via evolutionarily conserved regeneration signal-response enhancers. eLife 2019; 8:43186. [PMID: 30616715 PMCID: PMC6324879 DOI: 10.7554/elife.43186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Amphibians and fish have the ability to regenerate numerous tissues, whereas mammals have a limited regenerative capacity. Despite numerous developmental genes becoming reactivated during regeneration, an extensive analysis is yet to be performed on whether highly regenerative animals utilize unique cis-regulatory elements for the reactivation of genes during regeneration and how such cis-regulatory elements become activated. Here, we screened regeneration signal-response enhancers at the lhx1 locus using Xenopus and found that the noncoding elements conserved from fish to human function as enhancers in the regenerating nephric tubules. A DNA-binding motif of Arid3a, a component of H3K9me3 demethylases, was commonly found in RSREs. Arid3a binds to RSREs and reduces the H3K9me3 levels. It promotes cell cycle progression and causes the outgrowth of nephric tubules, whereas the conditional knockdown of arid3a using photo-morpholino inhibits regeneration. These results suggest that Arid3a contributes to the regeneration of nephric tubules by decreasing H3K9me3 on RSREs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanoka Suzuki
- Institute for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Kodai Hirano
- Institute for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hajime Ogino
- Amphibian Research Center, Hiroshima University, Higashi-hiroshima, Japan
| | - Haruki Ochi
- Institute for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Yamagata University, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sater AK, Moody SA. Using Xenopus to understand human disease and developmental disorders. Genesis 2017; 55. [PMID: 28095616 DOI: 10.1002/dvg.22997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Model animals are crucial to biomedical research. Among the commonly used model animals, the amphibian, Xenopus, has had tremendous impact because of its unique experimental advantages, cost effectiveness, and close evolutionary relationship with mammals as a tetrapod. Over the past 50 years, the use of Xenopus has made possible many fundamental contributions to biomedicine, and it is a cornerstone of research in cell biology, developmental biology, evolutionary biology, immunology, molecular biology, neurobiology, and physiology. The prospects for Xenopus as an experimental system are excellent: Xenopus is uniquely well-suited for many contemporary approaches used to study fundamental biological and disease mechanisms. Moreover, recent advances in high throughput DNA sequencing, genome editing, proteomics, and pharmacological screening are easily applicable in Xenopus, enabling rapid functional genomics and human disease modeling at a systems level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K Sater
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Sally A Moody
- Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|