Adhesive plasticity among populations of purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus)

Repeated Hyposalinity Pulses Immediately and Persistently Impair the Sea Urchin Adhesive System

Climate change will increase the frequency and intensity of extreme climatic events (e.g., storms) that result in repeated pulses of hyposalinity in nearshore ecosystems. Sea urchins inhabit these ecosystems and are stenohaline (restricted to salinity levels ∼32‰), thus are particularly susceptible to hyposalinity events. As key benthic omnivores, sea urchins use hydrostatic adhesive tube feet for numerous functions, including attachment to and locomotion on the substratum as they graze for food. Hyposalinity severely impacts sea urchin locomotor and adhesive performance but several ecologically relevant and climate change-related questions remain. First, do sea urchin locomotion and adhesion acclimate to repeated pulses of hyposalinity? Second, how do tube feet respond to tensile forces during single and repeated hyposalinity events? Third, do the negative effects of hyposalinity exposure persist following a return to normal salinity levels? To answer these questions, we repeatedly exposed green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) to pulses of three different salinities (control: 32‰, moderate hyposalinity: 22‰, severe hyposalinity: 16‰) over the course of two months and measured locomotor performance, adhesive performance, and tube foot tensile behavior. We also measured these parameters 20 h after sea urchins returned to normal salinity levels. We found no evidence that tube feet performance and properties acclimate to repeated pulses of hyposalinity, at least over the timescale examined in this study. In contrast, hyposalinity has severe consequences on locomotion, adhesion, and tube foot tensile behavior, and these impacts are not limited to the hyposalinity exposure. Our results suggest both moderate and severe hyposalinity events have the potential to increase sea urchin dislodgment and reduce movement, which may impact sea urchin distribution and their role in marine communities.

Morphological and Mechanical Tube Feet Plasticity among Populations of Sea Urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus)

Sea urchins rely on an adhesive secreted by their tube feet to cope with the hydrodynamic forces of dislodgement common in nearshore, high wave-energy environments. Tube feet adhere strongly to the substrate and detach voluntarily for locomotion. In the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, adhesive performance depends on both the type of substrate and the population of origin, where some substrates and populations are more adhesive than others. To explore the source of this variation, we evaluated tube foot morphology (disc surface area) and mechanical properties (maximum disc tenacity and stem breaking force) of populations native to substrates with different lithologies: sandstone, mudstone, and granite. We found differences among populations, where sea urchins native to mudstone substrates had higher disc surface area and maximum disc tenacity than sea urchins native to sandstone substrates. In a lab-based reciprocal transplant experiment, we attempted to induce a plastic response in tube foot morphology. We placed sea urchins on nonnative substrates (i.e., mudstone sea urchins were placed on sandstone and vice versa), while keeping a subgroup of both populations on their original substrates as a control. Instead of a reciprocal morphological response, we found that all treatments, including the control, reduced their disc area in laboratory conditions. The results of this study show differences in morphology and mechanical properties among populations, which explains population differences in adhesive performance. Additionally, this work highlights the importance of considering the impact of phenotypic plasticity in response to captivity when interpreting the results of laboratory studies.

Hyposalinity reduces coordination and adhesion of sea urchin tube feet

Climate change will increase the frequency and intensity of low-salinity (hyposalinity) events in coastal marine habitats. Sea urchins are dominant herbivores in these habitats and are generally intolerant of salinity fluctuations. Their adhesive tube feet are essential for survival, effecting secure attachment and locomotion in high wave energy habitats, yet little is known about how hyposalinity impacts their function. We exposed green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) to salinities ranging from ambient (32‰) to severe (14‰) and assessed tube feet coordination (righting response, locomotion) and adhesion [disc tenacity (force per unit area)]. Righting response, locomotion and disc tenacity decreased in response to hyposalinity. Severe reductions in coordinated tube foot activities occurred at higher salinities than those that affected adhesion. The results of this study suggest moderate hyposalinities (24-28‰) have little effect on S. droebachiensis dislodgement risk and survival post-dislodgment, while severe hyposalinity (below 24‰) likely reduces movement and prevents recovery from dislodgment.

Plasticity in fluctuating hydrodynamic conditions: Tube feet regeneration in sea urchins

Regenerating structures critical for survival provide excellent model systems for the study of phenotypic plasticity. These body components must regenerate their morphology and functionality quickly while subjected to different environmental stressors. Sea urchins live in high energy environments where hydrodynamic conditions pose significant challenges. Adhesive tube feet provide secure attachment to the substratum but can be amputated by predation and hydrodynamic forces. Tube feet display functional and morphological plasticity in response to environmental conditions, but regeneration to their pre-amputation status has not been achieved under quiescent laboratory settings. In this study, we assessed the effect of turbulent water movement, periodic emersion, and quiescent conditions on the regeneration process of tube feet morphology (length, disc area) and functionality (maximum disc tenacity, stem breaking force). Disc area showed significant plasticity in response to the treatments; when exposed to emersion and turbulent water movement, disc area was larger than tube feet regenerated in quiescent conditions. However, no treatment stimulated regeneration to pre-amputation sizes. Tube feet length was unaffected by treatments and remained shorter than non-amputated tube feet. Stem breaking force for amputated and not amputated treatments increased in all cases when compared to pre-amputation values. Maximum tenacity (force per unit area) was similar among tube feet subjected to simulated field conditions and amputation treatments. Our results suggest the role of active plasticity of tube feet functional morphology in response to field-like conditions and demonstrate the plastic response of invertebrates to laboratory conditions.