Designing a Total Knee Prosthesis

Tibiofemoral Slip Velocity in Total Knee Arthroplasty is Design-Invariant but Activity-Dependent

Tibiofemoral slip velocity is a key contributor to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) component wear, yet few studies have evaluated this quantity in vivo. The aim of the present study was to measure and compare tibiofemoral slip velocities in 3 TKA designs for a range of daily activities. Mobile biplane X-ray imaging was used to measure 6-degree-of-freedom tibiofemoral kinematics and the locations of articular contact in 75 patients implanted with a posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, or medial-stabilized design while each patient performed level walking, step up, step down, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit. Using these data, tibiofemoral slip velocity was calculated for the duration of each activity for each TKA design. The pattern of tibiofemoral slip velocity was similar for all 3 TKA designs within each activity but markedly different across the 5 activities tested, with the magnitude of peak slip velocity being significantly higher in level walking (range: 158-211 mm/s) than in all other activities (range: 43-75 mm/s). The pattern of tibiofemoral slip velocity in both the medial and lateral compartments closely resembled the pattern of tibiofemoral (knee) flexion angular velocity, with a strong linear relationship observed between slip velocity and flexion angular velocity (r = 0.81-0.97). Tibiofemoral slip velocity was invariant to TKA design but was significantly affected by activity type. Our measurements of slip velocity and articular contact locations for a wide range of daily activities may be used as inputs in joint simulator testing protocols and computational models developed to estimate TKA component wear.

Estimation of two wear factors for total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study based on musculoskeletal modelling

BACKGROUND

Primary causes of surgical revision after total hip arthroplasty are polyethylene wear and implant loosening. These factors are particularly related to joint friction and thus patients' physical activity. Assessing implant wear over time according to patients' morphology and physical activity level is key to improve follow-up and patients' quality of life.

METHODS

An approach initially proposed for tibiofemoral prosthetic wear estimation was adapted to compute two wear factors (force-velocity, directional wear intensity) using a musculoskeletal model. It was applied on 17 participants with total hip arthroplasty to compute joint angular velocity, contact force, sliding velocity, and wear factors during common daily living activities.

FINDINGS

Differences were observed between gait, sitting down, and standing up tasks. An incremental increase of both global wear factors (time-integral) was observed during gait from slow to fast speeds (p ≤ 0.01). Interestingly, these two wear factors did not result in same trend for sitting down and standing up tasks. Compared to gait, one cycle of sitting down or standing up tends to induce higher friction-related wear but lower cross-shear-related wear. Depending on the wear factor, significant differences can be found between sitting down and gait at slow speed (p ≤ 0.05), and between sitting down (p ≤ 0.05) or standing up (p ≤ 0.05) and gait at fast speed. Furthermore, depending on the activity, wear can be fostered by joint contact force and/or sliding velocity.

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrated the potential of wear estimation to highlight activities inducing a higher risk of implant wear after total hip arthroplasty from motion capture data.

The early innovators of today's resurfacing condylar knees

The 1970s saw an explosion of ideas in the field of prosthetic knee arthroplasty. This paper is an effort to identify the innovators who contributed to the development of today's condylar total knee prostheses and the surgical techniques used to insert them. The 1970s were selected because most innovations occurred during those years. Two different design approaches were undertaken simultaneously. One was a functional approach whereas the other was a strictly anatomical approach. Initially, these 2 approaches led to very different designs. But the common goal of recreating human knee function eventually led to more similarities than differences. The author describes how, when, and why these dedicated individuals came to their ideas. The work is largely based on interviews and correspondence with those involved as well as on reviews of patents and papers pertaining to their work.