A surgical indication in incurable breast cancer

Primary tumor removal improves the prognosis in patients with stage IV breast cancer: A population-based study (cohort study)

Adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were often used as a common stereotypy for female stage IV breast cancer rather than surgery. This study aimed to define the role of local surgery in metastatic breast cancer. Female metastatic breast cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data (2010-2013). We compared survival time between patients who received primary tumor removal (PTR) versus those who did not. Multivariate Cox regression models and competitive risk models were built to adjust potential confounders. Of 7669 female stage IV breast cancer patients, 2704 (35.3%) had surgery on their breast tumor and 4965 (64.7%) did not. In the entire cohort, women who underwent PTR had a 45% reduced risk of breast cancer-related death (multi-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60) compared with women who did not undergo PTR (P < 0.001). In a cause-specific hazard model (CS model), the multivariable HRs (95% CI) for the association of PTR with breast cancer related-death were 0.54 (0.50-0.60) in the multivariate-adjusted analysis. Similar results were also observed in the sub-distribution hazard function model (SD model) with corresponding multivariate HRs (95%CI) of 0.57 (0.52-0.63). Our study suggested that PTR was associated with improved survival in female stage IV breast cancer patients. The role of PTR in these patients needs to be re-evaluated.

Surgery of the primary tumor does not improve survival in stage IV breast cancer

We sought to evaluate the survival of patients who received breast surgery prior to any other breast cancer therapy following a metastatic diagnosis. Standard treatment for stage IV breast cancer is systemic therapy without resection of the primary tumor. Registry-based studies suggest that resection of the primary tumor may improve survival in stage IV cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis using data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Breast Cancer Outcomes Database. Patients were eligible if they had a metastatic breast cancer diagnosis at presentation with disease at a distant site and either received surgery prior to any systemic therapy or received systemic therapy only. Eligible patients who did not receive surgery were matched to those who received surgery based on age at diagnosis, ER, HER2, and number of metastatic sites. To determine whether estimates from the matched analysis were consistent with estimates that could be obtained without matching univariate and multivariable analyses of the unmatched sample were also conducted. There were 1,048 patients in the NCCN database diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer from 1997 to 2007. 609 metastatic breast cancer patients were identified as eligible for the study. Among the 551 patients who had data available for matching, 236 patients who did not receive surgery were matched to 54 patients who received surgery. Survival was similar between the groups with a median of 3.4 years in the nonsurgery group and 3.5 years in the surgery group. The groups were similar after adjusting for the presence of lung metastases and use of trastuzumab therapy (HR=0.94, CI 0.83-1.08, P=0.38). When matching for the variables associated with a survival benefit in previous studies, surgery was not shown to improve survival in the stage IV setting for this subset.

The role of surgery in breast cancer patients with isolated bone metastases at the time of diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Surgery for the primary tumor in breast cancer patients with synchronous isolated bone metastasis is applied for palliation. The aim was to determine whether surgical removal of the primary tumor provides a better survival and disease progression.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were diagnosed between the dates June 2004 and January 2007 and these patients are classified according to the removal of the primary tumor or not. Patients and tumor characteristics, removal of the primary tumor, and response to systemic therapy are examined as the factors that were affecting overall survival and time to progression of the disease.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 37.5 months. Mean time to progression and overall survival was longer for the patients who received surgery than the patients who did not (20.4 vs. 18.4 months and 57.6 vs. 44.5 months, respectively), but these were not significant (P = 0.58, P = 0.39). In multivariate analysis, response to systemic treatment [(P = 0.03), hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-0.93] was independent factor associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The response to systemic therapy is the major factor on survival in the breast cancer patients with isolated bone metastasis. Excision of the primary tumor has no effect on time to progression and overall survival.

Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988-2003 SEER data

BACKGROUND

Primary treatments for stage IV breast cancer are chemotherapy and radiation, with surgery usually reserved for tumor-related complications. We sought to determine whether surgical removal of the primary tumor provides a survival advantage for women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study by using the 1988-2003 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data. By use of multivariate Cox regression models, overall survival in women with stage IV disease was compared between women who underwent surgical excision of their breast tumor with women who did not, controlling for potential confounding demographic, tumor- and treatment-related variables, and propensity scores (accounting for variables associated with the likelihood of having surgery).

RESULTS

Of 9734 SEER patients with stage IV breast cancer, 47% underwent breast cancer surgery and 53% did not. Median survival was longer for women who had surgery than for women who did not, both among women who were alive at the end of the study period (36.00 vs. 21.00 months; P < .001) and among women who had died during follow-up (18.00 vs. 7.00 months; P < .001). After controlling for potential confounding variables and propensity scores, patients who underwent surgery were less likely to die during the study period compared with women who did not undergo surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, .63, 95% confidence interval, .60-.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the 1988-2003 SEER data indicated that extirpation of the primary breast tumor in patients with stage IV disease was associated with a marked reduction in risk of dying after controlling for variables associated with survival.