Evaluation of He4 Use in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer: First and Second Recurrence, and an Analysis of HE4 Concentration during Second- and Third-Line Chemotherapy

HE4 is a commonly used tumor marker for ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis. In our study, we aimed to assess its use in the diagnosis of subsequent OC recurrences and to evaluate its changes during recurrence diagnosis and the subsequent lines of chemotherapy treatment. This retrospective single center study was conducted on 188 patients treated for ovarian cancer recurrence at the Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology. The sensitivity and specificity of HE4 for patient survival prediction were analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Survival times to reach one of the endpoints (OS, PFS, TFI, PFS2, TFI2) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Elevated HE4 levels at the time of first relapse diagnosis, and after the third and the last course of second-line chemotherapy, significantly influences the time from OC diagnosis until first disease recurrence (PFS2) (p = 0.005, p = 0.015 and p = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, elevated serum HE4 concentration at the time of OC diagnosis (p = 0.012), and its later recurrence (first (p < 0.001), and second recurrent diagnosis (p = 0.143)) significantly influences patient OS. Increased HE4 concentration at the end of chemotherapeutic treatment negatively affects overall patient survival ((p = 0.006 for second line chemotherapy and (p = 0.022) for elevated HE4 concentration after the last course of third-line chemotherapy). Our preliminary results show an encouraging diagnostic and prognostic role of HE4 in recurrent ovarian cancer. HE4 measurements at different treatment time points during the second- and third-line chemotherapy treatment seem to correlate with patient survival.

Elevated serum level of human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) predicts poor prognosis in the critically ill with sepsis: a prospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) has been widely used as an important clinical tumor biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer. HE4 has recently been suggested to be an inflammatory biomarker and we hypothesized that the serum HE4 level upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission might predict prognosis in septic patients. We hypothesized that serum HE4 level upon intensive care unit (ICU) admission could predict prognosis in septic patients.

METHODS

Serum levels of HE4, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6 and IL-8 were quantified, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were recorded on day one of admission to ICU. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis of HE4, IL-6, PCT and SOFA at ICU admission for 28-day mortality was used to evaluate the ability of HE4 in predicting 28-day mortality of sepsis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1289 patients were recruited, and 117 patients were included for final analysis. On day of ICU admission, septic patients had significantly higher levels of serum HE4 than those with infection without sepsis, those with ovarian cancer, or healthy controls. Compared with septic survivors, septic non-survivors presented with significantly higher serum HE4 concentrations. Serum levels of HE4 correlated with disease severity scores and cytokine levels (IL-6 and IL-8). Upon ICU admission, the AUC for HE4 level association with 28-day mortality was 0.881, higher than the AUC for SOFA (0.713), IL-6 (0.589), and PCT (0.567). A regression analysis showed that HE4 was an independent mortality predictor.

CONCLUSION

HE4 can predict poor prognosis in septic patients, which may help to identify a group of septic patients at high risk of death.

HE4 is associated with clinical risk prognostic factors and survival outcome in primary fallopian tube carcinoma patients

AIM

To explore whether HE4 was associated with clinical risk prognostic factors and survival outcome in primary fallopian tube carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) patients from March 2011 to June 2019 were enrolled in this study. Serum CA125 and HE4 concentrations were measured at four time points including primary diagnosis, postsurgery, pre-recurrence, and recurrence. The relations between clinical risk prognostic factors with HE4 concentrations were investigated, and multivariate survival analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratios between HE4 levels with recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

HE4 were significantly elevated in poor performance status, advanced stage, high histological grade and residual tumor diameter >1 cm, and positive lymph node status, respectively, compared with those in well performance status, early stage, low histological grade, residual tumor diameter ≤1 cm, and negative lymph node status, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis indicated serum HE4 can predict outcome of recurrence-free survival and overall survival with hazard ratios of 9.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95-33.32) and 3.12 (95% CI: 1.07-9.08), respectively.

CONCLUSION

HE4 is associated with clinical risk prognostic factors in PFTC and contributes to predict survival outcome in PFTC cases.

Serum HE4 is associated with clinical prognostic factors and survival outcome in female patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether serum HE4 was associated with clinical risk prognostic factors and survival outcome.

METHODS

In this study, 72 patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) from January 2011 to October 2019 participated. Serum HE4 and CA125 levels were detected at primary diagnosis, post-surgery, pre-recurrence and the presence of recurrence. The relations between serum HE4 levels with clinical prognostic factors were analyzed, and the hazard ratios between serum HE4 levels with overall survival and recurrence-free survival were also analyzed by univariate and multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS

HE4 and CA125 levels were significantly elevated in serous type, high histological grade, advanced stage and positive lymph node status and residual tumor diameter more than 1 cm, respectively, compared with those in non-serous type, low histological grade, early stage, negative lymph node status and residual tumor diameter no more than 1 cm, respectively. HE4 was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival and overall survival with hazard ratios of 5.36 (95% confidence interval: 2.19-13.15) and 4.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.87-10.74), respectively.

CONCLUSION

HE4 is correlated with clinical risk prognostic factors in PPC and is effective in the recurrence detection and predicting outcome in PPC patients.

Early clearance of serum HE4 and CA125 in predicting platinum sensitivity and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer

Objectives

To assess the clinical value of early clearance of HE4 and CA125 for platinum sensitivity and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Method

HE4 and CA125 value including clinical data of 89 patients with ovarian cancer were collected. The clearance of HE4 and CA125 were assessed base on the platinum sensitivity, two-year PFS, PFS and OS.

Results

Sixteen patients were classified as platinum resistant and 73 as platinum sensitive according to the response to platinum-base chemotherapy. When HE4 clearance after 3rd cycle chemotherapy or CA125 clearance after 1st cycle chemotherapy, it gave the highest AUC of 0.788, with 100% of sensitivity and 57.5% of specificity respectively between platinum resistant and platinum sensitive group. In addition, 59 patients were classified as two-year PFS group and 30 as not achieved two-year PFS group according to obtaining two-year PFS or not. It gave the highest AUC of 0.730, with 83.3% of sensitivity and 62.7% of specificity respectively when HE4 clearance after 3rd cycle chemotherapy or CA125 clearance after 1st cycle. The prolonged PFS and OS were significantly associated by the clearance of HE4 after 3rd cycle chemotherapy (p< 0.0001, p< 0.0001) as well as CA125 after 1st cycle chemotherapy (p< 0.0001, p< 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our data suggested that the early clearance of HE4 and CA125 could predict platinum response and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Monitoring the HE4 and CA125 during first-line chemotherapy might be helpful in predicting platinum sensitivity and risk to progress and relapse.

Knockdown of HE4 suppresses aggressive cell growth and malignant progression of ovarian cancer by inhibiting the JAK/STAT3 pathway

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is well known to be a predictor of ovarian cancer clinically. HE4 is reported to play crucial roles in ovarian cancer progression and metastasis. The purpose of the present study was to explore its biological role and molecular mechanism in ovarian cancer. In our study, we found that expression levels of HE4 in tissues, serum and urine in ovarian cancer were upregulated compared to healthy and benign groups. HE4 expression was elevated in ovarian cancer cells. Knockdown of HE4 dampened cell proliferation and Ki67 expression, as well as enhanced apoptosis, caspase-3 activity and cleaved-caspase-3 expression. In addition, HE4 downregulation repressed invasion and migration capabilities of ovarian cancer cells. Western blot analyses showed that knockdown of HE4 reduced the levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and inhibited epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in ovarian cancer cells. In vivo animal experiments revealed that HE4 downregulation constrained the growth of xenograft tumor. Mechanism research showed that knockdown HE4 inhibited the activity of JAK/STAT3 pathway in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our findings reported that knockdown of HE4 suppresses aggressive cell growth and malignant progression of ovarian cancer by inhibiting the JAK/STAT3 pathway, which provides valuable insights to contribute to develop novel HE4-targeted therapies.

Summary: Our findings reported that HE4 knockdown suppresses aggressive cell growth and malignant progression of ovarian cancer by inhibiting the JAK/STAT3 pathway, which could provide a valuable insight into developing novel HE4-targeted therapies.

Integrated multiomic predictors for ovarian cancer survival

Increasingly affordable high-throughput molecular profiling technologies have made feasible the measurement of omics-wide interindividual variations for the purposes of predicting cancer prognosis. While multiple types of genetic, epigenetic and expression changes have been implicated in ovarian cancer, existing prognostic biomarker strategies are constrained to analyzing a single class of molecular variations. The extra predictive power afforded by the integration of multiple omics types remains largely unexplored. In this study, we performed integrative analysis on tumor-based exome-, transcriptome- and methylome-wide molecular profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for variations in cancer-relevant genes to construct robust, cross-validated multiomic predictors for ovarian cancer survival. These integrated polygenic survival scores (PSSs) were able to predict 5-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival in the Caucasian subsample with high accuracy (AUROC = 0.87 and 0.81, respectively). These findings suggest that the PSSs are able to predict long-term OS in TCGA patients with accuracy beyond that of previously proposed protein-based biomarker strategies. Our findings reveal the promise of an integrated omics-based approach in enhancing existing prognostic strategies. Future investigations should be aimed toward prospective external validation, strategies for standardizing application and the integration of germline variants.

Prognostic values of HE4 expression in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

To evaluate the prognostic impact of HE4 expression in patients with cancer.

Materials and methods

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and WangFang databases for publications concerning HE4 expression in patients with cancer. The correlation of HE4 expression level with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed.

Results

In this meta-analysis, 29 studies, with a total of 4,235 patients, were included. Our results showed that HE4 expression was significantly associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] =2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.77–2.62, P<0.001). Further subgroup analysis found that this correlation was not affected by race (White: HR =1.92, 95% CI =1.53–2.39, P<0.001; Asian: HR =2.62, 95% CI =2.06–3.35, P<0.001) or tumor types (endometrial cancer: HR =2.91, 95% CI =1.86–4.53, P<0.001; ovarian cancer: HR =1.82, 95% CI =1.50–2.22, P<0.001; lung cancer: HR =2.31, 95% CI =1.54–3.47, P<0.001). Our meta-analysis showed that HE4 overexpression was significantly associated with DFS (HR =2.50, 95% CI =1.86–3.37, P<0.001) and PFS (HR =1.27, 95% CI =1.11–1.45, P=0.001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that expression of HE4 was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with cancer. HE4 is a potential novel prognostic factor in patients with cancer.

Prognostic value of HE4 in patients with ovarian cancer

Background

There is no consensus in the medical community about the prognostic role of preoperative serum levels of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in ovarian cancer (OC). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to establish whether preoperative serum levels of HE4 are associated with OC prognosis.

Content

Eligible studies were searched for in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang Med Online. We performed a meta-analysis of 1315 OC cases from 14 published articles.

Summary

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that high HE4 was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (random effects model, hazard ratio [HR]=1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.40–2.614, p<0.0001; I2=52%, p=0.04) and; progression-free survival (PFS) (random effects model, HR=1.38, 95% CI=1.13–1.69, p=0.002; I2=85%, p<0.00001). However, subgroup analysis showed that high HE4 was not associated with poor OS (fixed effects model, HR=1.86, 95% CI=0.89–3.89, p=0.1; I2=34%, p=0.22) or PFS (random effects model, HR=1.34, 95% CI=0.95–1.88, p=0.1; I2=69%, p=0.007) for studies including only Asian populations.

Outlook

In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that high HE4 was associated with poor OC OS and PFS overall. However, the association of high HE4 with poor OS and PFS was not observed for Asians. Large-scale, multi-center investigations should be performed.

HE4 level in ascites may assess the ovarian cancer chemotherapeutic effect

BACKGROUND

The clinical treatment of ovarian cancer with ascites is problematic. The main reasons for treatment failure are the susceptibility to intraperitoneal metastasis and chemotherapeutic drug resistance. The purpose and significance of this study is to evaluate which marker might evaluate treatment efficacy and improve the cure rate.

RESULTS

This study compared a no chemotherapy group with a chemotherapy group regarding the determination of carbohydrate antigen 125 and human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer ascitic supernatants and cross-analyzed routine serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels. The level of human epididymis protein 4 in the ascites of the chemotherapy group was significantly lower than that of the no chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the expression of ascitic human epididymis protein 4 correlated positively with serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels (p < 0.001). MDR was positive in 13 of the 30 samples (43.33%) in the chemotherapy group with highly expressed CA125.

CONCLUSION

The level of human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer ascites may reflect the therapeutic effect of ovarian cancer patients, and a high level of human epididymis protein 4 might predict chemoresistance and the possibility of ascites formation. The determination of the expression of human epididymis protein 4 alone or combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 levels in both serum and ascites in ovarian cancer patients with ascites may have important significance for guiding and improving the treatment regimen.

HE4 and eIF3a Expression Correlates with Surgical Outcome and Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer Patients with Secondary Cytoreduction

For recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) is recommended as one optional treatment. However, little is known about the expression and clinical significance of biomarkers during SCS. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a clinical biomarker for ovarian cancer. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3a (eIF3a) is investigated extensively as a potential biomarker for malignancy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expressions of HE4 and eIF3a at SCS, as well as their associations with surgical outcome and survival in ROC patients. Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine the expressions of HE4 and eIF3a in ovarian tumors taken from both initial and secondary cytoreductive surgery of 35 ROC patients. eIF3a levels were significantly increased at SCS, compared to those at initial cytoreductive surgery (ICS), while HE4 levels were similar. Both HE4 and eIF3a expressions were associated with surgical outcome, in terms of residual tumor. For ICS, patients with high HE4 expression achieved a higher incidence of optimal cytoreduction than those with low HE4 expression (81.0% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.015). A similar result happened in SCS, indicated by higher incidence of no residual tumor in patients with high HE4 expression (76.4% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.046). And high HE4 expression at SCS was more likely to enhance surgical outcome of SCS (77.8% vs. 29.4%, P = 0.038). Therefore, high HE4 expression at either surgery is a predictor of better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.011 and 0.002). Furthermore, patients with an elevated total score (TS) of HE4 between the two surgeries tended to have prolonged OS, compared to those with a non-elevated TS of HE4 (P = 0.076). For eIF3a, initial eIF3a expression was associated with secondary residual tumor (P = 0.035), and the difference in eIF3a expression between the two surgeries correlated with OS (P = 0.052). The expressions of HE4 and eIF3a in tumor specimens correlated with surgical outcome and predicted OS in ROC patients with SCS, thus meriting further investigation.

Clinical Usefulness of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in Lung Cancer

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has been suggested as a useful new biomarker of lung cancer; however, few relevant large-scale studies have been published. In this study, we evaluated the utility of serum HE4 for lung cancer detection. HE4 levels were measured in serum samples from 100 lung cancer patients, 57 patients with benign lung diseases, and 274 healthy controls by using a chemiluminescent immunoassay, and variations in HE4 levels were analyzed by clinical status such as lung cancer, benign lung disease, and healthy condition, Tumor, Lymph Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor score, and histological cancer type. Lung cancer patients had significantly higher serum HE4 levels than patients with benign lung diseases and healthy controls (P<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for HE4 was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.89; P<0.0001) between lung cancer patients and healthy controls. Serum HE4 levels were significantly higher in patients with advanced disease (according to TNM stage) than in healthy controls (P<0.0001). HE4 levels were significantly elevated in patients with tumors of all types, those of different histological subgroups, and those with the smallest tumors (P=0.002). This report supports the potential of serum HE4 as an ancillary diagnostic marker for lung cancer detection.

Prognostic value of serum and tissue HE4 expression in ovarian cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 90 studies

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women. Accumulating evidence showed an evolving role of HE4 in monitoring the progression and prognosis of OC but without a comprehensive analysis for prognosis and survival data. Areas covered: The present meta-analysis aims to explore the association of HE4 with survival and the clinicopathological features of OC patients. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for relevant studies regarding the role of both serum and tissue HE4 expression in ovarian cancer. Expert commentary: HE4 has been proposed as the most promising biomarker that may complement the CA125 expression and has been approved by the FDA in monitoring the follow-up and relapse of OC patients. Our results are in accordance with the most recent evidence suggesting its important role in the prognostic surveillance of OC and a better performance in the early prediction of OC recurrence than CA125.

Could HE4 level measurements during first-line chemotherapy predict response to treatment among ovarian cancer patients?

Background

This study assessed the prognostic value of HE4 marker measurements at various stages of first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Methods

The study consisted of 90 ovarian cancer patients, including 48 women undergoing primary surgical treatment and 42 patients qualified for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Each patient underwent HE4 and CA 125 level measurements at the time of diagnosis and subsequently as follows: after surgical treatment, after the third course of adjuvant chemotherapy, before interval cytoreductive surgery and after chemotherapy. The HE4 value was assessed based on the PSF, OS, DFS, surgical outcome, two-year survival and platinum sensitivity.

Results

Preoperative HE4 levels were a predictor of platinum sensitivity (AUC– 0.644; p = 0.035) and DFS (AUC = 0.637; p = 0.0492). A univariate logistic regression analysis showed that serum HE4 significantly correlated with PFS (baseline results over median HR = 2.96, p = 0.0009; baseline over 75 percentile HR = 2.44, p = 0.0062; normalization after treatment HR = 0.46, p = 0.0125; 50% reduction before IDS HR = 0.64, p = 0.0017). In the multivariate analysis, normalization after treatment and 50% reduction before IDS significantly influenced the PFS (HR = 0.29, p = 0.00008; HR = 0.23, p = 0.0024). The HE4 levels also correlated with the OS as follows: values below the median (HR = 1.88, p = 0.0087), normalization after chemotherapy (HR = 0.08, p = 0.0003), and 50% reduction before IDS (HR = 0.39, p = 0.0496).

Conclusions

The significant effect of the normalization of the HE4 marker after therapy and 50% reduction of HE4 levels before interval cytoreductive surgery on PFS and OS confirmed that HE4 might be an independent prognostic factor of treatment response. HE4 measurements performed during first-line treatment of ovarian cancer may have prognostic significance.

Fully sialylated alpha-chain of complement 4-binding protein (A2160): a novel prognostic marker for epithelial ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

Fully sialylated alpha-chain of complement 4-binding protein (A2160) is a member of the glycoprotein family and has recently been identified as a diagnostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer. This study examined the utility of A2160 as a prognostic biomarker for this disease.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected plasma samples from 93 women with stage I-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery between 2009 and 2014. Pretreatment A2160 levels were correlated to clinico-pathological factors and survival outcome.

RESULTS

Women with advanced-stage disease had significantly higher 2160 levels compared to those with early stage disease (stage I-II versus III-IV, median 2.17-2.70 versus 5.31-8.70 U/mL, P < 0.01). Women with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma had higher A2160 levels compared to other histologies (6.60 versus 3.01 U/mL, P = 0.05). Women who had suboptimal cytoreduction had significantly higher A2160 levels than those who achieved optimal/complete cytoreduction (7.02 versus 2.30-3.17 U/mL, P < 0.01). On univariable analysis, higher A2160 levels were significantly associated with decreased progression-free survival (64-100 versus 1-33%ile, 5-year rates 53.4 versus 78.9%, P = 0.029). After controlling for age, CA-125 level, cytoreductive status, histology, and stage, higher A2160 levels remained an independent prognostic factor for decreased progression-free survival (adjusted-hazard ratio (HR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-6.11, P = 0.049). Similarly, higher A2160 levels were independently associated with decreased cause-specific survival on multivariable analysis (adjusted-HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.19-7.93, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that A2160 may be a useful prognostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer, and higher pretreatment levels of A2160 predicts poor survival outcome.

The role of novel biomarker HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancers, in fact, >80% of cases are diagnosed as advanced-stage disease associated with a high mortality rate (<40% of women cured). A systematic review was performed to estimate the role of HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian tumors. Areas covered: A comprehensive search of the literature from January 1952 to August 2016 was conducted using the terms 'ovarian tumor' and 'ovarian cancer' combined with 'HE4' and 'human epididymis protein 4'. The search identified a total of 259 citations, of which 141 were potentially relevant after initial evaluation. Of these studies, 75 primary studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed, with a total of 14,773 patients. Expert commentary: Serum HE4 dosage is a useful preoperative test for predicting the benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses. It seems to have a promising role in the prediction of clinical and surgical outcomes. Moreover, HE4 seems to better predict recurrence in comparison to CA-125.

HE4 as a predictor of adjuvant chemotherapy resistance and survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and HE4 tissue protein expression to predict tumor resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Consecutive inclusion of 198 patients diagnosed with EOC was conducted. Blood samples were collected prior to surgery and tissue samples during surgery. Patient data were registered prospectively in the Danish Gynecologic Cancer Database. The association between serum HE4 and HE4 tissue protein expression, resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy, PFS, and overall survival were analyzed in univariate analyses and in multivariate analyses adjusted for age, performance score, surgical outcome, stage, grade, and histological subtype. Serum HE4 levels predicted chemotherapy resistance, PFS, and overall survival correlated significantly (p < 0.001) in the univariate analyses; but after adjustment in a multivariate model, serum HE4 was insignificant, except in a subgroup analysis of postmenopausal women, where serum HE4 significantly predicted resistance to chemotherapy and progression-free survival. HE4 tissue protein expression predicted PFS (p = 0.022) and overall survival (p = 0.047) in the univariate analysis, while HE4 tissue protein expression failed to predict these outcomes in the adjusted multivariate analyses. Serum HE4 or HE4 tissue protein expression are not independent factors of chemotherapy resistance or survival in patients with EOC, but serum HE4 might predict chemotherapy resistance and PFS in postmenopausal women.

Role of human epididymis protein 4 in chemoresistance and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer

AIM

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a novel biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer. This study was designed to evaluate the role of HE4 in chemo-response against anti-cancer drugs and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

HE4-depleted cells and HE4-overexpressing cells were generated. The effect of HE4 gene silencing and overexpression was examined using a cell viability assay after exposure to chemotherapeutic agents and the signaling pathway. We studied the expression of HE4 in ovarian cancer tissue and the prognostic significance. Cytoplasmic staining was graded for intensity and percentage of positive cells. The grades were multiplied to determine an H-score.

RESULTS

Knockdown of HE4 in OVCAR-3 cells resulted in reduction in cell growth and increased sensitivity to paclitaxel and cisplatin compared to control cells. This effect originated from the decreased activation of cell-growth-related signaling, such as AKT and Erk mediated by epidermal growth factor (EGF), while overexpression of HE4 resulted in enhanced cell growth and suppressed the anti-tumorigenic activity of paclitaxel. Activation of AKT and Erk pathways was enhanced in HE4-overexpressing cells compared to control cells. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, the risk of death was significantly higher in patients with an H-score > 4.

CONCLUSION

HE4 induces chemoresistance against anti-cancer drugs and activates the AKT and Erk pathways to enhance tumor survival. HE4 expression in ovarian cancer tissue is associated with a worse prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

Serum HE4 superior to CA125 in predicting poorer surgical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains the deadliest form of gynecological cancers. Optimal tumor debulking, no matter the primary or the interval, is the most important prognostic factor for EOC, so there is an urgent demand for biomarkers to predict surgical outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) could predict surgical outcome of EOC. The levels of preoperative serum HE4 and CA125 were determined by electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) in 82 EOC patients, comprising 39 subjected to primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 43 with extensive stage III or IV disease to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS). Among 39 patients subjected to primary debulking surgery, HE4 was superior to CA125 in predicting surgical outcome (area under curve [AUC] 0.758 vs. 0.633). At a cutoff of 353.22 pmol/L, HE4 reached 77.4 % in sensitivity and 75 % in specificity. The prediction of surgical outcome of interval debulking surgery based on preoperative HE4 and CA125 values was performed in 43 patients who received NACT-IDS. The difference of AUC between HE4 and CA125 (0.793 vs. 0.663) indicating that HE4 was the better biomarker to predict surgical outcome of IDS. A pre-IDS HE4 value of 154.3 pmol/L is the optimal cutoff to identify patients who would not benefit from IDS with a sensitivity of 92.9 % and a specificity of 69 %. The change (>70 %) of HE4 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could predict optimal interval debulking surgery. Serum HE4 was superior to CA125 in predicting surgical outcome of primary debulking surgery and interval debulking surgery. The change (absolute value or percentage) of HE4 in neoadjuvant chemotherapy could predict the outcome of interval debulking surgery.

The Establishment of an HE4-CLIA Method and the Combined Analysis of HE4 and CA125 in Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

The human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) is a novel, verified biomarker for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Magnetic beads were coated with capture antibodies and were used with acridinium ester labeled detection antibodies in a sandwich-type immunoassay. The patient's HE4 serum levels were measured simultaneously with the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) kit we developed and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) kit from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). CA125 was also detected by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay. The diagnostic value was analyzed.

RESULTS

The assay demonstrated a linear range from 2.5 to 2,000 pmol/l, with an analytical sensitivity of 2.5 pmol/l. The reproducibility, recovery, and specificity of the immunoassay were demonstrated to be acceptable. Compared with the ECLIA kit from Roche in 124 serum samples (40 patients with ovarian cancer, 35 patients with benign gynecological diseases, and 49 health controls), there is a satisfied correlation coefficient of 0.875. The area under the receiver-operating curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.903 (95% CI was 0.839-0.966, P < 0.001) for HE4, 0.787 (95% CI was 0.694-0.879, P < 0.001) for CA125, and 0.914 (95% CI was 0.866-0.962, P < 0.001) for combined analysis of HE4 and CA125.

CONCLUSIONS

A quantitative method (HE4-CLIA) for detecting HE4 in serum was successfully established. Preliminary clinical sample analysis showed HE4-CLIA has a certain clinical value in the screening and diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Moreover, in distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian lesions, HE4 has higher demonstrated accuracy than CA125.

Assessment of selected cytokines, proteins, and growth factors in the peritoneal fluid of patients with ovarian cancer and benign gynecological conditions

Objectives

The ovarian tumor microenvironment, ie, the peritoneal fluid, is an intriguing research subject. The goal of this study was to assess the behavior of selected cytokines and growth factors within the peritoneal fluid in pathologies associated with ascites and to assess the relationship between the levels of these substances and select prognostic factors of ovarian cancer.

Methods

A total of 74 patients were enrolled in the study, including 36 patients with ovarian cancer and 38 patients with benign gynecological conditions. Peritoneal fluid collected during surgical procedures was used to assess the levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, stem cell factor (SCF), dickkopf-1, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin, osteonectin, and human epididymis protein 4. The median levels of these factors were compared between the two groups, and the levels of selected factors were assessed in the ovarian cancer group with regard to the clinical stage of cancer, tumor differentiation, presence of peritoneal spread and positive peritoneal fluid cytology results. The diagnostic value of the analyzed proteins within the peritoneal fluid was also assessed.

Results

Differences were observed between the patients with ovarian cancer and the patients with benign gynecological conditions associated with ascites with regard to the levels of IL-6, IL-8, GDF-15, SCF, osteopontin, osteonectin, and OPG. There were no differences in dickkopf-1, TRAIL, and human epididymis protein 4 levels between the two study groups. Cancer stage affected only the mean SCF and OPG levels, with lower SCF values and higher OPG values in advanced cancers compared to less-advanced cancers. Tumor differentiation was associated with significantly lower SCF values in the group of poorly differentiated tumors. A significant reduction in SCF values and a significant increase in OPG and IL-6 values were also observed within cancer cell-positive peritoneal fluid. Peritoneal spread was associated with higher levels of TRAIL, osteonectin, and IL-6 in ovarian cancer patients.

Conclusion

On the basis of the conducted studies, it appears that of the studied factors, GDF-15, SCF, and OPG deserve special attention in the context of future research on the tumor microenvironment. With regard to diagnostics, attention should be given primarily to GDF-15, IL-6, and osteonectin.

Prognostic Value of Serum HE4 Levels and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Scores at the Time of Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis

Objectives

The aim of this study is to assess whether the pretreatment serum HE4 levels or the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) scores at the time of initial diagnosis are associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with ovarian cancer receiving either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery.

Methods

A survival analysis of 101 cases of invasive ovarian cancer recruited in a previous diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from 2005 to 2009 at the University Hospital KU Leuven, Belgium. Serum HE4 levels (pM) and ROMA scores (%) were obtained before primary treatment. Dates of death were obtained by record linkage with patient hospital files. Progression was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) were estimated using multivariable Cox regression.

Results

Eighty patients (79%) with invasive ovarian cancer underwent primary debulking surgery, whereas 21 (21%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median DSS was 3.72 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19–4.07). Fifty-two patients (51%) died of disease, and 74 patients (73%) had progressive disease during follow-up. On univariable analysis, elevated pretreatment HE4 levels and ROMA scores were related to worse prognosis. However, after the adjustment for classic prognostic variables, HE4 levels (log2-transformed) and ROMA scores were unrelated to DSS (log-2 HE4: adjusted HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84–1.21 and ROMA: adjusted HR per 10% increase, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84–1.12) and PFS (log-2 HE4: adjusted HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84–1.13 and ROMA: adjusted HR per 10% increase, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88–1.11).

Conclusions

Pretreatment HE4 levels and ROMA scores are not independent prognostic factors for DSS and PFS after multivariable adjustment in patients with ovarian cancer.

Preoperative HE4 and ROMA values do not improve the CA125 diagnostic value for borderline tumors of the ovary (BOT) - a study of the TOC Consortium

Background

Borderline tumors of the ovary (BOT) are a distinct entity of ovarian tumors, characterized by lack of stromal invasion. Recent studies postulated that the presence of invasive implants, incomplete staging, fertility sparing surgery and residual tumor after surgery are major prognostic factors for BOT. There are no biomarkers that can predict BOT or the presence of invasive implants.

Objective

The aim of our study was to assess the value of CA125 and HE4 alone, or within ROMA score for detecting BOT, and for predicting the presence of invasive implants.

Methods

Retrospective, monocentric study on 167 women diagnosed with BOT or benign ovarian masses. Serum HE4, CA125 levels and ROMA were assessed preoperatively. Due to low number of BOT with invasive implants, we performed an unmatched analysis (consecutive patients) and a matched analysis (according to age and histology) to compare BOT with invasive implants, BOT without invasive implants and benign disease.

Results

There were no significant differences in the HE4 and CA125 expressions in the three groups of patients (p = 0.984 and p = 0.141, respectively). The ROC analysis showed that CA125 alone is superior to ROMA and HE4 in discriminating patients with BOT with invasive implants from patients with benign diseases and BOT without invasive implants. A newly established score, ROMABOT, did not perform better than ROMA. The analysis of the matched groups revealed similar results as the analysis of all samples.

Conclusions

Both HE4 and CA125 are not reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis of BOT or for predicting the presence of invasive implants.

HE4 tumor marker concentration in neoplastic peritoneal effusion and in peritoneal fluid associated with benign gynecological diseases

Background

The aim of our study was to evaluate the behaviour of the human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the peritoneal fluid encountered in various female genital diseases.

Methods

We enrolled 139 patients, 40 with ovarian cancer (group I), 82 with benign diseases (group II), and 17 with other malignant neoplasms (group III). The HE4 tumor marker concentrations were determined in serum, in the peritoneal effusion and ovarian cyst/ tumor fluids, CA125 in the serum only. We compared the groups, examined correlations and determined corresponding ROC curves. We evaluated the relationship between the HE4 marker concentration in the peritoneal effusion in the group I, depending on the selected prognostic parameters.

Results

The HE4 median value between the study groups did not differ statistically significantly and were as follows: in group I 3322 pmol/L, in the group II 2150 pmol/L and in the group III 627 pmol/L (p = 0.206376 for the groups I and II, p = 0.05929 for the groups I and III and p = 0.0797 for the groups II and III. In group I there were no differences found in the HE4 concentrations in the peritoneal fluid, depending on the stage, grade, the presence of neoplastic cells and the peritoneal dissemination.

Conclusions

The HE4 marker concentrations in the peritoneal fluid are highly irrespective of the pathology observed in the female sexual organ. Therefore, it seems that its determinations in the peritoneal fluid are completely useless in terms of diagnostics. More research is needed on the role of the HE4 marker, especially the place of its formation and possible use in the targeted therapy.

HE4 in gynecological cancers: report of a European investigators and experts meeting

The HE4 protein, which belongs to the “ four disulfi de ” acid protein group, has emerged as one of the most promising biomarkers in gynecologic oncology. An expert meeting on the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative determination of HE4 was held in November 2011, involving 25 clinical and laboratory specialists from 16 European countries.The aim of the meeting was to present and discuss the results of recent studies on the use of HE4 and on the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), which combines the results of HE4 and CA 125. The meeting was structured in separate sessions focusing on ovarian cancer risk stratification, differential diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring and with diagnosis and monitoring of endometrial cancer. We present here a summary of the data and evidence, presented, together with consensus statements on the different topics, where available,and suggestions for further studies and evaluations required to establish optimal use of HE4, either alone or in combination with other markers, for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in gynecological malignancies. Available evidences support the utility of this new cancer biomarker for risk stratification,prognosis and monitoring of epithelial ovarian cancer and of endometrial cancer.

Ovarian cancer: in search of better marker systems based on DNA repair defects

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common female cancer in the Western world, and the deadliest gynecological malignancy. The overall poor prognosis for ovarian cancer patients is a consequence of aggressive biological behavior and a lack of adequate diagnostic tools for early detection. In fact, approximately 70% of all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are diagnosed at advanced tumor stages. These facts highlight a significant clinical need for reliable and accurate detection methods for ovarian cancer, especially for patients at high risk. Because CA125 has not achieved satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in detecting ovarian cancer, numerous efforts, including those based on single and combined molecule detection and “omics” approaches, have been made to identify new biomarkers. Intriguingly, more than 10% of all ovarian cancer cases are of familial origin. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are the most common genetic defects underlying hereditary ovarian cancer, which is why ovarian cancer risk assessment in developed countries, aside from pedigree analysis, relies on genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Because not only BRCA1 and BRCA2 but also other susceptibility genes are tightly linked with ovarian cancer-specific DNA repair defects, another possible approach for defining susceptibility might be patient cell-based functional testing, a concept for which support came from a recent case-control study. This principle would be applicable to risk assessment and the prediction of responsiveness to conventional regimens involving platinum-based drugs and targeted therapies involving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

Preoperative HE4 expression in plasma predicts surgical outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients: results from the OVCAD study

OBJECTIVES

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the major cause of death due to gynecological malignancies. The most important prognostic factors are residual tumor mass after surgery and platinum-response. No predictive biomarkers are available to identify patients who will benefit from standard treatment. The aim of our study was to analyze the role of HE4 in predicting surgical and clinical outcome in primary EOC.

METHODS

In the European multicentric project "OVCAD", 275 consecutive patients with primary EOC were enrolled. Patients were eligible if radical cytoreductive surgery was performed and platinum-based chemotherapy was applied. Plasma and ascites samples were collected before or during surgery. The concentrations of HE4 and CA125 was determined using ELISA and Luminex technique, respectively.

RESULTS

Median age at first diagnosis was 58 years (range 18-85 years). Most patients presented with advanced stage disease, FIGO III or IV (94.6%), grades II-III (96%) and serous histology (86.2%). In most cases a complete cytoreduction to no residual tumor mass was achieved (68.4%). Higher plasma HE4 levels correlated with poor surgery outcome in terms of macroscopically residual tumor mass (p<0.001) and platinum-resistance (p=0.009). Plasma CA125 and the risk index (HE4 and CA125) were independent predictive factors for surgical outcome (p=0.001, OR=3.37, 95% CI=1.61-7.06 and p<0.001, OR=6,041, 95% CI=2.33-15.65, respectively). FIGO stage III was an independent predictive factor for platinum response (p=0.039, OR=0.436, 95% CI=0.198-0.960).

CONCLUSIONS

The presented data are showing that the combination of HE4 and CA125 expression in plasma might predict the surgical outcome in EOC and by this may have a prognostic impact on PFS and OS.