Locoregional Non-Surgical Treatments for Unresectable or Oligometastatic Sarcomas: A Literature Review

OPINION STATEMENT

Sarcomas are rare neoplasms, whose complex management is a consequence of their heterogeneity. Due to their variegate histology and characteristics, prospective trials are challenging to design. Thus, diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines are often based on limited evidence available, and only few and dated systemic treatment regimens are included in our current practice. For all these reasons, we believe that implementing therapeutic options, including local approach, is mandatory to guarantee the best management possible to patients. We explored evidence about locoregional treatments, assuming they could represent a fundamental part of an integrated oncological approach. The goal is to maximize local control of oligometastatic or oligoprogressive diseases, saving systemic treatment options for later stages, as well as to avoid demolitive surgery in patients affected by locally advanced sarcomas. Although several retrospective and prospective series have been conducted, evidence available is still poor in our opinion. Research should focus on evaluating predictive factors and individualized follow up strategies to identify ideal patients' features and more sensitive histological subtypes.

Variation in response rates to isolated limb perfusion in different soft-tissue tumour subtypes: an international multi-centre study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the response rates of different extremity soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes (eSTS) after isolated limb perfusion (ILP), based on an international multi-centre study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective cohort comprised eSTS patients from 17 specialised ILP centres that underwent melphalan-based ILP, with or without recombinant human tumour necrosis factor (rhTNFα) (TM-ILP and M-ILP, respectively). Response was measured on imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) and/or clinical response, for which M-ILPs were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 1109 eSTS patients were included. The three most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (17%, n = 184), synovial sarcoma (16%, n = 175) and myxofibrosarcoma (8%, n = 87). rhTNFα was used in 93% (TM-ILP) and resulted in a significantly better overall response rate (ORR, p = 0.031) and complete responses (CR, p < 0.001) in comparison to M-ILP, without significant differences among histological subgroups. The ORR of TM-ILP was 68%, including 17% CR. Also, 80% showed progressive disease. Significantly higher response rates were shown for Kaposi sarcoma (KS) with 42% CR and 96% ORR (both p < 0.001), and significantly higher CR rates for angiosarcoma (AS, 45%, p < 0.001) and clear cell sarcoma (CCS, 31%, p = 0.049). ILP was followed by resection ≤ 6 months in 80% of the patients. The overall limb salvage rate was 88%, without significant differences among histological subgroups, but was significantly higher for ILP responders compared to non-responders (93% versus 76%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ILP resulted in high response and LRS among all eSTS subtypes, however, with significant differences between subtypes with most promising results for KS, AS and CCS.

Health-related quality of life after isolated limb perfusion compared to extended resection, or amputation for locally advanced extremity sarcoma: Is a limb salvage strategy worth the effort?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) after isolated limb perfusion followed by resection (IR), compared to extended resection (ER), primary amputation (A) or secondary amputation after IR (IR-A).

METHODS

Patients were selected from the respondents of a multi-institutional cross-sectional cohort survivorship study (SURVSARC) conducted among sarcoma survivors registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), 2-10 years after diagnosis. Used PROs were the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Cancer worry scale (CWS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).

RESULTS

We identified 97 eSTS survivors: IR = 20, ER = 49, A = 20, IR-A = 8. While there were no differences in PROs between IR and ER, results showed better functioning and functionality in both groups versus the amputation groups. The amputation groups scored significantly lower on physical functioning (A = 62.7, IR-A = 65.7 versus IR = 78.0, ER = 82.7, p = 0.001) and role functioning (A = 67.5, IR-A = 52.8 versus IR = 79.2, ER = 80.6, p = 0.039), both EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Also for the TESS, the scores were significantly lower for the amputation groups compared to the limb sparing groups (upper extremity p = 0.007 with A = 68.9, IR-A = 71.6 versus IR = 93.3, ER = 91.1; lower extremity p < 0.001 with A = 72.2, IR-A50.9 versus IR = 84.5 and ER = 85.5). There were no significant differences between the groups on cancer worry, anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL in eSTS survivors treated with IR or ER is equal; for maintenance of physical functioning and functionality IR and ER outperform an amputation.

Anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade improves the efficacy of a melphalan-based therapy in experimental melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The induction of adaptive cellular immunity in patients with in-transit melanoma metastasis treated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan has been shown to contribute to the effectiveness of the therapy. Activated CD8⁺ T cells appear to be of particular importance for the efficacy of melphalan-based ILP therapy, as observed in both patients and animal models. In this study, we explored the possible synergistic effects of combining melphalan-based therapy with the checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1 on tumours in a mouse melanoma model.

METHODS

A murine vaccination model that utilized melphalan-exposed melanoma cells was used to mimic certain immunological features of melphalan-based ILP. The effects of the vaccine on tumour growth and PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ tumour-infiltrating T cells were analyzed. The melphalan-based vaccine was then combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody and tumour growth was assessed.

RESULTS

Treatment with melphalan-based therapy significantly induced the expression of PD-1 on CD8⁺ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Combination therapy using melphalan-based therapy followed by treatment with PD-1 antibodies significantly reduced early-stage tumour growth relative to monotherapies and no treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study thus suggests that the addition of PD-1 blockade to melphalan-based therapies, such as ILP, may be therapeutically beneficial.

Leakage through the bone-marrow during isolated limb perfusion in the lower extremity

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is used for melanoma in-transit metastases of the extremities. The use of Melphalan and TNF-alpha, necessitates monitoring of possible systemic leakage throughout the perfusion. It has been suspected that leakage through bone marrow is possible. We present the case of a patient with in-transit melanoma metastases in the lower extremity, who underwent minimally invasive ILP, according to our new protocol through percutaneous insertion of the catheters under fluoroscopy. Following cannulation of the vessels a high leakage rate was recorded. The procedure was converted to open with clamping of the artery and vein, however the leakage was not possible to control, and venography showed that this was due to bone marrow veins. To the best of our knowledge this is the first case of a verified leakage during ILP through bone marrow veins. We believe that some minor leakages registered under ILP could be attributed to this leakage route.

Response and Toxicity of Repeated Isolated Limb Perfusion (re-ILP) for Patients With In-Transit Metastases of Malignant Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a safe and well-established treatment for in-transit metastases of melanoma. In case of relapse or disease progression, ILP can be repeated (re-ILP). This study aimed retrospectively to analyze a large consecutive series of re-ILP and compare clinical outcomes with first-time ILP.

METHOD

Between 2001 and 2015, 290 consecutive patients underwent 380 ILPs. Of these, 90 were re-ILPs including 68 second ILPs, 16 third ILPs, 4 fourth ILPs, and two fifth ILPs. The study evaluated response (using World Health Organization [WHO] criteria), local toxicity (using the Wieberdink scale), and complications (using Clavien-Dindo).

RESULTS

The results were compared between the first ILP, the second ILP, and the third to fifth ILP. The overall response rate was respectively 83%, 80% and 68%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 60%, 41%, and 59%. In the re-ILP group, the patients with a CR after the first ILP had a 65% CR rate after the second ILP compared with 8% for the patients without a CR (p = 0.001). The risk for local toxicity or complications was not increased after re-ILP. The median overall survival periods were respectively 34, 41, and 93 months (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

As a therapeutic option, ILP can be repeated safely for in-transit metastases of melanoma, achieving similar high response rates without increasing complications or toxicity. Re-ILP is mainly indicated for patients who already had a CR after the first ILP, whereas other treatment options should be considered for primary non-responders.

Isolated Limb Perfusion and Infusion for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) and isolated limb infusion (ILI) have been variably used in recent years for the treatment of locally advanced or marginally resectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary studies to further characterize treatment patterns and outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed was queried for articles published in or after the year 2000, in the English language, with > 10 patients, and with adequate outcome data following ILP/ILI. Descriptive aggregate statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified, with a total of 1288 patients. Weighted mean patient age was 55.9 years and 52% were male. The majority underwent ILP (88%) versus 12% for ILI, and chemotherapeutic regimens used were as follows: (1) melphalan with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (78%), (2) melphalan ± actinomycin (10%), and (3) other regimens (12%). Most common histologies treated were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (21%), liposarcoma (16%), synovial (11%) and leiomyosarcoma (7%). Aggregate overall response rate (ORR) post-procedure was 73.3%, with 25.8% demonstrating a complete response (CR). Similar unadjusted ORRs were noted in the melphalan treatment groups with and without TNFα (72.0 and 67.0%, respectively; p = 0.27). Grade III toxicity was observed in 15.4% of patients, and grade IV/V toxicity was observed in 6.0% of patients. Overall limb salvage rate was 73.8% and median time to local (in-field) progression ranged from 4 to 28 months (weighted median 22.1 months).

CONCLUSION

ILP and ILI for extremity STS can be safely performed with appreciable response rates and significant limb salvage rates. Further study is needed to identify optimal treatment regimens by histology.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion. The switch from Steinmann pins to Omni-tract assisted isolation

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) represents an alternative to amputation for patients with either in-transit melanoma or unresectable soft tissue sarcoma, entailing delivery of high-dose chemotherapy after isolation of the extremity, under hyperthermic conditions. Stabilization of the Esmarch elastic bandage is so far performed with the use of Steinmann pins. In this study, we presented our experience with HILP and demonstrated an alternative technique for limb isolation using an Omni-tract retractor instead of the traditional Steinmann pin, while comparing the two methods.

METHODS

Forty patients, 28 with recurrent in-transit melanoma and 12 with locally advanced/recurrent sarcoma of the limbs, underwent HILP in a single institution and were included in the study. The Steinmann pin was applied in the first 23 cases, whereas the Omni-tract retractor was applied in the latter 17 patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the whole study group was 17.5 mo, whereas the overall response rate was 92.9% for melanoma and 75% for sarcoma patients. Both overall survival and local progression-free survival differed significantly between patients with complete response and those with partial response, stable disease or progressive disease. The use of the Omni-tract retractor was advantageous in every examined field, with the overall complication rate, duration of analgesic administration, and total opioid and paracetamol dose, being significantly less in the Omni-tract patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study was not a randomized trial, we consider that the noninvasive application of the Omni-tract retractor will gain significant acceptance, by contributing to the reduction of HILP complications.

Lower limb function and quality of life after ILP for soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan (TM-ILP) in combination with complete tumor resection is an effective treatment option for non-resectable soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities, with limb salvage rates greater than 80%. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life (QoL) after TM-ILP, also with regard to long-term survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 27 patients who had primarily non-resectable soft-tissue sarcoma of the leg and who had undergone TM-ILP and complete tumor resection (with limb-sparing intent) during their follow-up examinations using the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the German Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA-D). The results from the QLQ-C30 were compared to the reference values for the general population, to the "all cancer patients" reference values (both reference values published by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)), and to the reference values of a historical amputation group from the literature. The results of the SMFA were compared with those from a reference group of healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, we found that the global health status/QoL in the TM-ILP group was not significantly different from the general population or from patients with amputation, but it was higher than that of patients with cancer in general. Concerning the SMFA, we did find functional impairments in patients after TM-ILP compared to the reference group. With regard to long-term survival, we found no time-dependent deterioration in QoL for longer time intervals after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the use of TM-ILP in limb-sparing multimodal therapy settings from a quality-of-life perspective, but they also encourage further research on this matter.

Isolated limb perfusion as a treatment option for rare types of tumours

BACKGROUND

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is an established and effective treatment for advanced melanoma and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities with a high overall response rate. The aim of this study was to describe our experience of ILP for more rare types of tumours.

METHODS

Patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) (n = 4), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n = 2), B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), desmoid tumours (n = 3), pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) (n = 1) and giant cell tumour (n = 1) were treated with ILP and analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The four patients with in-transit MCC had three complete responses (CR) and one partial response (PR); the two patients with SCC had one CR and one stable disease (SD); the patients with desmoid tumours had two PR and one SD. A CR was also observed for the patient with a giant cell tumour, but the patient with PVNS had a SD. The patient with cutaneous metastases of B-cell lymphoma showed a CR, however with rapid systemic progression. Local toxicity according to Wieberdink was grade II in 10 patients (83%) and grade III in two patients (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that ILP can be used as a treatment option also for more rare disease entities when other treatments have failed.