Risk of occult irresectable disease at liver resection for hepatic colorectal cancer metastases: a contemporary analysis

Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.

Complex Surgical Strategies to Improve Resectability in Borderline-Resectable Disease

Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy in the USA and continues to pose a significant epidemiologic problem, despite major advances in the treatment of patients with advanced disease. Up to 50 % of patients will develop metastatic disease at some point during the course of their disease, with the liver being the most common site of metastatic disease. In this review, we address the relatively poorly defined entity of borderline-resectable colorectal liver metastases. The workup and staging of borderline-resectable disease are discussed. We then discuss management strategies, including surgical techniques and medical therapies, which are currently utilized in order to improve resectability.

Surgical management of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

For the 20% of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatic resection is safe, effective and potentially curative. Factors related to the primary and metastatic tumors individually and in clinical risk-scoring schemes are the best prognostic factors, although it is difficult to define patient groups with resectable, liver-limited CRLM that should be excluded from surgery. Systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer has improved but does not improve overall survival as adjuvant therapy after resection. Conversion to complete resection with systemic and/or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is an appropriate goal for patients with unresectable CRLM.

Hepatic arterial infusional chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) receive their blood supply predominantly through the hepatic artery. Intra-arterial drug delivery can optimize the dose and time exposure of chemotherapy to tumor cells while limiting systemic toxicity. Chemotherapy is most commonly administered through a catheter surgically placed in the gastroduodenal artery and connected to a subcutaneous pump. Due to its pharmacokinetics features, floxuridine is the most commonly used drug in the USA with hepatic arterial infusional (HAI) chemotherapy. To date, many clinical trials have shown the positive impact of HAI in the management of CRLM. Hence, in unresectable patients, HAI is associated with high response rates and commonly enables subsequent resection in both chemonaive and previously treated patients. Outcomes in patients converted to complete resection are similar to patients who present with initially resectable disease. In the adjuvant setting, HAI with floxuridine improves survival as well as hepatic and overall disease-free survival after complete resection of CRLM, as compared with 5-FU alone, in three of four randomized studies. To date, no trials have compared HAI combined with modern chemotherapy alone to modern chemotherapy alone in the adjuvant setting.

Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières meeting 2013

Objectives

Previous attempts at meta-analysis and systematic review have not provided clear recommendations for the clinical application of thermal ablation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Many authors believe that the probability of gathering randomised controlled trial (RCT) data is low. Our aim is to provide a consensus document making recommendations on the appropriate application of thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Methods

This consensus paper was discussed by an expert panel at The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières 2013. A literature review was presented. Tumour characteristics, ablation technique and different clinical applications were considered and the level of consensus was documented.

Results

Specific recommendations are made with regard to metastasis size, number, and location and ablation technique. Mean 31 % 5-year survival post-ablation in selected patients has resulted in acceptance of this therapy for those with technically inoperable but limited liver disease and those with limited liver reserve or co-morbidities that render them inoperable.

Conclusions

In the absence of RCT data, it is our aim that this consensus document will facilitate judicious selection of the patients most likely to benefit from thermal ablation and provide a unified interventional oncological perspective for the use of this technology.

Key Points

• Best results require due consideration of tumour size, number, volume and location.

• Ablation technology, imaging guidance and intra-procedural imaging assessment must be optimised.

• Accepted applications include inoperable disease due to tumour distribution or inadequate liver reserve.

• Other current indications include concurrent co-morbidity, patient choice and the test-of-time approach.

• Future applications may include resectable disease, e.g. for small solitary tumours.

First clinical experience of intra-operative high intensity focused ultrasound in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a phase I-IIa study

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but only 10-20% of patients are eligible. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) technology is of proven value in several indications, notably prostate cancer. Its intra-operative use in patients with CLM has not previously been studied. Preclinical work suggested the safety and feasibility of a new HIFU device capable of ablating volumes of up to 2cm x 2cm in a few seconds.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-centre phase I-IIa trial. HIFU was delivered immediately before scheduled hepatectomy. To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of rapidly ablating liver parenchyma, ablations were performed on healthy tissue within the areas scheduled for resection.

RESULTS

In total, 30 ablations were carried out in 15 patients. These ablations were all generated within 40 seconds and on average measured 27.5mm x 21.0mm. The phase I study (n = 6) showed that use of the HIFU device was feasible and safe and did not damage neighbouring tissue. The phase IIa study (n = 9) showed both that the area of ablation could be precisely targeted on a previously implanted metallic mark (used to represent a major anatomical structure) and that ablations could be undertaken deliberately to avoid such a mark. Ablations were achieved with a precision of 1-2 mm.

CONCLUSION

HIFU was feasible, safe and effective in ablating areas of liver scheduled for resection. The next stage is a phase IIb study which will attempt ablation of small metastases with a 5 mm margin, again prior to planned resection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT01489787.

First clinical experience of intra-operative high intensity focused ultrasound in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a phase I-IIa study

Background

Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but only 10–20% of patients are eligible. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) technology is of proven value in several indications, notably prostate cancer. Its intra-operative use in patients with CLM has not previously been studied. Preclinical work suggested the safety and feasibility of a new HIFU device capable of ablating volumes of up to 2cm x 2cm in a few seconds.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, single-centre phase I-IIa trial. HIFU was delivered immediately before scheduled hepatectomy. To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of rapidly ablating liver parenchyma, ablations were performed on healthy tissue within the areas scheduled for resection.

Results

In total, 30 ablations were carried out in 15 patients. These ablations were all generated within 40 seconds and on average measured 27.5mm x 21.0mm. The phase I study (n = 6) showed that use of the HIFU device was feasible and safe and did not damage neighbouring tissue. The phase IIa study (n = 9) showed both that the area of ablation could be precisely targeted on a previously implanted metallic mark (used to represent a major anatomical structure) and that ablations could be undertaken deliberately to avoid such a mark. Ablations were achieved with a precision of 1–2 mm.

Conclusion

HIFU was feasible, safe and effective in ablating areas of liver scheduled for resection. The next stage is a phase IIb study which will attempt ablation of small metastases with a 5 mm margin, again prior to planned resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT01489787

Feasibility and survival of 2-stage hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: definition of a simple and early clinicopathologic predicting score

INTRODUCTION

Bilobar colorectal metastases may be treated by a 2-stage surgical strategy. The risk of drop out after the first stage hepatectomy remains high and is associated with a nearly zero survival rate at 3 years. Our goal was to evaluate the factors predictive of the feasibility of the strategy and long-term survival, based on simple clinical and histologic features obtained from the first stage specimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent a first stage hepatectomy with curative intent were included. Preoperative clinical parameters and histologic features of the primary neoplasm and metastases obtained at the first stage hepatectomy were analyzed and compared between patients who did or did not undergo the second stage operation. A group of comparable patients treated only by chemotherapy was used as a control group.

RESULTS

The feasibility rate of this 2-stage resection was 76% (38/50 patients). Median survival was greater in patients treated with chemotherapy alone than for those who failed the second stage. A clinicopathologic score including male sex, segment 1 metastasis, need for >3 resection(s)/radiofrequency ablation(s), vascular invasion in the primary, need for change in type of chemotherapy, and microscopic biliary invasion by the metastasis was predictive of feasibility of the second stage and disease-free survival in patients achieving the second stage.

CONCLUSION

Combining preoperative clinical parameters with pathologic features of the primary and the metastatic lesions obtained during first stage hepatectomy predicted accurately patients who failed the second stage, and the long-term outcomes. Considering both clinical and pathologic parameters may help to define the best oncologic strategy by choosing between an exclusive chemotherapeutic or a surgical strategy.