Serum procalcitonin improves diagnosis of infectious complications after CRS/HIPEC

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improve the survival of selected patients with peritoneal metastasis. A major cause of treatment-related morbidity after CRS/HIPEC is infection and sepsis. HIPEC alters the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of blood and serum markers and therefore has an impact on early diagnosis of postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of blood and serum markers after CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS

Patients from two centers, operated between 2009 and 2017, were enrolled in this study. Perioperative blood samples were analyzed for white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT); postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo and infectious complications according to CDC criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, n=248 patients were included with peritoneal metastasis from different primary tumors treated by CRS/HIPEC. Depending on the applied HIPEC protocol, patients presented a suppressed WBC response to infection. In addition, a secondary and unspecific CRP elevation in absence of an underlining infection, and pronounced after prolonged perfusion for more than 60 min. PCT was identified as a highly specific - although less sensitive - marker to diagnose infectious complications after CRS/HIPEC.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Sensitivity and specificity of WBC counts and CRP values to diagnose postoperative infection are limited in the context of HIPEC. PCT is helpful to specify suspected infection. Overall, diagnosis of postoperative complications remains a clinical diagnosis, requiring surgical expertise and experience.

Side-effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers

Background

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) produces unwanted side-effects that are mainly caused by chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and these effects have not been systematically summarized. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the side-effects of HIPEC for GI cancers and propose practical strategies for adverse event management.

Methodology

PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for side-effects of HIPEC in GI cancers prior to October 20, 2022. A total of 79 articles were included in this review.

Results

Adverse events, such as enterocutaneous digestive fistulas, GI tract perforation, neutropenia, postoperative bleeding, ventricular tachycardia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, renal impairment, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, scrotal ulceration, and sarcopenia were described, and their clinical management was discussed. These side-effects involve the digestive, hematopoietic, circulatory, metabolic, and urinary systems. Effective methods for adverse event management included an expert multidisciplinary team, replacing chemotherapy drugs, using Chinese medicine, and careful preoperative assessments.

Conclusion

The side-effects of HIPEC are frequent and can be minimized by several effective methods. This study proposes practical strategies for adverse event management of HIPEC to assist physicians in choosing the optimal treatment method.

Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Origin Treated with Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: The Efficiency of Mitomycin C

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients affected by colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) can be improved with combined complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Two chemotherapeutic agents are mainly used: mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. A recent prospective randomized clinical trial showed that oxaliplatin-based HIPEC does not improve survival compared with CCRS alone. The purpose of our study was to compare the survival effectiveness of MMC versus oxaliplatin-based HIPEC using a homogeneous surgical technique and drug protocol.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included all patients prospectively registered for having undergone CCRS and HIPEC using MMC or oxaliplatin for CRC-PM in Strasbourg University Hospital, France, from December 2004 until December 2019. MMC-based HIPEC and oxaliplatin-based HIPEC groups were compared with an inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included. Groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics except for peritoneal carcinomatosis index. In the weighted multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) were significantly higher in the MMC-based HIPEC group compared with the oxaliplatin-based HIPEC group with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (CI 95% 0.56-0.98), p = 0.035 and 0.59 (CI 95% 0.40-0.98), p = 0.0084, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival or postoperative morbidity between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results favor a superiority of MMC for DFS and PDFS in comparison with oxaliplatin in HIPEC after CCRS in treatment with curative intent for CRC-PM.

Cirurgia Citorredutora com Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica em Pacientes com Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso de Apêndice: Série de 43 Casos

Introdução: O carcinoma primário de apêndice é uma condição rara. Muitas revisões retrospectivas internacionais delineiam a experiência de diferentes centros em neoplasias apendiculares. Por sua vez, o tratamento do câncer nessa localização é complexo e depende do subtipo histológico e da extensão da doença. Um dos tratamentos mais promissores é a cirurgia citorredutora (CCR) associada à quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (HIPEC). No Brasil, não há descrição de séries de casos que tiveram essa abordagem terapêutica. O objetivo desta série de casos é analisar as características sociodemográficas e o tipo de intervenção terapêutica em pacientes com doenças malignas de apêndice em um Centro de Assistência de Alta Complexidade em Oncologia III (Cacon III). Relato dos casos: Foram incluídos 43 casos de tumores primários de apêndice. O adenocarcinoma do apêndice do tipo mucinoso de baixo grau foi a neoplasia mais diagnosticada. O principal protocolo utilizado foi de uma a duas cirurgias e aplicação de mitomicina C em temperatura média de 40 graus. Os casos apresentaram grande heterogeneidade quanto ao uso do protocolo. Conclusão: O presente relato de 43 casos é importante por se tratar de um tumor raro nessa localização. A modalidade terapêutica descrita é promissora, mas não há protocolo definido para essa finalidade. É necessário atualizar as diretrizes terapêuticas para normatizar a conduta internamente, especialmente em se tratando de uma unidade de referência nacional.

Impact of Mitomycin-C-Induced Neutropenia after Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background

Mitomycin-C (MMC) is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, MMC has a side effect of myelosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations and impact of MMC-induced neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 124 colorectal cancer patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC between March 2015 and January 2019 were evaluated. Patients with malignancies of non-colorectal origin, hospital stay longer than 60 days, peritoneal cancer index > 30, and complete cytoreduction score > 2 were excluded. MMC 35 mg/m² was administered for 90 min at 41–43 °C. The patients were divided into three groups: no neutropenia, mild neutropenia (grade 1–2), and severe neutropenia (grade 3–4).

Results

In total, mild and severe neutropenia occurred in 30 (24.2%) and 48 (38.7%) patients, respectively. Age and body surface area were significantly different among the neutropenia groups. Severe neutropenia developed significantly earlier than mild neutropenia (6.9 days vs. 10.4 days, p < 0.001) and also lasted significantly longer (4.6 days vs. 2.5 days, p = 0.005). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly higher in the severe neutropenia group than in the no and mild neutropenia groups (8.3% vs. 6.7% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.015)

Conclusions

Severe neutropenia starts earlier and lasts longer than mild neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC using an MMC triple method. The higher rate of major postoperative complications in patients with severe neutropenia highlights the importance of postoperative management during the neutropenia period.

Pancytopenia after administration of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin-C: local therapy and systemic toxicity

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) coupled with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the standard of treatment for many cancers with peritoneal metastasis. Mitomycin-C (MMC), the most common chemotherapy utilized with HIPEC, is associated with neutropenia but the degree of hematologic toxicity is unclear when splenectomy is included as part of CRS with MMC. We present an interesting case of pancytopenia following treatment with HIPEC using MMC and comment on the possible role of splenectomy in exacerbating its cytotoxic effects. Our unique case highlights potential hematologic toxicity following MMC-HIPEC and splenectomy. It suggests that spleen removal may enhance toxicity profiles of chemotherapy such as MMC. Because MMC is the preferred agent of choice used in CRS-HIPEC, future studies should investigate optimal MMC dosing and patient selection when splenectomy is performed to balance survival benefit with hematologic toxicities.

Preparation and Evaluation of Intraperitoneal Long-Acting Oxaliplatin-Loaded Multi-Vesicular Liposomal Depot for Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis has a poor prognosis because of inadequate responses to systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy using oxaliplatin has attracted attention; however, the short half-life of oxaliplatin and its rapid clearance from the peritoneal cavity limit its clinical application. Here, a multivesicular liposomal (MVL) depot of oxaliplatin was prepared for IP administration, with an expected prolonged effect. After optimization, a combination of phospholipids, cholesterol, and triolein was used based on its ability to produce MVL depots of monomodal size distribution (1–20 µm; span 1.99) with high entrapment efficiency (EE) (92.16% ± 2.17%). An initial burst release followed by a long lag phase of drug release was observed for the MVL depots system in vitro. An in vivo pharmacokinetic study mimicking the early postoperative IP chemotherapy regimen in rats showed significantly improved bioavailability, and the mean residence time of oxaliplatin after IP administration revealed that slow and continuous erosion of the MVL particles yielded a sustained drug release. Thus, oxaliplatin-loaded MVL depots presented in this study have potential for use in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Toxicity profile of chemotherapy agents used in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity associated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is due to the synergistic effect of cytoreduction, effect hyperthermia and the cytotoxic agents used for HIPEC. This study was done to analyse the postoperative morbidity in relation to the chemotherapy agent used in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) in Indian set up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient with PSM, underwent CRS-HIPEC as per the institutional protocol. Patients were stratified as per the chemotherapy drug used during HIPEC & perioperative outcome were documented.

RESULTS

163 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC for PSM: 67.4% were of ovarian primary. Others were colorectal, appendicular, gastric primary and rare tumors.Cisplatin was the most common drug used: as alone (57.05%) or in combination with Adriamycin (12.88%). Mitomycin-C (MMC) was used in 20% and oxaliplatin in 10%.Grade 3-5 morbidity in the whole cohort was 44.8% and grade 1-2 was 74%.Grade 1-2 electrolyte abnormality was the most common morbidity overall and grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was the most common severe morbidity. Frequency of grade 3-5 morbidity were 38.7%, 48.5%,50% and 61.9% for Cisplatin alone, MMC, oxaliplatin and Adriamycin + cisplatin respectively. None of the patients had grade 3-4 nephrotoxicity as sole complication. All major complications were highest in the group who received Adriamycin. Cisplatin was associated with higher rate of electrolyte imbalance, oxaliplatin with post-operative bleeding. Rates of other complications did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin followed by MMC were the well tolerated drugs during HIPEC and tolerance to Adriamycin combination regimen in Indian patients was poor.

Organoids from colorectal peritoneal metastases as a platform for improving hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

Patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer have a poor prognosis. If the intraperitoneal tumour load is limited, patients may be eligible for cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment has improved overall survival, but recurrence rates are high. The aim of this study was to create a preclinical platform for the development of more effective intraperitoneal chemotherapy strategies.

Methods

Using organoid technology, five tumour cultures were generated from malignant ascites and resected peritoneal metastases. These were used in an in vitro HIPEC model to assess sensitivity to mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin, the drugs used most commonly in HIPEC. The model was also used to test a rational combination treatment involving MMC and inhibitors of the checkpoint kinase ATR.

Results

MMC was more effective in eliminating peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids than oxaliplatin at clinically relevant concentrations. However, the drug concentrations required to eliminate 50 per cent of the tumour cells (IC50) were higher than the median clinical dose in two of five organoid lines for MMC, and all five lines for oxaliplatin, indicating a general resistance to monotherapy. ATR inhibition increased the sensitivity of all peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids to MMC, as the IC50 decreased 2·6–12·4‐fold to well below concentrations commonly attained in clinical practice. Live‐cell imaging and flow cytometric analysis showed that ATR inhibition did not release cells from MMC‐induced cell cycle arrest, but caused increased replication stress and accelerated cell death.

Conclusion

Peritoneal metastasis‐derived organoids can be used to evaluate existing HIPEC regimens on an individual‐patient level and for development of more effective treatment strategies.

Incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with cisplatin plus mitomycin-c versus melphalan in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

INTRODUCTION

Cytopenia after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported in non-comparative studies with various chemotherapeutic regimens. This study compared the incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC and received melphalan or cisplatin plus mitomycin-c (CIS + MMC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from March 2011 to March 2017 and received melphalan 60 mg/m² or CIS 100 mg/m² combined with MMC 30 mg/m². Incidences and severity of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were compared between groups.

RESULTS

This study included 46 patients who received CIS + MMC and 35 patients who received melphalan. The leukopenia incidence was 25.7% in the melphalan group and 17.3% in the CIS + MMC group (P = 0.362), with one patient (2.8%) in the melphalan group developed grade V leukopenia. The number of days to leukocyte nadir was 32.8 days for CIS + MMC group compared to 9.8 days for melphalan group(P = 0.035). Thrombocytopenia occurred at a similar rate in the melphalan (60%) and CIS + MMC (68.8%) groups (P = 0.4). Grade III thrombocytopenia developed in 3.2% and 5% of patients in the melphalan and the CIS + MMC groups, respectively. Neutropenia did not occur in any patient. In multivariate analysis, leukopenia predictors were female gender (P = 0.047) and baseline leukocyte counts (P = 0.029). Baseline platelet count predicted thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Melphalan and CIS + MMC regimens were associated with comparable incidences of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Severe leukopenia and severe thrombocytopenia were rare following CRS/HIPEC using both chemotherapy regimens.

Inflammatory Response and Toxicity After Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy

Background: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel mode of intraperitoneal (IP) drug delivery claiming high IP tissue concentrations with low systemic uptake. The aim was to study inflammatory response and systemic toxicity after PIPAC.

Methods: Retrospective monocentric analysis of a consecutive cohort of PIPAC patients between January 2015 and April 2016. Detailed hematological and biochemical analysis was performed the day before surgery and once daily until discharge. Comparative statistics were performed using Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed ranked test.

Results: Fourty-two consecutive patients underwent a total of 91 PIPAC procedures. Twenty patients received oxaliplatin and 22 cisplatin+doxorubicin (37 vs. 54 procedures). Creatinine, AST and ALT were not significantly altered after PIPAC (p=0.095, p= p=0.153 and p=0.351) and not different between oxaliplatin and cisplatin+doxorubicin regimens (p=0.371, p=0.251 and p=0.288). C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) increased on post-operative day (POD) 2: ∆max 29±5 mg/L (p<0.001) and ∆max 0.05±0.01 μg/L (p=0.005), respectively. Leucocytes increased at POD 1: ∆max 2.2±0.3 G/L (p<0.001). Albumin decreased at POD 2: ∆max -6.0±0.5 g/L (p<0.001). CRP increase correlated positively with Peritoneal Cancer Index (tumor load) (ρ =0.521, p<0.001).

Conclusion: PIPAC was followed by a modest and transitory inflammatory response that was commensurate to the disease extent. No hematological, renal or hepatic toxicity was observed even after repetitive administration.

Safety of intraperitoneal Mitomycin C versus intraperitoneal oxaliplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

BACKGROUND

Colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is commonly treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). There is an ongoing international debate about which intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic agent is preferred, Mitomycin C (MMC) or oxaliplatin. We questioned whether the type of chemotherapeutic agent influenced postoperative complication rates or short-term survival.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study patients with colorectal PC who underwent CRS-HIPEC between January 2010 and December 2016 were included. Until March 2014 patients had preferentially been treated with MMC and thereafter with oxaliplatin in an iso-osmotic glucose/electrolyte dialysis (Dianeal^®) carrier solution. Main outcomes were postoperative complications, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients received MMC and 73 patients oxaliplatin. Postoperative complications did not differ between groups (44.2% (MMC) versus 43.8% (oxaliplatin); P = 0.958). Median DFS was 12.5 months (IQR 6.4-32.4) in the MMC-group and 13.1 months (IQR 6.1-NA) in the oxaliplatin-group (P = 0.669). Median OS was 37.2 months (IQR 17.2-NA) in the MMC-group and 29.4 months (IQR 17.0-NA) in the oxaliplatin-group (P = 0.764). The type of chemotherapeutic agent did not influence OS in multivariable analysis (oxaliplatin versus MMC HR 1.09 (95%CI 0.58-2.06)). The HIPEC-phase was shorter for oxaliplatin (median 32 (IQR 31-34) versus 91 min (IQR 90-92) for MMC (P < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal oxaliplatin reduced the chemoperfusion time when compared to intraperitoneal MMC without adversely influencing complication rates or short-term survival. It may therefore be the preferential drug in CRS-HIPEC procedures for colorectal PC.

Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are well-recognised complications of systemic chemotherapy. In cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), the interplay between surgical factors and systemic toxicity of chemotherapeutics must be considered when considering post-operative haematological outcomes. We sought to quantify the incidence of these events in cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC at our institution.

Methods

We conducted a single centre, a retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC from 2002 to 2015. Routine haematological data were analysed and complications classified according to CTCAE 4.0. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to compare those who received or not perioperative systemic chemotherapy.

Results

The rate of all-grade post-procedure neutropenia was 4 % (n=2/50); one grade 1, and one grade 4 neutropenia. The patient with grade 4 neutropenia died day 57 post-operatively, despite subsequent growth factor support. Eight percent (n=4/50) of patients had thrombocytopenia preoperatively. The overall rate of post-procedure thrombocytopenia was 46 % with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia of 4 %. If not present preoperatively, thrombocytopenia onset was on day 1 or 2 post-operatively, with a median duration of 3 days.

Conclusions

Intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy as HIPEC can cause haematological toxicity with potentially fatal outcomes. However, the incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after CRS and HIPEC is low.

Role of Mitomycin C in Preventing Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture represents the most frequent complication after implant-based breast reconstruction. An experimental study on mice demonstrated that capsule formation around breast implants is considerably diminished after topical application of mitomycin C. The authors conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy of mitomycin C in reducing capsular contracture rates following implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

METHODS

The authors randomized all women older than 18 years scheduled for the second stage of an implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer at the National Cancer Institute in Milan from October of 2005 to February of 2010 to receive or not receive the topical application of mitomycin C during surgery. The authors assessed capsular contracture, major postoperative complications, and aesthetic outcome.

RESULTS

The authors randomized 322 patients to receive mitomycin C or not at the second stage of implant-based breast reconstruction. One hundred sixty-two patients were allocated to the mitomycin C group and 160 patients were allocated to the control group. The relative risk of capsular contracture in the mitomycin C group was 0.92 (95 percent CI, 0.60 to 1.41). Major complications leading to reintervention, oncologic outcomes, and aesthetic outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first trial reporting data about the use of mitomycin C in breast reconstructive surgery in a clinical setting. Mitomycin C seems not to significantly affect capsular contracture rate and severity following implant-based reconstructive breast surgery at the tested doses.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefit and can, alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy), be used for treating primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier, high intraperitoneal drug concentration can be achieved by intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas systemic concentration remains low. Bidirectional chemotherapy may provide in addition adequate drug concentrations from the side of the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal tumour nodules. Major pharmacological problems of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are limited tissue penetration and poor homogeneity of drug distribution to the entire seroperitoneal surface. Significant pharmacological determinants of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are choice of drug, drug dosage, solution volume, carrier solution, intra-abdominal pressure, temperature, duration, mode of administration, extent of peritonectomy and interindividual variability. Drugs most commonly applied for intraperitoneal chemotherapy include mitomycin C, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluoruracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, premetrexed and melphalan. The drugs and their doses that are used vary widely among centres. While the adequate drug choice for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy is essential, randomized clinical trials to determine the most optimal drug or drug combination are lacking, and only eight retrospective comparative clinical studies are available. Further clinical pharmacological studies are required to determine the most effective drug regimen for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy in various indications. In the future, reliable drug sensitivity testing and genetic profiling of peritoneal metastases will be needed for enabling patient-specific therapy.

Pulmonary toxicity after intraperitoneal mitomycin C: a case report of a rare complication of HIPEC

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has become a common treatment approach for disseminated appendiceal neoplasms. Systemic absorption of intraperitoneal chemotherapeutics may lead to drug-induced toxicity, most commonly neutropenia. Mitomycin C has been the most commonly used chemotherapeutic in HIPEC for the past several decades.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we describe a rare pulmonary complication secondary to intraperitoneal administration of mitomycin C.

CONCLUSIONS

While rare, intraperitoneal mitomycin C has the potential to cause serious pulmonary toxicity that should be considered with administration. To our knowledge, this report represents only the second case described in the literature.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery in the Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal disease can lead to significant debility due to bowel obstructions, ascites, and cancer cachexia. Moreover, inadequate imaging techniques can lead to the suboptimal detection of disease, and the poor vascularity of tumors can lead to a poor response to systemic chemotherapy. However, combination cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising novel treatment for patients with this disease.

METHODS

The medical literature focusing on diagnostic updates and the management of peritoneal disease was reviewed. The application principles of HIPEC for use in peritoneal disease were also summarized.

RESULTS

Improvements in imaging and the application of laparoscopic techniques have significantly increased the rate of diagnosis of early peritoneal disease with consequently less morbid cytoreductive procedures. Appropriate patient selection based on prognostic scores along with complete cytoreduction can identify a cohort of patients likely to derive durable benefit from this combination treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, including surgical cytoreductive techniques, have demonstrated significant survival gains in patients with peritoneal disease. Although HIPEC can be used for the management of various types of histologies, further development of high-level evidence is necessary to advance the field.

Chemotherapy for intraperitoneal use: a review of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Peritoneal spread of tumors is a major problem in cancer management. Patients develop a marked deterioration in quality of life and shortened survival. This is in part due to bowel obstructions, marked ascites, and overall increase debilitation. Standard medical management has shown to be inadequate for the treatment of these problems. Surgery can palliate symptoms, however, it is unable to be complete at the microscopic level by a significant spillage of tumor cells throughout the abdomen. Chemotherapy can have some improvement in symptoms however it is short lived due to poor penetration into the peritoneal cavity. The role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is to maximize tumor penetration and optimize cell death while minimizing systemic toxicity. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) are two treatment methods that serve this role and have been shown to improve survival. This review will discuss different chemotherapies used for both of these treatment options.