Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients who underwent amputation surgery experienced worsened survival and to identify those patients for whom amputation surgery worsened survival.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 8897 patients with localized extremity STS between 1983 and 2016. Of these 6431 patients, 733 patients underwent amputation surgery (Amputation group), and 5698 underwent limb-sparing surgery (Limb-sparing group).

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 1346 patients were included. Patients in the Amputation group showed worsened survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS): hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.75, overall survival (OS): HR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.20-1.65). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, spindle cell sarcoma and liposarcoma in the Amputation group showed shortened survival (high-grade-CSS: HR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.16-1.77, OS: HR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.18-1.62; spindle cell sarcoma-CSS: HR = 4.75, 95%CI 1.56-14.4, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70; liposarcoma-CSS: HR = 2.91, 95%CI 1.54-5.50, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was shortened in localized extremity STS patients who received amputation surgery.

Challenges in the Management of Complex Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinical Scenarios

With nearly 15,000 new cases of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in the United States each year, early diagnosis and therapeutic management is imperative for successful patient outcomes. Primary STS is conventionally treated with a combination of wide-margin resection, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy, and, in specific cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in situations of complex disease presentation, guidelines for treatment are less clearly outlined. Limited metastatic disease, local recurrence, fungating STSs, and unplanned or incomplete resections of STSs present unique challenges for the multidisciplinary care team. The management of complex STS clinical scenarios usually involves limb-salvage resection or amputation as well as some combination of radiation therapy and/or ablative interventional radiology techniques. As a result, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for treating patients in these challenging scenarios, with a recent focus on the integration of plastic and reconstructive surgery into the treatment algorithm.

Amputation in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma: the experience of an East Asian referral center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes in a series of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who underwent amputation at a large East Asian referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 652 patients who underwent surgery for extremity STS, data of 37 consecutive patients who underwent amputation were reviewed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 96.0 months (range, 15-216). The patients were classified in to three cohorts. The primary localized (PL) group included patients who underwent amputation as a primary surgical procedure with curative intent. The recurrent localized (RL) group included patients who underwent amputation as a revision procedure after failure of previous limb sparing surgeries. The metastatic group included patients who underwent amputation as a palliative procedure.

RESULTS

There were 22 cases of amputation in 596 STS patients and the amputation rate was 3.6% (22/596). Further, 1.8% (9/490) of patients with primary localized STS underwent amputation. Patients with localized STS who underwent amputation had a 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 89.9% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 87.1-92.7%), a local-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of 84.1% (95% CI, 80.5-87.6%), and a metastasis-free survival (MFS) of 84.6%. (95% CI, 81.1-88.0%) Compared with previous studies, our results showed higher DSS and MFS rates with similar LRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The amputation rate of extremity STS in our institute in East Asia was similar but slightly lower than that reported in Western studies. The oncologic outcome of amputation reported in this study was higher than that indicated in Western studies and oncologic outcome of amputation was not statistically different from those of limb salvage surgery. However, considering the small cohort in single institute study, there is a possibility of selection bias and future multi-center study is necessary. From our results, amputation is still a feasible option for appropriately selected patients unsuitable for limb-conserving surgery.

Limb Amputations in Cancer: Modern Perspectives, Outcomes, and Alternatives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes current findings regarding limb amputation within the context of cancer, especially in osteosarcomas and other bony malignancies. We seek to answer the question of how amputation is utilized in the contemporary management of cancer as well as explore current advances in limb-sparing techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest research on amputation has been sparse given its extensive history and application. However, new research has shown that rotationplasty, osseointegration, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) can provide patients with better functional outcomes than traditional amputation. While limb-sparing surgeries are the mainstay for managing musculoskeletal malignancies, limb amputation is useful as a palliative technique or as a primary treatment modality for more complex cancers. Currently, rotationplasty and osseointegration have been valuable limb-sparing techniques with osseointegration continuing to develop in recent years. TMR and RPNI have also been of interest in the modern management of patients requiring full or partial amputations, allowing for better control over myoelectric prostheses.

Foot and Ankle Soft Tissue Sarcomas-Treatment and Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Foot and ankle soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare neoplasms associated with a high risk of local recurrence and metastasis. Although amputation is often performed, its impact on prognosis remains unknown. The aims of our systematic review were identifying risk factors for (1) disease-specific death, (2) local recurrence, (3) metastasis, and assessing (4) whether the type of surgery (amputation or limb-salvage) affected disease-specific survival.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Our study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 415624). Quality appraisal was done using STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies and 123 patients were included. Metastasis was the only risk factor for disease-specific death (OR = 107.85, P< .001). Previous unplanned excision (OR = 22.29, P = .009) and positive margins (OR = 64.48, P = .011) were associated with higher risk of local recurrence. Patients with high-grade tumors (OR = 13.22, P = .023) and tumors ≥6 cm (OR = 7.40, P = .022) were more likely to develop metastases. After adjusting for confounders (age, sex, and presence of metastasis), amputation was not associated with poorer disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Metastasis was the single most important risk factor for death with foot and ankle soft tissue sarcoma. Positive margins and history of previous unplanned excision are risk factors for local recurrence. The most important risk factors for metastasis are tumor grade and size ≥6 cm. Amputation was not associated with poorer disease-specific survival.

Outcomes of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Chronic Pain Control in the Oncologic Amputee Population

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) in the oncologic population are limited. We sought to examine the safety and effectiveness of TMR and RPNI in controlling postamputation pain in the oncologic population.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent oncologic amputation followed by immediate TMR or RPNI was conducted from November 2018 to May 2022. The primary study outcome was postamputation pain, assessed using the Numeric Pain Scale and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP). Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, tumor recurrence, and opioid use.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were evaluated for a mean follow-up period of 11.3 months. The majority of patients (65.1%) had a history of previous limb salvage. At final follow-up, patients had an average Numeric Pain Scale score for RLP of 1.3 ± 2.2 and for PLP, 1.9 ± 2.6. The final average raw PROMIS measures were pain intensity 6.2 ± 2.9 (T-score 43.5), pain interference 14.6 ± 8.3 (T-score 55.0), and pain behavior 39.0 ± 22.1 (T-score 53.4). Patient opioid use decreased from 85.7% preoperatively to 37.7% postoperatively and morphine milligram equivalents decreased from a mean of 52.4 ± 53.0 preoperatively to 20.2 ± 38.4 postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the oncologic population TMR and RPNI are safe surgical techniques associated with significant reductions in RLP, PLP, and improvements in patient-reported outcomes. This study provides evidence for the routine incorporation of TMR and RPNI in the multidisciplinary care of oncologic amputees.

Evidence for the Current Management of Soft-tissue Sarcoma and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Emerging Directions

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is not a single entity but, rather, a family of diseases with differing biologic behaviors and anatomic site- and histotype-specific responses to treatment. Whereas surgery remains the mainstay of treatment of primary, localized disease, evolving evidence is establishing the role of multimodality treatment of these tumors. This article summarizes prospective evidence to date informing our treatment of STS. Key future directions will include advancing our understanding of fundamental tumor biology and mechanisms of response and recurrence, as well as defining the optimal provision of regional, systemic, and targeted therapies, including the role of immunotherapy. Ongoing global collaborations will be integral to progress in treating these rare tumors.

Contemporary role of amputation for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

limb-sparing surgery is the mainstream treatment for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) at referral centers, following advances in surgical reconstructions and multimodal management. However, amputation is still needed in selected patients and has not yet been described for a ESTS cohort in a contemporary scenario.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

consecutive patients who underwent surgery for primary ESTS from 2006 to 2018 were extracted from a prospectively collected database at our reference center. Patients receiving amputation for either primary tumor or local recurrence (LR) after limb-sparing surgery were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1628 primary ESTS, 29 patients underwent primary amputation (1.8%), 22/1159 (1.9%) for upper limb and 7/469 (1.5%) for lower limb ESTS. Patients were mainly affected by grade III FNCLCC (89.6%) of notable dimension (median size 16 cm, IQR 10-24). 65.5% of patients received preoperative treatments (systemic or regional chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemo-radiation). Secondary amputation for LR was performed after a median of 23 months in 16/1599 patients (1%). Median survival time was 16.2 and 29.6 months after primary or secondary amputation respectively. Factors prompting the need for a primary amputation were most often a combination of multifocal disease, bone invasion and pain or neurovascular bundle involvement and relevant comorbidities, mainly for grade III tumors in elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary rate of amputation for ESTS at a reference center is extremely low. Still, amputation is required in selected cases with advanced presentations, especially in elderly, frail patients.

Case series of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the lower limb with delayed diagnosis: Experience at a tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Soft tissue sarcoma is an uncommon form of cancer with poor prognosis. Early diagnosis and treatment are vital for improving the treatment outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a series of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the lower extremity with delayed diagnosis to gain insight into the presentation, treatments and outcomes for this rare disease and to determine whether limb-salvage surgery yields reasonable outcomes.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Timely health seeking has an impact on the outcome of the treatment of any particular disease. Patient delays are usually socio-economic factors. Soft tissues sarcomas are uncommon malignant tumors that even managed adequately have a poor 5-year survival. Limb salvage becomes questionable especially when patients present late with adverse symptoms.

CONCLUSION

In this series, we found that patients presented late and this led to unfavorable oncological outcomes, also limb salvage was not an option due to delayed presentation. Thus, early diagnosis is recommended so as to improve treatment outcome.

Outcomes of soft-tissue sarcoma in nonagenarians

AIMS

Current literature suggests that survival outcomes and local recurrence rates of primary soft-tissue sarcoma diagnosed in the very elderly age range, (over 90 years), are comparable with those in patients diagnosed under the age of 75 years. Our aim is to quantify these outcomes with a view to rationalizing management and follow-up for very elderly patients.

METHODS

Retrospective access to our prospectively maintained oncology database yielded a cohort of 48 patients across 23 years with a median follow-up of 12 months (0 to 78) and mean age at diagnosis of 92 years (90 to 99). Overall, 42 of 48 of 48 patients (87.5%) were managed surgically with either limb salvage or amputation.

RESULTS

A lower overall local recurrence rate (LRR) was seen with primary amputations compared with limb salvage (p > 0.050). The LRR was comparable between free (R0), microscopically (R1), and macroscopically positive (R2) resection margins in the limb salvage group. Amputation was also associated with longer survival times (p < 0.050). Overall median survival time was limited to 20 months (0 to 80).

CONCLUSION

Early and aggressive treatment with appropriate oncological surgery confers the lowest LRR and a survival advantage versus conservative treatment in this cohort of patients. With limited survival, follow-up can be rationalized on a patient-by-patient basis using alternative means, such as GP, local oncology, and/or patient-led follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):177-182.

Telangiectatic soft tissue sarcoma and chronic expanding haematoma: a comparative review of MRI features

Soft tissue sarcomas containing a dominant component of haemorrhage are known to be aggressive tumours associated with a poor prognosis. Importantly, the clinical behaviour and imaging characteristics of extensively haemorrhagic soft tissue sarcomas (also termed telangiectatic soft tissue sarcomas) can resemble those of benign haematomas, particularly those that continue to expand over a prolonged period, so-called chronic expanding haematomas (CEH). The following review evaluates the current literature to identify the clinical, imaging and pathological characteristics of telangiectatic soft tissue sarcomas and to determine features that may help distinguish them from CEH. Ultimately, we suggest that lesions with sizeable regions of internal haemorrhage should be regarded with a high degree of suspicion for underlying malignancy and require referral to a tertiary sarcoma centre, where a carefully planned approach to biopsy and follow-up is needed to avoid errors in diagnosis.

Bone invasion in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: An underappreciated prognostic factor. Bone invasion in soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Bone invasion is unfrequently reported in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities (eSTS), it is difficult to assess preoperatively and its prognostic impact has not been extensively studied. The objective of this paper was to analyze the incidence and the clinical impact of histologically proven bone invasion in individuals with eSTS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using the medical files patients who had eSTS and were treated between 2012 and 2016. A 5 years survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional risk assessment. The outcomes of patients with and without bone invasion were compared.

RESULTS

370 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow up was 25 months, the median age was 45 years (IQR 31-58). Bone invasion was found in 41 (11.08%). Median tumor size was 11.8 cm. The majority of individuals were diagnosed at stage IV (n = 116, 31.4%), followed by stage IIIB (n = 87, 23.5%). High histological grade was associated with worse OS (HR 2.23, CI 95% 1.36-3.65, p = 0.001). Absence of bone invasion was associated with better prognosis (HR 0.541, CI 95% 0.34-0.86, p = 0.009). OS was 27.3 vs 49.28 months. The disease-free survival (DFS) was 25.1 in bone invasion vs 45.23 without bone invasion.

CONCLUSION

Bone invasion in individuals with eSTS is an independent adverse prognostic factor associated with lower OS and DFS; although infrequently reported, bone invasion might be considered as part of the staging in the future.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for musculoskeletal sarcoma patients in Greece

Purpose

To perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system in Greek patients with lower extremity sarcoma.

Methods

The Greek version of the MSTS for the lower extremity and TESS questionnaires was developed using previously reported methods. Included were 100 patients with musculoskeletal sarcoma who underwent limb salvage surgery. The test–retest reliability [interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between 2 different time points], internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), construct validity (Kaiser’s criteria, Eigenvalue > 1 rule), and external validity (Short form-36, Spearman’s Rho) were assessed.

Results

The test–retest reliability (ICC was 0.99 for MSTS-LE and 1 for TESS) and internal consistency were high (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.763 for MSTS-LE and 0.924 for TESS) for both questionnaires. Based on the Scree plot, the number of factors retained was 1 for MSTS-LE and 2 for TESS. The TESS showed a strong correlation with SF-36 (Spearman’s rho = 0.714, p < 0.001), but the correlation between MSTS for lower extremity and SF-36 was weak (Spearman’s Rho = 0.313, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

The Greek version of both the MSTS for lower extremity and TESS questionnaire showed sufficient reliability, internal consistency and good performance using the loading factor analysis when used postoperatively in Greek patients who underwent surgical resection of lower extremity sarcoma. However, only the TESS showed strong correlation with the SF-36, indicating that MSTS for lower extremity was not as powerful for the evaluation of the global health status of these patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00590-021-02921-5.

Limb Salvage Resection of Massive Dedifferentiated Thigh Liposarcoma in a Patient Lost to Follow-Up

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL) is a rare soft tissue tumor that represents a non-lipogenic progression of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL). Unlike WDL, DDL has the propensity for metastasis and is associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence. For DDL of the extremities that is resectable with acceptable functional outcomes, treatment includes primary surgical resection with negative margins. Although rare due to advances in reconstructive techniques, amputation for DDL of the extremities should be considered in which appropriate tumor resection cannot be performed without adequate preservation of limb function. We present the clinical progression of a patient with a large DDL of the right thigh who was initially lost to follow-up, but ultimately underwent delayed definitive therapy with the intent for limb salvage. This case illustrates the importance of assessing neurovascular, osseous, and soft tissue involvement to properly predict and preserve limb function while achieving adequate tumor resection.

A multidisciplinary approach to soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities

INTRODUCTION

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) denotes a group of rare and highly heterogeneous malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin. Accurate histological diagnosis is critical for selecting appropriate treatment. Complete tumor resection is the primary treatment for STS, and the efficacies of radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been tested in the adjuvant setting to improve oncological outcomes. Because most STS lesions arise in the extremities, preserving limb function and managing limb impairment after radical local treatment represent significant challenges.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the current front-line treatments for patients with extremity STS and discusses the multidisciplinary team-based efforts needed to improve oncological outcomes and survivorship.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the rarity, variety, and complexity of STS, a multidisciplinary approach involving experts in various disciplines is vital for improving outcomes in patients ranging from diagnosis to survivorship. A major challenge is building a sustainable system in each region permitting all patients with extremity STS to be treated at high-volume centers with multidisciplinary teams dedicated to this rare and complex disease.

Thirty-Day Outcomes after Surgery for Primary Sarcomas of the Extremities: An Analysis of the NSQIP Database

Background

Primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors requiring wide surgical resection and reconstruction to achieve local control. Postoperative complications can lead to delays in adjuvant therapy, potentially affecting long-term oncologic outcomes. Understanding postoperative complication risks is essential; however, past studies are limited by small sample sizes.

Purpose

This study uses a large national registry to characterize the incidence of complications and mortality in the first thirty days following surgical management of primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Cases were identified using diagnosis codes for malignant neoplasm of soft tissue or bone and procedure codes for amputation and radical resection. The cohort was subdivided by bone versus soft tissue sarcoma, upper versus lower extremity, and amputation versus limb salvage.

Results

One thousand, one hundred eleven patients were identified. The most frequent complications were surgical site infections, sepsis, and venous thromboembolism. The overall incidence of complications was 14.0%. Unplanned readmission and reoperation occurred after 7.0% and 8.0% of cases, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 0.3%, with one intraoperative death. Patient factors and complication rates varied by tumor location and surgical modality. Lower extremity cases were associated with higher rates of wound complications and infectious etiologies such as surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and systemic sepsis. In contrast, patients undergoing amputation were more likely to experience major medical complications including acute renal failure, cardiac arrest, and myocardial infarction.

Conclusion

Approximately 1 in 7 patients will experience a complication in the first thirty days following surgery for primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The unique risk profiles of lower extremity and amputation cases should be considered during perioperative planning and surveillance.

[Systematic planning of surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rarely malignant tumors. They are best treated by an experienced interdisciplinary sarcoma team. A preoperative biopsy and imaging are prerequisites for successful sarcoma treatment. Before surgery the multimodal treatment and the extent of resection and, if necessary, plastic reconstruction should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. The aim is always a complete R0 resection with optimal preservation of function. The preservation of critical structures (e. g. sciatic nerve) by a planned focal marginal resection along the critical structure can be performed by an experienced team in a multidisciplinary treatment setting.