A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD)

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative.

METHODS

A pragmatic, UK-wide multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Patients will be identified and recruited from supraregional multi-disciplinary team meetings (sMDT) and must be aged 18 or over requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, with no contraindications to surgical intervention for their cancer. Participants will be followed up for 6 months following randomisation. The primary outcome is the ability to recruit patients for randomisation across all selected sites and the rate of loss to follow-up. Other outcomes include acceptability of the trial and intervention to patients and healthcare professionals assessed by qualitative research and obtaining resource utilisation information for health economic analysis.

DISCUSSION

There are currently no other published RCTs comparing videoendoscopic versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Ongoing study is required to determine whether randomising patients to either procedure is feasible and acceptable to patients. The results of this study may determine the design of a subsequent trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registry, registration number NCT05592639. Date of registration: 13th October 2022, retrospectively registered.

Development of a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To develop and describe a minimally invasive technique for excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive cadaver and clinical case series.

ANIMALS

Four canine cadavers and three clinical patients.

METHODS

A 3D computed tomographic reconstruction of the canine axilla was used to identify an optimal avenue of approach to the lymph nodes. This approach was refined using endoscopic techniques in four cadavers (six procedures) and potential surgical hazards, landmarks, and the surgical time required for excisional biopsy of the nodes was recorded. The procedure was then performed in three clinical cases.

RESULTS

Axillary lymph node removal was achieved using an endoscopic technique with surgical times of 58 and 35 minutes in two of three clinical cases. The third case required conversion to an open approach after endoscopic identification of the node. No major complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes can be performed successfully using a minimally invasive technique in the dog. Further investigation in clinical cases is needed to determine the risks and complications of this procedure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Minimally invasive excisional biopsy of the axillary lymph nodes in dogs can be performed and may have a role in assisting with staging and local disease control in oncologic cases.

Starting a minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy program: Initial learning experience and outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is promising data on minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy indicating decreased wound complications compared with the standard open approach. We examined our institutional experience with starting a minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy program.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients undergoing videoscopic minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy from August 2017 to March 2022 by a single surgeon. Patients meeting criteria for inguinal lymphadenectomy were considered for minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy unless there was skin involvement by tumor or bulky disease. Data collected included patient characteristics, primary cancer, surgery, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients included. The mean age was 60.6 ± 16.2 years. Most patients were female (n = 17, 65.4%), and the primary diagnosis was melanoma (n = 21, 19.2%). In 6 cases (23.1%), minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy was combined with deep pelvic node dissection, but most patients did not have a concurrent procedure (n = 15, 57.7%). The median operative time was 119.0 minutes (range, 89.0-160.0), or 130.5 minutes (range, 89.0-345.0) when including concurrent procedures. The mean number of nodes retrieved was 9.8 ± 3.7, with a positive node identified in 19 patients (73.1%) during minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy. There were 12 (46.2%) patients experiencing at least one postoperative complication within 30 days of surgery, the most common being infection (n = 4, 15.4%). One patient required reoperation for infected hematoma washout. Postoperative intervention for seroma was undertaken in 3 patients (11.5%).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy is a safe approach to inguinal lymph node dissection, in terms of node retrieval and postoperative complications, and can feasibly be adopted into practice with minimal learning curve.

[Surgical technique of axillary, inguinal and iliac lymph node dissection]

BACKGROUND

Systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) plays an important role in the surgical treatment of many tumors. Despite continuous developments in surgical techniques, the morbidity in axillary, inguinal and iliac SLND remains high.

OBJECTIVE

Description of the currently existing surgical techniques of axillary, inguinal and iliac SLND with presentation of the possible advantages and disadvantages, also with respect to the oncological results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the currently available literature reports, study results and own experience, the techniques of SLND and treatment results are presented.

RESULTS

SLND in the axillary, inguinal and iliac regions is still a challenging procedure for surgeons and patients. This problem exists due to the complex anatomy and the high morbidity. Modifications of open surgical techniques led to a reduction of postoperative complications only in rare exceptions. Minimally invasive iliac SLND is possible and can be performed both by laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy. The application of videoscopic techniques in axillary and inguinal SLND is also possible and the feasibility has been confirmed in different studies. Using minimally invasive approaches a significant reduction in wound complications could be achieved. Nevertheless, up to now the oncological results of minimally invasive surgery are still unclear, especially for malignant melanoma.

CONCLUSION

By using minimally invasive SLND in the axillary, inguinal and iliac regions, a significant reduction of wound complications can be achieved. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the initially promising results, especially with respect to the oncological outcome.

Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an essential step in both treatment and staging of several malignancies including penile and vulvar cancers. Various open, video endoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques have been utilized so far. In this review, we aim to describe available minimally invasive surgical approaches for ILND, and review their outcomes and complications.

METHODS

The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in February 2020 to find relevant studies published in English within 2000-2020.

FINDINGS

There are different minimally invasive platforms available to accomplish dissection of inguinal nodes without jeopardizing oncological results while minimizing postoperative complications. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy and Robotic Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy are safe and achieve the same nodal yield, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy. When compared to open technique, Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy and Robotic Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy may offer faster postoperative recovery and fewer postoperative complications including wound dehiscence, necrosis, and infection. The relatively high rate and severity of postoperative complications hinders utilization of recommended ILND for oncologic indications. Minimally invasive approaches, using laparoscopic or robotic-assisted platforms, show some promise in reducing the morbidity of this procedure while achieving adequate short and intermediate term oncological outcomes.

Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is used for diagnosis and treatment in penile cancer (PC), vulvar cancer (VC), and melanomas draining to the inguinal lymph nodes. However, ILND is often characterized by its morbidity and high wound complication rate. Consequently, we aimed to characterize wound complication rates after ILND.

STUDY DESIGN

The NSQIP database was queried for ILND performed from 2005 to 2018 for melanoma, PC, or VC. Thirty-day wound complications included wound disruption and superficial, deep, and organ-space surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with covariates, including cancer type, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, BMI ≥30, smoking history, diabetes, operative time, and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 1,099 patients had an ILND with 92, 115, and 892 ILNDs performed for PC, VC, and melanoma, respectively. Wound complications occurred in 161 (14.6%) patients, including 12 (13.0%), 17(14.8%), and 132 (14.8%) patients with PC, VC, and melanoma, respectively. Median length of stay was 1 day (interquartile range 0 to 3 days), and median operative time was 152 minutes (interquartile 83 to 192 minutes). Readmission rate was 12.7%. Wound complications were associated with longer operative time per 10 minutes (odds ratio 1.038, 95% CI 1.019 to 1.056, p < 0.001), BMI ≥30 (odds ratio 1.976, 95% CI 1.386 to 2.818, p < 0.001), and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection (odds ratio 1.561, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.306, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of wound complications after ILND include BMI ≥30, longer operative time, and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection. There have been efforts to decrease ILND complication rates, including minimally invasive techniques and modified templates, which are not captured by NSQIP, and such approaches may be considered especially for those with increased complication risks.

A Novel Fascial Flap Technique After Inguinal Complete Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal complete lymph node dissection (CLND) for metastatic melanoma exposes the femoral vein and artery. To protect femoral vessels while preserving the sartorius muscle, we developed a novel sartorius and adductor fascial flap (SAFF) technique for coverage.

METHODS

The SAFF technique includes dissection of fascia off sartorius and/or adductor muscles, rotation over femoral vasculature, and suturing into place. Patients who underwent inguinal CLND with SAFF for melanoma at our institution were identified retrospectively from a prospectively-collected database. Patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression assessed associations of palpable and non-palpable disease with wound complications.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2019, 51 patients underwent CLND with SAFF. Median age was 62 years, and 59% were female. Thirty-one (61%) patients were presented with palpable disease and 20 (39%) had non-palpable disease. Fifty-five percent (95% confidence interval CI: 40%-69%) experienced at least one wound complication: wound infection was most common (45%; 95% CI: 31%-60%), while bleeding was the least (2%; 95% CI: 0.05%-11%). Complications were similar, with and without palpable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFF procedure covers femoral vessels, minimizes bleeding, preserves the sartorius muscle, and uses standard surgical techniques easily adoptable by surgeons who perform inguinal CLND.

A single-center comparison of our initial experiences in treating penile and urethral cancer with video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and later experiences in melanoma cases

Background

Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) is a minimally invasive approach that is increasingly indicated in oncological settings, with mounting evidence for its long-term oncological safety.

Objectives

To present our single-center experience of treating penile and urethral cancer with VEIL, as well as its more recent application in melanoma patients.

Methods

We prospectively recorded our experiences with VEIL from September 2010 to July 2018, registering the patient primary indication, surgical details, complications, and follow-up.

Results

Twenty-nine patients were operated in one (24) or both (5) groins; 18 had penile cancer, 1 had urethral cancer, and 10 had melanoma. A mean 8.62 ± 4.45 lymph nodes were removed using VEIL and of these, an average of 1.00 ± 2.87 were metastatic; 16 patients developed lymphocele and 10 presented some degree of lymphedema; there were no skin or other major complications. The median follow-up was 19.35 months; there were 3 penile cancer patient recurrences in the VEIL-operated side. None of the melanoma patients presented a lymphatic inguinal recurrence.

Conclusions

VEIL is a minimally invasive technique which appears to be oncologically safe showing fewer complications than open surgery. However, complications such as lymphorrhea, lymphocele, or lymphedema were not diminished by using VEIL.

Oncologic Outcomes of Multi-Institutional Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma Compared with Open Inguinal Dissection in the Second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II)

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy (MILND) is safe and feasible, but limited data exist regarding oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

This study performed a multi-institutional retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive MILND performed for melanoma between January 2009 and June 2016. The open ILND (OILND) comparative cohort comprised patients enrolled in the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II) between December 2004 and March 2014.The pre-defined primary end point was the same-basin regional nodal recurrence, calculated using properties of binomial distribution. Time to events was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The secondary end points were overall survival, progression-free survival, melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

RESULTS

For all the patients undergoing MILND, the same-basin regional recurrence rate was 4.4 % (10/228; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.1-7.9 %): 8.2 % (4/49) for clinical nodal disease and 3.4 % (6/179) for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) as the indication. For the 288 patients enrolled in MSLT-II who underwent OILND for a positive SLN, 17 (5.9 %) had regional node recurrence as their first event. After controlling for ulceration, positive LN count and positive non-SLNs at the time of lymphadenectomy, no difference in OS, PFS, MSS or DMFS was observed for patients with a positive SLN who underwent MILND versus OILND.

CONCLUSION

This large multi-institutional experience supports the oncologic safety of MILND for melanoma. The outcomes in this large multi-institutional experience of MILND compared favorably with those for an OILND population during similar periods, supporting the oncologic safety of MILND for melanoma.

Introducing minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection in a UK tertiary skin cancer service: Initial experience & outcomes

AIMS

We report the first UK case series of minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy (MILND) for patients with metastatic cutaneous pathology.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-centre, single-surgeon cohort study. Twenty-one patients who underwent MILND from May 2015 to February 2019 were included. Demographic data, disease burden, and surgical quality assurance parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

Median age was 69 (IQR: 58-76) with 14 women (66%) and 7 men (33%). Eighteen (85%) patients had melanoma with the rest having other skin malignancies. The median number of nodes resected was eight (IQR:6-11) and the median N-ratio was 0.18 [0.05-1.00]. The median surgical time for the procedure was 180 minutes (IQR: 147-225) Seven (33%) patients had complications--three trivial and four (19%) grade IIIB. Only one case (the first) was converted to an open procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first UK series of MILND in a cutaneous oncology service. Our results show that MILND is a safe technique that can be introduced into a busy NHS practice with a structured training program, with surgical quality assurance outcomes identical to open inguinal lymphadenectomy. Our learning curve was similar to previously published data.

One-Year Morbidity Following Videoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Stage III Melanoma

Simple Summary

Inguinal lymphadenectomy (the removal of lymph nodes in the groin) is currently part of the treatment options for stage III melanoma patients. Surgery can be performed using one large inguinal incision (open approach) or a few smaller incisions (videoscopic approach). Previous research has already shown less severe complications and comparable oncologic outcomes after the videoscopic approach. Postoperative lymphedema following inguinal lymphadenectomy is a well-known problem which can potentially decrease quality of life. With the arrival of adjuvant systemic treatment options, less invalidating surgery is highly desirable. However, lymphedema and quality of life have only been investigated after the open approach. Therefore, we evaluated lymphedema and quality of life following videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for stage III melanoma. The videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is a feasible approach due to the comparable lymphedema incidence and normalization of quality of life during follow-up.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to elucidate morbidity following videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for stage III melanoma. Methods: Melanoma patients who underwent a videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy between November 2015 and May 2019 were included. The measured outcomes were lymphedema and quality of life. Patients were reviewed one day prior to surgery and postoperatively every 3 months for one year. Results: A total number of 34 patients were included for participation; 19 (55.9%) patients underwent a concomitant iliac lymphadenectomy. Lymphedema incidence was 40% at 3 months and 50% at 12 months after surgery. Mean interlimb volume difference increased steadily from 1.8% at baseline to 6.9% at 12 months (p = 0.041). Median Lymph-ICF-LL total score increased from 0.0 at baseline to 12.0 at 3 months, and declined to 8.5 at 12 months (p = 0.007). Twelve months after surgery, Lymph-ICF-LL scores were higher for females (p = 0.021) and patients that received adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.013). The Median Distress Thermometer and EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score recovered to baseline at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.747 and p = 0.203, respectively). Conclusions: The onset of lymphedema is rapid and continues to increase up to one year after videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Quality of life recovers to the baseline value.

Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection: initial experience and reproducibility in a limited resource setting-with technique video

BACKGROUND

Conventional inguinal lymph node dissection comes with a high wound complication rate which increases hospital stay and may delay adjuvant treatment. Minimally invasive lymph node dissection (MILND) is a novel endoscopic technique which aims to minimize complications of lymphadenectomy. Herein we present our technique and experience with MILND to examine safety, feasibility and reproducibility in a setting of limited resources.

METHODS

All patients undergoing MILND in the National Cancer Institute, Cairo were prospectively included following informed consent, IRB and ethical committee approval. Demographics, clinical, pathological data and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification were recorded. Footage collected was used to create a step-by-step video demonstrating the technique.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven procedures were included in the study. The most common indications were vulval cancer (44%) and skin melanoma (19%). There were 5 (18%) conversions to open procedure, all of them in the first 10 cases of the learning curve. The median (range) operative time was 120 (45-240) min and there was a trend towards shorter operative time after the first 5 cases. Wound dehiscence occurred in 4 cases (15%). Three of them (11%) required reoperation (grade III). Grade I/II complications in the form of seroma and wound infection occurred in 34%. The median (range) postoperative hospital stay was 2 (1-14). The median (range) number of retrieved lymph nodes was 12 (3-19). No grade III/IV lymphedema was recorded at 90 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

MILND is a safe, feasible technique associated with relatively low postoperative wound complications even when performed in a centre with relatively limited resources.

Laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy in gynecology: preliminary experience at a single institution

PURPOSE

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), a promising innovation in minimally invasive surgery, has been used in treating gynecologic oncology diseases. There have been no reports in the literature regarding LESS for inguinal lymphadenectomy (LESS-IL) in gynecologic conditions. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of LESS-IL.

METHODS

Six patients with vulvar or vaginal cancer underwent LESS-IL from July 2018 to March 2019. Data regarding the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent a bilateral LESS-IL without conversion. LESS pelvic lymphadenectomy via an umbilical incision was also performed in a patient with vaginal cancer. The median operation time for the single-port laparoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomies was 105 min (range 70-134), with a median estimated blood loss of 108 ml (range 40-170). Median time of hospitalization was 7.5 days (range 5-10). A median of 11 (6-15) lymph nodes were dissected in a unilateral groin. The suction drains were removed after a median duration of 5 days (range 3-7). There were no skin-related or lymph-related postoperative complications. At a median follow-up period of 9 months, all the patients were alive and no recurrence was found.

CONCLUSION

LESS-IL is a feasible and safe technique for the surgical management of gynecologic cancers.

Oncological outcome of videoscopic groin dissection for lymph node metastasis from melanoma

BACKGROUND

Videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VIL) represents an innovative approach for patients with melanoma lymph node (LN) metastases, mainly aimed at lowering wound-related morbidity. However, long-term data on oncologic safety are still lacking. The aim of this study is to review the oncologic outcome of videoscopic groin dissection in a single institution caseload.

METHODS

Data were prospectively gathered on patients with inguinal melanoma metastasis who underwent VIL. Clinical data included age, race, sex, tumor histology, node counts and number of metastatic nodes. Disease-free survival and overall survival were monitored based on an institutional follow-up schedule. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Video-SIIO II study).

RESULTS

We analyzed 48 videoscopic groin dissections performed in 50 patients (2 patients underwent bilateral VIL). Median age was 54.5 years. Female/male ratio was 15/33. Indication for surgery was positive inguinal sentinel biopsy and cytological confirmed clinical disease in 40 and 10 cases, respectively. Median LN retrieval count was 19. After a median follow-up of 28 months, groin recurrence (lymphatic basin) was observed in one single case.

CONCLUSIONS

VIL for melanoma LN metastases is associated with a favorable oncologic outcome. In particular, LN yield and locoregional recurrence rate obtained with videoscopic dissection are comparable to those reported with the open technique. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results in a larger cohort of patients.

Evaluation of the videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients

INTRODUCTION

A completion or therapeutic inguinal lymph node dissection is a procedure accompanied with a high rate of postoperative complications. A novel, minimally invasive alternative has been developed; the videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study is to present our first experience with the videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy among melanoma patients with inguinal metastases.

METHODS

Melanoma patients with a histologically confirmed inguinal metastases who underwent a videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy between November 2015 and January 2018 were included. Outcome measures were operation time, nodal yield, and postoperative complications. Furthermore, lymphedema measurements were performed both subjectively and objectively.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients (3 males and 17 females) underwent a videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. In 75% of patients the procedure was combined with an open iliac lymphadenectomy. Median operation time of the videoscopic procedure was 110 min (range, 79-165). There were no perioperative complications or conversions. In 12 patients (60%) there was ≥1 postoperative complication. The most frequent complications were seroma and wound infection. All complications were treated conservatively without the need for a surgical re-intervention. The median nodal yield of the videoscopic procedure was 9 (range, 1-19). Lymphedema was present in nine patients (45%) after three months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our initial results show that the videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is an attractive alternative to the conventional open technique. The number of complications is comparable with the complication rate reported for the conventional open procedure, but they are less severe and there is no need for a surgical re-intervention.