Neoadjuvant Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiation Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with standard techniques (ST) offers a modest benefit in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). As the high-risk region (HRR) at risk for a positive surgical margin and recurrence is posterior and away from radiosensitive organs at risk, using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) allows targeted dose escalation to the HRR while sparing these organs. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant SIB RT can improve disease control compared with ST, without increasing toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified patients with resectable nonmetastatic RPS from 2000 to 2021 who received neoadjuvant RT of 180 to 200 cGy/fraction to standard volumes. SIB patients received 205 to 230 cGy/fraction to the appropriate HRR. Clinical endpoints included abdominopelvic control (APC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and acute toxicity.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 57 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-64), there were 103 patients with RPS who received either ST (n = 69) or SIB (n = 34) RT. Median standard volume dose was 5000 cGy (ST) and 4500 cGy (SIB), with a median HRR SIB dose of 5750 cGy. Liposarcomas (79% vs 53%; P = .004) and cT4 tumors (59% vs 19%; P < .001) were more common in the SIB cohort, without a significant difference in the rate of resection (82% vs 81%; P = .88) or R1 margin (53.5% vs 50%; P = .36); there were no R2 resections. SIB was associated with a significant improvement in 5-year APC (96% vs 70%; P = .046) and RFS (60.2% vs 36.3%; P = .036), with a nonsignificant OS difference (90.1% vs 67.5%; P = .164). On multivariable analysis, SIB remained a predictor for APC (hazard ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.74; P = .027) and RFS (hazard ratio, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; P = .045). SIB showed no significant detriment in toxicity, albeit with a lower rate of overall grade 3 acute toxicity (3% vs 22%; P = .023) compared with ST.

CONCLUSIONS

In RPS, dose escalation with neoadjuvant SIB RT may be independently associated with improved APC and RFS, without a detriment in toxicity, compared with ST. With the addition of standard RT having only a modest benefit compared with surgery alone, our study suggests that future prospective studies evaluating for the benefit of SIB RT should be considered.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas

Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare, with patterns of recurrence determined by the histologic subtype. A range of patient characteristics and treatment profiles combined with a myriad of presentations and clinical courses of recurrences make this diverse entity challenging to manage. Although surgical resection improves survival in select patients, the oncological outcomes are inferior to that of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas. Management options for unresectable disease include local ablative therapy, radiation and systemic therapy, with palliative surgery indicated occasionally. Attempts at disease control must be balanced with potential morbidity and impact on the patient's quality of life. This review aims to offer insights into the current understanding of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas and provide some guidance on management.

How to treat liposarcomas located in retroperitoneum

Almost half of retroperitoneal (RP) sarcomas are liposarcomas (LPS). The large majority of RP LPS are either well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) or dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), these latter further classified according to grading in G2 and G3 DDLPS. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment to achieve local control and possibly cure in primary localized disease. Over the last decade, a better delineation of the different histology-specific patterns of failure and the development of nomograms predictors of outcome has led to a better management of these rare tumors, with a special focus on non-surgical treatments. Available evidences - although far from exhaustive - show that radiation therapy might have a role, if any, as neoadjuvant treatment in locally aggressive histologies (i.e. WDLPS and G2 DDLPS), while it does not seem beneficial for histologies with a higher metastatic risk (i.e. G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, instead, can be considered to reduce the risk of distant metastasis while waiting for the results of an ongoing RCT (STRASS-2) evaluating its effect in these tumors. However, given the rarity of these diseases and the subsequent lack of strong evidences to guide treatment, outcome improvement in these patients remains a challenge. Patients' referral to a sarcoma center where a dedicated specialized multidisciplinary team tailor optimal treatment on a case-by-case basis is crucial to ensure these patients the best outcome. Refining available nomograms - e.g including molecular variables - and identifying predictors of response/toxicity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy might be significantly helpful in tailoring treatments to the patient's characteristics. Also, new systemic agents are eagerly awaited for improving the management further.

Experiences of patients and their relatives of postoperative radiological surveillance and surveillance intensity following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative radiological surveillance following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma (sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, pelvis, trunk or extremities) is standard of care in all international high-volume sarcoma centres in the world. The intensity of postoperative surveillance imaging is highly varied and knowledge of the impact of surveillance and surveillance intensity on patients' quality of life is limited. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the experiences of patients and their relatives/caregivers of postoperative radiological surveillance following resection of a primary soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will systematically search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and Epistemonikos. Hand searching of reference lists of included studies will be conducted. Further searches will be performed via Google Scholar, to reveal further studies within unpublished 'grey' literature. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria. After retrieval of the full text of the selected studies, the methodological quality will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Center for Evidence-Based Management checklist for Critical Appraisal of a Cross-Sectional Study. Data on the study population, relevant themes and conclusions will be extracted from the selected papers, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The systematic review does not require ethics approval. The findings of the proposed work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated widely to patients, clinicians and allied health professionals through the Sarcoma UK website, the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network and the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group. In addition, the outcomes of this research will be presented at national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022375118.

Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are heterogeneous tumours with variable disease biology and outcomes. The prognosis is primarily related to tumour histology and grade as well as the ability to achieve margin negative resection. Surgery involves compartment or contiguous organ resection to achieve the above goal. Careful utilization of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies like radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can lead to improvement in margin status, thereby contributing to better local control and possibly reducing systemic dissemination. Use of targeted therapies has paved newer pathways of treatment integration centred on molecular and genetic targets. The aim of this review is to update the reader on all aspects of retroperitoneal sarcoma management including emphasis on pertinent and landmark trials in this regard.

Treatment for local control of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas: A review of the literature

Retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas are uncommon tumors for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, achieving complete gross resection with microscopically negative margins is challenging, and local recurrence rates can be high. Patients often succumb to uncontrolled local disease. Radiation therapy offers a potential means for sterilizing microscopic residual disease, although its use continues to be controversial. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation continues to be investigated as an adjunct to surgery, along with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the current management of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas, focusing on studies of surgery and radiation therapy to maximize local control.

First and further-line multidisciplinary treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current knowledge and recent advances in retroperitoneal sarcoma management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgery, radiotherapy, and medical treatments of retroperitoneal sarcomas should take into account the peculiarities of each histotype and the unique anatomical site. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment and the only chance of cure for these diseases. In low-grade retroperitoneal sarcomas, like well differentiated liposarcoma, where the leading cause of death is dominated by local rather than distant relapses, treatment of the primary tumor encompasses extended surgery with multiorgan resection and evaluation of preoperative radiotherapy. Conversely, surgery is usually more conservative and without radiotherapy in those retroperitoneal sarcomas, such as leiomyosarcoma, characterized by a high risk of metastatic spread that prompted also the evaluation of neoadjuvant, histotype-driven chemotherapy. Surgery might have a role also for relapsed disease, despite long-term disease control probability declines at each recurrence. In advanced stages, anthracyclines still retain a key role and all medical treatment strategies should follow the specific chemosensitivity of each histotype to improve patient's outcomes.

SUMMARY

The rarity and heterogeneity in biological behavior and clinical presentation of retroperitoneal sarcomas deserves a multidisciplinary and histotype-driven treatment at all stages of the disease to be performed in highly specialized centers.

Comparison of preoperative chemoradiation with radiation or chemotherapy alone in patients with non-metastatic, resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma

Aim:

Optimal preoperative therapy regimen in the treatment of resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains unclear. This study compares the impact of preoperative radiation, chemoradiation and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) in RPS patients.

Materials and Methods:

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with non-metastatic, resectable RPS (2006–15). The primary endpoint was OS, evaluated by Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, Cox multivariable analysis and propensity score matching.

Results:

A total of 1,253 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 210 patients (17%) receiving chemoradiation, 850 patients (68%) receiving radiation and 193 patients (15%) receiving chemotherapy. On Cox multivariable analysis, when compared to preoperative chemoradiation, preoperative radiation was not associated with improved OS (hazards ratio [HR] 0·98, 95% CI 0·76–1·25, p = 0·84), while preoperative chemotherapy was associated with worse OS (HR 1·64, 95% CI 1·24–2·18, p < 0·001). Similar findings were observed in 199 and 128 matched pairs for preoperative radiation and chemotherapy, respectively, when compared to preoperative chemoradiation.

Findings:

Our study suggested an OS benefit in using preoperative chemoradiation compared to chemotherapy alone, but OS outcomes were comparable between preoperative chemoradiation and radiation alone.

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with and without hyperthermia in retroperitoneal sarcomas: feasibility, efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome

Purpose

Retroperitoneal (RPS) sarcomas are associated with poor local and abdominal tumor control. However, the benefit of preoperative radio- or chemotherapy alone for these entities is currently unclear. Moreover, as intermediate- and high-grade sarcomas have a tendency toward early metastasis, exploration of neoadjuvant strategies is of high importance. This analysis reports the results of our 20-year single-institution experience with preoperative neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation.

Methods

From 2000–2019, 27 patients with intermediate- or high-grade RPS (12 dedifferentiated liposarcoma, 10 leiomyosarcoma, 5 others) were treated with radiotherapy (median dose: 50.4 Gy; range 45–75 Gy) and two cycles of chemotherapy (doxorubicin 50 mg/m² BSA/d3 q28 and ifosfamide 1.5 g/m² BSA/d1‑5 q28) in neoadjuvant intent. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin alone in two cases and ifosfamide alone in one case. Fifteen patients (56%) additionally received deep regional hyperthermia.

Results

The median follow-up time was 53 months (±56.7 months). 92% of patients received two cycles of chemotherapy as planned and 92% underwent surgery. At 5 and 10 years, abdominal-recurrence-free survival was 74.6% (±10.1%) and 66.3% (±11.9%), distant metastasis-free survival was 67.2% (±9.7%) and 59.7% (±11.1%), and overall survival was 60.3% (±10.5%) and 60.3% (±10.5%), respectively. CTC grade III and IV toxicities were leukocytopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and anemia (11%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with and without hyperthermia for retroperitoneal sarcomas is feasible and provided high local control of intermediate- and high-grade sarcoma.

A systematic review of the current management approaches in leiomyosarcoma of inferior vena cava-Results from analysis of 118 cases

INTRODUCTION

Primary intravenous leiomyosarcomas are rare vascular tumors with aggressive disease biology. The diagnosis and management have been challenging as little data exist from large databases.

METHODS

A literature search was done to identify all cases of primary leiomyosarcomas in the last five years. Clinicopathological features and management strategies were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age was 53 years, predominantly females (2.5:1), presenting as metastases in up to 12.1% cases. Most tumors were locally advanced with a median size of 10cm. Inferior vena cava involvement from renal veins to infrahepatic veins remains the most frequent site (57.1%cases) while nearly half (52.8%) proceeded for surgery without histological proof. Most patients could undergo upfront resection (88.0%) with few patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4.3%) or neoadjuvant radiotherapy (2.2%). Significant multivisceral resections included right nephrectomy (41.3%), liver resection (25.7%) and left nephrectomy (2.2%). Most patients (91.8%) needed an inferior vena cava graft placement with remarkable microscopically negative margins (85.5% cases). Doxorubicin and ifosfamide were the most frequently used combination chemotherapy regimens in both pre and postoperative settings with partial responses. The median overall and disease free survival among operated patients was 60 months and 28 months respectively. In multivariate analysis large tumor, extensive inferior vena cava involvement, and need for adjuvant chemotherapy appeared significant predictors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive upfront surgical resection with clear margin remains the key for long-term survival. Doxorubicin-based regimens were preferred as neoadjuvant chemotherapy while adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both may be considered in high-risk patients.

National Trends in Treatment for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Modern Appraisal of Variability in Therapeutic Strategies

BACKGROUND

Little level 1 evidence exists to guide multimodality treatment in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS), which may lead to significant variation in therapeutic approaches. This analysis aimed to describe national RPS treatment trends and explore potential variability among low-/high-volume hospitals (LVH/HVHs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 5992 patients who underwent resection for primary RPS were retrospectively identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Time trend analyses examined rates of multivisceral resection (MVR), radiation, and chemotherapy use. LVHs were defined as those carrying out fewer than ten resections per year (N = 5433), whereas HVHs were defined as those carrying out ten or more (N = 559). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models compared trends between groups.

RESULTS

MVR was more frequent at HVHs (63.7% versus 43.5%, p < 0.001). Use of radiation varied widely by hospital volume. HVHs more frequently employed preoperative radiation as compared with LVHs (14.7% versus 8.1%, p < 0.001). Throughout the study period, LVHs increased utilization of preoperative radiation (2.6% to 12.0%, p < 0.001) whereas rates at HVHs remained stable. Overall, LVHs utilized postoperative radiation significantly more frequently as compared with HVHs (14.7% versus 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperative radiation at LVHs remained stable until 2013 and sharply declined thereafter (16.7% to 6.9%, p < 0.001). Rates of postoperative radiation use at HVHs remained lower than those at LVHs at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies for resection and radiation use at LVHs have trended towards those of HVHs. Current national implementation of preoperative radiation, MVR, and chemotherapy remains heterogeneous. These findings inform future trial design and support standardization of care.

Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.

Outcome after surgical resection of multiple recurrent retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Local recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM) are common in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS). Longer time to recurrence and resection of the recurrent lesion have been identified as beneficial prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) upon first tumor relapse. However, prognostic factors concerning OS upon subsequent recurrences are scarcely defined. In this study, we aimed to identify prognostic factors for post-relapse outcome in multiple recurrent RPS.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of primary and recurrent RPS at the University Hospital Heidelberg were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall, LR- and DM-free survival. Subgroup analyses were performed for liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma patients.

RESULTS

201 patients with primary disease, 101 patients with first, 66 patients with second and 43 patients with third LR as well as 75 patients with DM were analyzed. More than 12 months to recurrence and resection of recurrence were associated with improved OS after resection of first and second LR (5-year OS for first/second LR; resection: 64%/62%, no resection: 20%/46%). Gross macroscopic incomplete resection of first (p < 0.001), second (p = 0.001), and third recurrences (p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS.

CONCLUSION

Development of LR and DM is frequent in RPS. Once a tumor relapsed, patients benefit from tumor resection not only in case of first, but also in case of subsequent recurrences.

Myogenic dedifferentiation is associated with poor outcomes in retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcomas

Sarcomas are a heterogenous group of malignant tumors with origin or mesenchymal differentiation, they comprise 1–2% of all solid tumors. Retroperitoneum is the second most frequent site affected. Prognosis is worse compared to the limbs, with a 5y OS of 36–58%, and 50–60% patients will relapse. Dedifferentiated liposarcomas (ddLPS) are more aggressive, it is known that presence of a de-differentiated component increases the probability of distant recurrence and lowers OS. There is little information about the specific impact of each type of de-differentiation. To determine if the presence of myogenic differentiation markers in DDLPS is an adverse prognostic factor. A retrospective, observational, analytic cohort study was performed. Cases identified from the electronic clinical files from the National Cancer Institute in Mexico City, we included cases from January 1st 2005 to December 31st 2016. We correlated the presence of expression of myogenic markers (Smooth muscle actin, Calponin, H-caldesmon, Desmin and Myogenin) in the dedifferentiated component of DDLPS with overall survival and surgical outcomes. One hundred and forty-three cases were analyzed. Eighty-two were liposarcomas, and 38 had a dedifferentiated component. Of these 38 cases, 21(55.3%) were males and, 17(44.7%) were females. Median age was 54.1(27–79) years, median tumor size was 28 cm (13–56). Most patients had locally advanced disease: 32(84.2%) were in stage IIIB. 2.6% had metastatic disease and 5(13.2%) had stage Ib at diagnosis. Myogenic marker expression was found in 18.4% of cases; these patients had a worse median survival than cases with no myogenic expression: 18 months (95% CI 15.4–20.5) vs 32 months (95% CI 21.8–42.1) p = 0.01, we also found a relation with higher postoperative morbidity in these cases (p = 0.045). The presence of myogenic differentiation markers might be associated with a worse prognosis, in our series it corelated with worse OS, however it is not a common event. Relation with surgical morbidity is to be analyzed in further studies.

The impact of postoperative radiological surveillance intensity on disease free and overall survival from primary retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcoma

AIM

This observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of intensity of radiological surveillance on survival following resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary resection of soft tissue sarcoma arising in the retroperitoneum, abdomen or pelvis at a single, high-volume sarcoma centre. Intensity of follow-up regimes up to 5 postoperative years were categorized as 'European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) compliant' (intense), or 'non-ESMO compliant' (less-intense). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and reoperation rate. Analyses were stratified by high (grade 2 or 3) or low (grade 1) tumour grade.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, 67.1% had high-grade and 32.9% had low-grade disease. Overall, 40.0% of patients had ESMO-compliant radiological follow-up (high-grade:25.7%, low-grade:66.7%). 41.7% of patients died and 48.2% suffered local or distant recurrence by cessation of follow up. Upon univariable analysis for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliance reduced DFS (p = 0.066) but had no impact on OS. There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate in patients with ESMO-compliant and non-compliant follow-up (p = 0.097). In low-grade tumours, ESMO compliance significantly reduced DFS (p < 0.001), but without effecting OS. In risk-adjusted models for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliant follow-up was associated with reduced OS (HR:3.47, 1.40-8.61, p = 0.007) and no difference in DFS. In low-grade tumours, there was no association between overall ESMO compliance and OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find a benefit for high-intensity radiological surveillance and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection for high or low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Significance of intraoperative radiation therapy and high cumulative radiation doses in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

In retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) local recurrence (LR) rates remain high despite more aggressive surgical approaches. Since wide resection margins cannot be achieved in all patients, application of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been frequently discussed. Still, the significance of IORT in multimodal treatment of retroperitoneal STS remains unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of primary or recurrent retroperitoneal STS at the University of Heidelberg Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate Kaplan-Meyer and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of LR-free survival and to investigate the impact of IORT and high cumulative radiation doses. Analyses with propensity-score matched subgroups for IORT and cumulative radiation dose were performed to control for selection bias. Subgroup analyses for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma were likewise performed.

RESULTS

272 patients were identified. Recurrent tumors, histology of dedifferentiated liposarcoma or unclassified sarcoma and microscopically incomplete resection were associated with decreased LR-free survival. In liposarcoma, only recurrent and dedifferentiated tumors were confirmed as poor prognostic factors concerning LR. IORT and cumulative radiation doses exceeding 60 Gy did not influence LR rates (estimated 5-year LR-free survival: IORT: 39%, non-IORT: 46%; p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective evaluation, additional application of IORT does not significantly influence oncological outcome in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Randomized trials are needed to clarify the benefit of IORT.

2018 ESMO Sarcoma and GIST Symposium: 'take-home messages' in soft tissue sarcoma

The 7th edition of the ‘ESMO Sarcoma and GIST Symposium’ was held in Milan in February 2018. For the first time, the Symposium brought together representatives from the European Reference Network on rare adult solid cancer (EURACAN) joined by sarcoma experts from the USA, Japan and patient advocacy groups, to share insights and discuss future directions in this rare condition. This commentary will summarise the highlights in soft tissue sarcomas.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Extended surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in retroperitoneal sarcoma, although conflicting data exist on the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, particularly with regard to tumour grade and histological type. Experience of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma can inform treatment strategies, however these data cannot be universally extrapolated to the retroperitoneum where disease biology and anatomical considerations are different. The present review sets a historical context before discussing recent evidence and on-going multi-centre trials in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Promising data on histologically- and molecularly-targeted chemotherapy are discussed and the need for centralisation of retroperitoneal sarcoma services in order to facilitate large international collaborative trials is emphasised.