1
|
Dugan MM, Perez MC, Karapetyan L, Zager JS. Management of acral lentiginous melanoma: current updates and future directions. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1323933. [PMID: 38390259 PMCID: PMC10882087 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1323933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Acral lentiginous melanoma is a rare subtype of melanoma generally associated with poor outcomes, even when diagnosed at an early stage. The tumor genetic profile remains poorly understood, but it is known to have a suppressed immune environment compared to that of non-acral cutaneous melanomas, which limits therapy options. There is significant attention on the development of novel therapeutic approaches, although studies are limited due to disease rarity. For local disease, wide local excision remains the standard of care. Due to frequent under-staging on preoperative biopsy, wider margins and routine sentinel lymph node biopsy may be considered if morbidity would not be increased. For advanced disease, anti-PD1 monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 agents have been used as first-line treatment modalities. Anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination therapies have been shown to be particularly beneficial for patients with BRAF-mutant acral lentiginous melanoma. Other systemic combination regimens and targeted therapy options may be considered, although large studies with consistent results are lacking. Regional and intralesional therapies have shown promise for cutaneous melanomas, but studies generally have not reported results for specific histologic subtypes, especially for acral melanoma. Overall, the unique histologic and genetic characteristics of acral lentiginous melanoma make therapy options significantly more challenging. Furthermore, studies are limited, and data reporting has been inconsistent. However, more prospective studies are emerging, and alternative therapy pathways specific to acral lentiginous melanoma are being investigated. As further evidence is discovered, reliable treatment guidelines may be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Dugan
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Matthew C Perez
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Lilit Karapetyan
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huibers A, DePalo DK, Perez MC, Zager JS, Olofsson Bagge R. Isolated hyperthermic perfusions for cutaneous melanoma in-transit metastasis of the limb and uveal melanoma metastasis to the liver. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023:10.1007/s10585-023-10234-6. [PMID: 37843790 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10234-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Patients with cutaneous melanoma can develop in-transit metastases (ITM), most often localized to limbs. For patients with uveal melanoma that develop metastatic disease, the overall majority develop isolated liver metastases. For these types of metastases, regional cancer therapies have evolved as effective treatments. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP), isolated limb infusion (ILI), isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) and percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) achieve a high local concentration of chemotherapy with minimal systemic exposure. This review discusses the mechanism and available literature on locoregional treatment modalities in the era of modern immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Huibers
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Danielle K DePalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew C Perez
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani, College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rhodin KE, Tyler DS, Zager JS, Beasley GM. Great Debate: Limb Infusion for Melanoma: A Thing of the Past? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6319-6324. [PMID: 37458946 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13765-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Georgia M Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Raimondo C, Lozzi F, Di Domenico PP, Campione E, Bianchi L. The Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Metastases from Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14535. [PMID: 37833981 PMCID: PMC10572973 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241914535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is one of the deadliest skin tumors, accounting for almost 90% of skin cancer mortality. Although immune therapy and targeted therapy have dramatically changed the prognosis of metastatic melanoma, many patients experience disease progression despite the currently available new treatments. Skin metastases from melanoma represent a relatively common event as first sign of advanced disease or a sign of recurrence. Skin metastases are usually asymptomatic, although in advanced stages, they can present with ulceration, bleeding, and superinfection; furthermore, they can cause symptoms related to compression on nearby tissues. Treatments vary from simple surgery resections to topical or intralesional local injections, or a combination of these techniques with the most recent systemic immune or target therapies. New research and studies should focus on the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of the cutaneous metastases of melanoma in order to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the different behavior and prognoses of different patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosimo Di Raimondo
- Department of Dermatology, University of Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (P.P.D.D.); (E.C.); (L.B.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
DePalo DK, Perez MC, Huibers A, Olofsson Bagge R, Zager JS. Oncolytic intralesional therapy for metastatic melanoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023:10.1007/s10585-023-10228-4. [PMID: 37556092 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10228-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
In-transit metastasis (ITM) develop in approximately 1 in 10 patients with melanoma and the disease course can vary widely. Surgical resection is the gold-standard treatment; however, ITM are often surgically unresectable due to size, distribution, and/or anatomic involvement. Oncolytic viral therapies are one category of non-surgical treatment options available for ITM. They induce tumor cell lysis and systemic anti-tumor activity through selective infection of tumor cells by naturally occurring or genetically modified factors. While there are numerous oncolytic viral therapies in various stages of development for the treatment of ITM, this discussion focuses on the mechanism and available literature for the two most established herpes virus-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle K DePalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 McKinley Drive Room 4123, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew C Perez
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 McKinley Drive Room 4123, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anne Huibers
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 McKinley Drive Room 4123, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Effects of the Introduction of Modern Immunotherapy on the Outcome of Isolated Limb Perfusion for Melanoma In-Transit Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020472. [PMID: 36672422 PMCID: PMC9856283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is an effective locoregional treatment for melanoma in-transit metastasis, but the advent of modern effective immunotherapy, such as ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitors), has changed the treatment landscape. The primary aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of the patient population receiving ILP before and after the introduction of modern systemic treatments and to assess if outcomes after ILP were influenced by previous immunotherapy treatment. A single-centre analysis of patients that underwent ILP for melanoma in-transit metastasis between 2010 and 2021 was conducted, with patients grouped and compared by treatment time period: pre-ICI era (2010-2014) and ICI era (2017-2021). 218 patients were included. Patients undergoing ILP in the ICI era were slightly older (median age 73 vs. 68 years) compared to the pre-ICI era, with no other difference found. The overall response rate (ORR) was 83% vs. 84% and the complete response (CR) rate was 52% vs. 47% for the pre-ICI era and the ICI era, respectively. For patients that had received and failed immunotherapy prior to ILP (n = 20), the ORR was 75% and the CR rate was 50%. Melanoma-specific survival has improved, with a 3-year survival rate of 54% in the pre-ICI era vs. 86% in the ICI era. The patient population undergoing ILP for in-transit melanoma is largely unchanged in the current era of effective systemic treatments. Response rates have not decreased, and prior ICI treatment did not affect response rates, making ILP still a valid treatment option for this patient group.
Collapse
|
7
|
Holmberg CJ, Ny L, Hieken TJ, Block MS, Carr MJ, Sondak VK, Örtenwall C, Katsarelias D, Dimitriou F, Menzies AM, Saw RPM, Rogiers A, Straker RJ, Karakousis G, Applewaite R, Pallan L, Han D, Vetto JT, Gyorki DE, Tie EN, Vitale MG, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Cohen J, Hui JYC, Schachter J, Asher N, Helgadottir H, Chai H, Kroon H, Coventry B, Rothermel LD, Sun J, Carlino MS, Duncan Z, Broman K, Weber J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Teras J, Ollila DW, Long GV, Zager JS, van Akkooi A, Olofsson Bagge R. The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma in-transit with or without nodal metastases - A multicenter cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 169:210-222. [PMID: 35644725 PMCID: PMC9975793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The study aims to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international referral clinics. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and the USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c, and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Treatment was with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). The response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria modified for cutaneous lesions. RESULTS A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in eight countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients, respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. The overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate was 36%, and progressive disease (PD) rate was 32%. Median PFS was ten months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a one-, two-, and five-year PFS rate of 48%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the one-, two-, and five-year MSS rates were 95%, 83%, and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the role of systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy, including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Jacob Holmberg
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Matthew S. Block
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA,Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Michael J. Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Christoffer Örtenwall
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Florentia Dimitriou
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn PM. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Aljosja Rogiers
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia
| | - Richard J. Straker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Giorgos Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Rona Applewaite
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lalit Pallan
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dale Han
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - John T. Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - David E. Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emilia Nan Tie
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paulo A. Ascierto
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jade Cohen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Jane YC. Hui
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Jacob Schachter
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institite for Immuno-oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nethanel Asher
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institite for Immuno-oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - H. Helgadottir
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Harvey Chai
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Brendon Coventry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Luke D. Rothermel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA,Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA,Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zoey Duncan
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Kristy Broman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Jeffrey Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Ann Y. Lee
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA,NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Russell S. Berman
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA,NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Jüri Teras
- North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - David W. Ollila
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan S. Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Queiroz MM, Bertolli E, Belfort FA, Munhoz RR. Management of In-Transit Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:573-583. [PMID: 35192119 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01216-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this study is to discuss the current knowledge and future perspectives regarding the treatment options for in-transit metastases (ITM), along with the optimal algorithms for patients presenting with this adverse manifestation of melanoma. RECENT FINDINGS In addition to procedures historically accepted for the management of ITM, encompassing surgery and regional techniques, novel medications in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies now represent standard options, allowing for the possibility of combined approaches, with an expanding role of systemic therapies. Melanoma in-transit metastases consist of intralymphatic neoplastic implants distributed between the primary site and the regional nodal basin, within the subepidermal and dermal lymphatics. Distinct risk factors may influence the development of ITM, and the clinical presentation can be highly heterogeneous, enhancing the complexity of the management of ITM. Surgical resection, when feasible, continues to represent a standard approach for patients with curative intent. Patients with extensive or unresectable disease may also benefit from regional approaches that include isolated limb perfusion or infusion, electrochemotherapy, and a wide variety of intralesional therapies. Over the past decade, regimens with ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors dramatically expanded the benefit of systemic treatments for patients with melanoma, both in the adjuvant setting and for those with advanced disease, and the combination of these modalities with regional treatments, as well as neoadjuvant approaches, may represent the future for the treatment of patients with ITM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduardo Bertolli
- Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcomas Group, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Skin Cancer Department, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Group, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz
- Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. .,Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcomas Group, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moyers JT, Glitza Oliva IC. Immunotherapy for Melanoma. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1342:81-111. [PMID: 34972963 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79308-1_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is the leading cause of death from skin cancer and is responsible for over 7000 deaths in the USA each year alone. For many decades, limited treatment options were available for patients with metastatic melanoma; however, over the last decade, a new era in treatment dawned for oncologists and their patients. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents an important cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic melanoma; however, this chapter carefully reviews the past and current therapy options available, with a significant focus on immunotherapy-based approaches. In addition, we provide an overview of the results of recent advances in the adjuvant setting for patients with resected stage III and stage IV melanoma, as well as in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Finally, we provide a brief overview of the current research efforts in the field of immuno-oncology for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Moyers
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Newcomer K, Robbins KJ, Perone J, Hinojosa FL, Chen D, Jones S, Kaufman CK, Weiser R, Fields RC, Tyler DS. Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101030. [PMID: 35033317 PMCID: PMC9798450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Newcomer
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jennifer Perone
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - David Chen
- e. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Susan Jones
- f. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Roi Weiser
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yaney AC, Rossfeld KK, Wu TC, Agnese DM, Terando AM, Wuthrick EJ, Howard JH. Adjuvant Radiation Does Not Affect Locoregional Control Following Resection of Melanoma Satellitosis or In-Transit Disease. Am Surg 2021:31348211047492. [PMID: 34645291 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211047492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the association of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with improved locoregional (LR) recurrence for resected melanoma satellitosis and in-transit disease (ITD). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were collected retrospectively for resected melanoma satellitosis/ITD from 1996 to 2017. RESULTS 99 patients were identified. 20 patients (20.2%) received adjuvant RT while 79 (79.8%) did not. Mean follow-up in the RT group was 4.3 years and 4.7 years in the non-RT group. 80% of patients who underwent RT suffered a complication, most commonly dermatitis. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 9 patients (45%) treated with adjuvant RT and 30 patients (38%) in the non-RT group (P = 0.805). Median LR-DFS was 5.8 years in the RT group and 9.5 years in the non-RT group (P = 0.604). On multivariable analysis, having a close or positive margin was the only independent predictor of LR-DFS (HR 3.8 95% CI 1.7-8.7). In-transit disease was associated with improved overall survival when compared to satellitosis (HR 0.260, 95% CI 0.08-0.82). DISCUSSION The use of adjuvant RT is not associated with improved locoregional control in resected melanoma satellitosis or ITD. Close or positive margin was the only treatment-related factor associated with decreased LR-DFS after surgical resection of satellitosis/ITD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Yaney
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kara K Rossfeld
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Trudy C Wu
- 21767UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- 12306The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Evan J Wuthrick
- 25301H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John H Howard
- 21822University of South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Knackstedt R, Smile T, Yu J, Gastman BR. Non-Operative Options for Loco-regional Melanoma. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48:631-642. [PMID: 34503723 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the 5th most common cancer and stage IV melanoma accounts for approximately 4% of new melanoma diagnoses in the United States. The prognosis for regionally advanced disease is poor, but there have been numerous recent advances in the medical management of melanoma in-transit metastases. The goal of this paper is to review currently accepted treatment options for in-transit metastases and introduce emerging therapies. Therapies to be discussed include limb perfusion and infusion, immunotherapy, checkpoint inhibitors, and radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Knackstedt
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2049 East 100th Street, Desk A60, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Timothy Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Center, 10201 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jennifer Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Center, 10201 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Brian R Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 2049 East 100th Street, Desk A60, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Farrow NE, Leddy M, Landa K, Beasley GM. Injectable Therapies for Regional Melanoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 29:433-444. [PMID: 32482318 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients with unresectable cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal melanoma metastases are often candidates for injectable therapies, which are attractive for ease of intralesional delivery to superficial metastases and limited systemic toxicity profiles. Injectable or intralesional therapies can be part of multifaceted treatment strategies to kill tumor directly or to alter the tumor so as to make it more sensitive to systemic therapy. Talimogene laherparepvec is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved injectable therapy currently in wide clinical use in the United States, although ongoing trials are evaluating novel intralesional agents as well as combinations with systemic therapies, particularly checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma E Farrow
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Margaret Leddy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, DUMC Box 3966, Durham, NC 27110, USA
| | - Karenia Landa
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3443, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Georgia M Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, DUMC Box 3118, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Prospective Study of Intraarterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced WT BRAF Melanoma Patients. J Surg Res 2021; 268:737-747. [PMID: 34253376 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment strategies for advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients, resistant or not treatable with novel target and immunotherapeutic drugs, remain a significant challenge, particularly for patients with unresectable stage IIIC/D disease localized to inferior limbs and pelvis, for whom specific outcomes are rarely considered. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective study of multidisciplinary treatments, including locoregional melphalan chemotherapy, in 62 BRAF wild-type CM patients with locoregional metastases in the inferior limbs and pelvis, including inguinal regions. Patients were either in progression following or ineligible for, or not treatable with novel immunotherapy. For exclusively inferior limb-localised disease, patients received locoregional melphalan chemotherapy performed by hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (n = 19) or isolated limb infusion (n = 19), and for synchronous lesions localised to inferior limbs and pelvis, received hypoxic pelvic and limb perfusion (n = 24). Additional multidisciplinary therapy included local, locoregional and systemic treatments and the primary endpoint was tumour response. RESULTS The objective response rate following first cycle of locoregional chemotherapy was 37.1% at 3 mo and median progression-free survival was 4-mo, with 12.9% procedure-related complications, 30.6% low-grade haematological toxicity and 11.3% severe limb toxic tissue reactions. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the odds of response were significantly higher for patients ≤ 75 y of age and for patients with locoregional metastases exclusively located in the inferior limbs. CONCLUSION In this subgroup of CM patients with BRAF wild-type status, locoregional metastases localized to inferior limbs and pelvis, in progression following or ineligible for immunotherapy, melphalan locoregional chemotherapy demonstrated a safe and effective profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01920516; date of trial registration: August 6, 2013.
Collapse
|
15
|
Patel A, Carr MJ, Sun J, Zager JS. In-transit metastatic cutaneous melanoma: current management and future directions. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 39:201-211. [PMID: 33999365 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10100-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Management of in-transit melanoma encompasses a variety of possible treatment pathways and modalities. Depending on the location of disease, number of lesions, burden of disease and patient preference and characteristics, some treatments may be more beneficial than others. After full body radiographic staging is performed to rule out metastatic disease, curative therapy may be performed through surgical excision, intraarterial regional perfusion and infusion therapies, intralesional injections, systemic therapies or various combinations of any of these. While wide excision is limited in indication to superficial lesions that are few in number, the other listed therapies may be effective in treating unresectable disease. Where intraarterial perfusion based therapies have been shown to successfully treat extremity disease, injectable therapies can be used in lesions of the head and neck. Although systemic therapies for in-transit melanoma have limited specific data to support their primary use for in-transit disease, there are patients who may not be eligible for any of the other options, and current clinical trials are exploring the use of concurrent and sequential use of regional and systemic therapies with early results suggesting a synergistic benefit for oncologic response and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayushi Patel
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. .,Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 North McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Olofsson Bagge R, Ny L, Ascierto PA, Hodi FS, Larkin J, Robert C, Schachter J, Weber JS, Long GV, van Akkooi ACJ. The efficacy of immunotherapy for in-transit metastases of melanoma: an analysis of randomized controlled trials. Melanoma Res 2021; 31:181-185. [PMID: 33625104 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nearly 10% of patients with high-risk early-stage melanoma will develop satellite or in-transit metastases (ITM), classified as stage III disease similar to lymph node metastases. The pivotal registration trials of the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab, and the PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab, also included patients with unresectable stage III disease. However, there has been no analysis of patients with ITM, and anecdotal retrospective small series have indicated a potential lesser effect. This study aimed to identify patients with unresectable ITM within the randomized trials, and to determine response, progression-free survival and overall survival. The pivotal phase III randomized intervention trials that included melanoma patients with ITM, with or without nodal metastasis, and were treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab was identified. The datasets from each trial were then searched to identify the specific details of the investigated patient population for a pooled analysis. The primary endpoint was complete response rate. Seven trials that included stage III patients, and with accessible datasets, were identified. There was a total of 4711 patients, however, no patients with ITM could be identified, as this data was not captured by the case report forms. Evidence from prospective clinical trials on the use of immunotherapy in patients with ITM is lacking. We recommend pooling data from multiple institutions to examine efficacy of available drug therapies in this patient population, but more importantly, prospective clinical trials of locoregional treatments with or without systemic drug therapies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James Larkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline Robert
- Department of Medical Oncology Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Jacob Schachter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Jeffrey S Weber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Department of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Teras J, Carr MJ, Zager JS, Kroon HM. Molecular Aspects of the Isolated Limb Infusion Procedure. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9020163. [PMID: 33562337 PMCID: PMC7915579 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, isolated limb infusion (ILI) and hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) have been used to treat melanoma in-transit metastases and unresectable sarcoma confined to the limb utilizing the effect of loco-regional high-dose chemotherapy to the isolated limb. Both procedures are able to provide high response rates in patients with numerous or bulky lesions in whom other loco-regional treatments are becoming ineffective. In comparison to systemic therapies, on the other hand, ILI and HILP have the advantage of not being associated with systemic side-effects. Although in principle ILI and HILP are similar procedures, ILI is technically simpler to perform and differs from HILP in that it takes advantage of the hypoxic and acidotic environment that develops in the isolated limb, potentiating anti-tumour activity of the cytotoxic agents melphalan +/− actinomycin-D. Due to its simplicity, ILI can be used in both preclinical and clinical studies to test new cytotoxic regimens and combinations with the aim to overcome tumour resistance. In the future, administration of cytotoxic agents by ILI, in combination with systemic treatments such as BRAF/MEK/KIT inhibitors, immunotherapy (CTLA-4 blockade), and/or programmed death (PD-1) pathway inhibitors, has the potential to improve responses further by inducing increased tumour cell death while limiting the ability of the tumour to suppress the immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jüri Teras
- Department of Surgical Oncology, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia;
- Tallinn University of Technology, 12616 Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Michael J. Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.J.C.); (J.S.Z.)
| | - Jonathan S. Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.J.C.); (J.S.Z.)
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Hidde M. Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-8-7074-2163
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carr MJ, Sun J, Kroon HM, Miura JT, Beasley GM, Farrow NE, Mosca PJ, Lowe MC, Farley CR, Kim Y, Naqvi SMH, Kirichenko DA, Potdar A, Daou H, Mullen D, Farma JM, Henderson MA, Speakman D, Serpell J, Delman KA, Smithers BM, Coventry BJ, Tyler DS, Thompson JF, Zager JS. Oncologic Outcomes After Isolated Limb Infusion for Advanced Melanoma: An International Comparison of the Procedure and Outcomes Between the United States and Australia. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:5107-5118. [PMID: 32918177 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09051-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally invasive procedure for delivering high-dose chemotherapy to extremities affected by locally advanced or in-transit melanoma. This study compared the outcomes of melanoma patients treated with ILI in the United States of America (USA) and Australia (AUS). METHODS Patients with locally recurrent in-transit melanoma treated with ILI at USA or AUS centers between 1992 and 2018 were identified. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes of treatment response, in-field progression-free survival (IPFS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis evaluated whether availability of new systemic therapies affected outcomes. RESULTS More ILIs were performed in AUS (n = 411, 60 %) than in the USA (n = 276, 40 %). In AUS, more ILIs were performed for stage 3B disease than in the USA (62 % vs 46 %; p < 0.001). The reported complete response rates were similar (AUS 30 % vs USA 29 %). Among the stage 3B patients, AUS patients had better IPFS (p = 0.001), whereas DPFS and OS were similar between the two countries. Among the stage 3C patients, the USA patients had better OS (p < 0.001), whereas IPFS and DPFS were similar. Availability of new systemic therapies did not affect IPFS or DPFS in either country. However, the USA patients who received ILI after ipilimumab approval in 2011 had significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.62; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS AUS patients were treated at an earlier disease stage than the USA patients with better IPFS for stage 3B disease. The USA patients treated after the availability of new systemic therapies had a better OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Paul J Mosca
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Clara R Farley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Dennis A Kirichenko
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aishwarya Potdar
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hala Daou
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dean Mullen
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A Henderson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Speakman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jonathan Serpell
- Discipline of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Keith A Delman
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brendon J Coventry
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carr MJ, Kroon HM, Zager JS. ASO Author Reflections: Return to Isolated Limb Infusion for In-Transit Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:5119-5120. [PMID: 32918180 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09113-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kenyon-Smith TJ, Kroon HM, Miura JT, Teras J, Beasley GM, Mullen D, Farrow NE, Mosca PJ, Lowe MC, Farley CR, Potdar A, Daou H, Sun J, Farma JM, Henderson MA, Speakman D, Serpell J, Delman KA, Smithers BM, Barbour A, Coventry BJ, Tyler DS, Zager JS, Thompson JF. Factors predicting toxicity and response following isolated limb infusion for melanoma: An international multi-centre study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2140-2146. [PMID: 32739218 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally-invasive procedure for delivering high-dose regional chemotherapy to treat melanoma in-transit metastases confined to a limb. The aim of this international multi-centre study was to identify predictive factors for toxicity and response. METHODS Data of 687 patients who underwent a first ILI for melanoma in-transit metastases confined to the limb between 1992 and 2018 were collected at five Australian and four US tertiary referral centres. RESULTS After ILI, predictive factors for increased limb toxicity (Wieberdink grade III/IV limb toxicity, n = 192, 27.9%) were: female gender, younger age, procedures performed before 2005, lower limb procedures, higher melphalan dose, longer drug circulation and ischemia times, and increased tissue hypoxia. No patient experienced grade V toxicity (necessitating amputation). A complete response (n = 199, 28.9%) was associated with a lower stage of disease, lower burden of disease (BOD) and thinner Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma. Additionally, an overall response (combined complete and partial response, n = 441, 64.1%) was associated with female gender, Australian centres, procedures performed before 2005, lower limb procedures and lower actinomycin-D doses. On multivariate analysis, higher melphalan dose remained a predictive factor for toxicity, while lower stage of disease and lower BOD remained predictive factors for overall response. CONCLUSION ILI is safe and effective to treat melanoma in-transit metastases. Predictive factors for toxicity and response identified in this study will allow improved patient selection and optimization of intra-operative parameters to increase response rates, while keeping toxicity low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Kenyon-Smith
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa FL, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jüri Teras
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia; Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | - Dean Mullen
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Paul J Mosca
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Clara R Farley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aishwarya Potdar
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Hala Daou
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A Henderson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Speakman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jonathan Serpell
- Discipline of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Keith A Delman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Brendon J Coventry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa FL, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carr MJ, Sun J, Zager JS. Isolated limb infusion: Institutional protocol and implementation. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:99-105. [PMID: 32162353 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Patients with unresectable cutaneous and soft tissue malignancies confined to a limb have many treatment options. Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is one therapeutic option whereby the extremity is isolated and perfused with high-dose chemotherapy through a percutaneously placed catheter-based procedure. A detailed description of the ILI protocol at the Moffitt Cancer Center is given. We have shown that ILI is a safe and effective treatment strategy for malignancies confined to an extremity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Teras J, Kroon HM, Miura JT, Kenyon-Smith T, Beasley GM, Mullen D, Farrow NE, Mosca PJ, Lowe MC, Farley CR, Potdar A, Daou H, Sun J, Carr M, Farma JM, Henderson MA, Speakman D, Serpell J, Delman KA, Smithers BM, Barbour A, Tyler DS, Coventry BJ, Zager JS, Thompson JF. International Multicenter Experience of Isolated Limb Infusion for In-Transit Melanoma Metastases in Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1420-1429. [PMID: 32152775 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08312-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is used to treat in-transit melanoma metastases confined to an extremity. However, little is known about its safety and efficacy in octogenarians and nonagenarians (ON). PATIENTS AND METHODS ON patients (≥ 80 years) who underwent a first ILI for American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma between 1992 and 2018 at nine international centers were included and compared with younger patients (< 80 years). A cytotoxic drug combination of melphalan and actinomycin-D was used. RESULTS Of the 687 patients undergoing a first ILI, 160 were ON patients (median age 84 years; range 80-100 years). Compared with the younger cohort (n = 527; median age 67 years; range 29-79 years), ON patients were more frequently female (70.0% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.003), had more stage IIIB disease (63.8 vs. 53.3%; p = 0.02), and underwent more upper limb ILIs (16.9% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.009). ON patients experienced similar Wieberdink limb toxicity grades III/IV (25.0% vs. 29.2%; p = 0.45). No toxicity-related limb amputations were performed. Overall response for ON patients was 67.3%, versus 64.6% for younger patients (p = 0.53). Median in-field progression-free survival was 9 months for both groups (p = 0.88). Median distant progression-free survival was 36 versus 23 months (p = 0.16), overall survival was 29 versus 40 months (p < 0.0001), and melanoma-specific survival was 46 versus 78 months (p = 0.0007) for ON patients compared with younger patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ILI in ON patients is safe and effective with similar response and regional control rates compared with younger patients. However, overall and melanoma-specific survival are shorter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jüri Teras
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Surgical Oncology, North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia.,Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. .,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tim Kenyon-Smith
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Dean Mullen
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Paul J Mosca
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Clara R Farley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aishwarya Potdar
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hala Daou
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A Henderson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Speakman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jonathan Serpell
- Discipline of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Keith A Delman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Queensland Melanoma Project, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Brendon J Coventry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beasley GM, Zager JS, Thompson JF. The Landmark Series: Regional Therapy of Recurrent Cutaneous Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:35-42. [PMID: 31471842 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07760-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
In-transit melanoma represents a distinct disease pattern in which melanoma recurs as dermal or subcutaneous nodules between the primary melanoma site and the draining regional lymph node basin. The disease pattern is often not amenable to complete surgical resection. Since the 1950s, regional therapies have been explored for the treatment of this disease entity, with the goal of maximizing delivery of the therapeutic agent to the tumor while minimizing systemic toxicity. We reviewed landmark studies describing and evaluating regional chemotherapy and intralesional therapies for patients with in-transit melanoma metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia M Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Michielin O, van Akkooi ACJ, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1884-1901. [PMID: 31566661 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Centre, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Teras J, Kroon HM, Thompson JF, Teras M, Pata P, Mägi A, Teras RM, Boudinot SR. First Eastern European experience of isolated limb infusion for in-transit metastatic melanoma confined to the limb: Is it still an effective treatment option in the modern era? Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:272-276. [PMID: 31748147 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated limb infusion (ILI) with cytotoxic agents is a simple and effective treatment option for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITMs) confined to an extremity. Data for ILIs performed in Europe are sparse and to date no Eastern European ILI experience has been reported. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of ILI in Estonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data for twenty-one patients were collected and analysed. All patients had melanoma ITMs and underwent an ILI between January 2012 and May 2018. The cytotoxic drug combination of melphalan and actinomycin-D was used. Drug circulation times were 20-30 min under mildly hyperthermic conditions (38-39 °C). Primary outcome measures were treatment response and overall survival. RESULTS Nineteen lower limb and two upper limb ILIs were performed. The female to male ratio was 18:3. The overall response rate (complete + partial response) was 76% (n = 16), with a complete response in 38% (n = 8). The overall long-term limb salvage rate was 90% (n = 19). During follow-up, eight patients (38%) died, two due to metastatic melanoma. Five-year overall survival was 57%. CONCLUSION This first Eastern European report of ILI for melanoma ITMs shows results comparable to those from other parts of the world. In this era of effective targeted and immune therapies, ILI remains a useful treatment option, with a high overall response rate and durable responses in patients with melanoma ITMs confined to a limb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jüri Teras
- North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia; Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marina Teras
- North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia; Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Pille Pata
- Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia; IVEX Lab, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | - Roland M Teras
- North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Read RL, Thompson JF. Managing in-transit melanoma metastases in the new era of effective systemic therapies for melanoma. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2019; 12:1107-1119. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1689121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Read
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of General Surgery, Calvary Health Care, Canberra, Australia
- School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gamboa AC, Lowe M, Yushak ML, Delman KA. Surgical Considerations and Systemic Therapy of Melanoma. Surg Clin North Am 2019; 100:141-159. [PMID: 31753109 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent advances in effective medical therapies have markedly improved the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma. This article aims to highlight the current era of integrated multidisciplinary care of patients with advanced melanoma by outlining current approved therapies, including immunotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation therapy, and other strategies used in both the adjuvant and the neoadjuvant setting as well as the evolving role of surgical intervention in the changing landscape of advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Michael Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Melinda L Yushak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B4 Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Keith A Delman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365B Clifton Road Northeast, Suite B4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Melanoma has a unique propensity for locoregional metastasis secondary to intralymphatic transit not seen in other cutaneous or soft tissue malignancies. Novel intralesional therapies using oncolytic immunotherapy exhibit increasing response rates with observed bystander effect. Intralesional modalities in combination with systemic immunotherapy are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. Regional therapy is used in isolated limb locoregional metastasis whereby chemotherapy is delivered to an isolated limb avoiding systemic side effects. Multimodal treatment strategy is imperative in the treatment of locoregionally advanced melanoma. One must be versed on these quickly evolving therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Pointer
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 13220 USF Laurel Dr., Tampa, FL 33612
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612; Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 13220 USF Laurel Dr., Tampa, FL 33612.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Miura JT, Kroon HM, Zager JS. ASO Author Reflections: International Experience of Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma Shows Durable Response. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2495-2496. [PMID: 31087177 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07435-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John T Miura
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Karakousis GC. Let's Not Forget About Regional Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Extremity Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2322-2324. [PMID: 31062208 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07430-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|