Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Bacterial Colonization of Surgical Drains with the Use of Chlorhexidine-Coated Dressings After Breast Cancer Surgery

Alpha Defensin-1 Level Correlates with Periprosthetic Infection Severity following Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Background

Accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic infections following breast reconstructions is paramount to reduce morbidity. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1) is an antimicrobial peptide released by neutrophils. This study evaluates the relationship between quantitative AD-1 levels and infection severity in patients with suspected periprosthetic infection.

Methods

Retrospective review was conducted of patients with prior breast implant reconstruction undergoing surgery for either suspected infection or prosthesis exchange and revision. The AD-1 level in periprosthetic fluid was sent for quantitative analysis. Association between AD-1 levels with outcomes, management, systemic markers of infection, and overall infection severity was evaluated.

Results

Thirty-eight breasts were included. Infected breasts had higher AD-1 levels (3.91 versus 0.14, P < 0.01), greater odds of erythema [odds ratio (OR) 2.98 (1.53-5.82), P = 0.01], purulence [OR 2.84 (1.51-5.35), P = 0.01], fever [OR 1.84 (1.15-2.93), P = 0.01], threatened implant exposure [OR 2.97 (1.48-5.95), P < 0.01], and true implant exposure [OR 1.79 (1.04-3.08), P = 0.04]. Increasing AD-1 was an independent risk factor for washout (P < 0.01), and explant [OR 2.48 (1.47-4.2), P < 0.01]. AD-1 positively correlated with white blood cell count (β = 1.81 cells/µL, P < 0.01), and serum lactate (β = 0.19 meq/L, P < 0.04). Increasing AD-1 level was an independent predictor of infection severity (χ² = 22.77, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

AD-1 levels correlate with infection severity, highlighting its potential both when clinical examination is ambiguous and when treatment response is being monitored. Although further evaluation is warranted, AD-1 may demonstrate utility in novel breast implant salvage algorithms.

Hernia Mesh Complications: Management of Mesh Infections and Enteroprosthetic Fistula

The potential consequences of mesh infection mandate careful consideration of surgical approach, mesh selection, and preoperative patient optimization when planning for ventral hernia repair. Intraperitoneal mesh, microporous or laminar mesh, and multifilament mesh typically require explantation, whereas macroporous, monofilament mesh in an extraperitoneal position is often salvageable. Delayed presentation of mesh infection should raise the suspicion for enteroprosthetic fistula when intraperitoneal mesh is present. When mesh excision is necessary, the surgeon must carefully consider both the risk of recurrent infection as well as hernia recurrence when deciding on single-stage definitive reconstruction versus primary closure with delayed reconstruction.

The Efficacy of Antiseptic Treatment of Surgical Drains on Bacterial Colonisation and Surgical Site Infection Post Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication in women with post-operative drains following breast surgery, with the risk being as high as 19%. The authors aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of antiseptic treatment of drains to reduce the incidence of infections by comparing it to drains with no antiseptic coating. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed with an extensive search of the electronic databases retrieving 114 articles. Four articles met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of SSIs and secondary outcome measures included the incidence of bacterial colonisation in the bulb fluid and drain tube. The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower in the antiseptic group compared to the control (CI 95% 0.09 - 0.82, p = 0.02). In addition, there was a lower incidence of colonisation from both the bulb fluid and drain tube with P values of < 0.00001 and P < 0.0001 respectively. The authors report the first meta-analysis within the literature showing the efficacy of antiseptic treatment of surgical drains on colonisation and SSIs following breast surgery. More high-quality trials are recommended to further the current evidence base.

Risks and Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Hernia Mesh Repair and the Predictive Utility of ACS-NSQIP

AIM

The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review of surgical site infection after hernia surgery and the influence of perioperative preventative interventions.

METHODS

The review was based on current national and international guidelines and a literature search.

RESULTS

Mesh infection is a highly morbid complication after hernia surgery, and is associated with hospital re-admission, increased health care costs, re-operation, hernia recurrence, impaired quality of life and plaintiff litigation. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program is a particularly useful resource for the study and evidence-based practise of abdominal wall hernia repair.

DISCUSSION

The three major modifiable patient comorbidities significantly associated with postoperative surgical site infection in hernia surgery are obesity, tobacco smoking and diabetes mellitus. Preoperative optimization includes weight loss, cessation of smoking, and control of diabetes. Intraoperative interventions relate, in particular, to the control of fomite mediated transmission in the operating theatre and prevention of mesh contamination with S. aureus CFUs. Risk management strategies should also target the niche ecological conditions which enable bacterial survival and subsequent biofilm formation on an implanted mesh. Outcomes of mesh infection after hernia surgery are closely related to mesh type and porosity, patient smoking status, presence of MRSA, bacterial adhesion and biofilm production. The use of suction drains and the timing of drain removal are controversial and discussed in detail. Finally, the utility of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in predicting complications and outcomes in individual patients and the importance of quality improvement initiatives in surgical units are emphasized.

The relationship between post-surgery infection and breast cancer recurrence

Breast cancer is the second most prevalent form of cancer in women worldwide, with surgery remaining the standard treatment. The adverse impact of the surgery remains controversial. It has been suggested that systemic factors during the postoperative period may increase the risk of recurrence, specifically surgical site infection (SSI). The aim of this review was to critically appraise current published literature regarding the influence of SSIs, after primary breast cancer surgery, on breast cancer recurrence, and to delve into potential links between these. This systematic review adopted two approaches: to identify the incidence rates and risk factors related to SSI after primary breast cancer surgery; and, secondly, to examine breast cancer recurrence following SSI occurrence. Ninety-nine studies with 484,605 patients were eligible in the SSI-focused searches, and 53 studies with 17,569 patients for recurrence-focused. There was a 13.07% mean incidence of SSI. Six-hundred and thirty-eight Gram-positive and 442 Gram-negative isolates were identified, with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli most commonly identified. There were 2077 cases of recurrence (11.8%), with 563 cases of local recurrence, 1186 cases of distant and 25 cases which recurred both locally and distantly. Five studies investigated the association between SSI and breast cancer recurrence with three concluding that an association did exist. In conclusion, there is association between SSI and adverse cancer outcomes, but the cellular link between them remains elusive. Confounding factors of retrospective study design, surgery type and SSI definition make results challenging to compare and interpret. A standardized prospective study with appropriate statistical power is justified.

Do drain tubes help reduce risks of post-operative complications in complex incisional hernia repair (as defined by a recent court ruling)?

BACKGROUND

A recent legal case described in the ANZ Journal of Surgery has sparked significant topical interest in drain tube use in incisional hernia repairs in Australia. This study reviews a single centre experience of drain tube use in incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

Data from online clinical records was collected retrospectively from patients that underwent incisional hernia repair from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017. 'Complexity' factors of smoking, obesity and lower midline incision (as identified by the legal case) were also used to stratify groups.

RESULTS

A total of 410 incisional hernia repair cases were identified during the 5-year period. Median length of stay of the non-drain placement group was significantly shorter than that of the drain placement group (2 versus 6 days, P < 0.001). In total, 10.8% of patients with drain suffered from post-op wound infection compared to 3.6% in patients without a drain tube in-situ (P = 0.005). Seroma rates were no different with or without a drain (15.7% versus 16.9% P = 0.78). When stratified by 'complexity', there was a trend towards increased complications when drains were used.

CONCLUSION

Drain tubes were placed in only a small proportion of patients during incisional hernia repairs and were associated with a higher post-operative wound infection rate. When stratified by the 'complexity' factors outlined by the recent legal case, complications in more 'complex' patients may actually increase when a drain tube is used.