UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Oncological efficiency of wide local excision in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

BACKGROUND

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a slow-growing, low- to intermediate-grade malignant sarcoma. Its optimal treatment is resection with wide margins; the likelihood of local control associated with this procedure exceeds 90%. The probability of regional or distant metastases is <5%.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the clinical, epidemiological, and pathological features, the treatment types, and outcomes of patients to investigate the width of safe surgical margins (SM) and how the width of SMs affected recurrence in DFSP.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the records of 60 patients who were initially operated on with wide local excision for DFSP in the period 2008-2019. Optimal cutoff points for SMs were calculated with the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and found as 1.925 cm histopathologically and 2.26 cm macroscopically.

RESULTS

During the mean 89.6-month follow-up, local recurrence was seen in 36.7% and distant metastasis in 20% of the patients. Recurrences were significantly related to peripheral resection margins. Analysis by histopathologic cutoff points showed that the local recurrence rate was 84% when SM was ≤1.925 cm, but only 2.85% when >1.925 cm (p = 0.002). Recurrence-free survival was 40.92 months when SM was ≤1.925 cm and 225.75 months when s >1.925 cm (p<0.001). Analysis by macroscopic cutoff points showed that the local recurrence rate was 95.5% when SM was ≤2.26 cm, but only 4% when >2.26 cm (p = 0.001). Recurrence-free survival was 43 months when SM was ≤2.26 cm and 222 months when >2.26 cm (p<0.001). In metastatic patients, progression-free survival was 9 months with cytotoxic chemotherapy, whereas 38.4 months with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (imatinib) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study showed SMs >2.5 cm to be sufficiently safe for WLE and optimized the balance among safe margin width, reconstruction need, and surgical morbidity. In metastatic DFSP patients, tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy for progression-free survival.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans challenges: a case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare variant of skin sarcoma which is characterized by proliferation of spindle cells in a storiform pattern. Although it is mostly benign in its primary stages, it can cause a high burden of morbidity unless it is thoroughly excised.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we review six cases of DFSP which were characterized by skin lesions in various parts of the body. Patients were from 26 to 51 years old; four were Asian men and two were Asian women. Wide surgical excision was performed for all these patients and no extra treatment was considered. Samples were studied by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) tests. Only one of our patients experienced recurrence after the initial surgery.

CONCLUSION

Determining the best surgical method is still a dilemma in the treatment of DFSP lesions. There are numerous studies to prove the efficacy of various surgical interventions. Although DFSP is not commonly known as a malignant skin lesion, delay in treatment will have a catastrophic impact on patients' lives. Thus, applying an in-time surgical method (wide local excision in our cases) in treating DFSP is crucial in preventing recurrence as well as decreasing the morbidity burden of DFSP.

Risk factors for the development of local recurrence in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Local recurrence (LR) is one of the main pitfalls in surgery for extremities soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS). Achieving clear histopathological margins is the most important factor to reduce the risk of LR, but the ability to do so depends on not only surgical technique but also the interplay between tumor biology, anatomical location and surgical approach. The balance between postoperative morbidity and oncological benefits in reducing the risk of LR needs to be considered.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover which etiological factors for the development of eSTS lead to an increased risk of LR and discuss histological subtypes that have a high risk of LR and which surgical and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies can minimize the risk of LR.

EXPERT OPINION

The traditional view that surgical radicality always results in low rates of LR, while marginality alone always leads to high rates of relapse, is outdated. In the modern era of surgical oncology, limb salvage and high-level function after resectional surgery are the key surgical goals. The best results are achieved by combining effective neoadjuvant treatments with planned bespoke oncological operations that consider the biological and anatomical factors of each individual sarcoma.

Adequate surgical margins for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans - A multi-centre analysis

BACKGROUND

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a locally aggressive tumour. Adequate margins have a positive impact on recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to assess how adequate margins are achieved and secondly which additional treatment modalities might be necessary to achieve adequate margins.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Patients with DFSP treated between 1991 and 2016 at three tertiary centres were included. Patient- and tumour characteristics were obtained from a prospectively held database and patient files.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients with a median age of 39 (Interquartile range [IQ], 31-50) years and a median follow-up of 50 (IQ, 18-96) months were included. When DFSP was preoperatively confirmed by biopsy and resected with an oncological operation in a tertiary centre, in 86% was had clear pathological margins after one excision. Wider resection margins were significantly correlated with more reconstructions (p = 0.002). A substantial discrepancy between the primary surgical macroscopic and the pathological margins was found with a median difference of 22 (range, 10-46) mm (Fig. 1). There was no significant influence of the width of the pathological clear margins (if > 1 mm) and the recurrence rate (p = 0.710).

CONCLUSION

The wider the resection margins, the more likely it is to obtain clear pathological margins, but the more likely patients will need any form of reconstruction after resection. The aim of the primary excision should be wide surgical resection, where the width of the margin should be balanced against the need for reconstructions and surgical morbidity.

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a slow growing, low- to intermediate-grade dermal soft-tissue tumor. It has a high local recurrence rate but low metastatic potential. It is characterized by a uniform spindle cell arrangement, classically with a storiform pattern and CD34 immunoreactivity. The histomorphology and immunophenotype overlap with a broad range of other neoplasms. The standard treatment is complete surgical excision. The surgical procedures include wide local excision (WLE) with tumor free margins, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and amputation. Unresectable DFSPs are treated with radiation therapy and/or targeted therapy. DFSP has characteristic t(17; 22) (q22; q13), resulting in a COL1A1- PDGFB fusion transcripts in more than 90% of DFSPs. Molecular detection of the gene rearrangement or fusion transcripts is helpful for the diagnosis of patients with atypical morphology and for screening candidates for targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The aims of the present review are to update the clinical presentation, tumorigenesis and histopathology of DFSP and its variants for diagnosis and differential diagnosis from other benign and malignant tumors, to compare the advantages and drawbacks of WLE and MMS, to propose the baseline for selecting surgical procedure based on tumor’s location, size, stage and relationship with surrounding soft tissue and bone structures, and to provide a biologic rationale for the systemic therapy. We further propose a modified clinical staging system of DFSP and a surveillance program for the patients after surgical excision.

Unmasking dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Case report of an atypical presentation complicated by post-surgical excision

INTRODUCTION

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a rare type of malignant tumor of the cutaneous soft tissue that typically involves the dermis and surrounding structures. The typical clinical presentation involves an asymptomatic, slowly enlarging, indurated plaque, usually found on the trunk.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Here we present an atypical presentation of DFSP in a patient with a recurrent mass that was initially diagnosed as a lipoma, with supporting literature and clinical considerations for post-surgical management DISCUSSION: In its earlier stages, DFSP can mimic other benign or malignant dermatological pathologies, which can complicate diagnosis purely via history and physical exam. Atypical features such as prior surgical management, morphology, and location can complicate the clinical diagnosis of DFSP. Immunohistochemistry is often required for definitive diagnosis as DFSP is CD34+ and is histologically described as spindle-cells in whorled or storiform pattern, with uniform, small elongated cells.

CONCLUSION

DFSP is a rare tumor of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Though it commonly presents with induration, skin discoloration, and telangiectasias, it is important to keep DFSP as a differential in new masses found on previous surgical sites, especially if the previous mass had a possibility of recurrence.