1
|
De Bellis M, Mastrosimini MG, Capelli P, Alaimo L, Conci S, Campagnaro T, Pecori S, Scarpa A, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A. The Relevance of Radial Margin Status in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review. Dig Surg 2024; 41:92-102. [PMID: 38447545 DOI: 10.1159/000535995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is poor, and curative-intent resection is the most effective treatment associated with long-term survival. Surgery is technically demanding since it involves a major hepatectomy with en bloc resection of the caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct. Furthermore, to achieve negative margins, it may be necessary to perform concomitant vascular resection or pancreatoduodenectomy. Despite this aggressive approach, recurrence is often observed, considering 5-year recurrence-free survival below 15% and 5-year overall survival that barely exceeds 40%. SUMMARY The literature reports that survival rates are better in patients with negative margins, and surprisingly, R0 resections range between 19% and 95%. This variability is probably due to different surgical strategies and the pathologist's expertise with specimens. In fact, a proper pathological examination of residual disease should take into consideration both the ductal and the radial margin (RM) status. Currently, detailed pathological reports are lacking, and there is a likelihood of misinterpreting residual disease status due to the missing of RM description and the utilization of various definitions for surgical margins. KEY MESSAGES The aim of PHCC surgery is to achieve negative margins including RM. More clarity in reporting on RM is needed to define true radical resection and consistent design of oncological studies for adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy,
| | - Maria Gaia Mastrosimini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Capelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Pecori
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Efficacy of Extended Modification in Left Hemihepatectomy for Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison Between H12345'8'-B-MHV and H1234-B. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e585-e591. [PMID: 35129528 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to verify the prognostic impact of the tumor exposure at the liver transection margin (LTM) in left-sided perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of middle hepatic vein (MHV) resection on this exposure. BACKGROUND In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, tumors are unexpectedly exposed at the LTM during left hemihepatectomy (LH). METHODS Patients who underwent LH for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma during 2002 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. LH was classified into conventional and extended types, which preserved and resected the MHVs, respectively. Positive LTM was defined as the involvement of invasive carcinoma at the liver transection plane and/or the adjacent Glissonean pedicle exposed. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared between procedures. RESULTS Among 236 patients, conventional and extended LHs were performed in 198 and 38 patients, respectively. The LTM was positive in 31 (13%) patients, with an incidence of 14% versus 8% ( P = 0.432) and 24% versus 0% in advanced tumors ( P = 0.011). Tumor size ≥ 18 mm ( P = 0.041), portal vein invasion ( P = 0.009), and conventional LH ( P = 0.028) independently predicted positive LTM. In patients with negative LTM, the survival was comparable between the two groups: 60.4% versus 59.2% at 3 years ( P = 0.206), which surpassed 17.7% for those with positive LTM in the conventional group ( P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LTM status was an independent prognostic factor ( P = 0.009) along with ductal margin status ( P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS The LTM status is an important prognostic factor in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Extended LH reduced the risk of tumor exposure at the LTM with a subsequent improvement in the survival, particularly in advanced tumors.
Collapse
|
3
|
De Bellis M, Mastrosimini MG, Conci S, Pecori S, Campagnaro T, Castelli C, Capelli P, Scarpa A, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A. The Prognostic Role of True Radical Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma after Improved Evaluation of Radial Margin Status. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246126. [PMID: 36551610 PMCID: PMC9776927 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evaluation of surgical margins in resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) remains a challenging issue. Both ductal (DM) and radial margin (RM) should be considered to define true radical resections (R0). Although DM status is routinely described in pathological reports, RM status is often overlooked. Therefore, the frequency of true R0 and its impact on survival might be biased. OBJECTIVE To improve the evaluation of RM status and investigate the impact of true R0 on survival. METHODS From 2014 to 2020, 90 patients underwent curative surgery for PHCC at Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy. Both DM (proximal and distal biliary margin) and RM (hepatic, periductal, and vascular margin) status were evaluated by expert hepatobiliary pathologists. Patients with lymph-node metastases or positive surgical margins (R1) were candidates for adjuvant treatment. Clinicopathological and survival data were retrieved from an institutional database. RESULTS True R0 were 46% (41) and overall R1 were 54% (49). RM positivity resulted in being higher than DM positivity (48% versus 27%). Overall survival was better in patients with true R0 than in patients with R1 (median survival time: 53 vs. 28 months; p = 0.016). Likewise, the best recurrence-free survival was observed in R0 compared with R1 (median survival time: 32 vs. 15 months; p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis identified residual disease status as an independent prognostic factor of both OS (p = 0.009, HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.27-5.63) and RFS (p = 0.009, HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.20-3.83). CONCLUSION Excellent survival was observed in true R0 patients. The improved evaluation of RM status is mandatory to properly stratify prognosis and select patients for adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Gaia Mastrosimini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Pecori
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Claudia Castelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Capelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Impact of Positive Radial Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071680. [PMID: 35406452 PMCID: PMC8996964 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The only potentially curative treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is complete (R0) resection. This is difficult to achieve and great effort should be made to optimise surgical margins assessment and to thoroughly define their prognostic value. When considering resections for PHC, not only bile duct margins (ductal margins, DM), but also the liver transection plane and the dissection plane in the hepatoduodenal ligament (radial margins, RM) should be examined. Studies concerning PHC resections with comprehensive analyses of the recurrence and survival related to margins status most frequently consider only ductal margins. The importance of also assessing radial margins’ prognostic value was recently introduced and deserves to be further studied. To our knowledge, there is currently no evidence of prognostic value of isolated positive RM. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and to investigate the effects on the recurrence and survival of positive isolated RM in resected PHC. Abstract In resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), positive ductal margin (DM) is associated with poor survival. There is currently little knowledge about the impact of positive radial margin (RM) when DM is negative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the role of positive RM. Patients who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017 where retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to margin positivity: an isolated RM-positive group and DM ± RM group. Of the 75 patients identified; 34 (45.3%) had R1 resection and 17 had positive RM alone. Survival was poorer in patients with R1 resection compared to R0 (p = 0.019). After stratification according to margin positivity; R0 patients showed better survival than DM ± RM-positive patients (p = 0.004; MST 43.9 vs. 23.6 months), but comparable to RM-positive patients (p = 0.361; MST 43.9 vs. 39.5 months). Recurrence was higher in DM ± RM group compared to R0 (p = 0.0017; median disease-free survival (DFS) 15 vs. 30 months); but comparable between RM and R0 group (p = 0.39; DFS 20 vs. 30 months). In univariate and multivariate analysis, DM positivity resulted as a negative prognostic factor both for survival and recurrence. In conclusion, positive RM resections appear to have different recurrence patterns and survival rates than positive DM resections.
Collapse
|
5
|
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: What the radiologist needs to know. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103:288-301. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Manzia TM, Parente A, Lenci I, Sensi B, Milana M, Gazia C, Signorello A, Angelico R, Grassi G, Tisone G, Baiocchi L. Moving forward in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1939-1955. [PMID: 35070034 PMCID: PMC8713313 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.1939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite being the second most frequent primary liver tumor in humans, early diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are still unsatisfactory. In fact, survival after 5 years is expected in less than one fourth of patients diagnosed with this disease. Rare incidence, late appearance of symptoms and heterogeneous biology are all factors contributing to our limited knowledge of this cancer and determining its poor prognosis in the clinical setting. Several efforts have been made in the last decades in order to achieve an improved classification/understanding with regard to the diverse CCA forms. Location within the biliary tree has helped to distinguish between intrahepatic, perihilar and distal CCA types. Sequence analysis contributed to identifying several characteristic genetic aberrations in CCA that may also serve as possible targets for therapy. Novel findings are expected to significantly improve the management of this malignancy in the near future. In this changing scenario our review focuses on the current and future strategies for CCA treatment. Both systemic and surgical treatments are discussed in detail. The results of the main studies in this field are reported, together with the ongoing trials. The current findings suggest that an integrated multidisciplinary approach to this malignancy would be helpful to improve its outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso M Manzia
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parente
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Martina Milana
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Carlo Gazia
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Angelico
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grassi
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Redefining resection margins and dissection planes in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-radical resection is a rare event. Virchows Arch 2021; 480:557-564. [PMID: 34783866 PMCID: PMC8989813 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03231-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Radical tumor resection (pR0) is prognostic for disease-free and overall survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, no universal agreement exists on the definition of radical resection and histopathological reporting. The aim of this study was to provide a standardized protocol for histopathological assessment and reporting of the surgical specimen obtained after resection for pCCA. All consecutive patients operated for pCCA with curative intent at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2012 and 2021 were included. A standardized protocol for histopathological assessment and reporting of the surgical specimen after liver resection for pCCA is presented. A detailed mapping of the transection margins and dissection planes was performed. The results of applying different existing pR0 definitions were compared. Sixty-eight patients with pCCA were included. Five transection margins and two dissection planes were defined. By defining pR0 as cancer-free margins and planes tolerating distances <1mm, the pR0 rate was 66%. However, when pR0 was set as >1mm from invasive cancer to all resection margins and dissection planes, the pR0 rate fell to 16%. This study supports the use of thorough and standardized pathological handling, assessment and reporting of resection margins and dissection planes of surgical specimens of pCCA.
Collapse
|