Impact of Mitomycin-C-Induced Neutropenia after Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Postoperative leukopenia after cytoreductive surgery and hypertherm intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal carcinomatosis- causes and implication on outcomes in a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Leukocytes have been reported to have tumor stimulating effects in colorectal cancer, among other malignancies. In line with this, earlier research has shown improved disease-free survival in patients with postoperative neutropenia compared to non-neutropenic patients following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hypertherm intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

AIM

To evaluate the impact of postoperative leukopenia after CRS and HIPEC on recurrence rate, survival, and risk of complications.

METHODS

All CRS and HIPEC-procedures for colorectal adenocarcinoma in the national Swedish HIPEC-registry since 2015 and local registries in Uppsala and Malmö since 2003 until December 31st, 2021, were included (n = 921). Patients who did not complete a full CRS and HIPEC procedure (n = 99), had incomplete macroscopic cytoreduction (n = 25) or a lack of information on leukocyte count (n = 213) were excluded, resulting in 584 analyzed cases. Primary outcome was overall recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative leukopenia was observed in 54 (9.2%) cases of which 32 (5.5%) developed severe leukopenia. No differences in patient characteristics were noted between those with or without leukopenia. There were no differences in 3-year recurrence rate, overall survival or 3-year recurrence-free survival, between the groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment, HR 1.32 (95% CI: 1.02-1.71), higher PCI-score, HR 1.50 (95% CI: 1.09-2.05) and higher pN-stage HR 2.52 (95% CI: 1.74-3.65) were associated with higher 3-year recurrence rate. 3-year mortality was associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment, HR 1.82 (95% CI: 1.06-3.11), severe postoperative complication, HR 2.39 (95% CI: 1.39-4.13) and high PCI-score, HR 2.60 (95% CI: 1.31-5.14). Treatment with combined oxaliplatin/irinotecan, HR 12.34 (95% CI: 4.51-33.74) was associated with developing postoperative leukopenia. Longer operation time, HR 2.30 (95% CI: 1.55-3.42), and severe leukopenia, HR 3.50 (95% CI: 1.25-9.77) were associated with postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative leukopenia did not impact recurrence rate or long-term survival in a statistically significant manner. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and high PCI-score were associated with both recurrent disease and mortality within 3 years.

The pharmacokinetic profile of mitomycin C released from an injectable supramolecular hydrogel in a rodent model

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the pharmacokinetics of an ureido-pyrimidinone poly(ethylene) glycol (UPy-PEG) hydrogel loaded with mitomycin C (MMC) in rats. The hydrogel aims to enhance the intraperitoneal residence time of MMC, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes for peritoneal metastases (PM) patients.

METHODS

Rats were divided into two groups: h-MMC (n = 8), receiving MMC encapsulated in hydrogel, and pbs-MMC (n = 6), receiving MMC in PBS. Blood samples were collected from 5 min to 48 h post-administration. MMC concentrations were measured using LC-ESI-MS. Systemic and local adverse effects were assessed through blood analysis and post-mortem histopathology.

RESULTS

The hydrogel prolonged detectable plasma MMC levels: 24 h for h-MMC vs. 4 h for pbs-MMC. h-MMC had a Cmax of 120 ± 21 μg/L and a Tmax of 52.5 ± 8.2 min; pbs-MMC had a Cmax of 358 ± 24 μg/L and a Tmax of 37.5 ± 8.2 min. The area under the curve ratio of h-MMC/pbs-MMC was 87 %. Platelet counts were significantly lower in h-MMC at 24- and 48 h and in pbs-MMC at 48 h. No liver or kidney damage was observed, though vacuolated macrophages were noted in the hydrogel-treated groups.

CONCLUSION

The hydrogel effectively prolonged MMC presence in plasma, suggesting extended intraperitoneal residence time and supporting previous findings of therapeutic effectiveness in a PM rat model.

Challenges following CRS and HIPEC surgery in cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes

Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) are a pair of relatively modern therapeutic surgical methods in advanced cancerous patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The goal of CRS + HIPEC is treatment or to improve survival outcomes, which are linked to high morbidity side effects and complications, even with their possible advantages. Surgical-related, chemotherapy-related, anesthetic-related, gastrointestinal, organs and systemic complications are the categories into which complications are separated according to frequency, risk factors, and effect on patient outcomes. In this narrative review of the literature, the side effects and complications of HIPEC + CRS in cancer patients with PM are examined. The present knowledge on the incidence, frequency, kinds, and risk factors of acute complications following CRS + HIPEC is summarized in this study. This review emphasizes the need for careful patient selection criteria, precise surgical technique, and thorough intraoperative care to reduce or manage these risks. Moreover, it highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in treating these patients. This study aims to know these complications, improve clinical practice, and guide future studies to increase the safety and efficacy of CRS + HIPEC in treating metastatic colorectal cancer.

Comparison of EPIC Versus HIPEC in the Treatment of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases and Appendix Tumors Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

BACKGROUND

The selection of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer or appendiceal neoplasms following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) depends on the surgeon's discretion. This study was designed to compare postoperative and oncologic outcomes of HIPEC and EPIC using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

METHODS

This study included 175 patients who received HIPEC or EPIC following CRS at a single tertiary university hospital between December 1999 and December 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to control for pretreatment characteristics between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with postoperative and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

After IPTW, no significant differences in baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were observed between the two groups. The HIPEC group had a significantly longer operation time than the EPIC group. The EPIC group showed a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate than the HIPEC group. Operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02; p < 0.001), bowel anastomosis (OR 7.25; 95% CI 1.16-45.2; p = 0.034), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 7.62; 95% CI 1.85-31.4; p = 0.005), and EPIC (OR 8.76; 95% CI 2.16-35.5; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for major surgical complications. No association was observed between intraperitoneal chemotherapy type and major hematologic toxicity, overall survival, progression-free survival, or peritoneal progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

EPIC was a risk factor for major surgical complications. Survival outcomes were similar between the two types of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Short-Term Safety Evaluation of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Intraoperative and Postoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) during and after gastric cancer (GC) surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for GC surgery patients at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, from January 2020 to September 2022. The study group (n = 120) received HIPEC and the control group (n = 268) did not receive albumin-bound paclitaxel. Short-term safety indicators including intraoperative complications, hematological toxicity, liver and kidney function, and gastrointestinal function recovery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding intraoperative complications, hematological toxicity, liver and kidney function, and gastrointestinal function recovery time (P > 0.05 for all). In the study group, patients were further divided into subgroups based on dose and timing. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences among the different dose subgroups. However, when focusing on timing subgroups, the postoperative subgroup exhibited significantly higher white blood cell counts and bilirubin levels compared to the intraoperative subgroup, while the intraoperative subgroup had significantly higher bilirubin levels compared to both postoperative and intraoperative plus postoperative subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Albumin-bound paclitaxel demonstrates good safety and tolerability in HIPEC during and after GC surgery, without increasing the risk of intraoperative complications.

A Multicenter Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Nanoliposomal Irinotecan for Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients with Peritoneal Surface Disease

BACKGROUND

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a promising novel hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) agent given its enhanced efficacy against gastrointestinal tumors, safety profile, thermo-synergy, and heat stability. This report describes the first in-human phase 1 clinical trial of nal-IRI during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC.

METHODS

Patients with peritoneal surface disease (PSD) from appendiceal and colorectal neoplasms were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial using nal-IRI (70-280 mg/m²) during HIPEC for 30 min at 41 ± 1 °C. The primary outcome was safety. The secondary outcomes were pharmacokinetics (PK) and disease-free survival. Adverse events (AEs) categorized as grade 2 or higher were recorded. The serious AEs (SAEs) were mortality, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Irinotecan and active metabolite SN38 were measured in plasma and peritoneal washings.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 18 patients, who received nal-IRI during HIPEC at 70 mg/m² (n = 3), 140 mg/m² (n = 6), 210 mg/m² (n = 3), and 280 mg/m² (n = 6). No DLT or mortality occurred. The overall morbidity for CRS/HIPEC was 39% (n = 7). Although one patient experienced neutropenia, no AE (n = 131) or SAE (n = 3) was definitively attributable to nal-IRI. At 280 mg/m², plasma irinotecan and SN38 measurements showed maximum concentrations of 0.4 ± 0.6 µg/mL and 3.0 ± 2.4 ng/mL, a median time to maximum concentration of 24.5 and 26 h, and areas under the curve of 22.6 h*µg/mL and 168 h*ng/mL, respectively. At the 6-month follow-up visit, 83% (n = 15) of the patients remained disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 1 HIPEC trial (NCT04088786), nal-IRI was observed to be safe, and PK profiling showed low systemic absorption overall. These data support future studies testing the efficacy of nal-IRI in CRS/HIPEC.

Side-effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers

Background

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) produces unwanted side-effects that are mainly caused by chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, and these effects have not been systematically summarized. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the side-effects of HIPEC for GI cancers and propose practical strategies for adverse event management.

Methodology

PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for side-effects of HIPEC in GI cancers prior to October 20, 2022. A total of 79 articles were included in this review.

Results

Adverse events, such as enterocutaneous digestive fistulas, GI tract perforation, neutropenia, postoperative bleeding, ventricular tachycardia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, renal impairment, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, scrotal ulceration, and sarcopenia were described, and their clinical management was discussed. These side-effects involve the digestive, hematopoietic, circulatory, metabolic, and urinary systems. Effective methods for adverse event management included an expert multidisciplinary team, replacing chemotherapy drugs, using Chinese medicine, and careful preoperative assessments.

Conclusion

The side-effects of HIPEC are frequent and can be minimized by several effective methods. This study proposes practical strategies for adverse event management of HIPEC to assist physicians in choosing the optimal treatment method.