Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Impact of RAS, BRAF mutations and microsatellite status in peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer treated with cytoreduction + HIPEC: scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown survival benefits in select patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Molecular alterations, particularly RAS/BRAF mutations and Microsatellite Instability (MSI), play crucial roles in prognostic stratification and treatment planning, influencing both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). This scoping review evaluates the prognostic role of MSI and RAS/BRAF mutations in patients with PM-CRC treated with CRS-HIPEC.

DESIGN

A literature search was conducted across several databases to identify papers published between 2000 and September 2024. We selected 18 publications that considered DFS and OS as primary or secondary outcomes in patients with RAS/BRAF mutations and MSI following CRS-HIPEC treatment. Studies involving appendiceal cancer, peritoneal disease from non-CRC, pediatric patients, or subjects not treated with CRS-HIPEC were excluded.

RESULTS

Most studies suggest that RAS and BRAF mutations have a negative influence on survival outcomes. While inconsistencies exist, RAS mutations are generally associated with worse DFS. Specific KRAS subtypes such as KRASMUT2 or KRAS G12V and the BRAF V600 variant correlate with poorer prognosis. MSI status appears to attenuate the adverse effects of RAS/BRAF mutations on survival, although conflicting data persist.

CONCLUSION

RAS and BRAF mutations correlate with poorer outcomes in PM-CRC, underscoring the need for mutation-informed strategies to refine HIPEC and systemic therapies. Recognizing subtypes may improve patient selection for CRS-HIPEC, optimizing both local disease control and long-term survival. Future research should incorporate these molecular profiles to enhance therapeutic decision-making and better address this challenging condition.

Microsatellite instability should not determine candidacy for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a multimodal therapeutic option for the management of peritoneal metastases (PM). Treatment outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) PM undergoing CRS+HIPEC with microsatellite instability (MSI) remain unknown. We examined the patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with MSI CRC after CRS+HIPEC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of all patients with CRC PM undergoing CRS+HIPEC (2010-2020). Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using the chi-square test and independent samples t test, respectively. Survival was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

There were 324 patients diagnosed as having CRC PM undergoing CRS+HIPEC (MSI, n = 23; microsatellite stable [MSS], n = 301). There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics, tumor characteristics, or perioperative factors between the 2 groups. There was a trend toward improved survival in the MSI group with a median overall survival (OS) of 96.7 month compared with patients with MSS disease (median OS, 51.4 months; P = .10). Patients with MSI demonstrated median progression-free survival (PFS) 8.5 months compared with 11.4 months in the MSS cohort (P = .28).

CONCLUSION

Patients with CRC PM, regardless of MSI or MSS status, demonstrate similar OS and PFS after CRS+HIPEC. MSI status should not change a patient's candidacy for CRS+HIPEC.

Effect of RAS and BRAF mutations on peritoneal metastasis risk and cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (CRC-PM) have a worse prognosis than those with liver and lung metastases. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective locoregional treatment for CRC-PM. To date, the prognostic analysis of CRS/HIPEC mostly focuses on clinical and pathological characteristics; however, genetic characteristics, such as RAS/BRAF mutation status, are not sufficient. This study aimed to systematically assess the correlation between RAS/BRAF status and PM risk, as well as the prognostic efficacy of CRS/HIPEC for CRC.

METHOD

This study was written in accordance with the 2020 guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library with the following keywords: "Peritoneal Neoplasms," "raf Kinases" and "ras Proteins". The fixed-effects model and inverse variance method were used for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to reflect the risk of PM associated with RAS/BRAF mutations. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI were used to evaluate the effects of RAS/BRAF mutations on the prognosis of CRS/HIPEC.

RESULT

Eighteen articles included 5567 patients. In the risk analysis of PM, patients with BRAF mutation were more likely to have PM than those with wild-type BRAF (OR = 2.28, 95 % CI = 1.73-3.01, P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the effect of RAS mutation and wild-type on PM of CRC (OR = 1.28, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.66, P = .06, I2 = 0 %). In a prognostic analysis of CRS/HIPEC, RAS mutation predicted poor overall survival (HR = 1.68, 95 % CI = 1.39-2.02, P < 0.001, I2 = 1 %) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.61, 95 % CI = 1.34-1.94, P < 0.001, I2 = 42 %). The results for BRAF mutation was consistent with the prognostic impact of RAS mutation's overall survival (HR = 2.57, 95 % CI = 1.93-3.44, P < 0.001, I2 = 0 %) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.90, 95 % CI = 1.40-2.56, P < 0.001, I2 = 82 %).

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutation, rather than RAS mutation, was a high-risk factor for CRC-PM. And both BRAF and RAS mutations negatively affected the prognosis of CRS/HIPEC in CRC-PM patients. Our results could provide suggestions for the selection of comprehensive treatment for CRC-PM with RAS/BRAF mutations.

Top Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Articles from 2022 to Inform your Cancer Practice

Over the last few decades, the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without regional-based peritoneal therapies such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has evolved in the management of patients with peritoneal surface malignances (PSMs). Despite the benefit of CRS in improving oncologic outcomes, significant challenges remain in the treatment of patients with advanced PSMs, and the role of HIPEC continues to be questioned. Additionally, while there has been improvement in perioperative outcomes, long-term survival remains poor. As a result, there is much need to improve our understanding of the processes that drive tumor biology, thereby improving patient selection for various treatment approaches. Additionally, newer therapies are needed for patients who remain poor surgical candidates and who progress on systemic therapy. This article highlights recently published studies that we consider impactful in the care of patients with PSMs.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Multimodal treatment in peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal neoplasms may improve overall survival (OS). In this study, we reported our experience in using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal neoplasms. The first aim was to evaluate the overall survival of these patients. Furthermore, using the results of the Prodige 7 Trial and incorporating them with the entropy balance statistical tool, we generated a pseudopopulation on which to test the use of CRS alone. We performed a retrospective analysis based on a prospective database of all 55 patients treated with CRS + HIPEC between March 2004 and January 2023. The median OS was 47 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 90.8%, 58.7% and 42.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the data in the pseudogroup generated with entropy balance. This finding confirms the critical role of complete cytoreduction in achieving the best OS for patients with PM. PCI > 6 seems to be the most important prognostic factor influencing OS. At present, CRS + HIPEC seems to be the therapeutic strategy that guarantees the best results in terms of OS for patients with relatively low PCI and in whom a CCS ≤ 1 can be achieved.

Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence on KRAS mutational profiles in colorectal cancer (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aims to determine the prevalence of specific KRAS mutations and their prognostic value in a homogeneous cohort of patients with isolated CRC PM treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 13 Italian centers, gathered in a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. KRAS mutation subtypes have been correlated with clinical and pathological characteristics and survival [overall survival (OS), local (peritoneal) disease-free survival (LDFS) and disease-free survival (DFS)].

RESULTS

KRAS mutations occurred in 172 patients (47.5%) out of the 362 analyzed. Two different prognostic groups of KRAS mutation subtypes were identified: KRASMUT1 (G12R, G13A, G13C, G13V, Q61H, K117N, A146V), median OS > 120 months and KRASMUT2 (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12S, G12V, G13D, A59E, A59V, A146T), OS: 31.2 months. KRASMUT2 mutations mainly occurred in the P-loop region (P < 0.001) with decreased guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis activity (P < 0.001) and were more frequently related to size (P < 0.001) and polarity change (P < 0.001) of the substituted amino acid (AA). When KRASMUT1 and KRASMUT2 were combined with other known prognostic factors (peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction score, grading, signet ring cell, N status) in multivariate analysis, KRASMUT1 showed a similar survival rate to KRASWT patients, whereas KRASMUT2 was independently associated with poorer prognosis (hazard ratios: OS 2.1, P < 0.001; DFS 1.9, P < 0.001; LDFS 2.5, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRC PM, different KRAS mutation subgroups can be determined according to specific codon substitution, with some mutations (KRASMUT1) that could have a similar prognosis to wild-type patients. These findings should be further investigated in larger series.

Genomic Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Peritoneal Metastases from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Colorectal Cancer Registry

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to characterize patients with mCRC and PM from a clinical and molecular perspective using the American Association of Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) registry. Patients' tumor samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) from advanced disease and progression-free survival (PFS) from start of cancer-directed drug regimen were estimated and adjusted for the left truncation bias. A total of 1,281 patients were analyzed, 244 (19%) had PM at time of advanced disease. PM were associated with female sex [OR: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.54; P = 0.014] and higher histologic grade (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.08-2.71; P = 0.022), while rectal primary tumors were less frequent in patients with PM (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88; P < 0.001). APC occurred less frequently in patients with PM (N = 151, 64% vs. N = 788, 79%) while MED12 alterations occurred more frequently in patients with PM (N = 20, 10% vs. N = 32, 4%); differences in MED12 were not significant when restricting to oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants according to OncoKB. Patients with PM had worse OS (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16-1.81) after adjustment for independently significant clinical and genomic predictors. PFS from initiation of first-line treatment did not differ by presence of PM. In conclusion, PM were more frequent in females and right-sided primary tumors. Differences in frequencies of MED12 and APC alterations were identified between patients with and without PM. PM were associated with shorter OS but not with PFS from first-line treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Utilizing the GENIE BPC registry, this study found that PM in patients with colorectal cancer occur more frequently in females and right-sided primary tumors and are associated with worse OS. In addition, we found a lower frequency of APC alterations and a higher frequency in MED12 alterations in patients with PM.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer-An Overview of Current Status and Future Perspectives

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are observed in approximately 8% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, either synchronously or metachronously during follow-up. PM often manifests as the sole site of metastasis. PM is associated with a poor prognosis and typically shows resistance to systemic chemotherapy. Consequently, there has been a search for alternative treatment strategies. This review focuses on the global evolution of the combined approach involving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the management of PM. It encompasses accepted clinical guidelines, principles for patient selection, surgical and physiological considerations, biomarkers, pharmacological protocols, and treatment outcomes. Additionally, it integrates the relevant literature and findings from previous studies. The role of CRS and HIPEC, in conjunction with other therapies such as neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, is discussed, along with the management of patients presenting with oligometastatic disease. Furthermore, potential avenues for future development in this field are explored.

Is Systemic Chemotherapy Useful in Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases? A Propensity-Score Analysis

PURPOSE

Multimodal treatment of colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM) includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and surgical cytoreduction (CRS), eventually with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), in select patients. Considering lack of clear guidelines, this study was designed to analyze the role of chemotherapy and its timing in patients treated with CRS-HIPEC.

METHODS

Data from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise were collected by a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO). Clinicopathological variables, SC use, and timing of administration were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local (peritoneal) DFS (LDFS) after propensity-score (PS) weighting to reduce confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 367 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC were included in the propensity-score weighting. Of the total patients, 19.9% did not receive chemotherapy within 6 months of surgery, 32.4% received chemotherapy before surgery (pregroup), 28.9% after (post), and 18.8% received both pre- and post-CRS-HIPEC treatment (peri). SC was preferentially administered to younger (p = 0.02) and node-positive (p = 0.010) patients. Preoperative SC is associated with increased rate of major complications (26.9 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.0009). After PS weighting, there were no differences in OS, DFS, or LDFS (p = 0.56, 0.50, and 0.17) between chemotherapy-treated and untreated patients. Considering SC timing, the post CRS-HIPEC group had a longer DFS and LDFS than the pre-group (median DFS 15.4 vs. 9.8 m, p = 0.003; median LDFS 26.3 vs. 15.8 m, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRC-PM treated with CRS-HIPEC, systemic chemotherapy was not associated with overall survival benefit. The adjuvant schedule was related to prolonged disease-free intervals. Additional, randomized studies are required to clarify the role and timing of systemic chemotherapy in this patient subset.

Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement

Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur when cancer cells spread inside the abdominal cavity and entail an advanced stage of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prognosis, which is poor, correlates highly with tumour burden, as measured by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in specialized centres should be offered especially to patients with a low to moderate PCI when complete resection is expected. The presence of resectable metastatic disease in other organs is not a contraindication in well-selected patients. Although several retrospective and small prospective studies have suggested a survival benefit of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to CRS, the recently published phase III studies PRODIGE-7 in CRC patients with PM, and COLOPEC and PROPHYLOCHIP in resected CRC with high-risk of PM, failed to show any survival advantage of this strategy using oxaliplatin in a 30-min perfusion. Final results from ongoing randomized phase III trials testing CRS plus HIPEC based on mitomycin C (MMC) are awaited with interest. In this article, a group of experts selected by the Spanish Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD) and the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncologic Surgery (GECOP), which is part of the Spanish Society of Surgical Oncology (SEOQ), reviewed the role of HIPEC plus CRS in CRC patients with PM. As a result, a series of recommendations to optimize the management of these patients is proposed.

Peritoneal Metastasis: A Dilemma and Challenge in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common mode of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) and has a poorer prognosis compared to other metastatic sites. The formation of PM foci depends on the synergistic effect of multiple molecules and the modulation of various components of the tumor microenvironment. The current treatment of CRC-PM is based on systemic chemotherapy. However, recent developments in local therapeutic modalities, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC), have improved the survival of these patients. This article reviews the research progress on the mechanism, characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of CRC-PM, and discusses the current challenges, so as to deepen the understanding of CRC-PM among clinicians.

Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis of Rectal Origin

BACKGROUND

The peritoneum is a common metastatic site of colorectal cancer (CRC) and associated with worse oncological outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to improve outcomes in selected patients. Studies have demonstrated significant difference in survival of patients with primary colon and rectal tumors both in local and in metastatic setting; but only few assessed outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for rectal and colon tumors. We studied the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2009 and 2021 was performed.

RESULTS

199 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRC. 172 patients had primary colon tumors and 27 had primary rectal tumors. Primary rectal location was associated with longer surgery (mean 4.32, hours vs 5.26 h, p = 0.0013), increased blood loss (mean 441cc vs 602cc, p = 0.021), more blood transfusions (mean 0.77 vs 1.37units, p = 0.026) and longer hospitalizations (mean 10 days vs 13 days, p = 0.02). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in rectal primary group; 7.03 months vs 10.9 months for colon primaries (p = 0.036). Overall survival was not statistically significant; 53.2 months for rectal and 60.8 months for colon primary tumors. Multivariate analysis indicated origin (colon vs rectum) and Peritoneal Cancer Index to be independently associated with DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis had worse peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Overall survival was excellent in both groups. This data may be used for risk stratification when considering CRS/HIPEC for patients with rectal primary.

Impact of Molecular Status on Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) are present in 5 to 15% of instances of CRC, and the overall survival (OS) of patients with CRC-PM is much lower than that of patients with other isolated metastatic locations. In recent years, the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in conjunction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has resulted in a significant improvement in CRC-PM patients' OS. Despite this, a significant proportion of CRS patients continue to suffer complications of grades III to V or even die during the perioperative period. Early diagnosis, optimization of patient selection criteria, and refining of individualized combination therapy are necessary for these patients. In this review, we evaluate studies examining the relationship between molecular status and CRS in CRC-PM. Our objective is to gain a comprehensive understanding of how the altered molecular status of CRC-PM impacts CRS, which could increase the likelihood of tailored therapy in the future.

Effect of BRAF mutation on the prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery for synchronous peritoneal metastasis

Background

KRAS/BRAF mutations (mutKRAS/mutBRAF) are unfavorable prognostic factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases to the liver and lungs. However, their effects on the prognosis for patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis (S-PM) of CRC after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are controversial. In the study, we aimed to determine the effects of mutKRAS/mutBRAF on the prognosis for patients with S-PM who received CRS.

Methods

A total of 142 patients diagnosed with S-PM between July 2007 and July 2019 were included in this study. The demographics, mutKRAS/mutBRAF status, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the difference in survival between groups.

Results

Among 142 patients, 68 (47.9%) showed mutKRAS and 42 (29.5%) showed mutBRAF. The median OS values were 8.4 and 34.3 months for patients with mutBRAF and BRAF wild-type, respectively (P < 0.01). However, KRAS status was not significantly associated with median OS (P = 0.76). Multivariate analysis revealed carcinoembryonic antigen, CRS, HIPEC, and mutBRAF as independent predictors for OS. Based on these findings, a nomogram was constructed. The C-index was 0.789 (95% confidence interval, 0.742-0.836), indicating good predictive ability of the model. Furthermore, the 1- and 2-year survival calibration plots showed good agreement between the predicted and actual OS rates. The area under curves of the 1- and 2-year survival predictions based on the nomogram were 0.807 and 0.682, respectively. Additionally, mutBRAF was significantly associated with lower PFS (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

mutBRAF is an independent prognostic risk factor for S-PM. The established nomogram predicted the OS of patients with CRC having S-PM with high accuracy, indicating its usefulness as a valuable prognostic tool for the designated patient cohort.

Survival of Patients with Deficient Mismatch Repair Versus Proficient Mismatch Repair Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Curative-Intent Local Treatment of Metastases in a Nationwide Cohort

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether curative-intent local therapy of metastases is of similar benefit for the biological distinct subgroup of patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this nationwide study, recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in patients with dMMR versus pMMR mCRC who underwent curative-intent local treatment of metastases between 2015 and 2018. Subgroup analyses were performed for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and cytoreductive surgery ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS ± HIPEC). Multivariable regression was conducted.

RESULTS

Median RFS was 11.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5-41.1 months] for patients with dMMR tumors compared with 8.9 months (95% CI 8.1-9.8 months) for pMMR tumors. Two-year RFS was higher in patients with dMMR versus pMMR (43% vs. 21%). Results were similar within subgroups of local treatment (CRLM and CRS ± HIPEC). Characteristics differed significantly between patients with dMMR and pMMR mCRC; however, multivariable analysis continued to demonstrate dMMR as independent factor for improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.87]. Median OS was 33.3 months for dMMR mCRC compared with 43.5 months for pMMR mCRC, mainly due to poor survival of patients with dMMR in cases of recurrence in the preimmunotherapy era.

CONCLUSION

Patients with dMMR eligible for curative-intent local treatment of metastases showed a comparable to more favorable RFS compared with patients with pMMR, with a clinically relevant proportion of patients remaining free of recurrence. This supports local treatment as a valuable treatment option in patients with dMMR mCRC and can aid in shared decision-making regarding upfront local therapy versus immunotherapy.

Different oncological features of colorectal cancer codon-specific KRAS mutations: Not codon 13 but codon 12 have prognostic value

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are linked to Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. KRAS mutations are associated with poor CRC prognosis, especially KRAS codon 12 mutation, which is associated with metastasis and poorer survival. However, the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of KRAS codon 13 mutation in CRC remain unclear.

AIM

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of codon-specific KRAS mutations, especially in codon 13.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for stage I-III CRC between January 2009 and December 2019. Patients with KRAS mutation status confirmed by molecular pathology reports were included. The relationships between clinicopathological characteristics and individual codon-specific KRAS mutations were analyzed. Survival data were analyzed to identify codon-specific KRAS mutations as recurrence-related factors using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 2203 patients, the incidence of KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 mutations was 27.7%, 9.1%, and 1.3%, respectively. Both KARS codons 12 and 13 mutations showed a tendency to be associated with clinical characteristics, but only codon 12 was associated with pathological features, such as stage of primary tumor (T stage), lymph node involvement (N stage), vascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor size, and microsatellite instability. KRAS codon 13 mutation showed no associations (77.2% vs 85.3%, P = 0.159), whereas codon 12 was associated with a lower 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (78.9% vs 75.5%, P = 0.025). In multivariable analysis, along with T and N stages and vascular and perineural invasion, only codon 12 (hazard ratio: 1.399; 95% confidence interval: 1.034-1.894; P = 0.030) among KRAS mutations was an independent risk factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that KRAS codon 13 mutation is less likely to serve as a prognostic biomarker than codon 12 mutation for CRC in a large-scale cohort.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with stage I-III MMR-deficient colon cancer: a national, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase II study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Within the last two decades, major advances have been made in the surgical approach for patients with colorectal cancer. However, to this day we face considerable challenges in reducing surgery-related complications and improving long-term oncological outcomes. Unprecedented response rates have been achieved in studies investigating immunotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. This has raised the question of whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy may change the standard of care for localised dMMR colon cancer and pave the way for organ-sparing treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase II study in patients with stage I-III dMMR colon cancer scheduled for intended curative surgery. Eighty-five patients will be treated with one dose of pembrolizumab (4 mg/kg) and within 5 weeks will undergo a re-evaluation with an endoscopy and a CT scan-to assess tumour response-before standard resection of the tumour. The primary endpoint is the number of patients with pathological complete response, and secondary endpoints include safety (number and severity of adverse events) and postoperative surgical complications. In addition, we aspire to identify predictive biomarkers that can point out patients that achieve pathological complete response.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Regional Committee for Health Research and Ethics and the Danish Medicines Agency have approved this study. The study will be performed according to the Helsinki II declaration. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and presented at international congresses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05662527.

The molecular biology of peritoneal metastatic disease

Peritoneal metastases are a common form of tumor cell dissemination in gastrointestinal malignancies. Peritoneal metastatic disease (PMD) is associated with severe morbidity and resistance to currently employed therapies. Given the distinct route of dissemination compared with distant organ metastases, and the unique microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity, specific tumor cell characteristics are needed for the development of PMD. In this review, we provide an overview of the known histopathological, genomic, and transcriptomic features of PMD. We find that cancers representing the mesenchymal subtype are strongly associated with PMD in various malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss the peritoneal niche in which the metastatic cancer cells reside, including the critical role of the peritoneal immune system. Altogether, we show that PMD should be regarded as a distinct disease entity, that requires tailored treatment strategies.

Impact of myometrium invasion on survival outcomes following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective surgical intervention for peritoneal surface malignancy. The effect of myometrium invasion on outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective review of our institutional registry with analysis of CRS-HIPEC cases involving a hysterectomy. Compared cases with myometrium invasion versus those without invasion. Primary outcome was survival as measured by overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcome was the evaluation of risk factors for myometrium invasion based on multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 126 cases of CRS-HIPEC involving a hysterectomy were identified. Ninety-seven cases (76.9%) had no myometrium invasion and the remaining 29 cases (23.1%) had malignant invasion. The presence of myometrial invasion was a significant negative survival prognostic factor. The OS was halved with mean survival times of 2.8 (±2.3) versus 5.8 (±4.7) years for cases with and without invasion, respectively (p = 0.002). Five-year OS rates were also inferior with myometrium invasion at 17.4% versus 53.8% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.181, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.057-0.580, p = 0.002). A similar trend was present with DFS with mean survival times of 1.4 (±0.9) versus 3.7 (±3.9) years for noninvasion and invasion cases (p = 0.009). The 5-year DFS rates were 0% versus 34.8% (OR = 0.652, 95% CI: 0.549-0.775, p = 0.004). Secondary analysis significantly associated several risk factors with myometrium invasion to include lymph node positivity (OR = 2.539, 95% CI: 1.074-6.003, p = 0.012), colorectal primary tumors (OR = 2.248, 95% CI: 1.094-5.161, p = 0.035), and high-grade tumors (OR = 2.160, 95% CI: 1.080-4.820, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Myometrium invasion is a significant negative prognostic factor for survival following CRS-HIPEC. Several risk factors are potentially predictive of identifying those at high-risk for myometrium invasion.

Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: The Impact of the Results of PROPHYLOCHIP, COLOPEC, and PRODIGE 7 Trials on Peritoneal Disease Management

HIPEC is a potentially useful locoregional treatment combined with cytoreduction in patients with peritoneal colorectal metastases. Despite being widely used in several cancer centers around the world, its role had never been investigated before the results of three important RCTs appeared on this topic. The PRODIGE 7 trial clarified the role of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC in patients treated with radical surgery. Conversely, the PROPHYLOCHIP and the COLOPEC were designed to chair the role of HIPEC in patients at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases. Although all three trials demonstrated the relative ineffectiveness of HIPEC for treating or preventing peritoneal metastases, these results are not sufficient to abandon this technique. In addition to some criticisms relating to the design of the trials and their statistical value, the oxaliplatin-based HIPEC was found to be ineffective in preventing or treating peritoneal colorectal metastases, especially in patients already treated with systemic platinum-based chemotherapy. Several studies are ongoing investigating further HIPEC drugs and regimens. The review deeply discussed all the aspects and relapses of this new evidence.