Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database

Textbook outcome and textbook oncological outcome in esophagogastric cancer surgery - A systematic scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Quality assurance in esophagogastric surgery, particularly in an oncological context, is important, especially as long-term survival is highly affected by the short-term outcomes. Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) serve as multidimensional metrics to assess surgical quality by evaluating various perioperative factors, as well as oncological outcomes. TO and TOO have been associated with improved long-term survival.

AIM

This study aimed to examine the incidence of, and the definitions of TO and TOO used in esophagogastric oncological surgery.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the PRISMA scoping review extension. The AMSTAR-2 was used to rate the review. A comprehensive systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science and results were screened through Covidence. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

A total of 55 observational cohort studies on esophagogastric cancer surgery were included. A total of 245,075 patients was included in the assessment of the achievement of TO and TOO. The rate of TO achievement ranged from 20.4 to 84.2 %, while the rate of TOO achievement ranged from 21.3 to 57.6 %. TO and TOO definitions varied widely, combining a median of nine (range: 4-11) parameters with a total of 45 different parameters being reported.

CONCLUSION

This systematic scoping review showed significant variations in incidence and in the definitions used for TO and TOO in esophagogastric cancer surgery between the included studies. This highlights the importance of standardizing the definitions of TO and TOO.

Disparities in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy: an age and rural-urban residence-based cohort study with propensity score matching analysis

This study estimated overall survival (OS) among gastric cancer patients stratified by age and rural-urban residence after radical gastrectomy. Patients (n = 286) undergoing curative gastrectomy were categorized into four groups based on age (older ≥ 60 years or younger < 60 years) and residence (rural or urban), including rural older (G1), urban older (G2), rural younger (G3) and urban younger (G4) groups. G1 presented with significantly more males, upper stomach cancers and total gastrectomies, while less patients receiving ≥ 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates were 39.9% for G1, 61.1% for G2, 73.1% for G3, and 71.2% for G4, with a median OS of 47 months in G1 and not reached for other groups. OS was significantly worse in G1 than other groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, type of gastrectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, perineural invasion, pT category and pN category as independent prognostic factors. After propensity score matching, rural older patients continued to show significantly inferior OS compared to urban older (hazard ratio = 2.269 [1.274-4.042], P = 0.005) and rural younger (hazard ratio = 2.103 [1.116-3.961], P = 0.021) patients. Rural older patients suffered poorer OS after radical gastrectomy, highlighting the need for special attention and comprehensive treatment strategies.

Textbook outcome in ovarian cancer and its impact on survival: comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Patients who achieve the textbook outcome (TO) present an uneventful postoperative course. Obtaining TO has also been related to better survival in oncological patients. Information about TO in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer who undergo surgery is very scarce. Our objective was investigate TO in patients with carcinomatosis of ovarian origin who underwent interval surgery with or without HIPEC (TOOC) and its impact on survival.

METHODS

A multicenter study was performed between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were > 18 years old, with ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis, who underwent scheduled surgery after response to neoadjuvant therapy. The criteria to establish TOOC were no major complications, no mortality, non-prolonged stay (p75:10 days), complete cytoreduction (CC-0), and no readmission.

RESULTS

365 patients were included, and TOOC was achieved in 204 (55.9%) patients. CC-0 cytoreduction was obtained in 312(85.5%). 7 patients (1.9%) died. 71 (19.5%) presented major complications (≥ IIIa). The readmission rate was 9.3%, and 24.9% of the patients presented a prolonged stay. The parameter with most significant negative impact on achieving TOOC was length of stay. Multivariate analysis confirmed postsurgical PCI, age, HIPEC, and time of surgery in minutes as an independent factor of TOOC. Survival analysis showed that patients who achieved TOOC had better overall survival (41 months (24.5- 67) versus 27 months (14-48.2) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

TO is an easy and valuable management tool for evaluating and comparing results obtained at different centers after surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis of locally advanced ovarian cancer. Achieving TOOC benefits overall survival.

Textbook oncological outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer patients with preoperative sarcopenia: a multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND

The impact of postoperative sarcopenia on the Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains uncertain. This study investigates the relationship between sarcopenia and TOO, explores its long-term prognostic value, and develops a prognostic model incorporating sarcopenia and TOO for survival prediction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and pathological data from patients with LAGC who underwent radical surgery at two Chinese tertiary referral hospitals. Sarcopenia was defined as an SMI < 36.4 cm2/m2 in males and < 28.4 cm2/m2 in females. TOO was defined as the addition of perioperative chemotherapy to the textbook outcomes (TO). A nomogram was developed to predict postoperative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in LAGC patients.

RESULTS

The study included 972 patients with LAGC. The overall TOO achievement rate was 67.1%. The TOO achievement rate was significantly higher in patients non-sarcopenia compared to those with sarcopenia (68.9% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.031). Logistic regression revealed that age ≥ 65, high ASA score, and sarcopenia were independent risk factors for TOO failure. Cox regression analysis identified TOO, sarcopenia, tumor size, differentiation, vascular invasion, pT stage, and pN stage as independent predictors of OS and RFS. Nomogram models based on sarcopenia and TOO accurately predicted the 3-year and 5-year OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative sarcopenia was an independent predictor of TOO implementation. A prognostic prediction model that integrates preoperative sarcopenia and TOO, which outperforms the current staging system, can aid clinicians in effectively assessing the prognosis of patients with LAGC.

How to measure quality of surgery as a component of multimodality treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequent reasons for cancer-related death worldwide. The multimodal therapeutic strategies are now pragmatically tailored to each patient, especially in advanced GC. A radical but safe gastrectomy remains the cornerstone of the GC treatment. Moreover, the quality-of-life (QoL) outcome measures are now routinely utilized in order to select optimal type of gastrectomy, as well as reconstruction method. Postoperative complications are frequent, and effective diagnosis and treatment of complications is crucial to lower the mortality rates. The postoperative complications prolong hospital stay and may result in poor QoL, thus eliminating the completion of perioperative adjuvant therapy. Therefore, avoiding morbidity is not only relevant for the immediate postoperative course, but can also affect long-term oncological outcome. Measuring outcome enables surgeons to: monitor their own results; compare quality of treatment between centres; facilitate improvement both for surgery alone and combined treatment; select optimal procedure for an individual patient. Textbook oncological outcome is a composite quality measure representing the ideal hospitalization for gastrectomy, as well as stage-appropriate (perioperative) adjuvant chemotherapy. Standardized system for recording complications and adherence to multimodality treatment guidelines are crucial for achieving the ultimate goal of surgical quality-improvement that can benefit patients QoL and long-term outcomes after fast and uneventful hospitalization for gastrectomy.

Textbook outcome as indicator of surgical quality in a single Western center: results from 300 consecutive gastrectomies

Textbook outcome (TO) has been proposed as a tool to evaluate surgical quality. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) adds chemotherapeutic compliance to TO. This study was conducted to analyze the TO and TOO of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our center. Data from a prospective database of patients operated on for gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2018 and September 2022 were analyzed. Postoperative management followed Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines. The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit group defined TO as a multidimensional measure (10 items). TOO also considers guideline-accordant chemotherapeutic compliance. Three hundred patients underwent surgery during the study period (167 men, 133 women). One hundred seventy-six (58.7%) reached TO. Achieving TO was influenced by patients' comorbidities, calculated via the Charlson Comorbidity Score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.002) and surgery type (subtotal gastrectomy; p < 0.001), but not by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.057) or surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open; p = 0.208). The analysis of TOO included 213 patients. Of these, 71 (33%) underwent complete adequate systemic treatment. Compared with the non-TOO group, patients who achieved TOO had a lower median age (64 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001) and lower ASA score (p < 0.001) and more frequently underwent preoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Our results represent the experience of a single team at a high-volume Western institute. Patients' comorbidities and surgery type influenced whether TO was achieved. Conversely, younger age, lower ASA score and preoperative chemotherapy were associated with TOO.

Proximal gastric cancer-time for organ-sparing approach?

BACKGROUND

A steady increase in gastroesophageal junction and proximal gastric cancer (GC) incidence has been observed in the West. Given recent advances in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), we sought to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of patients with proximal GC who underwent total (TG) vs proximal gastrectomy (PG).

METHODS

Patients with stage II/III proximal GC who underwent curative-intent treatment between 2009 and 2019 were identified using National Cancer Database. Multivariable analysis was used to identify oncologic outcomes after TG vs PG.

RESULTS

Among 7616 patients with GC who underwent surgical resection, PG and TG were performed on 5246 (68.8%) and 2370 patients (31.2%), respectively. Patients who underwent PG were more likely to receive NAC (TG 52.3% vs PG 64.5%) (P < .001). On pathologic analysis, patients who underwent TG were more likely to have pT4 tumors (TG 11.7% vs PG 3.1%), metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) (TG 64.6% vs PG 60.4%), and >16 LNs evaluated (TG 64.1% vs PG 53.1%), yet a lower likelihood of negative resection margins (TG 86.6% vs PG 90.0%) (all P < .001). Although gastrectomy procedure type did not affect long-term survival, receipt of NAC was associated with overall survival (OS) among patients who underwent TG (5-year OS, NAC 43.5% vs no NAC 24.6%) and PG (5-year OS, NAC 43.1% vs no NAC 26.7%) (both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

PG may be an alternative surgical approach to TG in well-selected patients with proximal GC after administration of preoperative systemic chemotherapy.

Textbook oncological outcomes and prognosis after curative gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The impact of achieving textbook oncological outcome (TOO) as a multimodal therapy quality indicator on the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains inadequately assessed.

METHODS

Patients with AGC who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2017 at two East Asian medical centers were included. TOO was defined as achieving the textbook outcome (TO) and receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT or ACT). Cox and logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic and non-TOO-associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3626 patients, 57.6% achieved TOO (TOO group), exhibiting significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than the non-TOO group (both p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified TOO as an independent prognostic factor for 5-year OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.81; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that open gastrectomy, lack of health insurance, age ≥65 years, ASA score ≥ Ⅲ, and tumor size ≥50 mm are independent risk factors for non-achievement of TOO (all p < 0.05). On a sensitivity analysis of TOO's prognostic value using varying definitions of chemotherapy parameters, a stricter definition of chemotherapy resulted in a decrease in the TOO achievement rate from 57.6 to 22.3%. However, the associated reductions in the risk of death and recurrence fluctuated within the ranges of 33-39% and 28-37%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TOO is a reliable and stable metric for favorable prognosis in AGC. Optimizing the surgical approach and improving health insurance status may enhance TOO achievement.

Textbook outcome in liver surgery: open vs minimally invasive hepatectomy among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We sought to investigate whether minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) was superior to open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of achieving textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of HCC between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international database. TOLS was defined by the absence of intraoperative grade ≥2 events, R1 resection margin, posthepatectomy liver failure, bile leakage, major complications, in-hospital mortality, and readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 1039 patients who underwent HCC resection were included in the analysis. Although most patients underwent OH (n = 724 [69.7%]), 30.3% (n = 315) underwent MIH. Patients who underwent MIH had a lower tumor burden score (3.6 [IQR, 2.6-5.2] for MIH vs 6.1 [IQR, 3.9-10.1] for OH) and were more likely to undergo minor hepatectomy (84.1% [MIH] vs 53.6% [OH]) than patients who had an OH (both P < .001). After propensity score matching to control for baseline differences between the 2 cohorts, the incidence of TOLS was comparable among patients who had undergone MIH (56.6%) versus OH (64.8%) (P = .06). However, MIH was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (6.0 days [IQR, 4.0-8.0] for MIH vs 9.0 days [IQR, 6.0-12.0] for OH). Among patients who had MIH, the odds ratio of achieving TOLS remained stable up to a tumor burden score of 4; after which the chance of TOLS with MIH markedly decreased.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCC who underwent resection with MIH versus OH had a comparable likelihood of TOLS, although MIH was associated with a short length of stay.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach on Attainment of a Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Review of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a composite outcome measure realized when all desired short-term quality metrics are met following an oncologic operation. This study examined whether minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) is associated with increased likelihood of TOO attainment.

METHODS

The 2010-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. Surgical approach was described as open (OG), laparoscopic (LG), or robotic (RG). TOO was defined as having met five metrics: R0 resection, AJCC compliant lymph node evaluation (n ≥ 15), no prolonged length of stay (< 75th percentile by year), no 30-day readmission, and receipt of guideline-accordant systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Of 21,015 patients identified, 5708 (27.2%) underwent MIG (LG = 21.9%, RG = 5.3%). Patients who underwent RG were more likely to have met all TOO criteria, and consequently TOO. Logistic regression models revealed that patients undergoing MIG were significantly more likely to attain TOO. MIG was associated with a higher likelihood of adequate LAD, no prolonged LOS, and concordant chemotherapy. Patients who underwent LG and achieved TOO had the highest median OS (86.7 months), while the OG non-TOO cohort experienced the lowest (34.6 months). The median OS for the RG TOO group was not estimable; however, the mortality rate (.7%) was the lowest of the six cohorts.

CONCLUSION

RG resulted in a significantly increased likelihood of TOO attainment. Although TOO is associated with increased OS across all surgical approaches, attainment of TOO following MIG is associated with a statistically significantly higher median OS.

Improved guideline compliance and textbook oncologic outcomes among patients undergoing multimodal treatment and minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been identified to improve unfavorable survival outcomes among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), several randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated a difference in oncological outcomes/overall survival (OS) among patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline adherence and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) among patients undergoing MIS versus open surgery for LAGC.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with stage II/III LAGC (cT2-T4N0-3M0) who underwent curative-intent treatment between 2013 and 2019 were evaluated using the National Cancer Database. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the association between surgical approach, NCCN guideline adherence, TOO, and OS. The study was registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry (registration number: ISRCTN53410429) and conducted according to the Strengthening The Reporting Of Cohort Studies in Surgery and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 13,885 patients, median age at diagnosis was 68 years (IQR, 59-76); most patients were male (n = 9887, 71.2%) and identified as White (n = 10,295, 74.1%). Patients who underwent MIS (n = 4692, 33.8%) had improved NCCN guideline adherence and TOO compared with patients who underwent open surgery (51.3% vs 43.5% and 36.7% vs 27.3%, respectively; both P < .001). Adherence to NCCN guidelines and likelihood to achieve TOO increased from 2013 to 2019 (35.6% vs 50.9% and 31.4% vs 46.4%, respectively; both P < .001). Moreover, improved median OS was observed among patients with NCCN guideline adherence and TOO undergoing MIS versus open surgery (57.3 vs 49.8 months [P = .041] and 68.4 vs 60.6 months [P = .025], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

An overall increase in guideline-adherent treatment and achievement of TOO among patients with LAGC undergoing multimodal and curative-intent treatment in the United States was observed. Adoption of minimally invasive gastrectomy may result in improved short- and long-term outcomes.

Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate of textbook outcome (TO) and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) in the European population based on the GASTRODATA registry.

BACKGROUND

TO is a composite parameter assessing surgical quality and strongly correlates with improved overall survival. Following the standard of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer, TOO was proposed as a quality and optimal multimodal treatment parameter.

METHODS

TO was achieved when all the following criteria were met: no intraoperative complications, radical resection according to the surgeon, pR0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no severe postoperative complications, no reintervention, no admission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged length of stay, no postoperative mortality and no hospital readmission. TOO was defined as TO with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy compliance.

RESULTS

Of the 2558 patients, 1700 were included in the analysis. TO was achieved in 1164 (68.5%) patients. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70] and D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.10) had a positive impact on TO achievement. Older age (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94), pT3/4 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99), ASA 3/4 (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86) and total gastrectomy (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70), had a negative impact on TO achievement. TOO was achieved in 388 (22.8%) patients. Older age (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.53), pT3 or pT4 (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69), and ASA 3 or 4 (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.79) had a negative impact on TOO achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite successively improved surgical outcomes, stage-appropriate chemotherapy in adherence to the current guidelines for multimodal treatment of gastric cancer remains poor. Further implementation of oncologic quality metrics should include greater emphasis on perioperative chemotherapy and adequate lymphadenectomy.

Textbook outcome in oncological gastric surgery: a systematic review and call for an international consensus

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure used to assess the quality of surgical practice. It is a reflection of an "ideal" surgical result, based on a series of benchmarks or established reference points that may vary depending on the pathology in question. References to TO in the literature are scarce, and the few reports that are available were all published very recently. In the case of gastric surgery, there is no established consensus on the parameters that should be included in TO, a circumstance that prevents comparison between series.

AIM

To present a review of the literature on TO in gastric surgery (TOGS) and to try to establish a consensus on its definition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Following the PRISMA guide, we performed an unlimited search for articles on TOGS in the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane, Latindex, Scielo, and Koreamed databases, without language restriction, updated on December 31, 2022. The inclusion criterion was any type of study assessing TO in adult patients after oncological gastric surgery. Selected studies were assessed, and TOGS was measured. The parameters used to assess the achievement of TOGS in selected studies were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included, comprising a total of 44,581 patients who had undergone an oncological gastric resection. The median rate of TOGS was 38.6%. All the publications but one included mortality as a TO variable, showing statistically significant differences in favor of the group in which TOGS was achieved. All articles included the number of nodes examined in the surgical specimen, with the assessment of fewer than 15 being associated with a low rate of TOGS achievement in five studies (41.7%). The variable postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score was the most important cause of failure to achieve TOGS in four studies (33.3%). Seven articles (58.3%) found a significant increase in long-term survival in patients who obtained TO. Advanced age, elevated ASA, and Charlson score had a negative impact on obtaining TOGS.

CONCLUSIONS

The standardization of TOGS is necessary to be able to establish comparable results between groups.