Trends in and Prognostic Significance of Time to Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Diagnostic delay at diagnosis and time-to-treatment influence overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents with nonspecific symptoms, leading to long diagnostic delays and time-to-treatment. Data on the effects of diagnostic delay and time-to-treatment on the prognosis of PDAC patients are limited, dated and heterogeneous.

AIMS

To investigate whether diagnostic delay, time-to-treatment, or diagnostic delay + time-to-treatment (overall delay) impact overall survival (OS) and whether they differ in patients followed up at a tertiary referral center compared to community hospitals.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective cohort of consecutive patients with PDAC, recording demographics, presenting symptoms, stage, treatments, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 282 patients were included. Diagnostic delay>49 days was significantly associated with a higher risk of death in univariate (HR 1.627; 95 % CI 1.15-2.28; p = 0.005) but not in multivariate analysis, whereas overall delay>104 days was significantly associated with a higher risk of death in both univariate (HR 1.83; 95 %CI 1.29-2.61; p = 0.0008) and multivariate (HR, 1.63; 95 % CI, 1.13-2.34; p = 0.008) analyses. Patients who were entirely cared for in tertiary center presented a significantly shorter median time-to-treatment (49 vs. 56 days; p = 0.048) than those in community hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged diagnostic and overall delays seem to impair the survival of patients with PDAC. While diagnostic delay might be reduced with higher awareness of specific warning symptoms, the overall delay can be reduced through specific and faster dedicated therapeutic pathways in referral centers.

Insurance remains a major source of disparity for patients with testicular cancer: call for advocacy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of socioeconomic factors, including insurance status, on treatment and survival for patients with testicular cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We extracted a retrospective cohort from the National Cancer Database that included patients diagnosed with testicular cancer 2004-2020. Competing-risks and Cox regression multivariate models including demographic, pathological, and socioeconomic covariates were constructed to evaluate receipt of treatment and death, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 95 955 patients with testicular cancer were identified. Compared with private insurance, Medicaid (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, P < 0.001), Medicare (SHR 0.73, P < 0.001), and uninsured (SHR 0.72, P < 0.001) patients were associated with decreased likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. Compared with private insurance, Medicaid (SHR 0.55, P < 0.001), Medicare (SHR 0.76, P-value <0.001), uninsured (SHR 0.63, P-value < 0.001), and other government insurance (SHR 0.71, P = 0.010) was associated with decreased likelihood of receiving radiation. Medicaid insurance status (reference private, HR 2.60, P < 0.001) conferred the second largest hazard of death, behind having Stage III disease (reference Stage 0). Compared with private insurance, Medicare (HR 2.20, P < 0.001), no insurance (HR 2.32, P < 0.001), and other government insurance (HR 1.53, P = 0.027) statuses had higher risk of death. Patients diagnosed in Medicaid-expansion states had lower all-cause mortality (11.4% vs 13.6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Testicular cancer care relies on early diagnosis and treatment. It is critically important to have a healthcare system where individuals have access to insurance and are served equitably.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear today whether the poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was further worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this may affect providers and patients, today. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on care delivery and outcomes of patients with PDAC in the United States.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for PDAC, between 2017 and 2020. Changes in the number of diagnoses and treatment patterns were compared annually for the entire cohort. Changes in surgical outcomes and median time from diagnosis to treatment were compared and analyzed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of 127,613 patients with PDAC, PDAC diagnoses from 2017 (30,573) to 2019 (33,465) increased but decreased in 2020 (31,218). The number of patients receiving surgery or radiotherapy was stable between 2017 to 2019 (21.75% ± 0.05% and 13.9% ± 0.3%, respectively) but decreased in 2020 (20.7% and 12.4% respectively). Although patients received chemotherapy with increasing frequently from 2016 (60.7%) to 2019 (63.5%), this trend stopped in 2020 (63%). Of 27,490 patients undergoing surgery, the mean time from diagnosis to surgery increased from 2017 (34 days) to 2019 (56 days), with an increase in delay in 2020 (81 days). Moreover, patients who were tested for COVID-19, had a longer median time from diagnosis to surgery even if tested negative (COVID+, 140 days; COVID-, 112 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although the oncologic quality of PDAC surgery remained the same during the pandemic, not only did the pandemic lead to an underdiagnosis of PDAC and care delays, but even the suspicion of COVID-19 in patients with a negative test adversely affected their care.