Impact of subvalvular procedure for ischemic mitral regurgitation on leaflet configuration, mobility, and recurrence

Updated pathophysiological overview of functional MR (ventricular and atrial)

Basic mechanism of ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is subvalvular tethering. Left ventricular (LV) dilatation, in association with mitral valve (MV) annular dilatation, causes outward displacement of papillary muscles (PMs), which abnormally pulls or tethers MV leaflets, resulting in MV tenting, reduction in leaflets coaptation and MR. Because surgical annuloplasty does shorten distance between anterior and posterior MV annuli to improve coaptation but does not address this subvalvular tethering, ventricular FMR frequently persists or recurs in the chronic stage after surgical annuloplasty. This high incidence of persistent/recurrent MR requires additional procedures to reduce subvalvular tethering. Although patients occasionally show marked improvements after annuloplasty with surgical tethering reduction procedures such as PM approximation, evidence to support benefits of such surgery is limited, requiring further trials. Recently, MV adaptation or MV leaflets tissue growth associated with LV dilatation attracts attention. Patients with larger MV leaflets with significant LV dilatation/dysfunction show less MV tethering and MR compared to those with smaller MV leaflets but with similar LV remodeling, suggesting the protective or beneficial role of MV leaflets tissue growth against LV remodeling. The MV leaflets tissue growth has the potential to lead to novel strategies of treatment for ventricular FMR. It is well known that atrial FMR is frequent in patients with left atrial dilatation, typically in those with isolated atrial fibrillation. The degree of atrial FMR is usually mild, even when it is present, and occasionally moderate, and severe atrial FMR is really rare. It is known that only severe regurgitation causes heart failure in primary MR, resulting in description on indications of surgery or intervention for only severe MR in current guidelines. Therefore, this atrial FMR up to moderate degree did not attract attention for a long time. However, recent studies have shown that patients with only moderate atrial FMR develop severe heart failure, suggesting more aggressive indication of MV surgery or intervention for "moderate" regurgitation in patients with atrial FMR. Therefore, atrial FMR is now recognized highly important. The unveiled malignant nature of atrial FMR arises many questions, including (1) why patients with only moderate atrial FMR develop heart failure? (2) do patients with mild atrial FMR develop heart failure or not?, and many others. Atrial FMR seems even more mysterious after the unveiling of its significance.

Predictors of outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing percutaneous valve repair

Percutaneous mitral valve repair has been increasingly performed worldwide after approval. We sought to investigate predictors of clinical outcome in patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing percutaneous valve repair. The MITRA-UMG study, a single-centre registry, retrospectively collected consecutive patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe or severe MR undergoing MitraClip therapy. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure. Between March 2012 and July 2018, a total of 150 consecutive patients admitted to our institution were included. Procedural success was obtained in 95.3% of patients. The composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF was met in 55 patients (37.9%) with cumulative incidences of 7.6%, 26.2%, at 30 days and 1-year, respectively. In the Cox multivariate model, NYHA functional class and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi), independently increased the risk of the primary endpoint at long-term follow-up. At Kaplan–Meier analysis, a LVEDVi > 92 ml/m² was associated with an increased incidence of the primary endpoint. In this study, patients presenting with dilated ventricles (LVEDVi > 92 ml/m²) and advanced heart failure symptoms (NYHA IV) at baseline carried the worst prognosis after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Papillary muscle intervention vs mitral ring annuloplasty in ischemic mitral regurgitation

Background and Aims

The main pathophysiological factor of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is the outward displacement of the papillary muscles (PMs) leading to leaflet tethering. For this reason, papillary muscle intervention (PMI) in combination with mitral ring annuloplasty (MRA) has recently been introduced into clinical practice to correct this displacement, and to reduce the recurrence of regurgitation.

Methods

A meta‐analysis was conducted comparing the outcomes of PMI and MRA performed in combination vs MRA performed alone, in terms of MR recurrence and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR). A meta‐regression was carried out to investigate the impact of the type of PMI procedure on the outcomes.

Results

MR recurrence in patients undergoing both PMI and MRA was lower than in those who only had MRA (log incidence rate ratio, −0.66; lower‐upper limits, −1.13 to 0.20; I² = 0.0%; p = .44; Egger's test: intercept 0.35 [−0.78 to 1.51]; p = .42).

The group with both PMI and MRA and that with only MRA showed a slightly higher reduction in left ventricular diameters (−5.94%; −8.75% to 3.13%,). However, in both groups, LVRR was <10%. No difference was detected between PM relocation/repositioning and papillary muscle approximation in terms of LVRR (p = .33).

Conclusions

Using PMI and MRA together has a lower MR recurrence than using MRA alone. No significant LVRR was observed between the two groups nor between the PMI techniques employed.