Clinical impacts of CT-derived fractional flow reserve under insurance reimbursement: Results from multicenter, prospective registry

BACKGROUND

Although computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) has been reimbursed in a few countries, its impacts on daily practice of coronary artery diseases are not fully elucidated. We evaluated the clinical impacts of FFRCT under the real Japanese insurance reimbursement.

METHODS

In the multicenter prospective registry: DYNAMIC-FFRCT study, a total of 410 patients who underwent FFRCT analysis under reimbursement were prospectively enrolled at 6 Japanese sites from October 2019 to November 2021. Coronary CT angiography and FFRCT findings, treatment plans, and 90-day outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint was the redirection rate from the tests that might be expected without FFRCT [invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-selected group, myocardial perfusion single photon emission CT (MPS)-selected group, optimal medical therapy (OMT)-selected group, and others-selected group] to those that were actually performed based on FFRCT.

RESULTS

ICA could be avoided in 39.5 % in the ICA-selected group (N = 233). In particular, in 94.3 % of patients with an FFRCT value of >0.80, additional examinations, such as ICA, were avoided. In addition, in the MPS-selected group (N = 133), 92.6 % had no additional tests with FFRCT > 0.80, while only 2 cases with FFRCT ≤ 0.80 underwent additional MPS examination. On the contrary, 33.3 % of the OMT-selected group (N = 33) had FFRCT ≤ 0.80. Approximately, 35 % medical cost reduction was also finally expected.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of FFRCT could not only reduce unnecessary ICA and be a test that replaces the conventional non-invasive functional assessment modality but also result in medical cost reduction even when used under real Japanese insurance reimbursement.

Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived virtual fractional flow reserve (FFR) and FFR derived from computed tomography for functional assessment of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and intravascular ultrasound-derived fractional flow reserve (IVUS-FFR) are two functional assessment methods for coronary stenoses. However, the calculation algorithms for these methods differ significantly. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Six hundred and seventy patients (698 lesions) with known or suspected coronary artery disease were screened for this retrospective analysis between January 2020 and July 2021. A total of 40 patients (41 lesions) underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and FFR evaluations within six months after completing coronary CT angiography were included. Two novel CFD-based models (AccuFFRct and AccuFFRivus) were used to compute the CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR values, respectively. The invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 was used as the reference standard for evaluating the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR.

RESULTS

Both AccuFFRivus and AccuFFRct demonstrated a strong correlation with invasive FFR (R = 0.7913, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.6296, P < 0.0001), and both methods showed good agreement with FFR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.960 (P < 0.001) for AccuFFRivus and 0.897 (P < 0.001) for AccuFFRct in predicting FFR ≤ 0.80. FFR ≤ 0.80 were predicted with high sensitivity (96.6%), specificity (85.7%), and the Youden index (0.823) using the same cutoff value of 0.80 for AccuFFRivus. A good diagnostic performance (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 85.7%, and Youden index 0.754) was also demonstrated by AccuFFRct.

CONCLUSIONS

AccuFFRivus, computed from IVUS images, exhibited a high diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial ischemia. It demonstrated better diagnostic power than AccuFFRct, and could serve as an accurate computational tool for ischemia diagnosis and assist in clinical decision-making.

Combination of coronary CT angiography, FFRCT , and risk factors in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients suspected CAD

BACKGROUND

To examine the utility of fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (FFR_CT ) for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This was a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study including consecutive 1187 patients aged 50-74 years with suspected CAD and had available coronary CT angiography (CCTA). In patients with ≥50% coronary artery stenosis (CAS), FFR_CT was further analyzed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association of FFR_CT and cardiovascular risk factors with incident MACE within 2 years.

RESULTS

Among 933 patients with available information on MACE within 2 years after enrollment, the incidence rate of MACE was higher in 281 patients with CAS than in those without CAS (6.11 vs. 1.16 per 100 patient-year). In 241 patients with CAS, the Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that FFR_CT as well as diabetes mellitus and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level were independently associated with incident MACE. Moreover, the hazard ratio was significantly higher in patients harboring all three factors compared to those harboring 0-2 of the three factors (6.01; 95% confidence interval: 2.77-13.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Combinatorial assessment using CCTA for stenosis, FFR_CT , and risk factors was useful for more accurate prediction of MACE in patients with suspected CAD. Among patients with CAS, those with lower FFR_CT , diabetes mellitus, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level were at highest risk for MACE during the 2-year period following enrollment.

Influence of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction on the Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to demonstrate the influence of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction on the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR).

METHODS

One hundred vessels from 90 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent echocardiography, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), CT-FFR, invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and fractional flow reserve (FFR). The study population was divided into normal and dysfunction groups according to the LV diastolic function, and the diagnostic performance in both groups was assessed.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation between CT-FFR and FFR (R = 0.768 p < 0.001) on a per-vessel basis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82.3%, 81.8%, and 82%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.6%, 88.5%, and 87.2% in the normal group and 81%, 77.5%, and 78.7% in the dysfunction group, respectively. CT-FFR showed no statistically significant difference in the AUC in the normal group vs. the dysfunction group (AUC: 0.920 [95% CI 0.787-0.983] vs. 0.871 [95% CI 0.761-0.943], Z = 0.772 p = 0.440). However, there was still a good correlation between CT-FFR and FFR in the normal group (R = 0.767, p < 0.001) and dysfunction group (R = 0.767 p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LV diastolic dysfunction had no effect on the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR. CT-FFR has good diagnostic performance in both LV diastolic dysfunction and the normal group and can be used as an effective tool for finding lesion-specific ischemia while screening for arterial disease in patients.

Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA)-derived machine learning fractional flow reserve CT (ML-FFRct) versus that of ischemia detected on single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on incident cardiovascular outcomes.

BACKGROUND

SPECT MPI and ML-FFRct are noninvasive tools that can assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary atherosclerotic disease.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and SPECT MPI. ML-FFRct was computed using a ML prototype. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction (D/MI), and the secondary outcome was D/MI and unplanned revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) occurring more than 90 days postimaging. Multiple nested multivariate cox regression was used to model a scenario wherein an initial anatomical assessment was followed by a functional assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients (mean age: 64 ± 13 year; 53% males) were included. Comorbidities were prevalent (78% hypertension, 66% diabetes, 81% dyslipidemia). ML-FFRct was <0.8 in at least 1 proximal/midsegment was present in 41.6% of patients, and ischemia on MPI was present in 13.8%. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 7% of patients (n = 33) experienced D/MI. On multivariate Cox proportional analysis, the presence of ischemia on MPI but not ML-FFRct significantly predicted D/MI (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0-5.0; P = 0.047; or HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3-1.4; P = 0.306 respectively) when added to CCTA obstructive stenosis. Furthermore, the model with SPECT ischemia had higher global chi-square result and significantly improved reclassification. Results were similar using the secondary outcome and on several sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a high-risk patient cohort, SPECT MPI but not ML-FFRct adds independent and incremental prognostic information to CCTA-based anatomical assessment and clinical risk factors in predicting incident outcomes.

Effect of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Physicians' Clinical Behavior - Differences Between Sites With and Without Appropriate Use Criteria as Designated by the Japanese Reimbursement System

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) is an established tool for identifying lesion-specific ischemia that is now approved for use by the Japanese insurance system. However, current clinical reimbursement is strictly limited to institutions with designated appropriate use criteria (AUC). This study assessed differences in physicians’ behavior (e.g., use and interpretation of FFR_CT, final management) according to Japanese AUC and non-AUC site designation.

Methods and Results: Of 5,083 patients in the ADVANCE Registry, 1,829 from Japan were enrolled in this study. Physicians’ behavior after interrogating CCTA and FFR_CT was analyzed separately according to AUC and non-AUC site designation. Compared with AUC sites, patients referred for FFR_CT from non-AUC sites had a higher rate of negative FFR_CT, less severe anatomic stenosis, and a slightly lower rate of management plan reclassification (51.2% vs. 61.3%), with near-identical utility in both groups. Actual care corresponded equally well to post-FFR_CT plans in both groups. The likelihood of revascularization for positive or negative FFR_CT was similar between the 2 groups. Importantly, AUC and non-AUC sites were equally unlikely to revascularize patients with negative FFR_CT and stenosis >50% or patients with positive FFR_CT and stenosis <50%.

Conclusions: Compared with AUC sites, non-AUC sites had lower disease burden and reclassification of management plans, but nearly identical clinical integration. Actual care corresponded equally well to post-FFR_CT recommendations at both sites.