The effect of pravastatin on prevention of restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can quickly restore myocardial perfusion after acute coronary syndrome. Whether and which lipid-lowering regimens are effective in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and mortality risk after PCI remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the benefits of different lipid-lowering regimens on the risk of MACEs and mortality in the post-PCI population by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Public databases, including PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to August 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on lipid-lowering regimens in post-PCI populations were included and analysed. The outcomes were the incidence of all-cause mortality and MACEs, whether reported as dichotomous variables or as HRs.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine RCTs were included. For MACEs, alirocumab plus rosuvastatin (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.44), evolocumab plus ezetimibe and statins (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.59), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) plus pitavastatin (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.96) and icosapent ethyl plus statins (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.86) had significant advantages and relatively high rankings. For mortality, rosuvastatin (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.84), ezetimibe plus statins (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.89) and icosapent ethyl plus statins (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.96) had significant advantages compared with the control.

CONCLUSION

EPA, especially icosapent ethyl, plus statins had a beneficial effect on reducing the risk of MACEs and mortality in post-PCI patients. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors plus statins were able to reduce the risk of MACEs, but the risk of mortality remained unclear.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018099600.

Pitavastatin-incorporated nanoparticle-eluting stents attenuate in-stent stenosis without delayed endothelial healing effects in a porcine coronary artery model

AIM

The use of currently marketed drug-eluting stents presents safety concerns including increased late thrombosis, which is thought to result mainly from delayed endothelial healing effects (impaired re-endothelialization resulting in abnormal inflammation and fibrin deposition). We recently developed a bioabsorbable polymeric nanoparticle (NP)-eluting stent using a novel cationic electrodeposition technology. Statins are known to inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and to promote vascular healing. We therefore hypothesized that statin-incorporated NP-eluting stents would attenuate in-stent stenosis without delayed endothelial healing effects.

METHODS

Among six marketed statins, pitavastatin (Pitava) was found to have the most potent effects on VSMC proliferation and endothelial regeneration in vitro. We thus formulated a Pitava-NP-eluting stent (20µg Pitava per stent).

RESULTS

In a pig coronary artery model, Pitava-NP-eluting stents attenuated in-stent stenosis as effectively as polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). At SES sites, delayed endothelial healing effects were noted, whereas no such effects were observed in Pitava-NP-eluting stent sites.

CONCLUSION

Pitava-NP-eluting stents attenuated in-stent stenosis as effectively as SES without the delayed endothelial healing effects of SES in a porcine coronary artery model. This nanotechnology platform could be developed into a safer and more effective device in the future.

Preventing restenosis in early drug-eluting stent era: recent developments and future perspectives

Restenosis is the major limitation of the successful therapy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with coronary artery disease. The problem was appreciated in the late 1970s to early 1980s. Only in recent years, anti-restenotic therapy has achieved a breakthrough with the development of drug-eluting stents. Here, we provide an overview about pathological mechanisms of restenosis after PCI. Present therapeutic approaches to overcome restenosis and recent clinical results are revisited, and some major concerns in the post-drug-eluting stent era are discussed.

Effects of statins on vascular structure and function: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Statins reduce cardiovascular events by more than can be explained by their effects on lipids. We conducted a systematic review of how statins affect vascular structure and function, differences among statins, and correlations between the effects of statins on vascular outcomes and either lipid levels or cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

We primarily searched MEDLINE (1980 to March 2004) to identify all studies with at least 10 subjects that reported the effects of currently available statins on coronary artery stenosis, carotid intima-media thickness, and endothelial function (excluding studies of drug combinations and subjects with organ transplants). Meta-analyses were performed when feasible.

RESULTS

Statins decrease the progression and increase the regression of coronary artery lesions and luminal narrowing. Compared with placebo, statins decrease the likelihood of coronary artery restenosis (summary risk ratio = 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.77 to 0.95). Statins appear to slow the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness. Although the effect of statins on coronary endothelial function is uncertain, statins appear to improve peripheral endothelial function. There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that individual statins differ in their effects on these outcomes. Studies generally found weak or no correlation between the effects of statins on vascular outcomes and lipid levels. No study showed a correlation between vascular effect and clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Statins slow the progression of, and may reverse, atherosclerosis. The magnitude of these effects, however, is small compared with the effects of statins on cardiovascular events. Statins also improve measures of vascular function, which may contribute to their clinical benefits. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that individual statins differ in their vascular effects.

Influence of alcohol consumption on restenosis rate after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

To disclose possible influences of alcoholic beverages on restenosis rate in men with coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stent implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

225 consecutive male patients underwent PTCA and stent implantation. All patients had a control angiography and were contacted for a questionnaire regarding their drinking habits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean late loss of luminal diameter, rate of coronary restenosis of 50% or more within the stented segment, and rate of repeat angioplasty.

RESULTS

53 patients (with 80 stents) consumed < 50 g of alcohol a week and 172 (with 266 stents) consumed more (50-700 g a week). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups except for a higher prevalence of reduced cardiac function and multivessel disease and a lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration among patients who consumed little or no alcohol. Patients who consumed > or = 50 g alcohol a week had a lower mean late loss of the luminal diameter (1.1 (0.79) mm v 1.45 (0.82) mm, p = 0.002), a lower rate of coronary restenosis within the stented segment (33.7% v 48.8%, p = 0.001), and a lower rate of repeat angioplasty (23.3% v 42.5%, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, only alcohol consumption and diabetes were independent and significant discriminators for late loss of luminal diameter (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively), restenosis (odds ratio 0.54 and 2.08, respectively), and repeat angioplasty (odds ratio 0.39 and 2.18, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Alcohol intake is associated with reduced restenosis after PTCA and stent implantation.

Fighting restenosis after coronary angioplasty: contemporary and future treatment options

Despite the widespread use of coronary stents, prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) remains a major challenge. The restenotic process is even higher after balloon angioplasty without stenting and has been shown to be in the range of 30-50%. Experimental data suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors ("statins") might have a beneficial effect on restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Proposed mechanisms include favorable effects on plasma lipoproteins, endothelial function, plaque architecture and stability, thrombosis and inflammation. Although statins have documented efficacy in reducing clinical events and angiographic disease progression in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, the results of subsequent large prospective clinical trials using different types of statins clearly demonstrate that statins do not have a short-to-medium term effect on prevention of restenosis after successful conventional PTCA. The underlying pathological reasons for this shortcoming as well as promising innovative approaches including gene therapy and local drug delivery of vasoactive substances will be discussed in this review.

Lipid-lowering therapy after coronary revascularization

Atherosclerosis is often asymptomatic, unrecognized, and undertreated. Lumen irregularities are important angiographic findings that should be addressed aggressively through risk factor modification, medical therapy, and coronary revascularization. Both angiographic and clinical benefits have been demonstrated with lipid reduction therapy in randomized clinical trials. Coronary revascularization is indicated for symptom relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndromes at "intermediate" and "high" risk of subsequent death or myocardial infarction. In patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), future cardiac events may be related to lumen renarrowing or to progression of atherosclerotic disease at sites remote from the site of coronary revascularization. The time course of restenosis is relatively self-limiting, generally occurring within 6-12 months after the procedure. Clinical events occurring > 1 year after PCI generally relate to new lesions or progression of existing atherosclerotic disease. Patients with diabetes mellitus may be at higher risk for late coronary events than nondiabetic patients. In post-coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients, the majority of late events relate to degeneration of saphenous vein grafts. Lipid lowering therapy after coronary revascularization has been shown to prevent clinical events related to plaque instability and inhibit progression of saphenous vein graft disease. Thus, there are 2 goals in management of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease: (1) to relieve the flow-limiting stenosis, and (2) to prevent future clinical events with aggressive lipid lowering and modification of other risk factors. Patients, specialists, and primary care physicians each need to take accountability for this risk-factor modification.

Lipid-lowering therapy after coronary revascularization: the interventional cardiologist's perspective

Despite the success of coronary interventions in the treatment of stenosis due to coronary atherosclerosis, it behooves cardiologists to treat the underlying disease by decreasing patients' cholesterol levels. Intravascular ultrasound has made it possible to detect plaque accumulation not visible on angiography. Although advanced lesions that are fibrous and calcific can be treated with atherectomy and lasers, it is the soft, lipid-laden plaque that is particularly vulnerable to rupture and leads to coronary events. Therefore, attention must also focus on decreasing atherosclerotic progression in patients who have undergone coronary interventions. Studies have clearly shown the value of cholesterol reduction in decreasing coronary events. However, a review of cardiologists' practices shows that more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is needed. One way to achieve this goal is to treat and monitor patients who have undergone revascularization procedures and to encourage patients to become more involved in their own care.

Effect of pravastatin on angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. The PREDICT Trial Investigators. Prevention of Restenosis by Elisor after Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether pravastatin affects clinical or angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Experimental data and preliminary clinical studies suggest that lipid-lowering drugs might have a beneficial effect on restenosis after coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, 695 patients were randomized to receive pravastatin (40 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months after successful balloon angioplasty. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/day). The primary angiographic end point was minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at follow-up, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. A sample size of 313 patients per group was required to demonstrate a difference of 0.13 mm in MLD between groups (allowing for a two-tailed alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20). To allow for incomplete angiographic follow-up (estimated lost to follow-up rate of 10%), 690 randomized patients were required. Secondary end points were angiographic restenosis rate (restenosis assessed as a categoric variable, > 50% stenosis) and clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization).

RESULTS

At baseline, clinical, demographic, angiographic and lipid variables did not differ significantly between groups. In patients treated with pravastatin, there was a significant reduction in total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels and a significant increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. At follow-up the MLD (mean +/- SD) was 1.47 +/- 0.62 mm in the placebo group and 1.54 +/- 0.66 mm in the pravastatin group (p = 0.21). Similarly, late loss and net gain did not differ significantly between groups. The restenosis rate (recurrence > 50% stenosis) was 43.8% in the placebo group and 39.2% in the pravastatin group (p = 0.26). Clinical restenosis did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pravastatin has documented efficacy in reducing clinical events and angiographic disease progression in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, this study shows that it has no effect on angiographic outcome at the target site 6 months after coronary angioplasty.

Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease

Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which lowers plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis. Pravastatin produces consistent dose-dependent reductions in both total and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Favourable changes in other parameters such as total triglyceride and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels are generally modest. Combination therapy with other antihyperlipidaemic agents such as cholestyramine further enhances the efficacy of pravastatin in patients with severe dyslipidaemias. Available data suggest that pravastatin is effective in elderly patients and in patients with hypercholesterolaemia secondary to diabetes mellitus or renal disease. The benefit of cholesterol-lowering in terms of patient outcomes is currently an area of considerable interest. Recently completed regression studies (PLAC I, PLAC II, KAPS and REGRESS) show that pravastatin slows progression of atherosclerosis and lowers the incidence of coronary events in patients with mild to moderately severe hypercholesterolaemia and known coronary heart disease. Large scale primary (WOSCOPS) and secondary (CARE) prevention studies, moreover, demonstrate that pravastatin has beneficial effects on coronary morbidity and mortality. In WOSCOPS, all-cause mortality was reduced by 22%. Pravastatin is generally well tolerated by most patients (including the elderly), as evidenced by data from studies of up to 5 years in duration. As with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, myopathy occurs rarely (< 0.1% of patients treated with pravastatin): approximately 1 to 2% of patients may present with raised serum levels of hepatic transaminases. Thus, with its favourable effects on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality and total mortality, pravastatin should be considered a first-line agent in patients with elevated cholesterol levels, multiple risk factors or coronary heart disease who are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity.

Restenosis: is there a pharmacologic fix in the pipeline?

One of the most frustrating aspects of restenosis is that it is the result of advances in medical care (there was no restenosis before the days of balloon angioplasty), yet it seems to be resistant to all that science has to offer. Still we believe there is reason to be optimistic. We are at last beginning to see some promise from clinical trials, and data being generated confirm some of the hypotheses previously generated from animal experiments. Thus the effects seen with the GP IIb/IIIa antibody 7E3 suggest that thrombosis may be as important in its long-term sequelae as it is for acute reocclusion. The jury is still out on whether antiproliferative approaches will be a therapeutic option, but local delivery paradigms using novel formulations delivered by catheter or impregnated in stents may allow the concept to be tested without the risk of systemic toxicity. Plans are also underway for gene therapy trials, although we may have to wait for better vector technology before taking these into the coronary bed. Perhaps we should move away from the "single pill" approach and accept that, like many infections, malignancies, or even heart failure, a multifaceted approach with combination therapy will provide the first glimmer of that brighter tomorrow.

Aortic counterpulsation may improve late patency of the occluded coronary artery in patients with early failure of thrombolytic therapy

OBJECTIVES

Using a prospective, randomized design, we tested our hypothesis that the augmentation of diastolic pressure by intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) would improve the late patency of the occluded coronary artery in patients with early failure of thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND

Rescue angioplasty is often performed in patients in whom thrombolysis has failed, although 30% to 60% of the infarct-related arteries that are closed early after thrombolytic therapy will open later with conservative therapy.

METHODS

The study included 45 patients in whom thrombolysis had failed, despite treatment with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase 0.75 mg/kg body weight) delivered over 60 min within 12 h of the onset of symptoms. All patients underwent coronary angiography 60 min after initiation of thrombolytic therapy (baseline), and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 0, 1 or 2 flow was defined as failed thrombolysis. The patients were randomized to groups receiving IABP for 48 h (n = 23) or conservative therapy (n = 22, control subjects) at the end of cardiac catheterization. The late patency of the infarct-related artery, the primary end point of the study, was evaluated 3 weeks after myocardial infarction. Stenosis of the infarct-related artery was measured using a computer-assisted quantitative angiographic system in blinded manner. Data are expressed as mean value +/- SEM.

RESULTS

There was no difference with regard to the baseline value for TIMI flow grade between the groups. However, 3 weeks after myocardial infarction, the patients treated with IABP had a significantly higher frequency of TIMI flow grade 3, lower residual percent stenosis and larger minimal lumen diameter of the infarct-related artery than did the control subjects (74% vs. 32%, p < 0.05; 42 +/- 5% vs. 68 +/- 6%, p < 0.01; and 1.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that in patients with early failure of thrombolytic therapy, IABP may improve late patency of the occluded coronary artery, probably due to augmented perfusion pressure.