Severe primary HIV-1 infection among black persons in Barbados

Quantitative antibiotic use in hospitals: comparison of measurements, literature review, and recommendations for a standard of reporting

BACKGROUND

Reports on antibiotic use often lack complete definitions of the units of measurement, hampering the comparison of data between hospitals or hospital units.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To compare methods of measures of in-hospital antimicrobial use, we determined aggregate in-hospital consumption data at a tertiary care university hospital using variations of nominators and denominators. Means of defined daily doses (DDD) of individual antimicrobials per 100 bed-days and per 100 admissions at each hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) were calculated. Furthermore, a literature review was performed for benchmarking purposes.

RESULTS

Antibiotic use in different hospital units ranged from 0.105 to 323.37 DDD/100 bed-days and from 4.23 to 6737.92 DDD/100 admissions, respectively. Including the day of discharge in the denominator 'bed-days' underestimated antibiotic use in various hospital wards by up to 27.7 DDD/100 bed-days (26.0%). Equating 'numbers of patients admitted to the hospital' and 'numbers of admissions' on a hospital level resulted in a difference of 192.6 DDD/100 admissions (64%) because patients transferred between hospital units accounted for multiple admissions. Likewise, reporting antimicrobial (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] group 'J') instead of antibiotic (ATC group 'J01') use led to a difference of 16.5 DDD/100 bed-days (19.3%). The literature review revealed underreporting of complete definitions of antibiotic use measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on in-hospital antimicrobial use vary widely not only due to different antibiotic policies at different institutions but also due to different methods of measures. Adherence to the standard of reporting the methods of measurement is warranted for benchmarking and promotion of rational antimicrobial use.

Evaluation of the clinical utility of a rapid blood test for human leptospirosis

A rapid assay device for the detection of Leptospira-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was applied on whole blood samples collected from a group of consecutive patients admitted with clinical suspicion of leptospirosis to a district hospital in Kerala, India. The hospital is located in an area that is endemic for leptospirosis. The results of the rapid assay showed an agreement of 94.3% with those of an IgM ELISA routinely used for the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. The rapid assay was simply performed by the addition of 10 microL blood to the sample well of a plastic assay device followed by the addition of 130 microL sample fluid. The assay was read after 10 min by visual inspection and was scored positive when staining of the antigen line in the test zone was observed. The assay utilizes stabilised components and can be stored without the need for refrigeration. These characteristics make the assay ideal in areas where the disease is common and where laboratory support is not routinely available.

Leptospirosis

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic infection with a much greater incidence in tropical regions and has now been identified as one of the emerging infectious diseases. The epidemiology of leptospirosis has been modified by changes in animal husbandry, climate, and human behavior. Resurgent interest in leptospirosis has resulted from large outbreaks that have received significant publicity. The development of simpler, rapid assays for diagnosis has been based largely on the recognition that early initiation of antibiotic therapy is important in acute disease but also on the need for assays which can be used more widely. In this review, the complex taxonomy of leptospires, previously based on serology and recently modified by a genotypic classification, is discussed, and the clinical and epidemiological value of molecular diagnosis and typing is also evaluated.