van der Kam WJ, Moorman PW, Koppejan-Mulder MJ. Effects of electronic communication in general practice.
Int J Med Inform 2000;
60:59-70. [PMID:
10974641 DOI:
10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00096-4]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To obtain insight into the effects of electronic communication on GPs by studying those publications in literature describing the effects of structured electronic clinical communication in general practice.
METHODS
We retrieved all publications in the English language indexed in MEDLINE under the MESH term 'Computer Communication Networks' AND having either 'family practice' or 'primary health care' as MESH term OR 'GP', or 'GPs' as text word.
RESULTS
A total of 176 publications were retrieved of which 30 publications met the criteria. In 28 of these 30 publications potential effects were described; one described claimed effects, three described demonstrated effects with subjective data and five described demonstrated effects with objective data. The studies documented, furthermore, effects on the speed of communication, the content of information and records, a change of processes involved in the communication, quality of care, costs, workload of physicians, appreciation of physicians, confidentiality, and adherence.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that only a few studies evaluated electronic communication versus paper communication. Of these studies, only a few report improvement. Our final conclusion is that, so far, literature has not shown that the positive effects can be explained by electronic communication as such.
Collapse