Parathyroid hormone measurement in chronic kidney disease: Impact of inter-method variability on mineral bone disease assessment

BACKGROUND

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is measured routinely as part of Chronic Kidney Disease Bone and Mineral Disorders (CKD-MBD) assessment. Multiple PTH assays exist with known differences resulting in CKD-MBD guidelines recommending treatment based on assay-specific thresholds. The study objectives are to assess between manufacturer and within manufacturer variability of PTH assays and the impact of assay variability on the assessment of CKD-BMD using both vendor defined and empirically derived thresholds.

METHODS

Data were collected from Ontario, Canada's Proficiency Testing Program (24 challenge vials, 115-133 laboratories all using secondary generation PTH assays. Mean PTH and precision by the coefficient of analytical variation (CV_a) were calculated. For each vial, whether the manufacturer's mean value exceeded the vendor-defined and empirically-derived upper limit of normal (ULN) was recorded and the concordance between assays was determined.

RESULTS

Across all laboratories, the mean PTH range was 12.0 ± 3.9 pmol/L and the mean CV_a was 30%. The percent of vials with a mean PTH exceeding manufacturer's specific ULN varied substantially between manufacturers. Only 58% of vials had complete concordance as to whether mean PTH was above assay-specific ULNs. This increased to 83% using the empirically derived ULN.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD-BMD assessment and management will depend on the PTH assay. The between-assay variability is reduced but not eliminated when empirically derived reference intervals are used. Improvements in PTH measurement are required in order to ensure consistent patient care.

Measuring parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with oxidative stress--do we need a fourth generation parathyroid hormone assay?

Oxidation of PTH at methionine residues results in loss of biological activity. PTH may be oxidized in patients with renal disease. The aim of this study was to develop an assay considering oxidation of PTH. Oxidized hPTH was analyzed by high resolution nano-liquid chromatography coupled to ESI-FTT tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-ESI-FT-MS/MS) directly and after proteolytic cleavage. The oxidized hPTH(1–84) sample shows TIC-peaks at 18–20 min and several mass peaks due to mass shifts caused by oxidations. No significant signal for oxidized hPTH(1–84) species after removal of oxidized PTH molecules by a specific column with monoclonal antibodies (MAB) raised against the oxidized hPTH was detectable. By using this column in samples from 18 patients on dialysis we could demonstrate that measured PTH concentrations were substantially lower when considering oxidized forms of PTH. The relationship between PTH concentrations determined directly and those concentrations measured after removal of the oxidized PTH forms varies substantially. In some patients only 7% of traditionally measured PTH was free of oxidation, whereas in other patients 34% of the traditionally measured PTH was real intact PTH. In conclusion, a huge but not constant proportion of PTH molecules are oxidized in patients requiring dialysis. Since oxidized PTH is biologically inactive, the currently used methods to detect PTH in daily clinical practice may not adequately reflect PTH-related bone and cardiovascular abnormalities in patients on dialysis.