Distribution of potential eye and tissue donors within an Australian teaching hospital

Eye and Tissue donation has the capacity to transform lives, yet the vast majority of potential in-hospital donors are not recognised. Studies which describe the relative importance of specific units or wards in determining the size of the donor pool are limited. The aim of this study was to map the distribution of potential Eye and Tissue donors within the study hospital. A 12-month retrospective analysis of all patient deaths at the study hospital was undertaken. The ability to donate corneal, heart valve, bone and skin tissue was investigated. Patients were classified as potential donors if they met specific age criteria and had an absence of contraindications based on electronic database search. There were 985 deaths during the study period. Deaths occurred under the care of 26 separate clinical units, and within 28 unique wards and treatment spaces. Four hundred and forty nine (45.6%) patients were identified as potential eye or tissue donors. The majority of potential donors occurred in ICU, Emergency and palliative care units. Of the subset of 328 deaths ≤ 70 years, the frequency of potential tissue donors was 55% (n = 181). ED and ICU had significantly higher frequencies of potential donor than other wards (86 and 77%, p < 0.01). The current study has identified the ED, ICU and PCUs are being important sites for potential Eye and Tissue Donors within our hospital. These will provide an important focus for future interventions to improve the rate of eye and tissue donation.

Estimation of the potential eye and tissue donor pool in an Australian emergency department

OBJECTIVE

EDs have long been considered a potential source of eye and tissue donors, but no specific evidence to support this was identified in the Australian setting. The present study aims to bridge that knowledge gap, by analysing medical and social histories of those who have died over a 5 year period so as to determine donation eligibility in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was undertaken of all patients who died within the Royal Melbourne Hospital ED between 2010 and 2014. ED records, pharmacy records and electronic medical histories were audited for the presence of eye and tissue donation exclusion criteria and the distribution of these criteria within the target population.

RESULTS

Over the 5 year period, of 326 deaths that occurred in the ED, one third was suitable for eye donation (n = 106) and one in seven (n = 45) for tissue donation. Of the age appropriate patients, five criteria were identified that excluded up to 85% of the population not eligible to donate. These were: haematological malignancies, neurodegenerative conditions, non-haematological malignancies, chronic renal failure and eye disease.

CONCLUSION

The present study has identified a large pool of potential eye and tissue donors; a pool mostly unrecognised by emergency clinicians. An extensive list of exclusion criteria restricts donor potential. However, the present study has identified that only five fundamentally limit donation in the ED population. Utilisation of this knowledge will allow for the development of clinical triggers that will improve identification, and increase realisation, of potential donors.

Estimating the Number of Organ Donors in Australian Hospitals--Implications for Monitoring Organ Donation Practices

The Australian DonateLife Audit captures information on all deaths which occur in emergency departments, intensive care units and in those recently discharged from intensive care unit. This information provides the opportunity to estimate the number of donors expected, given present consent rates and contemporary donation practices. This may then allow benchmarking of performance between hospitals and jurisdictions. Our aim was to develop a method to estimate the number of donors using data from the DonateLife Audit on the basis of baseline patient characteristics alone.

Australian audit of intubated deaths in 68 hospitals allowed development of a highly predictive model of organ donation that permits estimation of potential donor numbers.

Are all tissue donors recognised? A cohort study in three Dutch hospitals

Nowadays, the demand for tissue transplantation has significantly increased. To optimize donor recruitment, the potential availability of tissue donors has to be evaluated. In 2011 we conducted a cohort study in three Dutch hospitals in the Netherlands. The potential amount of eligible tissue donors found, based on medical records in these hospitals is compared to the physician's donation form report. In total 1,342 patient records were analysed. From these records, the donation officers considered 484 patients as a potential tissue donor (36.1 %). Despite the absence of contra-indication, the physician did not recognise 25 % (n = 123/484) of potential tissue donors. Physicians' lack of sufficient knowledge of tissue donation was the main cause of adequately identifying tissue donors. A higher percentage of tissue donors in these Dutch hospitals should be feasible through creating awareness and education regarding tissue donation.