Rheumatoid arthritis: a novel radiographic projection for hand assessment

[Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand : Part 2: Imaging]

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis can cause joint destruction, especially joints of the hands. Diagnosed at an early stage, which often includes imaging methods, can minimize structural joint damage and resulting disabilities as well as avoid systemic manifestations such as cardiovascular damage through rapid and continuous so-called targeted treatment approaches.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is the systematic description and report of imaging findings in rheumatoid arthritis as the most common autoimmunologic rheumatologic disease, which is characterized by a typical pattern of synovitis of the hands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Narrative review based on the current literature on the subject from the radiological and rheumatological point of view.

RESULTS

Inflammation of the hands represents the most frequently affected area of the body in rheumatoid arthritis. Taking into consideration the topology and typical synovitis patterns of the hands, differences between early and late stages are described. Knowledge regarding image-based morphological changes associated with this complex disease, especially in the hands, is important in the differential diagnosis, especially in early stages of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

For the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis of the hands, the radiologist must be familiar with basic knowledge of arthritis in the hands to confidently analyze the typical patterns present in the diagnostic imaging at initial diagnosis and during the course of the disease, which serve as a guide for therapy decisions.

Should ultrasound be used routinely in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?

INTRODUCTION

A growing body of evidence indicates the benefits of early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prompt treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) in terms of relieving symptoms, improving prognosis, and reducing long-term complications. There is however some controversy over the most beneficial method of imaging in providing accurate early diagnosis. Though current practice favours clinical and radiological assessment, this is increasingly supplemented by ultrasound techniques (and, to a lesser extent, CT and MRI scanning). While EULAR and ESSR favour the use of ultrasonography (US) as the first-line investigation in cases of suspected RA, a recent NICE review upholds the traditional place of plain film radiographs of hands and feet to detect erosions as early signs of synovitis. This review considers the evidence for US in the early diagnosis of RA and the case for it becoming the primary assessment modality in rheumatology clinics.

AIMS

This paper aims to assess the current literature on the efficacy of ultrasonography in diagnosing early RA, by comparing US with alternative imaging modalities. The goal is to propose the most appropriate method of diagnosis to improve early initiation of DMARD treatment for optimum disease outcomes.

METHODS

Searches for related studies and review articles were carried out using electronic databases and hand searches. Additional references were gleaned from the bibliographies of included papers. Related articles and pop-outs from PubMed were also used. The search was refined in PubMed, by only using reviews which were written in English and published in past 10 years and had full free text available.

RESULTS

This review confirms that US has a high level of sensitivity in diagnosing RA (and hence a low risk of missing cases of RA which might benefit from early treatment with DMARDs). It also has a high level of specificity (and hence a low risk of falsely diagnosing somebody with RA who may suffer adverse effects of DMARD therapy). US is already widely available and well accepted by clinicians and patients. It does not involve exposure to radiation and can be readily delivered by appropriately trained staff.

CONCLUSION

This review of relevant studies indicates that US should become accepted as the investigation with the most favourable balance of benefits to risks in the early diagnosis of RA. Given the continuing controversy surrounding studies of different imaging techniques in RA, further research into the diagnostic role of US in RA is indicated.