Resolution of symptomatic epidural fibrosis following treatment with combined pentoxifylline–tocopherol

Prospective application of stem cells to prevent post-operative skeletal fibrosis

Post-operative skeletal fibrosis is considered one of the major complications causing dysfunction of the skeletal system and compromising the outcomes of clinical treatment. Limited success has been achieved using current therapies; more effective therapies to reduce post-operative skeletal fibrosis are needed. Stem cells possess the ability to repair and regenerate damaged tissue. Numerous studies show that stem cells serve as a promising therapeutic approach for fibrotic diseases in tissues other than the skeletal system by inhibiting the inflammatory response and secreting favorable cytokines through activating specific signaling pathways, acting as so-called medicinal signaling cells. In this review, current therapies are summarized for post-operative skeletal fibrosis. Given that stem cells are used as a promising therapeutic approach for fibrotic diseases, little effort has been undertaken to use stem cells to prevent post-operative skeletal fibrosis. This review aims at providing useful information for the potential application of stem cells in preventing post-operative skeletal fibrosis in the near future. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1236-1245, 2019.

Repurposing Pentoxifylline for the Treatment of Fibrosis: An Overview

Fibrosis is a potentially debilitating disease with high morbidity rates. It is estimated that half of all deaths that occur in the USA are attributed to fibrotic disorders. Fibrotic disorders are characterized primarily by disruption in the extracellular matrix deposition and breakdown equilibrium, leading to the accumulation of excessive amounts of extracellular matrix. Given the potentially high prevalence of fibrosis and the paucity of agents currently available for the treatment of this disease, there is an urgent need for the identification of drugs that can be utilized to treat the disease. Pentoxifylline is a methylxanthine derivative that is currently approved for the treatment of vascular diseases, in particular, claudication. Pentoxifylline has three main properties: improving the rheological properties of blood, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidative. Recently, the effectiveness of pentoxifylline in the treatment of fibrosis via attenuating and reversing fibrotic lesions has been demonstrated in several clinical trials and animal studies. As a result of the limited availability of antifibrotic agents in the long-term treatment of fibrosis that can attenuate and even reverse fibrotic lesions effectively, it would be of particular importance to consider the potential clinical utility of pentoxifylline in the treatment of fibrosis. Thus, this paper discusses the evolving roles of pentoxifylline in the treatment of different types of fibrosis.

Pentoxifylline and tocopherol in the management of cancer patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: an observational retrospective study of initial case series

OBJECTIVE

Very few studies have evaluated the efficacy of pentoxifylline and tocopherol (PENT-E) in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), although some studies have shown the therapeutic and prophylactic benefit of PENT-E in the management of osteoradionecrosis. We report the outcomes of MRONJ managed with PENT-E in patients with metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven patients diagnosed with established cases of refractory MRONJ caused by antiresorptive medications for the management of metastatic bone tumors or multiple myeloma were administered PENT-E for a mean period of 16.8 months (range 3-48 months).

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up visit, all patients demonstrated relief of symptoms. There was radiographic evidence of new bone fill of prior radiolucent defect in all patients. Two patients had resolution of exposed bone, two patients had partial resolution, one patient had no change in exposed bone, and one patient with three sites of exposed bone before starting PENT-E had resolution in one site, partial resolution in another site, and no change in the third site. PENT-E was well tolerated in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case series demonstrated that PENT-E was well tolerated and may be an effective adjunct in the management of MRONJ.

Novel Treatment of Radicular Pain With a Multi-Mechanistic Combination Topical Agent: A Case Series and Literature Review

Introduction

Pharmacologic treatment of radicular pain with oral medications is limited by adverse effects and concern for dependence. While topical formulations have been explored in pain research, there is no published literature evaluating the efficacy in radicular pain. We present the first three cases of radicular pain successfully treated with a topical formulation of diclofenac, ibuprofen, baclofen, cyclobenzaprine, bupivacaine, gabapentin, and pentoxifylline (T7).

Case Presentation

Case series evaluating T7 for treatment of radicular pain in a single, outpatient pain center. Pain was rated on the numeric rating scale (NRS) on initial evaluation and follow up after a trial of T7. One to two grams of T7 was applied to the affected area 3 - 4 times daily in addition to the patient’s baseline pharmacologic management. Three patients with median age of 50 (range, 39 to 65) and diagnosis of cervical and/or lumbosacral radicular pain participated. Two of the three had chronic radicular pain despite use of analgesic agents, spinal injections and failed spinal surgery syndrome. Each reported subjective improvement in radicular pain, function and sleep. There was an average decrease in NRS score consistent with 30% - 40% global improvement in symptoms, clinically significant based on the minimal clinically important difference for radicular pain. T7 was well tolerated without adverse reactions. Surgery was prevented or delayed in all cases.

Conclusions

This is the first report of the successful treatment of radicular pain with a topical agent. This highlights the need for randomized, prospective study of both single and compounded topical agents for treatment of radicular pain.

A radiobiological analysis of multicenter data for postoperative keloid radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To identify factors significantly affecting recurrence rates after postoperative external beam radiotherapy (XRT) of keloids, and to delineate any radiation dose response and effects of radiation dose per fraction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A comprehensive literature review was performed to compile a database of 2,515 resected keloids (36.9% earlobe). Postoperative XRT was 45- to 100-kV X-rays in 27.0% or 120- to 250-kV X-rays in 11.1%, Co-60 in 1.9%, Sr-90 in 4.7%, 1.5- to 9-MeV electrons in 26.5%, and no XRT in 28.8%. In the 1,791 irradiated patients, the median radiation parameters were as follows: total dose, 15 Gy (range, 6-30 Gy); dose per fraction, 5.0 Gy (range, 2-15 Gy); fractions, 3 (range, 1-10); and time, 7 days (range, 0-33 days).

RESULTS

Multivariate stepwise logistic regression correlated decreased keloid recurrence with earlobe location (p = 1.98E-10; odds ratio, 0.34), biologically effective dose (p = 1.01E-27), and treatment with electron beam or Co-60 vs. other techniques (p = 0.0014; odds ratio, 0.72). Different radiobiological models calculated values of α/β = 1.12 to 2.86 (mean, 2.08) and time (repopulation) correction factors for biologically effective dose from 0.98 to 2.13 Gy per day (mean, 1.34) starting 10 days after surgery. Different models (with α/β = 2.08) predicted that doses needed for 90% and 95% control with 3 fractions of postoperative electron beam were 16.0 to 16.2 Gy and 18.3 to 19.2 Gy, respectively, in less than 10 days for earlobe keloids and 21.5 to 22.2 Gy and 23.4 to 24.8 Gy, respectively, in less than 10 days for other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative keloid radiotherapy requires moderately high doses and optimal technique to be effective. The relatively low α/β ratio indicates that radiotherapy with a limited number of fractions and high doses per fraction is the best strategy.

[Post-operative fibrosis: pathophysiological aspects and therapeutical perspectives]

Postoperative fibrosis (POF) is a rare, localized, and irreversible delayed effect of surgery, described in numerous tissues and organs. Is this fibrotic process amenable to therapeutic intervention? A synthesis of various clinical and histopathological aspects, and of cellular and molecular process regulation is described. In summary, there exists a prefibrotic chronic inflammatory phase, a constituted and cellular phase, and lastly a matricial densification and remodelling phase. The respective phases and the roles played over time by the main protagonists, namely myofibroblasts, extracellular matrix and growth factor (TGFbeta1) are clarified. Understanding the mechanism of POF leads logically to treatments derived from our knowledge of the treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis: anti-inflammatory drugs help in the prefibrotic phase, pentoxifylline-tocopherol combination (PE) in the organized fibrotic phase, and pentoclo (PE-clodronate) in the late fibronecrotic phase. Randomized trials are necessary to validate the preliminary results of phase II trials.

Current Management for Late Normal Tissue Injury: Radiation-Induced Fibrosis and Necrosis

Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) and radionecrosis (RN) are late complications that are usually considered irreversible. Usual management strategy includes eliminating local and general aggravating factors and controlling acute and chronic inflammation with steroids. Thanks to progress in understanding the pathophysiology of these lesions, several lines of treatment have been developed in clinical practice. However, results of clinical studies are difficult to compare because of variations in severity of RIF, method of RIF assessment, availability of efficient therapeutic drugs, treatment duration, and quality of trial design. For moderate established RIF, current management strategy mainly includes (1) anti-inflammatory treatment with corticosteroids or interferon gamma; (2) vascular therapy with pentoxifylline (PTX) or hyperbaric oxygen (HBO); and (3) antioxidant treatment with superoxide dismutase, tocopherol (vitamin E), and, most successfully, with a PTX-vitamin E combination. On the basis of etiology, RN can be managed by (1) anti-inflammatory treatment with corticosteroids and possibly clodronate, (2) vascular therapy with HBO and PTX, (3) antioxidant treatment with a PTX-vitamin E combination, and (4) a PTX-vitamin E-clodronate combination. Controlled randomized trials are now necessary to identify the best treatment at each step of RIF. In the future, these treatments of fibrosis and necrosis should include targeted drugs (such as growth factors) to take organ specificities into account.

Treatment of Peyronie's disease with oral pentoxifylline

BACKGROUND

A 51-year-old male presented with a penile deformity without obvious etiology. Physical examination revealed hard plaques in the dorsal and ventral penis.

INVESTIGATIONS

Physical examination, penile ultrasound.

DIAGNOSIS

Peyronie's disease.

MANAGEMENT

Oral pentoxifylline.

Pentoxifylline and vitamin E combination for superficial radiation-induced fibrosis: A phase II clinical trial

We treated 34 radiation-induced superficial fibrotic lesions with pentoxifylline and vitamin E for 3 months. Mean surface area of the lesions decreased from 112 to 65 cm(2) after treatment (P<0.001). A subgroup of 21 fibrotic lesions received the medications for 6 months, in which surface area decreased from 80 to 27 cm(2) (P<0.001). Pentoxifylline-vitamin E combination improved radiation-induced fibrosis.