Determination and comparison of radiotherapy dose responses for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal liver tumours

Evolution of Response-Based Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Cancer

ABSTRACT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy has emerged as a safe and effective treatment modality for properly selected hepatocellular cancer (HCC) patients with normal liver function. However, many HCC patients have reduced baseline liver function due to underlying cirrhosis or prior liver-directed therapies. Therefore, because of the increased risk of hepatotoxicity, the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with reduced liver function has been approached with caution. Individualized, response-based radiotherapy incorporates models, imaging tools, and biomarkers that determine the dose-response relationship of the liver before, during, and after treatment and has been useful in reducing the likelihood of liver damage without sacrificing tumor control. This review discusses the evolution of response-based radiotherapy for HCC and highlights areas for further investigation.

Refining stereotactic body radiation therapy as a bridge to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, there are no consensus guidelines to advise optimal patient selection and radiotherapy planning parameters to minimise the risk of surgical and medical complications after liver transplant (LT) in patients who have had prior SBRT for HCC, whilst optimising treatment benefit.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who received liver SBRT as a bridge to LT at a tertiary institution between 2017 and 2019.

RESULTS

Nine patients received SBRT as bridging therapy to LT. HCC location varied from peripheral to central/hilar regions and HCC diameter was 13-54 mm. Median time between SBRT and LT was 141 days (range 27-461 days). Median operating time was 360 min (range 270-480 min). Four patients (44%) had visible SBRT reaction or fibrosis at the time of LT. SBRT reaction resulted in clinical impact in one patient (11%) only, where vascular clamping of the IVC was required for 10 min.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for HCC enabling patients to remain within LT criteria, even for lesions not amenable to other more conventional bridging therapies. We describe a preliminary decision pathway to guide the optimal use of SBRT as a bridge to LT developed in our institution.

Does HCC Etiology Impact the Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? An Asian Liver Radiation Therapy Group Study

Background/Purpose

The Asian Liver Radiation Therapy Study Group has formed a large and detailed multinational database of outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we explored the potential impact of HCC etiology on SBRT efficacy. Tumor control probability (TCP) models were established to estimate the likelihood of local control (LC).

Methods

Data from 415 patients who were treated with SBRT for HCC were reviewed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify key predictors of LC. TCP models accounting for biologic effective dose (BED) and tumor diameter were generated to quantify associations between etiology and LC.

Results

Cox models demonstrated that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was associated with favorable LC following SBRT (HR=0.52, 95% CI 0.04–0.96, p=0.036). The 2-year LC rate for patients with HCV etiology was 88%, compared to 78% for other patients. Small tumor and high BED were also associated with favorable LC. TCP models demonstrated a 10–20% absolute increase in predicted LC across the range of SBRT doses and tumor sizes.

Conclusion

We found a novel association between HCV status and LC after SBRT for HCC that warrants further exploration. If validated in other datasets, our findings could help clinicians tailor SBRT schedules.

TCP post-radioembolization and TCP post-EBRT in HCC are similar and can be predicted using the in vitro radiosensitivity

Background

Tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is proposed as a predictor of patient outcome after liver radioembolization (RE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and can be evaluated with ⁹⁰Y-TOF-PET. The aim is to evaluate the correlation between PET-based tumors EUD and the clinical response evaluated with dual molecular tracer (¹¹C-acetate and ¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT post-RE.

Methods

34 HCC tumors in 22 patients were prospectively evaluated. The metabolic response was characterized by the total lesion metabolism variation (ΔTLM) between baseline and follow-up. This response allowed to compute a tumor control probability (TCP) as a function of the tumor EUD.

Results

The absorbed dose response correlation was highly significant (R = 0.72, P < 0.001). With an absorbed dose threshold of 40 Gy, the metabolic response was strongly different in both groups (median response 35% versus 100%, P < 0.001). Post-RE TCP as a function of the EUD was very similar to that observed in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), with TCP values equal to 0.5 and 0.95 for a EUD of 51 Gy and 100 Gy, respectively. The TCP was perfectly predicted by the Poisson model assuming an inter tumor radiosensitivity variation of 30% around the HCC cell in vitro value.

Conclusions

EUD-based ⁹⁰Y TOF-PET/CT predicts the metabolic response post-RE in HCC assessed using dual molecular PET tracers and provides a similar TCP curve to that observed in EBRT. In vivo and in vitro HCC radiosensitivities are similar. Both TCPs show that a EUD of 100 Gy is needed to control HCC for the three devices (resin spheres, glass spheres, EBRT). Observed absorbed doses achieving this 100 Gy-EUD ranged from 190 to 1800 Gy!

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00911-0.

Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?

•

There has been a paradigm shift to SBRT without evidence that these high-dose ultra-low fractions result in improved outcomes.

•

This prospective cohort compares the survival of patients treated with conventional versus SBRT treatments for liver tumours.

•

The SBRT group received an average of 5 fractions, and the conventional group received an average of 17 fractions.

•

397 patients were included. Overall survival was higher for SBRT patients at the 2-year time point (42% vs 27% p = 0.01).

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Characterization of rib fracture development following liver directed stereotactic body radiation therapy

Purpose

Rib fractures are a well-described complication following thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, there are limited data in the setting of liver-directed SBRT.

Methods

Patients who underwent liver SBRT from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the demographic, clinical, and dosimetric factors associated with the development of rib fractures.

Results

Three hundred and forty-three consecutive patients were reviewed with median follow-up of 9.3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.7-17.4 months); 81% of patients had primary liver tumors and 19% had liver metastases. Twenty-one patients (6.2%) developed rib fractures with a median time to diagnosis of 7 months following SBRT (IQR: 5-19 months). Of those patients, 11 experienced concomitant chest wall pain, while 10 patients had an incidental finding of a rib fracture on imaging. On univariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 2.29; p = 0.05), V30 Gy (OR: 1.02; p < 0.001), V40 Gy (OR: 1.08; p < 0.001), maximum chest wall dose (OR: 1.1; p < 0.001), and chest wall D30 cm³ (OR: 1.09; p < 0.001) were associated with an increased probability of developing a rib fracture. On multivariate analysis, maximum chest wall dose (OR: 1.1; p < 0.001) was associated with developing a rib fracture. Receipt of more than one course of SBRT (p = 0.34), left versus right sided lesion (p = 0.69), osteoporosis (p = 0.54), age (p = 0.82), and PTV volume (p = 0.55) were not significant.

Conclusions

Rib fractures following liver SBRT were observed in 6.2% of patients with the majority being asymptomatic. To mitigate this risk, clinicians should minimize dose delivery to the chest wall. Female patients may be at increased risk.

Clinical application of advances and innovation in radiation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background:

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved over the past two decades, with the development of newer treatment modalities. While various options are available, unmet needs are reflected through the mixed treatment outcome for intermediate-stage HCC. As HCC is radiosensitive, radiation therapies have a significant role in management. Radiation therapies offer local control for unresectable lesions and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Radiotherapy also provides palliation in metastatic disease, and acts as a bridge to resection and transplantation in selected patients. Advancements in radiotherapy modalities offer improved dose planning and targeted delivery, allowing for better tumor response and safer dose escalations while minimizing the risks of radiation-induced liver damage. Radiotherapy modalities are broadly classified into external beam radiation therapy and selective internal radiation therapy. With emerging modalities, radiotherapy plays a complementary role in the multidisciplinary care of HCC patients.

Aim:

We aim to provide an overview of the role and clinical application of radiation therapies in HCC management.

Relevance for Patients:

The continuous evolution of radiotherapy techniques allows for improved therapeutic outcomes while mitigating unwanted adverse effects, making it an attractive modality in HCC management. Rigorous clinical studies, quality research and comprehensive datasets will further its application in the present era of evidence-based practice in Medicine.

Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dose Prescription Method Using Uncomplicated Tumor Control Probability Model

Purpose

This work was to establish an uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) model using hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) clinical data in our institution. The model was then used to analyze the current dose prescription method and to seek the opportunity for improvement.

Methods and Materials

A tumor control probability (TCP) model was generated based on local clinical data using the maximum likelihood method. A UTCP model was then formed by combining the established TCP model with the normal tissue complication probability model based on the study by Dawson et al. The authors investigated the dependence of maximum achievable UTCP on planning target volume equivalent uniform dose (EUD) at various ratio between planning target volume EUD and normal liver EUD (T/N EUD ratios). A new term uncomplicated tumor control efficiency (UTCE) was also introduced to analyze the outcome. A UTCE value of 1 implied that the theoretical maximum UTCP for the corresponding T/N EUD ratio was achieved.

Results

The UTCE of the HCC SBRT patients based on the current dose prescription method was found to be 0.93 ± 0.05. It was found that the UTCE could be increased to 0.99 ± 0.03 by using a new dose prescription scheme, for which the UTCP could be maximized while keeping the normal tissue complication probability value smaller than 5%.

Conclusions

The dose prescription method of the current HCC SBRT in our institution was analyzed using a UTCP model established based on local clinical data. It was shown that there could be a potential to increase the prescription dose of HCC SBRT. A new dose prescription scheme was proposed to achieve better UTCP. Additional clinical trials would be required to validate the proposed dose prescription scheme in the future.

Impact of dose heterogeneity in target on TCP and NTCP for various radiobiological models in liver SBRT: different isodose prescription strategy

INTRODUCTION

The impact of dose heterogeneity within the tumor on TCP and NTCP was studied using various radiobiological models. The effect of the degree of heterogeneity index (HI) on TCP was also analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven pre-treated liver SBRT cases were included in this study. Two different kinds of treatment techniques were employed. In both arms, the prescribed dose was received by 95% of the PTV. Initially, the inhomogeneous treatment plans (IHTP) were made in which the spatial change of dose within the PTV was high and the maximum dose within the PTV can go up to 160%. Subsequently, in another arm, homogeneous treatment plans (HTP) were generated in which PTV was covered with the same prescription isodose and the maximum dose can go up to 120%. As per RTOG 1112, all organs at risk (OAR's) were considered while optimization of the treatment plans. TCP was calculated using the Niemierko and Poisson model. NTCP was calculated using the Niemierko and LKB fractionated model.

RESULTS

For the IHTP, TCP was decreasing as 'a' value decreased in the Niemierko model whereas, for HTP, TCP was found to be the same. NTCP of the normal liver was less in IHTP as compared to HTP, and the Niemierko model overestimates the NTCP as compared to LKB fractionated model. NTCP for all other OAR's was <1% in both kinds of treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

IHTP is found to be clinically better than HTP because NTCP of the normal liver was significantly less and TCP was more for certain 'a' values of the Niemierko model and the Poisson model. There is not any effect of HI on TCP was observed. Advances in knowledge: IHTP could be used clinically because of the dose-escalation and subsequently, leads to an increase in the TCP.

Dose-Response Relationship in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of an Asian Liver Radiation Therapy Group Study

PURPOSE

Despite the worldwide implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a lack of consensus guideline on prescription dose. Herein, this multinational study aimed to investigate the effects of the prescribed radiation dose on oncologic outcomes of SBRT for HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The multi-institutional retrospective cohort included 510 patients treated with SBRT between 2010 and 2016. All relevant clinical factors and factors related to SBRT were analyzed to evaluate freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS). Based on a biologically effective dose (BED) cutoff value of 100 Gy, 198 tumors were selected from each group in propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics in the BED <100 Gy group were unfavorable (Child-Pugh class B, 19%; advanced stage, 72%; median tumor size was 4 cm) compared with the BED ≥100 Gy group. With a median follow-up of 22 (interquartile range, 9.8-37.6) months, the 2-year FFLP and OS rates were 77% and 73%, respectively. Patients treated with a BED ≥100 Gy showed better rates of 2-year FFLP and OS than patients treated with a BED <100 Gy (FFLP, 89% vs 69%; OS, 80% vs 67%; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis before and after PSM, BED ≥100 Gy was identified as the main prognostic factor for both FFLP and OS (P < .01). Additionally, a dose-response relationship was observed between FFLP and BED (odds ratio, 0.92 per 5 Gy, P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

A BED ≥100 Gy was significantly associated with outcomes, and a dose-response relationship was observed between local tumor progression and BED. Given that SBRT is being increasingly used in HCC, detailed consensus guidelines regarding SBRT dose prescription should be established.

A Pilot Study of the PD-1 Targeting Agent AMP-224 Used With Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is poor. We assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the anti-programmed cell death 1 fusion protein AMP-224 in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide and stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) treatment in patients with mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were enrolled. Six received SBRT 8 Gy on day 0 (dose level 1), whereas 9 received 8 Gy on days -2 to day 0. All received cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) on day 0. On day 1, both groups received AMP-224 10 mg/kg I.V., repeated every 2 weeks for a total of 6 doses. Primary end points were feasibility and safety.

RESULTS

Ten (67%) patients completed 6 doses of AMP-224; 5 patients (33%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed; 9 patients (60%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, all Grade 1 or 2. No objective response was noted; 3 patients (20%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-9.6 months), respectively. M2 macrophage polarization was present in the pretreatment tumor biopsy samples, but not post-treatment samples.

CONCLUSION

AMP-224 in combination with SBRT and low-dose cyclophosphamide was well tolerated, however, no significant clinical benefit was observed in patients with mCRC.

Radiotherapy for HCC: Ready for prime time?

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has an evolving role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), largely due to recent advances in imaging technology. Often utilized in situations where other locoregional therapies are not feasible, SBRT has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment that confers high rates of durable local control. However, there is limited evidence to firmly establish its place in the treatment paradigm for HCC. In this article, we review the current evidence and highlight specific considerations in the multiple settings where SBRT may be used, including for primary HCC treatment and bridging/downstaging, as well as exploring the potential for SBRT in the treatment of extrahepatic oligo-metastatic HCC.

Predictors of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Eastern and Western Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Proton Beam Therapy

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT).

METHODS

This multicenter study included 136 patients with HCC (eastern, n = 102; western, n = 34) without evidence of intrahepatic tumor progression after PBT. The RILD was defined as ascites with alkaline-phosphatase abnormality, grade ≥3 hepatic toxicity, or Child-Pugh score worsening by ≥2 within 4 months after PBT completion. The proton doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2-GyE fractions. The unirradiated liver volume (ULV) was defined as the absolute liver volume (LV) receiving <1 GyE; the standard liver volume (SLV) was calculated using body surface area. Possible correlations of clinicodosimetric parameters with RILD were examined.

RESULTS

The mean pretreatment LV was 85% of SLV, and patients with a history of hepatectomy (P < .001) or hepatitis B virus infection (P = .035) had significantly smaller LV/SLV. Nineteen (14%) patients developed RILD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ULV/SLV (P = .001), gross tumor volume (P = .001), and Child-Pugh classification (P = .002) as independent RILD predictors, and mean liver dose and target-delivered dose were not associated with RILD occurrence. A "volume-response" relationship between ULV/SLV and RILD was consistently observed in both eastern and western cohorts. In Child-Pugh class-A patients whose ULV/SLV were ≥50%, 49.9%-40%, 39.9%-30% and <30%, the RILD incidences were 0%, 6%, 16%, and 39% (P < .001), respectively. For the Child-Pugh class-B group, the RILD incidences in patients with ≥60%, 59.9%-40%, and <40% of ULV/SLV were 0%, 14%, and 83% (P = .006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ULV/SLV, not mean liver dose, independently predicts RILD in patients with HCC undergoing PBT. The relative and absolute contraindications for Child-Pugh class-A patient's ULV/SLV are <50% and <30%, and <60% and <40% for Child-Pugh class-B patients, respectively. Our results indicate that the likelihood of hepatic complications for PBT is dictated by similar metrics as that for surgery.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer have greater radioresistance than that of pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers and whether good local control can be achieved by dose escalation in stereotactic body radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement and methods. Studies were obtained from a database search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for publications using search terms designed to identify studies on "oligometastases," "lung," "stereotactic radiotherapy," and "colorectal cancer." For meta-analysis 1, studies that showed the number of local failures after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma and other cancers were included. For meta-analysis2, studies in which a comparison was made of local control rates of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma by stereotactic body radiotherapy with a higher dose and that with a lower dose were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel statics with the fixed or random-effect model by Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Eighteen retrospective studies with 1920 patients with pulmonary oligometastases were used in meta-analysis 1. The local control rate in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer was significantly lower than that in patients with pulmonary oligometastases from other cancers (odds ratio = 3.10, P < .00001). Next, 8 retrospective studies with 478 patients were included in meta-analysis 2 for dose escalation. Better local control was achieved by a higher prescription dose than by a lower prescription dose (odds ratio = 0.16, P < .00001).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy was significantly worse than that of pulmonary metastases from other cancers; however, our results also indicated that good local control of pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer can be achieved by dose escalation.

Proton beam therapy outcomes for localized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study documents the utilization and efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) in western patients with localized unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with HCC, Child-Pugh class of A or B, no prior radiotherapy history, and ECOG performance status 0-2 received PBT at our institution from 2007 to 2016. Radiographic control within the PBT field (local control, LC) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of PBT.

RESULTS

Most (83%) patients had Child-Pugh class A. Median tumor size was 6 cm (range, 1.5-21.0 cm); 22% of patients had multiple tumors and 28% had tumor vascular thrombosis. Twenty-five (54%) patients received prior treatment. Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 97.7 GyE (range, 33.6-144 GyE) administered in 15 fractions. Actuarial 2-year LC and OS rates were 81% and 62% respectively; median OS was 30.7 months. Out-of-field intrahepatic failure was the most common site of disease progression. Patients receiving BED ≥90 GyE had a significantly better OS than those receiving BED <90 GyE (49.9 vs. 15.8 months, p = 0.037). A trend toward 2-year LC improvement was observed in patients receiving BED ≥90 GyE compared with those receiving BED <90 GyE (92% vs. 63%, p = 0.096). On multivariate analysis, higher BED (p = 0.023; hazard ratio = 0.308) significantly predicted improved OS. Six (13%) patients experienced acute grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose PBT is associated with high rates of LC and OS for unresectable HCC. Dose escalation may further improve outcomes.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Trends and Controversies

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Depending on the extent of disease and competing comorbidities for mortality, multiple liver-directed therapy options exist for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Advancements in radiation oncology have led to the emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy as a promising liver-directed therapy, which delivers high doses of radiation with a steep dose gradient to maximize local tumor control and minimize radiation-induced treatment toxicity. In this study, we review the current clinical data as well as the unresolved issues and controversies regarding stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: (1) Is there a radiation dose–response relationship with hepatocellular carcinoma? (2) What are the optimal dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced liver disease, and do they differ for patients with varying liver function? (3) How do we assess treatment response on imaging? (4) How does stereotactic body radiation therapy compare to other liver-directed therapy modalities, including proton beam therapy? Based on the current literature discussed, this review highlights future possible research and clinical directions.

Proton Beam Therapy and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Charged particle therapy with proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising radiation modality to minimize radiation hepatotoxicity while maintaining high rates of tumor local control. Both PBT and CIRT deposit the majority of their dose at the Bragg peak with little to no exit dose, resulting in superior sparing of normal liver tissue. CIRT has an additional biological advantage of increased relative biological effectiveness, which may allow for increased hypofractionation regimens. Retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated encouragingly high rates of local control and overall survival and low rates of hepatotoxicity with PBT and CIRT. Ongoing randomized trials will evaluate the value of PBT over photons and other standard liver-directed therapies and future randomized trials are needed to assess the value of CIRT over PBT.

Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy

Currently, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is assumed to be constant with a value of 1.1 in proton therapy. Although trends of RBE variations are well known, absolute values in patients are associated with considerable uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a variable proton RBE in proton therapy liver trials using different fractionation schemes. Sixteen liver cancer cases were evaluated assuming two clinical schedules of 40 Gy/5 fractions and 58.05 Gy/15 fractions. The linear energy transfer (LET) and physical dose distribution in patients were simulated using Monte Carlo. The variable RBE distribution was calculated using a phenomenological model, considering the influence of the LET, fraction size and α/β value. Further, models to predict normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP) were used to investigate potential RBE effects on outcome predictions. Applying the variable RBE model to the 5 and 15 fractions schedules results in an increase in mean fraction-size equivalent dose (FED) to the normal liver of 5.0% and 9.6% respectively. For patients with a mean FED to the normal liver larger than 29.8 Gy, this results in a non-negligible increase in the predicted NTCP of the normal liver averaging 11.6%, ranging from 2.7% to 25.6%. On the other hand, decrease in TCP was less than 5% for both fractionation regimens for all patients when assuming a variable RBE instead of constant. Consequently, the difference in TCP between the two fractionation schedules did not change significantly assuming a variable RBE while the impact on the NTCP difference was highly case specific. In addition, both the NTCP and TCP decrease with increasing α/β value for both fractionation schemes, with the decreases being more pronounced when using a variable RBE compared to using RBE  =  1.1. Assuming a constant RBE of 1.1 most likely overestimates the therapeutic ratio in proton therapy for liver cancer, predominantly due to underestimation of the RBE-weighted dose to the normal liver. The impact of applying a variable RBE (as compared to RBE  =  1.1) on the NTCP difference of the two fractionation regimens is case dependent. A variable RBE results in a slight increase in TCP difference. Variations in patient radiosensitivity increase when using a variable RBE.

Dosimetric and clinical effects of interfraction and intrafraction correlation errors during marker-based real-time tumor tracking for liver SBRT

Correlation model error (CME) between the internal target and the external surrogate, and marker-tumor correlation error (MTCE) between the tumor and the implanted marker occur during marker-based real-time tumor tracking. The effects of these intrafraction and interfraction errors on the dose coverage in the clinical target volume (CTV) and on tumor control probability (TCP) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were evaluated in this study. Eight HCC patients treated with non-isocentric dose delivery by a robotic radiosurgery system were enrolled. The CMEs were extracted from the treatment log file, and the MTCEs were calculated from the preceding study. The CMEs and MTCEs were randomly added to each beam's robot position, and the changes in the TCP and the 2%, 95% and 99% dose coverage values for the CTV (D2, D95 and D99) were simulated. The data were statistically analyzed as a function of the CTV to planning target volume (PTV) margin, the dose fraction and the marker-tumor distance. Significant differences were observed in the majority of the CTV D2, D95 and D99 values and the TCP values. However, a linear regression revealed that ∆CTV D2, D95 and D99 have a weak correlation with ∆TCP. A dose-difference metric would be unable to detect a critical error for tumor control if the coverage changes for the CTV and ∆TCP were weakly correlated. Because the simulated TCP-based parameter determination was based on the dose simulation, including predicted interfraction and intrafraction errors, we concluded that a 95th percentile TCP-based parameter determination would be a robust strategy for ensuring tumor control while reducing doses to normal structures.

Clinical and imaging-based prognostic factors in radioembolisation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a retrospective exploratory analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between absorbed dose and response of colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with [⁹⁰Y]-resin microspheres and to explore possible clinical and imaging derived prognostic factors.

Methods

FDG PET/CT was used to measure response of individual lesions to a measured absorbed dose, derived from post-treatment ⁹⁰Y PET imaging. Predicted dose was also derived from planning [^99mTc]-MAA SPECT data. Peak standardised uptake value and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were explored as response measures, and compared to dose metrics including average dose (D_avg), biologically effective dose, minimum dose to 70% of lesion volume and volume receiving at least 50 Gy. Prognostic factors examined included baseline TLG, RAS mutation status, FDG heterogeneity and dose heterogeneity. In an exploratory analysis, response and clinico-pathological variables were evaluated and compared to overall survival.

Results

Sixty-three lesions were analysed from 22 patients. Poor agreement was seen between predicted and measured dose values. TLG was a superior measure of response, and all dose metrics were significant prognostic factors, with a D_avg of ~50 Gy derived as the critical threshold for a significant response (>50% reduction in TLG). No significant correlation was found between baseline TLG or RAS mutation status and response. Measured dose heterogeneity was a significant prognostic factor and when combined with D_avg had a positive predictive value for response >80%. In the exploratory analysis for prognostic factors of survival, low hepatic tumour burden and mean reduction in TLG >65% were independently associated with improved overall survival.

Conclusions

Lesions receiving an average dose greater than 50 Gy are likely to have a significant response. For lesions receiving less than 50 Gy, dose heterogeneity is a significant prognostic factor. Lesions receiving an average dose less than 20 Gy are unlikely to respond. A reduction in TLG may be associated with improved overall survival.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-017-0292-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Strategies to tackle the challenges of external beam radiotherapy for liver tumors

Primary and metastatic liver cancer is an increasingly common and difficult to control disease entity. Radiation offers a non-invasive treatment alternative for these patients who often have few options and a poor prognosis. However, the anatomy and aggressiveness of liver cancer poses significant challenges such as accurate localization at simulation and treatment, management of motion and appropriate selection of dose regimen. This article aims to review the options available and provide information for the practical implementation and/or improvement of liver cancer radiation programs within the context of stereotactic body radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy guidelines. Specific patient inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented given the significant toxicity found in certain sub-populations treated with radiation. Indeed, certain sub-populations, such as those with tumor thrombosis or those with larger lesions treated with transarterial chemoembolization, have been shown to have significant improvements in outcome with the addition of radiation and merit special consideration. Implementing a liver radiation program requires three primary challenges to be addressed: (1) immobilization and motion management; (2) localization; and (3) dose regimen and constraint selection. Strategies to deal with motion include simple internal target volume (ITV) expansions, non-gated ITV reduction strategies, breath hold methods, and surrogate marker methods to enable gating or tracking. Localization of the tumor and organs-at-risk are addressed using contrast infusion techniques to take advantage of different normal liver and cancer vascular anatomy, imaging modalities, and margin management. Finally, a dose response has been demonstrated and dose regimens appear to be converging. A more uniform approach to treatment in terms of technique, dose selection and patient selection will allow us to study liver radiation in larger and, hopefully, multicenter randomized studies.

A multivariable model to predict survival for patients with hepatic carcinoma or liver metastasis receiving radiotherapy

AIM

New parameters that correlate with overall survival were identified in patients with liver lesions treated with radiation therapy.

METHODS

Pretreatment information and parameters of radiation treatment plans for 129 metastatic and 66 hepatocellular carcinoma liver cancer patients were analyzed. Study end points included overall survival collected from patient charts and electronic records.

RESULTS

Two practical nomograms were constructed for primary hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis patients. For patients with a Child-Pugh A, radiation dose escalation provided a significant survival benefit. However, for those with Child-Pugh B or C, increasing dose does not impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

The developed models can potentially guide dose selection and provide prognostic information but still require external validation.

Radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of liver cancer: a survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE

To report the results of the first Italian survey investigating the role of liver-directed radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary approach of primary and metastatic liver cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 21-item, two-section questionnaire was sent to all Italian radiotherapy centers on June 2014. The two sections aimed at: (1) evaluating the presence of a multidisciplinary liver tumor board and describing the role of radiation oncologists within the latter, (2) analyzing Radiotherapy treatment details and differences between centers.

RESULTS

A total of 37 centers completed the survey. A multidisciplinary liver tumor board was available in most centers (73 %), with a radiation oncologist routinely attending the latter in the majority of cases (85 %). Most of the respondents considered liver-directed Radiotherapy as the third line choice when other therapies were not indicated or technically suitable. 18 centers reported the use of liver-directed radiotherapy. The majority of centers started liver irradiation after 2010. The most adopted motion management strategy was abdominal compression. The most adopted GTV-CTV expansion was 0 and 5 mm for metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was the technique of choice; several treatment schedules were registered, being 45 Gy in three fractions the most reported fractionation scheme. Dose was prescribed at the PTV margin in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Liver-directed radiotherapy represents a new field of interest which is currently adopted by 10 % of all Italian Centers. The technical equipment seems adequate. The variations observed in the treatment regimens reflect the lack of a well-established standard schedule.

Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of approximations in current analytical dose calculation methods (ADCs) on tumor control probability (TCP) in proton therapy.

METHODS

Dose distributions planned with ADC were compared with delivered dose distributions as determined by Monte Carlo simulations. A total of 50 patients were investigated in this analysis with 10 patients per site for 5 treatment sites (head and neck, lung, breast, prostate, liver). Differences were evaluated using dosimetric indices based on a dose-volume histogram analysis, a γ-index analysis, and estimations of TCP.

RESULTS

We found that ADC overestimated the target doses on average by 1% to 2% for all patients considered. The mean dose, D95, D50, and D02 (the dose value covering 95%, 50% and 2% of the target volume, respectively) were predicted within 5% of the delivered dose. The γ-index passing rate for target volumes was above 96% for a 3%/3 mm criterion. Differences in TCP were up to 2%, 2.5%, 6%, 6.5%, and 11% for liver and breast, prostate, head and neck, and lung patients, respectively. Differences in normal tissue complication probabilities for bladder and anterior rectum of prostate patients were less than 3%.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that current dose calculation algorithms lead to underdosage of the target by as much as 5%, resulting in differences in TCP of up to 11%. To ensure full target coverage, advanced dose calculation methods like Monte Carlo simulations may be necessary in proton therapy. Monte Carlo simulations may also be required to avoid biases resulting from systematic discrepancies in calculated dose distributions for clinical trials comparing proton therapy with conventional radiation therapy.

A Survey of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Korea

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in Korea. A nationwide survey was conducted by the Korean Stereotactic Radiosurgery Group of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology (KROG 13-13).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SBRT was defined as radiotherapy with delivery of a high dose of radiation to an extracranial lesion in ≤ 4 fractions. A 16-questionnaire survey was sent by e-mail to the chief of radiation oncology at 85 institutions in June 2013.

RESULTS

All institutions (100%) responded to this survey. Of these, 38 institutions (45%) have used SBRT and 47 institutions (55%) have not used SBRT. Regarding the treatment site, the lung (92%) and liver (76%) were the two most common sites. The most common schedules were 60 Gy/4 fractions for non-small cell lung cancer, 48 Gy/4 fractions for lung metastases, 60 Gy/3 fractions for hepatocellular carcinoma, and 45 Gy/3 fractions or 40 Gy/4 fractions for liver metastases. Four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was the most common method for planning CT (74%). During planning CT, the most common method of immobilization was the use of an alpha cradle/vacuum-lock (42%).

CONCLUSION

Based on this survey, conduct of further prospective studies will be needed in order to determine the appropriate prescribed doses and to standardize the practice of SBRT.