Commissioning of a new wide-bore MRI scanner for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer

AAPM Task Group 334: A guidance document to using radiotherapy immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment

Use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiation therapy has increased substantially in recent years as more radiotherapy centers are having MR simulators installed, requesting more time on clinical diagnostic MR systems, or even treating with combination MR linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. With this increased use, to ensure the most accurate integration of images into radiotherapy (RT), RT immobilization devices and accessories must be able to be used safely in the MR environment and produce minimal perturbations. The determination of the safety profile and considerations often falls to the medical physicist or other support staff members who at a minimum should be a Level 2 personnel as per the ACR. The purpose of this guidance document will be to help guide the user in making determinations on MR Safety labeling (i.e., MR Safe, Conditional, or Unsafe) including standard testing, and verification of image quality, when using RT immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment.

K2S Challenge: From Undersampled K-Space to Automatic Segmentation

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers strong soft tissue contrast but suffers from long acquisition times and requires tedious annotation from radiologists. Traditionally, these challenges have been addressed separately with reconstruction and image analysis algorithms. To see if performance could be improved by treating both as end-to-end, we hosted the K2S challenge, in which challenge participants segmented knee bones and cartilage from 8× undersampled k-space. We curated the 300-patient K2S dataset of multicoil raw k-space and radiologist quality-checked segmentations. 87 teams registered for the challenge and there were 12 submissions, varying in methodologies from serial reconstruction and segmentation to end-to-end networks to another that eschewed a reconstruction algorithm altogether. Four teams produced strong submissions, with the winner having a weighted Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.910 ± 0.021 across knee bones and cartilage. Interestingly, there was no correlation between reconstruction and segmentation metrics. Further analysis showed the top four submissions were suitable for downstream biomarker analysis, largely preserving cartilage thicknesses and key bone shape features with respect to ground truth. K2S thus showed the value in considering reconstruction and image analysis as end-to-end tasks, as this leaves room for optimization while more realistically reflecting the long-term use case of tools being developed by the MR community.

Image quality and acquisition time assessments for phase oversampling in compressed sensing sensitivity encoding: Comparison with conventional SENSE

This study compared sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed sensing sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) for phase oversampling distance and assessed its impact on image quality and image acquisition time. The experiment was performed with a large diameter phantom using 16-channel anterior body coils. All imaging data were divided into three groups according to the parallel imaging technique and oversampling distances: groups A (SENSE with phase oversampling distance of 150 mm), B (CS-SENSE with phase oversampling distance of 100 mm), and C (CS-SENSE with phase oversampling distance of 75 mm). No statistically significant differences were observed among groups A, B, and C regarding both T2 and T1 turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences using an acceleration factor (AF) of 2 (p = 0.301 and 0.289, respectively). In comparison with AF 2 of group A, the scan time of AF 2 of groups B and C was reduced by 11.2% and 23.5% (T2 TSE) and 15.8% and 22.7% (T1 TSE), respectively, while providing comparable image quality. Significant image noise and aliasing artifact were more evident at AF ≥ 2 in group A compared with groups B and C. CS-SENSE with a less phase oversampling distance can reduce image acquisition time without image quality degradation compared with that of SENSE, despite the increase in aliasing artifact as the AF increased in both CS-SENSE and SENSE.

Design and construction of a customizable phantom for the characterization of the three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion

One of the main challenges to using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy is the existence of system‐related geometric inaccuracies caused mainly by the inhomogeneity in the main magnetic field and the nonlinearities of the gradient coils.

Several physical phantoms, with fixed configuration, have been developed and commercialized for the assessment of the MRI geometric distortion. In this study, we propose a new design of a customizable phantom that can fit any type of radio frequency (RF) coil. It is composed of 3D printed plastic blocks containing holes that can hold glass tubes which can be filled with any liquid. The blocks can be assembled to construct phantoms with any dimension.

The feasibility of this design has been demonstrated by assembling four phantoms with high robustness allowing the assessment of the geometric distortion for the GE split head coil, the head and neck array coil, the anterior array coil, and the body coil. Phantom reproducibility was evaluated by analyzing the geometric distortion on CT acquisition of five independent assemblages of the phantom.

This solution meets all expectations in terms of having a robust, lightweight, modular, and practical tool for measuring distortion in three dimensions. Mean error in the position of the tubes was less than 0.2 mm. For the geometric distortion, our results showed that for all typical MRI sequences used for radiotherapy, the mean geometric distortion was less than 1 mm and less than 2.5 mm over radial distances of 150 mm and 250 mm, respectively.

These tools will be part of a quality assurance program aimed at monitoring the image quality of MRI scanners used to guide radiation therapy.

IPEM topical report: guidance on the use of MRI for external beam radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2021;66:055025. [PMID: 33450742 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abdc30]

This document gives guidance for multidisciplinary teams within institutions setting up and using an MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning service. It has been written by a multidisciplinary working group from the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM). Guidance has come from the experience of the institutions represented in the IPEM working group, in consultation with other institutions, and where appropriate references are given for any relevant legislation, other guidance documentation and information in the literature. Guidance is only given for MRI acquired for external beam RT treatment planning in a CT-based workflow, i.e. when MRI is acquired and registered to CT with the purpose of aiding delineation of target or organ at risk volumes. MRI use for treatment response assessment, MRI-only RT and other RT treatment types such as brachytherapy and gamma radiosurgery are not considered within the scope of this document. The aim was to produce guidance that will be useful for institutions who are setting up and using a dedicated MR scanner for RT (referred to as an MR-sim) and those who will have limited time on an MR scanner potentially managed outside of the RT department, often by radiology. Although not specifically covered in this document, there is an increase in the use of hybrid MRI-linac systems worldwide and brief comments are included to highlight any crossover with the early implementation of this technology. In this document, advice is given on introducing a RT workload onto a non-RT-dedicated MR scanner, as well as planning for installation of an MR scanner dedicated for RT. Next, practical guidance is given on the following, in the context of RT planning: training and education for all staff working in and around an MR scanner; RT patient set-up on an MR scanner; MRI sequence optimisation for RT purposes; commissioning and quality assurance (QA) to be performed on an MR scanner; and MRI to CT registration, including commissioning and QA.

Imaging performance of a high-field in-line magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator with a patient rotation system for fixed-gantry radiotherapy

This paper describes the imaging performance of a high-field in-line MRI linear accelerator with a patient rotation system in-situ. Signal quality was quantified using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and RF uniformity maps. B0-field inhomogeneity was assessed using magnetic field mapping. SNR was evaluated with various entries into the Faraday cage which were required for extended couch translations. SNR varied between 103 and 87 across PRS rotation angles. Maximum B0-field inhomogeneity corresponded to 0.7 mm of geometric distortion. A 45 × 55 cm² aperture allowed PRS translation with no reduction in SNR. Imaging performance with the PRS in-situ was found to be acceptable.

Implementation of a dedicated 1.5 T MR scanner for radiotherapy treatment planning featuring a novel high-channel coil setup for brain imaging in treatment position

Purpose

To share our experiences in implementing a dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) scanner for radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning using a novel coil setup for brain imaging in treatment position as well as to present developed core protocols with sequences specifically tuned for brain and prostate RT treatment planning.

Materials and methods

Our novel setup consists of two large 18-channel flexible coils and a specifically designed wooden mask holder mounted on a flat tabletop overlay, which allows patients to be measured in treatment position with mask immobilization. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of this setup was compared to the vendor-provided flexible coil RT setup and the standard setup for diagnostic radiology. The occurrence of motion artifacts was quantified. To develop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, we formulated site- and disease-specific clinical objectives.

Results

Our novel setup showed mean SNR of 163 ± 28 anteriorly, 104 ± 23 centrally, and 78 ± 14 posteriorly compared to 84 ± 8 and 102 ± 22 anteriorly, 68 ± 6 and 95 ± 20 centrally, and 56 ± 7 and 119 ± 23 posteriorly for the vendor-provided and diagnostic setup, respectively. All differences were significant (p > 0.05). Image quality of our novel setup was judged suitable for contouring by expert-based assessment. Motion artifacts were found in 8/60 patients in the diagnostic setup, whereas none were found for patients in the RT setup. Site-specific core protocols were designed to minimize distortions while optimizing tissue contrast and 3D resolution according to indication-specific objectives.

Conclusion

We present a novel setup for high-quality imaging in treatment position that allows use of several immobilization systems enabling MR-only workflows, which could reduce unnecessary dose and registration inaccuracies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01703-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Making Magnets More Attractive: Physics and Engineering Contributions to Patient Comfort in MRI

Patient comfort is an important factor of a successful magnetic resonance (MR) examination, and improvements in the patient's MR scanning experience can contribute to improved image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and efficiency in the radiology department, and therefore reduced cost. Magnet designs that are more open and accessible, reduced auditory noise of MR examinations, light and flexible radiofrequency (RF) coils, and faster motion-insensitive imaging techniques can all significantly improve the patient experience in MR imaging. In this work, we review the design, development, and implementation of these physics and engineering approaches to improve patient comfort.

Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom

OBJECTIVE

Inversion recovery-pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (IR-PETRA) is an effective magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequence in generating pseudo-CTs. The hardware-related spatial-distortion (HRSD) in MR images potentially deteriorates the accuracy of pseudo-CTs. Thus, we aimed at characterizing HRSD for IR-PETRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

gross-HRSD_overall (Euclidean-sum of gross-HRSD_i (i = x, y, z)) for IR-PETRA was assessed using a brain-specific phantom for two MR scanners (1.5 T-Aera and 3.0 T-Prisma). Moreover, hardware imperfections were analyzed by determining gradient-nonlinearity spatial-distortion (GNSD) and B₀-inhomogeneity spatial-distortion (B₀ISD) for magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) which has well-known distortion characteristics.

RESULTS

In 3.0 T, maximum of gross-GNSD_overall (Euclidean-sum of gross-GNSD_i) and gross-B₀ISD for MP-RAGE was 2.77 mm and 0.57 mm, respectively. For this scanner, the mean and maximum of gross-HRSD_overall for IR-PETRA were 0.63 ± 0.38 mm and 1.91 mm, respectively. In 1.5 T, maximum of gross-GNSD_overall and gross-B₀ISD for MP-RAGE was 3.41 mm and 0.78 mm, respectively. The mean and maximum of gross-HRSD_overall for IR-PETRA were 1.02 ± 0.50 mm and 3.12 mm, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The spatial accuracy of MR images, besides being impacted by hardware performance, scanner capabilities, and imaging parameters, is mainly affected by its imaging strategy and data acquisition scheme. In 3.0 T, even without applying vendor correction algorithms, spatial accuracy of IR-PETRA image is sufficient for generating pseudo-CTs. In 1.5 T, distortion-correction is required to provide this accuracy.

Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy: A review

Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is a promising approach to improving clinical outcomes for patients treated with radiation therapy. The roles of image guidance, adaptive planning and magnetic resonance imaging in radiation therapy have been increasing over the last two decades. Technical advances have led to the feasible combination of magnetic resonance imaging and radiation therapy technologies, leading to improved soft-tissue visualisation, assessment of inter- and intrafraction motion, motion management, online adaptive radiation therapy and the incorporation of functional information into treatment. MRgRT can potentially transform radiation oncology by improving tumour control and quality of life after radiation therapy and increasing convenience of treatment by shortening treatment courses for patients. Multiple groups have developed clinical implementations of MRgRT predominantly in the abdomen and pelvis, with patients having been treated since 2014. While studies of MRgRT have primarily been dosimetric so far, an increasing number of trials are underway examining the potential clinical benefits of MRgRT, with coordinated efforts to rigorously evaluate the benefits of the promising technology. This review discusses the current implementations, studies, potential benefits and challenges of MRgRT.

IPEM Topical Report: A 2018 IPEM survey of MRI use for external beam radiotherapy treatment planning in the UK

The benefits of integrating MRI into the radiotherapy pathway are well published, however there is little consensus in guidance on how to commission or implement its use. With a view to developing consensus guidelines for the use of MRI in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment planning in the UK, a survey was undertaken by an Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) working-party to assess the current landscape of MRI use in EBRT in the UK. A multi-disciplinary working-party developed a survey to understand current practice using MRI for EBRT treatment planning; investigate how MRI is currently used and managed; and identify knowledge gaps. The survey was distributed electronically to radiotherapy service managers and physics leads in 71 UK radiotherapy (RT) departments (all NHS and private groups). The survey response rate was 87% overall, with 89% of NHS and 75% of private centres responding. All responding centres include EBRT in some RT pathways: 94% using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) images potentially acquired without any input from RT departments, and 69% had some form of MRI access for planning EBRT. Most centres reporting direct access use a radiology scanner within the same hospital in dedicated (26%) or non-dedicated (52%) RT scanning sessions. Only two centres reported having dedicated RT MRI scanners in the UK, lower than reported in other countries. Six percent of radiotherapy patients in England (data not publically available outside of England) have MRI as part of their treatment, which again is lower than reported elsewhere. Although a substantial number of centres acquire MRI scans for treatment planning purposes, most centres acquire less than five patient scans per month for each treatment site. Commissioning and quality assurance of both image registration and MRI scanners was found to be variable across the UK. In addition, staffing models and training given to different staff groups varied considerably across the UK, reflecting the current lack of national guidelines. The primary barriers reported to MRI implementation in EBRT planning included costs (e.g. lack of a national tariff for planning MRI), lack of MRI access and/or capacity within hospitals. Despite these challenges, significant interest remains in increasing MRI-assisted EBRT planning over the next five years.

Brain and Head-and-Neck MRI in Immobilization Mask: A Practical Solution for MR-Only Radiotherapy

In brain/head-and-neck radiotherapy (RT), thermoplastic immobilization masks guarantee reproducible patient positioning in treatment position between MRI, CT, and irradiation. Since immobilization masks do not fit in the diagnostic MR head/head-and-neck coils, flexible surface coils are used for MRI imaging in clinical practice. These coils are placed around the head/neck, in contact with the immobilization masks. However, the positioning of these flexible coils is technician dependent, thus leading to poor image reproducibility. Additionally, flexible surface coils have an inferior signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) compared to diagnostic coils. The aim of this work was to create a new immobilization setup which fits into the diagnostic MR coils in order to enhance MR image quality and reproducibility. For this purpose, a practical immobilization setup was constructed. The performances of the standard clinical and the proposed setups were compared with four tests: SNR, image quality, motion restriction, and reproducibility of inter-fraction subject positioning. The new immobilization setup resulted in 3.4 times higher SNR values on average than the standard setup, except directly below the flexible surface coils where similar SNR was observed. Overall, the image quality was superior for brain/head-and-neck images acquired with the proposed RT setup. Comparable motion restriction in feet-head/left-right directions (maximum motion ≈1 mm) and comparable inter-fraction repositioning accuracy (mean inter-fraction movement 1 ± 0.5 mm) were observed for the standard and the new setup.

MRI commissioning of 1.5T MR-linac systems - a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic Resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems represent a new type of technology that allows for online MR-guidance for high precision radiotherapy (RT). Currently, the first MR-linac installations are being introduced clinically. Since the imaging performance of these integrated MR-linac systems is critical for their application, a thorough commissioning of the MRI performance is essential. However, guidelines on the commissioning of MR-guided RT systems are not yet defined and data on the performance of MR-linacs are not yet available.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Here we describe a comprehensive commissioning protocol, which contains standard MRI performance measurements as well as dedicated hybrid tests that specifically assess the interactions between the Linac and the MRI system. The commissioning results of four MR-linac systems are presented in a multi-center study.

RESULTS

Although the four systems showed similar performance in all the standard MRI performance tests, some differences were observed relating to the hybrid character of the systems. Field homogeneity measurements identified differences in the gantry shim configuration, which was later confirmed by the vendor.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the importance of dedicated hybrid commissioning tests and the ability to compare the machines between institutes at this very early stage of clinical introduction. Until formal guidelines and tolerances are defined the tests described in this study may be used as a practical guideline. Moreover, the multi-center results provide initial bench mark data for future MR-linac installations.

Quantitative analysis of image quality for acceptance and commissioning of an MRI simulator with a semiautomatic method

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) simulation differs from diagnostic MRI in purpose, technical requirements, and implementation. We propose a semiautomatic method for image acceptance and commissioning for the scanner, the radiofrequency (RF) coils, and pulse sequences for an MRI simulator. The ACR MRI accreditation large phantom was used for image quality analysis with seven parameters. Standard ACR sequences with a split head coil were adopted to examine the scanner's basic performance. The performance of simulation RF coils were measured and compared using the standard sequence with different clinical diagnostic coils. We used simulation sequences with simulation coils to test the quality of image and advanced performance of the scanner. Codes and procedures were developed for semiautomatic image quality analysis. When using standard ACR sequences with a split head coil, image quality passed all ACR recommended criteria. The image intensity uniformity with a simulation RF coil decreased about 34% compared with the eight‐channel diagnostic head coil, while the other six image quality parameters were acceptable. Those two image quality parameters could be improved to more than 85% by built‐in intensity calibration methods. In the simulation sequences test, the contrast resolution was sensitive to the FOV and matrix settings. The geometric distortion of simulation sequences such as T1‐weighted and T2‐weighted images was well‐controlled in the isocenter and 10 cm off‐center within a range of ±1% (2 mm). We developed a semiautomatic image quality analysis method for quantitative evaluation of images and commissioning of an MRI simulator. The baseline performances of simulation RF coils and pulse sequences have been established for routine QA.

Geometric accuracy of the MR imaging techniques in the presence of motion

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for improving tumor delineation and tumor tracking in the presence of respiratory motion. The purpose of this work is to design and build an MR compatible motion platform and to use it for evaluating the geometric accuracy of MR imaging techniques during respiratory motion. The motion platform presented in this work is composed of a mobile base made up of a flat plate and four wheels. The mobile base is attached from one end and through a rigid rod to a synchrony motion table by Accuray^® placed at the end of the MRI table and from the other end to an elastic rod. The geometric accuracy was measured by placing a control point‐based phantom on top of the mobile base.

In‐house software module was used to automatically assess the geometric distortion. The blurring artifact was also assessed by measuring the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of each control point. Our results were assessed for 50, 100, and 150 mm radial distances, with a mean geometric distortion during the superior–inferior motion of 0.27, 0.41, and 0.55 mm, respectively. Adding the anterior–posterior motion, the mean geometric distortions increased to 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm. Blurring was observed during motion causing an increase in the FWHM of ≈30%. The platform presented in this work provides a valuable tool for the assessment of the geometric accuracy and blurring artifact for MR during motion. Although the main objective was to test the spatial accuracy of an MR system during motion, the modular aspect of the presented platform enables the use of any commercially available phantom for a full quality control of the MR system during motion.

Consensus opinion on MRI simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning

AIM

To determine the levels at which consensus could be reached regarding general and site-specific principles of MRI simulation for offline MRI-aided external beam radiation treatment planning.

METHODS

A process inspired by the Delphi method was employed to determine levels of consensus using a series of questionnaires interspersed with controlled opinion feedback.

RESULTS

In general, full consensus was reached regarding general principles of MRI simulation. However, the level of consensus decreased when site-specific principles of MRI simulation were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate variability in MRI simulation approaches that are largely explained by the use of MRI in combination with CT.

Image Non-Uniformity Correction for 3-T Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver

Purpose:

Image non-uniformity may cause substantial problems in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging especially when a 3-T scanner is used. We evaluated the effect of image non-uniformity correction in gadolinium ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR imaging using a 3-T scanner.

Methods:

Two commercially available methods for image non-uniformity correction, surface coil intensity correction (SCIC), and phased-array uniformity enhancement (PURE), were applied to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced images acquired at 3-T in 20 patients. The calibration images were used for PURE and not for SCIC. Uniformity in the liver signal was evaluated visually and using histogram analysis. The liver-to-muscle signal ratio (LMR) and liver-to-spleen signal ratio (LSR) were estimated, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated from the liver signal, LMR, and LSR.

Results:

Without non-uniformity correction, hyperintensity was consistently observed near the liver surface. Both SCIC and PURE improved uniformity in the liver signal; however, the superficial hyperintensity remained after the application of SCIC, especially in the hepatobiliary-phase images, and focal hyperintensity was shown in the lateral segment of the left hepatic lobe after the application of PURE. PURE increased LMR dramatically and LSR mildly, with no changes in CERs. SCIC depressed temporal changes in LMR and LSR and obscured contrast effects, regardless of the method used for calculation of CER.

Conclusion:

SCIC improves uniformity in the liver signal; however, it is not suitable for a quantitative assessment of contrast effects. PURE is indicated to be a useful method for non-uniformity correction in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging using a 3-T scanner.

Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning

OBJECTIVE

To develop a method for the assessment and characterization of 3D geometric distortion as part of routine quality assurance for MRI scanners commissioned for Radiation Therapy planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the in-plane and through-plane geometric distortions on a 1.5T GE MRI-SIM unit are characterized and the 2D and 3D correction algorithms provided by the vendor are evaluated. We used a phantom developed by GE Healthcare that covers a large field of view of 500mm, and consists of layers of foam embedded with a matrix of ellipsoidal markers. An in-house Java-based software module was developed to automatically assess the geometric distortion by calculating the center of each marker using the center of mass method, correcting of gross rotation errors and comparing the corrected positions with a CT gold standard data set. Spatial accuracy of typical pulse sequences used in RT planning was assessed (2D T1/T2 FSE, 3D CUBE, T1 SPGR) using the software. The accuracy of vendor specific geometric distortion correction (GDC) algorithms was quantified by measuring distortions before and after the application of the 2D and 3D correction algorithms.

RESULTS

Our algorithm was able to accurately calculate geometric distortion with sub-pixel precision. For all typical MR sequences used in Radiotherapy, the vendor's GDC was able to substantially reduce the distortions. Our results showed also that the impact of the acquisition produced a maximum variation of 0.2mm over a radial distance of 200mm. It has been shown that while the 2D correction algorithm remarkably reduces the in-plane geometric distortion, 3D geometric distortion further reduced the geometric distortion by correcting both in-plane and through-plane distortions in all acquisitions.

CONCLUSION

The presented methods represent a valuable tool for routine quality assurance of MR applications that require stringent spatial accuracy assessment such as radiotherapy. The phantom used in this study provides three dimensional arrays of control points. These tools and the detailed results can be also used for developing new geometric distortion correction algorithms or improving the existing ones.

Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom

PURPOSE

Accurate geometry is required for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). When considering the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for RTP, geometric distortions observed in the acquired images should be considered. While scanner technology and vendor supplied correction algorithms provide some correction, large distortions are still present in images, even when considering considerably smaller scan lengths than those typically acquired with CT in conventional RTP. This study investigates MRI acquisition with a moving table compared with static scans for potential geometric benefits for RTP.

METHODS

A full field of view (FOV) phantom (diameter 500 mm; length 513 mm) was developed for measuring geometric distortions in MR images over volumes pertinent to RTP. The phantom consisted of layers of refined plastic within which vitamin E capsules were inserted. The phantom was scanned on CT to provide the geometric gold standard and on MRI, with differences in capsule location determining the distortion. MRI images were acquired with two techniques. For the first method, standard static table acquisitions were considered. Both 2D and 3D acquisition techniques were investigated. With the second technique, images were acquired with a moving table. The same sequence was acquired with a static table and then with table speeds of 1.1 mm/s and 2 mm/s. All of the MR images acquired were registered to the CT dataset using a deformable B-spline registration with the resulting deformation fields providing the distortion information for each acquisition.

RESULTS

MR images acquired with the moving table enabled imaging of the whole phantom length while images acquired with a static table were only able to image 50%-70% of the phantom length of 513 mm. Maximum distortion values were reduced across a larger volume when imaging with a moving table. Increased table speed resulted in a larger contribution of distortion from gradient nonlinearities in the through-plane direction and an increased blurring of capsule images, resulting in an apparent capsule volume increase by up to 170% in extreme axial FOV regions. Blurring increased with table speed and in the central regions of the phantom, geometric distortion was less for static table acquisitions compared to a table speed of 2 mm/s over the same volume. Overall, the best geometric accuracy was achieved with a table speed of 1.1 mm/s.

CONCLUSIONS

The phantom designed enables full FOV imaging for distortion assessment for the purposes of RTP. MRI acquisition with a moving table extends the imaging volume in the z direction with reduced distortions which could be useful particularly if considering MR-only planning. If utilizing MR images to provide additional soft tissue information to the planning CT, standard acquisition sequences over a smaller volume would avoid introducing additional blurring or distortions from the through-plane table movement.

Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques for radiotherapy planning

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a number of benefits for the planning of radiotherapy (RT), but its uptake into clinical practice has often been restricted to specialist research sites. There is often a lack of detailed MRI knowledge within the RT community and an apprehension of geometric distortions, both of which prevent its best utilization and merit the introduction of a standardized approach and common guidelines. This review sets out to address some of the issues involved in acquiring MRI scans for RT planning in the context of a number of clinical sites of interest and concludes with recommendations for its best practice in terms of imaging protocol and quality assurance. The article is of particular interest to the growing number of cancer therapy centers that are embarking on MRI simulation on either existing systems or their own dedicated scanners.