A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Clinical outcomes of abbreviated high dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: lessons from the COVID pandemic for high dose-rate fractionation

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with abbreviated high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) that used 2-implants and delivered 4-5 fractions over 7-12 days rather than 21-28 days.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer, treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) ± chemotherapy followed by abbreviated MR/CT-based HDR-BT were included. The planning aim was to achieve > 70Gy equivalent doses in 2Gy (EQD210Gy) at Point A dose in patients undergoing intracavitary BT (ICBT) and > 85Gy EQD210Gy to the HRCTV in intracavitary-interstitial BT (IC-ISBT). The dose constraints to 2 cc of bladder, rectum and sigmoid were restricted to < 90Gy3, < 75Gy3 and < 75Gy EQD23Gy respectively.

RESULTS

From 2020 to 2022, 245 patients were treated with EBRT followed by MR/CT-based HDR-BT. Median OTT was 57 days. The median HRCTV volume was 35.5cc with higher HRCTV in MR than CT-based (42.3cc vs. 32.8cc). The median dose to Point-A, HRCTV-D90, B2cc, R2cc and S2cc for ICBT was 78.1, 86.2, 87, 70.2 and 70.4Gy respectively. For IC-ISBT cohort, the median dose to HRCTV-D90, B2cc, R2cc, and S2cc was 86.1, 88.6, 70 & 66.7Gy respectively. The 3-years local control, pelvic control, locoregional, disease free and overall survival was 90%, 88%, 83.7%, 75.5% and 85% respectively. Late ≥ grade III gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 7.3% and 1.6% respectively with marginally higher toxicity in CT based cohort.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated HDR-BT schedule of 2-implants 4-5 fractions is radiobiological iso-effective and clinically safe with comparable oncological outcomes and adverse events.

In vivo dosimetry with an inorganic scintillation detector during multi-channel vaginal cylinder pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy: Dosimetry for pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy

Background and purpose

In vivo dosimetry is not standard in brachytherapy and some errors go undetected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of multi-channel vaginal cylinder pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy using in vivo dosimetry.

Materials and methods

In vivo dosimetry data was collected during the years 2019-2022 for 22 patients (32 fractions) receiving multi-channel cylinder pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy. An inorganic scintillation detector was inserted in a cylinder channel. Each fraction was analysed as independent data sets. In vivo dosimetry-based source-tracking was used to determine the relative source-to-detector position. Measured dose was compared to planned and re-calculated source-tracking based doses. Assuming no change in organ and applicator geometry throughout treatment, the planned and source-tracking based dose distributions were compared in select volumes via γ-index analysis and dose-volume-histograms.

Results

The mean ± SD planned vs. measured dose deviations in the first pulse were 0.8 ± 5.9 %. In 31/32 fractions the deviation was within the combined in vivo dosimetry uncertainty (averaging 9.7 %, k = 2) and planning dose calculation uncertainty (1.6 %, k = 2). The dwell-position offsets were < 2 mm for 88 % of channels, with the largest being 5.1 mm (4.0 mm uncertainty, k = 2). 3 %/2 mm γ pass-rates averaged 97.0 % (clinical target volume (CTV)), 100.0 % (rectum), 99.9 % (bladder). The mean ± SD deviation was -1. 1  ± 2.9 % for CTV D98, and -0.2 ± 0.9 % and -1.2 ± 2.5 %, for bladder and rectum D2cm3 respectively, indicating good agreement between intended and delivered dose.

Conclusions

In vivo dosimetry verified accurate and stable dose delivery in multi-channel vaginal cylinder based pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy.

Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: The very first comparison study

Purpose

For cervical cancer patients, intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is utilized with various dose-rate systems, such as low-dose-rate (LDR), high-dose-rate (HDR), and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR). This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with either LDR-, HDR-, or PDR-ICBT.

Material and methods

A total of 613 patients were treated with pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by either LDR- (271 patients), HDR- (259 patients), or PDR- (83 patients) ICBT. Point-based planning was performed according to orthogonal radiographs in LDR patients, and computed tomography (CT) imaging in HDR and PDR patients. ICBT prescribed dose was as follows: for LDR treatment, 30 Gy in a single-session; for HDR: 7 Gy × 3 fractions (once a week fraction); and for PDR: 27 Gy in an hourly pulse of 70 cGy, with all the doses prescribed at point A. Radioactive source used was cesium-137 for LDR, and iridium-192 for HDR and PDR treatments.

Results

Loco-regional control (LRC) rate was 74%, 75%, and 77% in LDR, HDR, and PDR groups, respectively (p = 0.80). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the three groups, i.e., LDR, HDR, and PDR was 63%, 64%, and 68%, respectively (p = 0.77). Severe late toxicity (RTOG grade ≥ 3) rate in the three groups was comparable (LDR, 12%; HDR, 8%; and PDR, 8.9%, p = 0.36).

Conclusions

Our study revealed comparable LRC, 5-year OS, and late toxicity rates using three dose-rate systems. Lower OS rates were observed in LDR group for stage III patients compared with patients in HDR and PDR groups. Therefore, we suggest that LDR should be used with caution while treating stage III patients.

Redefining the role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer treatment using a preplanned approach

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to determine predictive factors for cervical cancer patients who would benefit more from high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS

The sample included 50 patients treated with brachytherapy following external radiochemotherapy. PDR plans were compared to HDR preplans, with a focus on patients who may benefit from PDR using preplan metrics and clinical variables. The expected clinical effect was quantified using a tumor control probability model.

RESULTS

Results showed PDR plans with 60 pulses to be optimal for achieving target clinical goals for D90CTVHR. A CTVHR volume of >67.5cc and/or D90CTVHR dose on the HDR preplan of <31.1 Gy was the strongest indicator for patient selection who would gain >3% increase in TCP with PDR. The process showed 96% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 98% specificity. Only 16% of patients showed a relevant benefit from PDR over HDR, with a mean D90CTVHR of 7 Gy higher and a mean TCP at 3 years of 4.8% higher for PDR. The benefit of PDR is highly influenced by the choice of alpha/beta ratio and repair halftime.

CONCLUSION

A small subset of cervical cancer patients may gain from PDR over HDR. CTVHR volume and preplan D90CTVHR doses may be useful in selecting patients for PDR brachytherapy.

Locally advanced cervical cancer: how the improvement in techniques in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy impacts on survival outcomes and long-term toxicities

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy are the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Reported long-term outcomes for treated with both IMRT and 3D-Image-guided-adaptive brachytherapy are lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 165 patients with FIGO Stage IB-IVB cervical cancer, treated with chemoradiotherapy in combination with brachytherapy. External beam radiotherapy was delivered as IMRT/VMAT/TOMO helical or 3DCRT. The intracavitary brachytherapy treatment (ICBT) was performed using two different planning system (with or without optimization).

RESULTS

Among the patient subgroups, comprising those who received IMRT/VMAT/Tomo helical and 3DCRT, as well as those who underwent ICBT planning optimization and those who did not, homogeneity was observed in terms of age, performance status, T stage, N status, TNM stage, and histology. With a median follow-up time of 60.5 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) in the 3DCRT and IMRT groups was 74.9% and 92.8%, respectively (p = 0.033). The 5-year OS in the ICBT planning optimization group was 93.7%, compared to 75% in the non-optimization group (p = 0.014). Regarding late radiation toxicities, patients in the IMRT group had a lower incidence of chronic rectal toxicity compared to those in the 3DCRT group (6.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.001). The group with ICBT planning optimization had a lower incidence of late urinary toxicities (10.4%) compared to the non-optimized ICBT planning group (18.2%, p = 0.012). Similarly, the ICBT planning optimization group had a lower incidence of late rectal toxicity (6.5% with 80% grade 1 and 20% grade 2) compared to the non-optimized ICBT planning group (34.1%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this series, the group of patients receiving optimized ICBT had an advantage in terms of OS and CSS suggesting that the use of new Treatment Planning Systems associated with 3D imaging, improves the long-term survival. Additionally, a significant reduction in late rectal and urinary toxicity has been observed.

Brachytherapy boost in anal canal cancer - A GEC ESTRO PDR task force meta-analysis

Purpose

A meta-analysis is presented comparing clinical outcomes and toxicities between high dose rate (HDR) and pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) for anal cancer.

Methods and material

Retrospective or prospective clinical trials were identified on electronical databases. Data were collected per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses guidelines. Pooled effect size for HDR and PDR BT were compared using subgroup analyses.

Results

Nine retrospective studies with a total of 481 patients treated were included of which 219 with HDR and 262 with PDR. Significant differences were observed between the two groups for baseline characteristics and treatment. The cumulative proportion of stage T3-T4 was lower in the HDR group, 0.15 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.29] vs 0.27 [95 %CI 0.09-0.57] in the LDR group, p < 0.001. Lower BT doses (in equivalent 2-Gy fraction dose) were given for patients in the HDR group, 11.9 Gy [95 %CI 8.2-15.5] vs 19.5 Gy [95 %CI 15.0-24.0] in the PDR group, p < 0.001. No significant differences were found for clinical outcomes or toxicities. The pooled effect size of the overall survival at 5 years for HDR and PDR was respectively 0.82 [95 %CI 0.70-0.94] and 0.82 [95 %CI 0.73-0.91], p > 0.99. The 5 years local control was 0.86 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.91] and 0.83 [95 %CI 0.77-0.89], p = 0.62. Cumulative toxicity-related colostomy proportion was 0.04 [95 %CI 0.02-0.09] and 0.03 [95 %CI 0.02-0.07], p = 0.85.

Conclusion

Both modalities provided a good profile of tolerance and are effective organ conservative strategies for patients with anal canal cancer. In parallel with ongoing developments to better determine the optimal fractionation and dose for HDR-BT treatments, especially in large tumors, PDR BT still has a crucial role for dose escalation strategy in advanced cases.

Electronic brachytherapy for treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers: clinical results and toxicities

Purpose

Although surgical approaches are standard for most non-melanomatous skin cancers, some patients are not candidates due to medical co-morbidities or functional or cosmetic or lesion location. High-dose-rate electronic brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) may be an alternative treatment modality.

Material and methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted from April 2011 to April 2013. All lesions were pathologically confirmed as malignant basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma. A HDR-EBT system delivered a median biological equivalent dose of 50 Gy total to a depth of 0.1-0.5 cm using various sizes of applicators. Treatment feasibility, acute and late toxicity, cosmetic outcomes, and local recurrence were assessed.

Results

Thirty-three patients with a mean age of 76 years with 50 cutaneous lesions were treated. Locations included 17 extremity lesions and 33 head and neck lesions. After treatments, acute grade 3 moist desquamation developed in 9 of the lesions (18%). Acute grade 4 ulceration developed in 3 lesions in the lower extremity (6%) and 1 upper lip lesion (2%). These toxicities were improved after a median of 20 days. Amongst the 4 lesions with grade 4 toxicities, a greater proportion were in lower extremity lesions compared to head and neck lesions (75% vs. 25%). There was no difference in the rate of grade 3 and 4 toxicities between patients aged ≤ 75 years and aged > 75 years (p = 0.082). With a mean long-term follow-up of 45.6 months, there was 1 local recurrence treated with surgery and no reported late toxicities.

Conclusions

Our experience with HDR-EBT for non-melanomatous skin cancers is encouraging in terms of efficacy and convenience for patients. Our long-term follow-up shows a good response in all treated sites. Caution should be used for extremity sites, and more fractionated regimens should be considered to avoid severe acute toxicities.

The Impact of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Measuring Clinical Outcomes in the Primary Treatment of Cervical Cancer

Purpose

Radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy is used to treat locally advanced cervical cancer. Our institution has transitioned to high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) from low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in 2008, and a review was conducted on the effect of this change on patient outcomes.

Methods and Materials

A single-arm retrospective chart review was performed on locally advanced (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique stage IB-IVA) patients with cervical cancer treated with combined external beam radiation therapy and HDR-ICBT with curative intent between 2008 and 2014. Clinical outcomes were evaluated, and multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors.

Results

Of the 76 patients selected, median age was 47.9 years and median follow-up was 5.2 years. Thirteen patients (17.1%) developed locoregional recurrence and 23 patients (30.3%) patients developed distant recurrence. Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 63.7% and 69.3%, respectively. A significant survival difference was found between stages (P < .001). Multivariate analysis found nodal involvement was strongly associated with poorer survival (P = .007).

Conclusions

Our experience with the transition to HDR-ICBT as part of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer resulted in acceptable long-term outcomes and toxicity to that of LDR brachytherapy. Potential further improvement of treatment outcomes for patients may be possible with image guided brachytherapy and the addition of effective systemic therapy.

High precision radiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective monoinstitutional study

Purpose

To analyse the survival outcomes and toxicity profile of patients treated with pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for uterine cervical cancer in a single institution.

Material and methods

Between March 2011 and December 2014, 50 patients with histologically proven stages IB1-IVB cervical cancer were treated with IMRT followed by PDR-BT boost. Radiation treatment consisted of IMRT to pelvic with or without paraaortic lymph nodes to a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy. Weekly concomitant chemotherapy was administered to 45 patients. PDR-BT boost was delivered with a median dose of 30 Gy to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) after a median time of 14 days since IMRT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) - European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring criteria and Subjective Objective Management Analytic-Late Effects of Normal Tissues (SOMA-LENT) criteria.

Results

Two patients had tumour persistence at 6 months after the end of BT. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 6 distant metastases with or without regional relapse were observed. The 1- and 5-year progression-free survival was 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) and 76% (95% CI: 61-86%), whereas the 3- and 5-year overall survival was 91% (95% CI: 78-97%) and 76% (95% CI: 56-88%), respectively. Urinary and rectal toxicity higher than grade 2 was observed in 6.3% and 17% of patients, respectively. Five patients (10.6%) had grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity requiring colostomy.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that the combination of IMRT and PDR-BT can be considered an effective treatment for cervical cancer, ensuring high local control, despite the high percentage of locally advanced disease.

Sustained partial remission of a metastatic NEN using off-label immunotherapy with pembrolizumab

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of tumors, which can be histologically separated by primary location, proliferation rate and differentiation of tumor cells. The therapeutic options and outcome depend on grading, staging and resectability of the tumor. Established treatment options of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and carcinomas (NEC) are based especially on surgery, tumor specific medical treatments, peptide guided radioreceptor therapy (PRRT) and locoregional therapies. We report about a patient diagnosed with a pancreatic, non-functional NET/NEC G2/3 with a proliferation rate of 20% at initial immunohistochemical diagnosis. During the course of the disease, the proliferation rate increased up to more than 50% over a period of 5 years. Due to loss of response to established therapies (i.e. systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy and brachytherapy), an off-label immunotherapy with the PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab was initiated based on a 30% PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. This report is the first demonstrating a partial remission of a pancreatic NEN using pembrolizumab monotherapy with a hepatic tumor volume reduction of at least 66%, combined with an improvement of the Karnofsky score rising from 60% to 100%. This case offers insight into the potential role of immunotherapy in a subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

[Brachytherapy for head and neck cancers]

The main indications of the brachytherapy of head and neck cancers are the limited tumours of the lip, the nose, the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Nasopharynx tumours are nowadays treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This technique can be exclusive, associated with external radiotherapy or postoperative. It can also be a salvage treatment for the second primaries in previously irradiated areas. If the low dose rate brachytherapy rules remain the reference, the pulse dose rate technique allows the prescription of the dose rate and the optimisation of the dose distribution. Results of high dose rate brachytherapy are now published. This paper reports the recommendations of the Gec-ESTRO, published in 2017, and takes into account the data of the historical low dose rate series, and is upgraded with the pulsed-dose rate and high dose rate series.

GEC-ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for performing bladder-sparing treatment with brachytherapy for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma

The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In selected cases a bladder sparing approach is possible, for example a limited surgical excision combined with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. To perform brachytherapy flexible catheters have to be implanted in the bladder wall. The implantation is done either by the open retropubic approach or the endoscopic surgical approach. The largest experience for brachytherapy is with low-dose rate and pulsed-dose rate, although some short-term experience with high-dose rate is also reported. The main advantage for this technique is the conservation of bladder function, with comparable local control rates as for cystectomy series in selected cases. The GEC-ESTRO/ACROP (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology / Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice) recommendations to perform bladder implantations and brachytherapy as a treatment option for MIBC are described.