Comparison of two radiation techniques for the breast boost in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer

Interobserver variability (between radiation oncologist and radiation therapist) in tumor bed contouring after breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

To examine interobserver variability between the radiation oncologist (RTO) and the radiation therapist (RTT) in delineating the tumor bed (TB) in early breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a radiotherapy boost to the TB. In a first group, the clinical target volume (CTV) for the boost was the surgical bed, defined by using surgical clips. In a second group, the CTV was defined by identifying a seroma cavity or a metallic find on the scar. These contours were compared in terms of volume, number of slices, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

RESULTS

Forty patients were assessed: 20 had surgical clips (group 1) while the other 20 had none (group 2). There was no difference in the number of slices contoured by the 2 operators for group 1, but a statistically significant difference emerged in the volumes: the RTT identified a TB that was a mean 45% smaller than the one identified by the RTO. Random differences were found between the 2 operators for group 2. The TBs delineated for this group were significantly larger (P<0.05) than those identified by the RTT for group 1. The mean Dice value between the RTO's and the RTT's TBs was 0.69±0.07 (range 0.53-0.81) for group 1 and 0.37±0.18 (range 0-0.58) for group 2 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the use of clips coincided with less interoperator variability. With appropriate training, the RTT may play an important part in the multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.