Application of FLASH-3D dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma

Assessment of endometrial cancer with microcystic, elongated, and fragmented pattern invasion using multiparametric MRI

OBJECTIVES

To assess the MRI findings of endometrial cancer with microcystic, elongated, and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion and to evaluate the optimal sequences to detect deep myometrial invasion with MELF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center case-control study included 85 patients with endometrial cancer, including 17 patients with MELF, between December 2020 and January 2023. Preoperative MRI, including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) with equilibrium phase contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI were reviewed by three radiologists. DWI signal gradation with DWI-CE mismatch (DG-DCM) and tumor-myometrium synchronous early enhancement (TME) were evaluated, as well as the diagnostic performance for deep myometrial invasion, first with T2WI + CE alone and then with the addition of DWI + DCE. Pathology was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of DG-DCM were 41.2-76.5% and 89.7-98.5%, and those of TME were 70.7-82.4% and 94.1-95.6%, respectively, for MELF by the three readers. For the diagnosis of deep myometrial invasion with MELF, the addition of DWI + DCE to T2WI + CE significantly improved the sensitivity for two readers (from 16.7 to 91.7% for Reader 1, from 16.7 to 83.3% for Reader 2, p < 0.01) and the accuracy for one reader (from 35.3 to 82.4% for Reader 1, p < 0.01). In contrast, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy did not change with the addition of DWI + DCE in tumors without MELF.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial cancer with MELF may show characteristic MRI findings of DG-DCM and TME. The value of DWI and DCE in detecting deep myometrial invasion may be high for MELF pattern invasion.

Comparing the efficacy of different methods in assessing cervical stromal invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study of 2,020 patients

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the preoperative diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and endometrial biopsy for cervical stromal invasion (CSI) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and to discuss the influencing factors of CSI.

Material and methods

A total of 2,020 patients with EC were retrospectively analyzed in a tertiary hospital. Basic patient information, clinical pathology, and laboratory indicators were collected and analyzed. Using the postoperative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, the diagnostic efficacies of different preoperative methods were analyzed. Additionally, influencing factors of CSI were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The sensitivity (Sens.), specificity (Spec.), accuracy (Acc.), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), Youden's index, and Kappa value of the MRI vs. CT groups were 49.50% vs. 56.74%, 92.24% vs. 79.09%, 87.70% vs. 76.15%, 11.60 vs. 4.93, 0.42 vs. 0.36, and 0.392 vs. 0.256 (p < 0.001), respectively. The Sens., Spec., Acc., DOR, Youden's index, and Kappa value of the endometrial biopsy group were 41.74%, 93.25%, 87.08%, 9.97, 0.35, and 0.363 (p < 0.001), respectively. CSI was associated with cancer antigen 125, myometrial invasion, adnexal invasion, parametrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, and progesterone receptor.

Conclusions

MRI is relatively superior in assessing CSI, although diagnostic authenticity and consistency were unsatisfactory. Combining MRI and biopsy could improve diagnostic sensitivity, aiding in clinical decision making and prognostic prediction. Comprehensive consideration of high-risk factors for the occurrence of CSI may aid the diagnosis. Preoperative diagnostic methods of CSI in EC still need to be explored further to improve efficiency.

Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Women with Endometrial Cancer: Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions

Background

The 2019 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for endometrial cancer recommend performing either dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE MRI) or single-phase CE MRI. However, no study has directly compared these options. Therefore, this study compared dynamic versus single-phase CE MRI for the evaluation of myometrial invasion in women with endometrial cancer.

Methods

This retrospective, single-institution comparative study was conducted among women with surgically proven endometrial cancer, including 30 consecutive women with single-phase CE MRI and 30 age- and pathologic stage-matched women with dynamic CE MRI. Three readers independently compared dynamic and single-phase CE MRI in terms of the tumor-myometrium signal intensity (SI) difference ratio, depth of myometrial invasion, image quality, and image number. Pathologic findings served as a reference standard for the depth of myometrial invasion.

Results

The estimated mean SI difference ratios of dynamic CE MRI and single-phase CE MRI fell within an equivalence margin of 0.05 (90% confidence intervals [CIs] = [-0.0497 to -0.0165], [-0.0226 to -0.0403], and [-0.0429 to -0.0433], respectively, for readers A, B, and C). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of deep myometrial invasion was not significantly different between the acquisitions (P = .3315, P = .3345, and P = .8593, respectively). Single-phase CE MRI showed significantly better image quality than dynamic CE MRI (P = .0143, P = .0042, and P = .0066, respectively), while the median number of images for dynamic CE MRI was 2.4 times higher than that for single-phase CE MRI.

Conclusion

Single-phase acquisition may be a better option for CE MRI in women with endometrial cancer than dynamic acquisition.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging is a non-invasive technique used for the evaluation of tissue vascularity features through imaging series acquisition after contrast medium administration. Over the years, the study technique and protocols have evolved, seeing a growing application of this method across different imaging modalities for the study of almost all body districts. The main and most consolidated current applications concern MRI imaging for the study of tumors, but an increasing number of studies are evaluating the use of this technique also for inflammatory pathologies and functional studies. Furthermore, the recent advent of artificial intelligence techniques is opening up a vast scenario for the analysis of quantitative information deriving from DCE. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive update on the techniques, protocols, and clinical applications - both established and emerging - of DCE in whole-body imaging.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates the selection of patients prior to fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the staging of well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in potential candidates for fertility-sparing management.

METHODS

This multi-center retrospective study included 48 potential candidates for fertility-sparing management (age <46 years, grade 1 endometroid EC) who did not wish to undergo fertility-sparing management and thus underwent definitive surgery. Two readers (R1, R2) independently reviewed bpMRI (T1, T2, and diffusion-weighted imaging) and mpMRI (bpMRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, DCE) during two separate sessions spaced one month apart for the presence of myometrial invasion (MI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), malignant adnexal disease (mAD), and pelvic lymphadenopathy (pLNM). Each reader also recorded maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and tumor-to-uterine volume ratio (TVR) on T2-weighted imaging. The diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI was determined for each reader with surgical pathology serving as a gold standard.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for bpMRI versus mpMRI was 0.76/0.78 (R1/R2) versus 0.84/0.83 for MI, 0.79/0.76 versus 0.99/0.80 for CSI, 0.84/0.84 versus 0.84/0.80 for mAD, and 0.82/0.82 for pLMN. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting tumor spread beyond the endometrium were 71%/77% and 71%/65% for bpMRI (R1/R2) vs. 84%/90% and 71%/65% for mpMRI (R1/R2), respectively. The AUC of maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and TVR for MI was 0.71/0.61, 0.73/0.75, and 0.75/0.77 for R1/R2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRI had moderate diagnostic performance across potential candidates for fertility-sparing treatment of EC. mpMRI outperformed bpMRI for detecting EC spreading beyond the endometrium.