Elbow MR arthrography with traction

SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

Direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) is often considered the most accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of intra-articular structures, but utilization and performance vary widely without consensus. The purpose of this white paper is to develop consensus recommendations on behalf of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) based on published literature and expert opinion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Standards and Guidelines Committee of the SSR identified guidelines for utilization and performance of dMRA as an important topic for study and invited all SSR members with expertise and interest to volunteer for the white paper panel. This panel was tasked with determining an outline, reviewing the relevant literature, preparing a written document summarizing the issues and controversies, and providing recommendations.

RESULTS

Twelve SSR members with expertise in dMRA formed the ad hoc white paper authorship committee. The published literature on dMRA was reviewed and summarized, focusing on clinical indications, technical considerations, safety, imaging protocols, complications, controversies, and gaps in knowledge. Recommendations for the utilization and performance of dMRA in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot regions were developed in group consensus.

CONCLUSION

Although direct MR arthrography has been previously used for a wide variety of clinical indications, the authorship panel recommends more selective application of this minimally invasive procedure. At present, direct MR arthrography remains an important procedure in the armamentarium of the musculoskeletal radiologist and is especially valuable when conventional MRI is indeterminant or results are discrepant with clinical evaluation.

Acute and Chronic Elbow Disorders

Elbow pain is very common and can be due to many pathologic conditions. After radiographs are obtained, advanced imaging is often necessary. Both ultrasonography and MR imaging can be used to evaluate the many important soft-tissue structures of the elbow, with each modality having advantages and disadvantages in certain clinical scenarios. Imaging findings between the two modalities often correlate. It is important for musculoskeletal radiologists to understand normal elbow anatomy and how best to use ultrasonography and MR imaging to evaluate elbow pain. In this way, radiologists can provide expert guidance to referring clinicians and best guide patient management.

Posttreatment Changes of the Elbow

Radiologists should be familiar with the typical surgical procedures applied at the elbow and aware of the spectrum of normal and pathologic appearances of posttreatment situations throughout all radiologic modalities. Most important in the case of posttraumatic surgical elbow procedures is correct postoperative elbow joint alignment, appropriate fixation of joint-forming fragments, and proper insertion of screws, plates, and anchor devices that do not conflict with intra-articular or bony structures. To report soft tissue repair procedures correctly, radiologists need to know the broad spectrum of different techniques applied and their appearance on magnetic resonance imaging.

Preoperative Evaluation and Surgical Simulation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow Using Three-Dimensional MRI-CT Image Fusion Images

We used our novel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography fusion images (3D MRI-CT fusion images; MCFIs) for detailed preoperative lesion evaluation and surgical simulation in osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the elbow. Herein, we introduce our procedure and report the findings of the assessment of its utility. We enrolled 16 men (mean age: 14.0 years) and performed preoperative MRI using 7 kg axial traction with a 3-Tesla imager and CT. Three-dimensional-MRI models of the humerus and articular cartilage and a 3D-CT model of the humerus were constructed. We created MCFIs using both models. We validated the findings obtained from the MCFIs and intraoperative findings using the following items: articular cartilage fissures and defects, articular surface deformities, vertical and horizontal lesion diameters, the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification, and surgical procedures. The MCFIs accurately reproduced the lesions and correctly matched the ICRS classification in 93.5% of cases. Surgery was performed as simulated in all cases. Preoperatively measured lesion diameters exhibited no significant differences compared to the intraoperative measurements. MCFIs were useful in the evaluation of OCD lesions and detailed preoperative surgical simulation through accurate reproduction of 3D structural details of the lesions.

MRI of the Elbow: How to Do It

The diagnostic cascade for elbow complaints starts with the physical examination and radiographs that already can clarify or rule out many causes. Depending on the suspected pathology, additional imaging is necessary. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the advantage of accurately demonstrating a broad spectrum of diseases. The main indication for noncontrast MRI of the elbow is chronic epicondylitis. For magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography, it is suspected chondral and osteochondral abnormalities. Indirect MR arthrography is an option when direct arthrography is not practicable. MR arthrography of the elbow with traction is feasible, with promising results for the assessment of the radiocapitellar cartilage.

Systematic Review of Elbow Instability in Association With Refractory Lateral Epicondylitis: Myth or Fact?

BACKGROUND

Elbow instability, particularly posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI), has been reported in patients with refractory lateral epicondylitis (LE). However, evidence of diagnostic approach and surgical outcomes is lacking.

PURPOSE

To identify (1) the risk factors, clinical and radiologic-diagnostic characteristics, and (2) the treatment options and clinical outcome of LE with PLRI.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EMBASE databases using keywords as well as Medical Subject Headings terms and Emtree using "(lateral epicondylitis OR tennis elbow) AND (instability OR posterolateral rotatory instability)" for English-language studies. We conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 8 articles comprising 6 level 4 and 2 level 3 studies were identified, including 249 patients (254 elbows). The main triggering factor was heavy labor activity (74/172; 43%). A total of 184 patients (73.9%) received either single (4/184; 2.2%) or multiple (180/184; 97.8%) steroid injections. Clinically, instability was always accompanied by pain in 9% of study individuals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that radial collateral ligament (RCL) and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) lesions were most common (18/79; 23%). The most common surgical procedure performed was arthroscopic RCL plication (62/120; 52%) followed by LUCL reconstruction (30/120; 25%). A ligament patholaxity sign was shown intraoperatively for 64% (44/69). Clinical outcomes ranged from good to excellent in all studies. The most common residual symptom was limited range of motion (11/18; 61%).

CONCLUSION

Instability can coexist and may be associated with refractory LE. The risk factors of instability associated with refractory LE are heavy labor and multiple steroid injections. A systematic approach to identify the clinical and MRI presentation of the condition followed by examination under anesthesia are necessary for affirmative diagnosis, as independent presentations may be misleading.

A novel three-dimensional MRI-CT image fusion technique for precise preoperative evaluation and treatment of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans

OBJECTIVES

We developed a novel method to create three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-CT (3D MRI-CT) fusion images for detailed lesion evaluation and surgical simulation in capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (COCD). This study aimed to clarify its usefulness.

METHODS

We enrolled 12 boys with COCD (mean age, 13.8 years) and preoperatively constructed 3D models of the humerus and articular cartilage from MR images obtained with a 3-T imager. For better visualization of the articular cartilage outline, we applied 7 kg of axial traction to the elbow during MRI. We also constructed a 3D model of the humerus from CT images. 3D MRI-CT fusion images were created using both models. The average distance difference between two corresponding points as per the 3D CT and 3D MRI models of the humerus was evaluated. Using the 3D MRI-CT fusion images, we measured longitudinal and transverse lesion diameters; evaluated articular cartilage fissures and defects, articular surface deformities, and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification; and validated the results using intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

The mean average distance difference was 0.75 mm. The 3D MRI-CT fusion images accurately reproduced lesion conditions in every case and correctly predicted the ICRS classification with 100% accuracy. Preoperatively measured longitudinal and transverse lesion diameters were not significantly different from intraoperative measurements (p = 0.79, 0.32 respectively).

CONCLUSION

3D MRI-CT fusion images provide a detailed evaluation of COCD lesion severity by presenting the exact positional relationship between the articular cartilage and subchondral bone.

KEY POINTS

• We developed a novel method to create three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography (3D MRI-CT) fusion images for the evaluation of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans. • 3D MRI-CT fusion images enabled the accurate prediction of lesions and provided a detailed evaluation of lesion severity by presenting the exact positional relationship between the articular cartilage and subchondral bone.

Effect of elbow MRI with axial traction on articular cartilage visibility-a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Accurate evaluation of the articular cartilage of the elbow using MRI is sometimes challenging because of its anatomical complexity and relatively small size. Moreover, the articular cartilage of the humerus is in close contact with the opposing cartilage surfaces. Magnetic resonance arthrography with traction was reported to resolve this issue; however, less invasive methods are desirable. This study aimed to assess the effect of MRI with axial traction (without arthrography) on joint space widening and cartilage outline visibility of the elbow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 10 volunteers (female = 1; mean age, 36.7 ± 8.6; range 28-56) and performed MRI with and without axial traction on the elbow. Joint space widths were measured, and the humeral articular cartilage outline visibility was evaluated at the radiocapitellar joint and lateral one-third and medial one-third of the ulnohumeral joints. Measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Volunteers scored pain and discomfort during MRI with traction using the visual analog scale in a questionnaire format.

RESULTS

Traction significantly increased joint space width at the radiocapitellar joint. Humeral articular cartilage outline visibility also significantly improved at the radiocapitellar joint. Pain and discomfort scores during traction MRI were low.

CONCLUSION

MRI of the elbow with traction widens joint space and enables better articular cartilage visibility at the radiocapitellar joint. Anatomical features of the elbow might have affected these results. Therefore, it would be safe and useful for evaluating elbow injuries involving articular cartilage lesions.

[MR and CT arthrography in cartilage imaging : Indications and implementation]

BACKGROUND

The imaging of chondral pathologies is an essential part in the work-up of acute and chronic joint diseases. Besides conventional MR imaging, CT and MR arthrography are well-established methods in evaluating articular cartilage. The application of these techniques requires knowledge of indications and safe injection procedures by the performing radiologist.

PURPOSE

Our goal is to describe the techniques of cross-sectional arthrographies of different joints, give an overview of general and joint-specific considerations for practical application as well as provide typical indications for cartilage imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective PubMed literature search concerning "arthrography", "CT arthrography", "MR arthrography", "arthrography cartilage", "arthrography wrist", "arthrography elbow", "arthrography shoulder", "arthrography hip", "arthrography knee", "arthrography ankle", "arthrography complications", "arthrography imaging guidance" "osteochondral lesion", "cartilage imaging" and "cartilage lesion" was performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CT and MR arthrography are valuable and safe tools in cartilage imaging. They are useful to verify and specify chondral pathologies, usually after conventional MR imaging, and have an important role in evaluating the stability and therefore in therapeutic decision making of osteochondral lesions. CT arthrography is not only a substitute technique in case of MR contraindications, it can be advantageous in small joints (wrist, elbow, ankle) compared to MR arthrography due to its higher image resolution. Fluoroscopic guided joint puncture is still the most commonly used image guidance method, but the role of ultrasound is steadily increasing. Joint traction in MR arthrography is a promising technique to improve cartilage visualization, though it is not yet used in clinical routine imaging.

Subtle elbow instability associated with lateral epicondylitis

Background

In lateral epicondylitis, even in the absence of apparent instability, subtle instability can be found under anesthesia. We wanted to ascertain the following: (1) how many elbows surgically treated with lateral epicondylitis showed subtle instability during examination under anesthesia (EUA), (2) how effective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was in predicting subtle instability, and (3) if any difference existed in preoperative clinical data between elbows with and without subtle instability during EUA.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-two elbows (117 patients) diagnosed with intractable lateral epicondylitis underwent surgical treatment. No elbow showed apparent instability with conventional physical examination. Under general anesthesia, the elbows were examined for subtle instability via fluoroscopy and divided into unstable and stable groups. Potential prognostic factors and functional scores were assessed retrospectively. The MRIs were reviewed again by two radiologists.

Results

Seventeen elbows (unstable group, 13.9%) had subtle instability in EUA, while 105 elbows (stable group, 86.1%) did not. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex injury was noted in the MRIs of 28 elbows. Fifteen elbows showed subtle instability among 28 elbows with abnormal MRI (positive predictive value, 53.6%), while 81 elbows did not show subtle instability among 82 elbows with normal MRI (negative predictive value, 98.7%). The preoperative visual analog scale score was higher in the unstable group than in the stable group (p < 0.001), and a history of multiple corticosteroid injections (≥3) was related to subtle instability in EUA (p = 0.042). Other factors showed no significant differences between both groups.

Conclusions

Subtle instability resulting from LCL complex injury was noted in elbows with lateral epicondylitis. This could be visualized with fluoroscopic EUA, and preoperative MRI could be used to exclude subtle instability. Surgeons should consider checking for subtle instability, especially when patients have a history of multiple corticosteroid injections (≥3) or severe pain and MRI indicates instability.

Ankle Traction During MRI of Talar Dome Osteochondral Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the impact of axial traction during MRI of talar dome osteochondral lesions using a small-FOV coil.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective study of 33 patients undergoing high-resolution MRI of the ankle using a microscopy coil with and without axial traction was performed. Two radiologists independently measured the tibiotalar joint space width and semiquantitatively graded intraarticular joint fluid dispersion, cartilage surface visibility of the osteochondral lesion, and cartilage surface visibility elsewhere in the tibiotalar joint before and after traction. Patients were instructed to report any discomfort during ankle traction.

RESULTS

None of the patients reported discomfort or other symptoms during ankle traction. The tibiotalar joint space significantly increased (increase in cartilage-cartilage distance, 0.5-0.7 mm; all, p < 0.05) after traction compared with before traction. The degree of intraarticular joint fluid dispersion and the cartilage surface visibility at the osteochondral lesion and elsewhere in the tibiotalar joint improved after traction (all, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Traction MRI of the ankle is safe and technically feasible. This study is the first to date to investigate the effect of ankle traction on the MRI assessment of talar dome osteochondral lesions. Traction improves cartilage surface visibility of talar dome osteochondral lesions.