A quantitative study of shape descriptors from glioblastoma multiforme phenotypes for predicting survival outcome

Quantifying the Growth of Glioblastoma Tumors Using Multimodal MRI Brain Images

Predicting the eventual volume of tumor cells, that might proliferate from a given tumor, can help in cancer early detection and medical procedure planning to prevent their migration to other organs. In this work, a new statistical framework is proposed using Bayesian techniques for detecting the eventual volume of cells expected to proliferate from a glioblastoma (GBM) tumor. Specifically, the tumor region was first extracted using a parallel image segmentation algorithm. Once the tumor region was determined, we were interested in the number of cells that could proliferate from this tumor until its survival time. For this, we constructed the posterior distribution of the tumor cell numbers based on the proposed likelihood function and a certain prior volume. Furthermore, we extended the detection model and conducted a Bayesian regression analysis by incorporating radiomic features to discover those non-tumor cells that remained undetected. The main focus of the study was to develop a time-independent prediction model that could reliably predict the ultimate volume a malignant tumor of the fourth-grade severity could attain and which could also determine if the incorporation of the radiomic properties of the tumor enhanced the chances of no malignant cells remaining undetected.

New insights into glioma frequency maps: From genetic and transcriptomic correlate to survival prediction

Increasing evidence indicates that glioma topographic location is linked to the cellular origin, molecular alterations and genetic profile. This research aims to (a) reveal the underlying mechanisms of tumor location predilection in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and lower-grade glioma (LGG) and (b) leverage glioma location features to predict prognosis. MRI images from 396 GBM and 190 LGG (115 astrocytoma and 75 oligodendroglioma) patients were standardized to construct frequency maps and analyzed by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. We then investigated the spatial correlation between glioma distribution with gene expression in healthy brains. We also evaluated transcriptomic differences in tumor tissue from predilection and nonpredilection sites. Furthermore, we quantitively characterized tumor anatomical localization and explored whether it was significantly related to overall survival. Finally, we employed a support vector machine to build a survival prediction model for GBM patients. GBMs exhibited a distinct location predilection from LGGs. GBMs were nearer to the subventricular zone and more likely to be localized to regions enriched with synaptic signaling, whereas astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma tended to occur in areas associated with the immune response. Synapse, neurotransmitters and calcium ion channel-related genes were all activated in GBM tissues coming from predilection regions. Furthermore, we characterized tumor location features in terms of a series of tumor-to-predilection distance metrics, which were able to predict GBM 1-year survival status with an accuracy of 0.71. These findings provide new perspectives on our understanding of tumor anatomic localization. The spatial features of glioma are of great value in individual therapy and prognosis prediction.

MRI-derived radiomics to guide post-operative management of glioblastoma: Implication for personalized radiation treatment volume delineation

Background

The glioblastoma's bad prognosis is primarily due to intra-tumor heterogeneity, demonstrated from several studies that collected molecular biology, cytogenetic data and more recently radiomic features for a better prognostic stratification. The GLIFA project (GLIoblastoma Feature Analysis) is a multicentric project planned to investigate the role of radiomic analysis in GB management, to verify if radiomic features in the tissue around the resection cavity may guide the radiation target volume delineation.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyze from three centers radiomic features extracted from 90 patients with total or near total resection, who completed the standard adjuvant treatment and for whom we had post-operative images available for features extraction. The Manual segmentation was performed on post gadolinium T1w MRI sequence by 2 radiation oncologists and reviewed by a neuroradiologist, both with at least 10 years of experience. The Regions of interest (ROI) considered for the analysis were: the surgical cavity ± post-surgical residual mass (CTV_cavity); the CTV a margin of 1.5 cm added to CTV_cavity and the volume resulting from subtracting the CTV_cavity from the CTV was defined as CTV_Ring. Radiomic analysis and modeling were conducted in RStudio. Z-score normalization was applied to each radiomic feature. A radiomic model was generated using features extracted from the Ring to perform a binary classification and predict the PFS at 6 months. A 3-fold cross-validation repeated five times was implemented for internal validation of the model.

Results

Two-hundred and seventy ROIs were contoured. The proposed radiomic model was given by the best fitting logistic regression model, and included the following 3 features: F_cm_merged.contrast, F_cm_merged.info.corr.2, F_rlm_merged.rlnu. A good agreement between model predicted probabilities and observed outcome probabilities was obtained (p-value of 0.49 by Hosmer and Lemeshow statistical test). The ROC curve of the model reported an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88).

Conclusion

This is the first hypothesis-generating study which applies a radiomic analysis focusing on healthy tissue ring around the surgical cavity on post-operative MRI. This study provides a preliminary model for a decision support tool for a customization of the radiation target volume in GB patients in order to achieve a margin reduction strategy.

Radiomic and Volumetric Measurements as Clinical Trial Endpoints—A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

The extraction of quantitative data from standard-of-care imaging modalities offers opportunities to improve the relevance and salience of imaging biomarkers used in drug development. This review aims to identify the challenges and opportunities for discovering new imaging-based biomarkers based on radiomic and volumetric assessment in the single-site solid tumor sites: breast cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer and glioblastoma. Developing approaches to harmonize three essential areas: segmentation, validation and data sharing may expedite regulatory approval and adoption of novel cancer imaging biomarkers.

Abstract

Clinical trials for oncology drug development have long relied on surrogate outcome biomarkers that assess changes in tumor burden to accelerate drug registration (i.e., Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria). Drug-induced reduction in tumor size represents an imperfect surrogate marker for drug activity and yet a radiologically determined objective response rate is a widely used endpoint for Phase 2 trials. With the addition of therapies targeting complex biological systems such as immune system and DNA damage repair pathways, incorporation of integrative response and outcome biomarkers may add more predictive value. We performed a review of the relevant literature in four representative tumor types (breast cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer and glioblastoma) to assess the preparedness of volumetric and radiomics metrics as clinical trial endpoints. We identified three key areas—segmentation, validation and data sharing strategies—where concerted efforts are required to enable progress of volumetric- and radiomics-based clinical trial endpoints for wider clinical implementation.

Relapse patterns and radiation dose exposure in IDH wild-type glioblastoma at first radiographic recurrence following chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To quantify the radiation dose distribution and lesion morphometry (shape) at baseline, prior to chemoradiation, and at the time of radiographic recurrence in patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

The IMRT dose distribution, location of the center of mass, sphericity, and solidity of the contrast enhancing tumor at baseline and the time of tumor recurrence was quantified in 48 IDH wild-type GBM who underwent postoperative IMRT (2 Gy daily for total of 60 Gy) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.

RESULTS

Average radiation dose within enhancing tumor at baseline and recurrence was ≥ 60 Gy. Centroid location of the enhancing tumor shifted an average of 11.3 mm at the time of recurrence with respect to pre-IMRT location. A positive correlation was observed between change in centroid location and PFS in MGMT methylated patients (P = 0.0007) and Cox multivariate regression confirmed centroid distance from baseline was associated with PFS when accounting for clinical factors (P = 0.0189). Lesion solidity was higher at recurrence compared to baseline (P = 0.0118). Tumors that progressed > 12 weeks after IMRT were significantly more spherical (P = 0.0094).

CONCLUSION

Most GBMs recur local within therapeutic IMRT doses; however, tumors with longer PFS occurred further from the original tumor location and were more solid and/or nodular.

Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Tumors: Current State-of-the-Art of AI Methods Applied to MRI

Given growing clinical needs, in recent years Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have increasingly been used to define the best approaches for survival assessment and prediction in patients with brain tumors. Advances in computational resources, and the collection of (mainly) public databases, have promoted this rapid development. This narrative review of the current state-of-the-art aimed to survey current applications of AI in predicting survival in patients with brain tumors, with a focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). An extensive search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar using a Boolean research query based on MeSH terms and restricting the search to the period between 2012 and 2022. Fifty studies were selected, mainly based on Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), radiomics-based methods, and methods that exploit traditional imaging techniques for survival assessment. In addition, we focused on two distinct tasks related to survival assessment: the first on the classification of subjects into survival classes (short and long-term or eventually short, mid and long-term) to stratify patients in distinct groups. The second focused on quantification, in days or months, of the individual survival interval. Our survey showed excellent state-of-the-art methods for the first, with accuracy up to ∼98%. The latter task appears to be the most challenging, but state-of-the-art techniques showed promising results, albeit with limitations, with C-Index up to ∼0.91. In conclusion, according to the specific task, the available computational methods perform differently, and the choice of the best one to use is non-univocal and dependent on many aspects. Unequivocally, the use of features derived from quantitative imaging has been shown to be advantageous for AI applications, including survival prediction. This evidence from the literature motivates further research in the field of AI-powered methods for survival prediction in patients with brain tumors, in particular, using the wealth of information provided by quantitative MRI techniques.

GPCR genes as a predictor of glioma severity and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a comprehensive analysis of the differential expression of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes in order to construct a GPCR gene signature for human glioma prognosis.

METHODS

This current study investigated several glioma transcriptomic datasets and identified the GPCR genes potentially associated with glioma severity.

RESULTS

A gene signature comprising 13 GPCR genes (nine upregulated and four downregulated genes in high-grade glioma) was developed. The predictive power of the 13-gene signature was tested in two validation cohorts and a strong positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation test: ρ = 0.649 for the Validation1 cohort; ρ = 0.693 for the Validation2 cohort) was observed between the glioma grade and 13-gene based severity score in both cohorts. The 13-gene signature was also predictive of glioma prognosis based on Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis in four cohorts of patients with glioma.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of GPCR gene expression in glioma may help researchers gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis of high-grade glioma. Further studies are needed to validate the association between these GPCR genes and glioma pathogenesis.

AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?

Radiomic models outperform clinical data for outcome prediction in high-grade gliomas (HGG). However, lack of parameter standardization limits clinical applications. Many machine learning (ML) radiomic models employ single classifiers rather than ensemble learning, which is known to boost performance, and comparative analyses are lacking in the literature. We aimed to compare ML classifiers to predict clinically relevant tasks for HGG: overall survival (OS), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, epidermal growth factor receptor vIII (EGFR) amplification, and Ki-67 expression, based on radiomic features from conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our objective was to identify the best algorithm for each task. One hundred fifty-six adult patients with pathologic diagnosis of HGG were included. Three tumoral regions were manually segmented: contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis, and non-enhancing tumor. Radiomic features were extracted with a custom version of Pyradiomics and selected through Boruta algorithm. A Grid Search algorithm was applied when computing ten times K-fold cross-validation (K=10) to get the highest mean and lowest spread of accuracy. Model performance was assessed as AUC-ROC curve mean values with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Extreme Gradient Boosting (xGB) obtained highest accuracy for OS (74,5%), Adaboost (AB) for IDH mutation (87.5%), MGMT methylation (70,8%), Ki-67 expression (86%), and EGFR amplification (81%). Ensemble classifiers showed the best performance across tasks. High-scoring radiomic features shed light on possible correlations between MRI and tumor histology.

Glioblastoma radiomics to predict survival: Diffusion characteristics of surrounding nonenhancing tissue to select patients for extensive resection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary CNS neoplasm with poor overall survival (OS) despite standard of care. On MRI, GBM is usually characterized by an enhancing portion (CET) (surgery target) and a nonenhancing surrounding (NET). Extent of resection is a long debated issue in GBM, with recent evidence suggesting that both CET and NET should be resected in <65 years old patients, regardless of other risk factors (i.e., molecular biomarkers). Our aim was to test a radiomic model for patient survival stratification in <65 years old patients, by analyzing MRI features of NET, to aid tumor resection.

METHODS

Sixty-eight <65 years old GBM patients, with extensive CET resection, were selected. Resection was evaluated by manually segmenting CET on volumetric T1-weighted MRI pre and postsurgery (within 72 h). All patients underwent the same treatment protocol including chemoradiation. NET radiomic features were extracted with a custom version of Pyradiomics. Feature selection was performed with principal component analysis (PCA) and its effect on survival tested with Cox regression model. Twelve months OS discrimination was tested by t-test followed by logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The most relevant features were identified from the component matrix.

RESULTS

Five PCA components (PC1-5) explained 90% of the variance. PC5 resulted significant in the Cox model (p = 0.002; exp(B) = 0.686), at t-test (p = 0.002) and logistic regression analysis (p = 0.006). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based features were the most significant for patient survival stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC radiomic features on NET predict survival after standard therapy and could be used to improve patient selection for more extensive surgery.

Introduction to radiomics and radiogenomics in neuro-oncology: implications and challenges

Neuro-oncology largely consists of malignancies of the brain and central nervous system including both primary as well as metastatic tumors. Currently, a significant clinical challenge in neuro-oncology is to tailor therapies for patients based on a priori knowledge of their survival outcome or treatment response to conventional or experimental therapies. Radiomics or the quantitative extraction of subvisual data from conventional radiographic imaging has recently emerged as a powerful data-driven approach to offer insights into clinically relevant questions related to diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, as well as assessing treatment response. Furthermore, radiogenomic approaches provide a mechanism to establish statistical correlations of radiomic features with point mutations and next-generation sequencing data to further leverage the potential of routine MRI scans to serve as "virtual biopsy" maps. In this review, we provide an introduction to radiomic and radiogenomic approaches in neuro-oncology, including a brief description of the workflow involving preprocessing, tumor segmentation, and extraction of "hand-crafted" features from the segmented region of interest, as well as identifying radiogenomic associations that could ultimately lead to the development of reliable prognostic and predictive models in neuro-oncology applications. Lastly, we discuss the promise of radiomics and radiogenomic approaches in personalizing treatment decisions in neuro-oncology, as well as the challenges with clinical adoption, which will rely heavily on their demonstrated resilience to nonstandardization in imaging protocols across sites and scanners, as well as in their ability to demonstrate reproducibility across large multi-institutional cohorts.

Machine learning-based radiomic, clinical and semantic feature analysis for predicting overall survival and MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Survival varies in patients with glioblastoma due to intratumoral heterogeneity and radiomics/imaging biomarkers have potential to demonstrate heterogeneity. The objective was to combine radiomic, semantic and clinical features to improve prediction of overall survival (OS) and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status from pre-operative MRI in patients with glioblastoma.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 181 MRI studies (mean age 58 ± 13 years, mean OS 497 ± 354 days) performed in patients with histopathology-proven glioblastoma. Tumour mass, contrast-enhancement and necrosis were segmented from volumetric contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). 333 radiomic features were extracted and 16 Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images (VASARI) features were evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists. Top radiomic, VASARI and clinical features were used to build machine learning models to predict MGMT status, and all features including MGMT status were used to build Cox proportional hazards regression (Cox) and random survival forest (RSF) models for OS prediction.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for MGMT promoter methylation index was 12.75%; 42 radiomic features exhibited significant differences between high and low-methylation groups. However, model performance accuracy combining radiomic, VASARI and clinical features for MGMT status prediction varied between 45 and 67%. For OS predication, the RSF model based on clinical, VASARI and CE radiomic features achieved the best performance with an average iAUC of 96.2 ± 1.7 and C-index of 90.0 ± 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

VASARI features in combination with clinical and radiomic features from the enhancing tumour show promise for predicting OS with a high accuracy in patients with glioblastoma from pre-operative volumetric CE-T1WI.

Overall Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma With Radiomic Features Using Machine Learning

Glioblastoma is a WHO grade IV brain tumor, which leads to poor overall survival (OS) of patients. For precise surgical and treatment planning, OS prediction of glioblastoma (GBM) patients is highly desired by clinicians and oncologists. Radiomic research attempts at predicting disease prognosis, thus providing beneficial information for personalized treatment from a variety of imaging features extracted from multiple MR images. In this study, first-order, intensity-based volume and shape-based and textural radiomic features are extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T1ce MRI data. The region of interest is further decomposed with stationary wavelet transform with low-pass and high-pass filtering. Further, radiomic features are extracted on these decomposed images, which helped in acquiring the directional information. The efficiency of the proposed algorithm is evaluated on Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge training, validation, and test datasets. The proposed approach achieved 0.695, 0.571, and 0.558 on BraTS training, validation, and test datasets. The proposed approach secured the third position in BraTS 2018 challenge for the OS prediction task.

Analysis of MRI Data in Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive imaging tool for neuroradiological diagnosis. Numerous concepts of automated MRI analysis and the use of machine learning have been proposed to assist diagnosis and prognosis. While these academic innovations have proven effective in principle within controlled environments, their application to clinical practice has faced unmet requirements, such as the ability to perform reliably across a heterogeneous population, to work robustly in the presence of comorbidities, and to be invariant to scanner hardware and image quality. The lack of realistic confidence bounds and the inability to handle missing data have also reduced the application of most of these methods outside of academic studies. Mastering the complex challenges in the diagnostic process may help researchers discover novel biological constructs in multimodal data and improve stratification for clinical trials, paving the way for precision medicine. This review presents the state of the art of computerized brain MRI analysis for diagnostic purposes. We critically evaluate the current clinical usefulness of the methods and highlight challenges and future perspectives of the field.

Machine learning and radiomic phenotyping of lower grade gliomas: improving survival prediction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutational status in stratifying biologically distinct subgroups of gliomas. This study aimed to evaluate whether MRI-based radiomic features could improve the accuracy of survival predictions for lower grade gliomas over clinical and IDH status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiomic features (n = 250) were extracted from preoperative MRI data of 296 lower grade glioma patients from databases at our institutional (n = 205) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)/The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) (n = 91) datasets. For predicting overall survival, random survival forest models were trained with radiomic features; non-imaging prognostic factors including age, resection extent, WHO grade, and IDH status on the institutional dataset, and validated on the TCGA/TCIA dataset. The performance of the random survival forest (RSF) model and incremental value of radiomic features were assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics.

RESULTS

The radiomics RSF model identified 71 radiomic features to predict overall survival, which were successfully validated on TCGA/TCIA dataset (iAUC, 0.620; 95% CI, 0.501-0.756). Relative to the RSF model from the non-imaging prognostic parameters, the addition of radiomic features significantly improved the overall survival prediction accuracy of the random survival forest model (iAUC, 0.627 vs. 0.709; difference, 0.097; 95% CI, 0.003-0.209).

CONCLUSION

Radiomic phenotyping with machine learning can improve survival prediction over clinical profile and genomic data for lower grade gliomas.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics analysis with machine learning can improve survival prediction over the non-imaging factors (clinical and molecular profiles) for lower grade gliomas, across different institutions.

A Multi-parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Signature and a Practical ML Model for Stratifying Glioblastoma Patients Based on Survival Toward Precision Oncology

Purpose: Predicting patients' survival outcomes is recognized of key importance to clinicians in oncology toward determining an ideal course of treatment and patient management. This study applies radiomics analysis on pre-operative multi-parametric MRI of patients with glioblastoma from multiple institutions to identify a signature and a practical machine learning model for stratifying patients into groups based on overall survival.

Methods: This study included 163 patients' data with glioblastoma, collected by BRATS 2018 Challenge from multiple institutions. In this proposed method, a set of 147 radiomics image features were extracted locally from three tumor sub-regions on standardized pre-operative multi-parametric MR images. LASSO regression was applied for identifying an informative subset of chosen features whereas a Cox model used to obtain the coefficients of those selected features. Then, a radiomics signature model of 9 features was constructed on the discovery set and it performance was evaluated for patients stratification into short- (<10 months), medium- (10–15 months), and long-survivors (>15 months) groups. Eight ML classification models, trained and then cross-validated, were tested to assess a range of survival prediction performance as a function of the choice of features.

Results: The proposed mpMRI radiomics signature model had a statistically significant association with survival (P < 0.001) in the training set, but was not confirmed (P = 0.110) in the validation cohort. Its performance in the validation set had a sensitivity of 0.476 (short-), 0.231 (medium-), and 0.600 (long-survivors), and specificity of 0.667 (short-), 0.732 (medium-), and 0.794 (long-survivors). Among the tested ML classifiers, the ensemble learning model's results showed superior performance in predicting the survival classes, with an overall accuracy of 57.8% and AUC of 0.81 for short-, 0.47 for medium-, and 0.72 for long-survivors using the LASSO selected features combined with clinical factors.

Conclusion: A derived GLCM feature, representing intra-tumoral inhomogeneity, was found to have a high association with survival. Clinical factors, when added to the radiomics image features, boosted the performance of the ML classification model in predicting individual glioblastoma patient's survival prognosis, which can improve prognostic quality a further step toward precision oncology.

Integration of Radiomic and Multi-omic Analyses Predicts Survival of Newly Diagnosed IDH1 Wild-Type Glioblastoma

Predictors of patient outcome derived from gene methylation, mutation, or expression are severely limited in IDH1 wild-type glioblastoma (GBM). Radiomics offers an alternative insight into tumor characteristics which can provide complementary information for predictive models. The study aimed to evaluate whether predictive models which integrate radiomic, gene, and clinical (multi-omic) features together offer an increased capacity to predict patient outcome. A dataset comprising 200 IDH1 wild-type GBM patients, derived from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) (n = 71) and the McGill University Health Centre (n = 129), was used in this study. Radiomic features (n = 45) were extracted from tumor volumes then correlated to biological variables and clinical outcomes. By performing 10-fold cross-validation (n = 200) and utilizing independent training/testing datasets (n = 100/100), an integrative model was derived from multi-omic features and evaluated for predictive strength. Integrative models using a limited panel of radiomic (sum of squares variance, large zone/low gray emphasis, autocorrelation), clinical (therapy type, age), genetic (CIC, PIK3R1, FUBP1) and protein expression (p53, vimentin) yielded a maximal AUC of 78.24% (p = 2.9 × 10⁻⁵). We posit that multi-omic models using the limited set of ‘omic’ features outlined above can improve capacity to predict the outcome for IDH1 wild-type GBM patients.

18F-FDG-PET-based radiomics features to distinguish primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma

The differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is essential due to the difference in treatment strategies. This study retrospectively reviewed 77 patients (24 with lymphoma and 53 with GBM) to identify the stable and distinguishable characteristics of lymphoma and GBM in ¹⁸F-fluorodeocxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images using a radiomics approach. Three groups of maps, namely, a standardized uptake value (SUV) map, an SUV map calibrated with the normal contralateral cortex (ncc) activity (SUV/ncc map), and an SUV map calibrated with the normal brain mean (nbm) activity (SUV/nbm map), were generated, and a total of 107 radiomics features were extracted from each SUV map. The margins of the ROI were adjusted to assess the stability of the features, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of each feature was compared with the SUVmax to evaluate the distinguishability of the features. Nighty-five radiomics features from the SUV map were significantly different between lymphoma and GBM, 46 features were numeric stable after marginal adjustment, and 31 features displayed better performance than SUVmax. Features extracted from the SUV map demonstrated higher AUCs than features from the further calibrated maps. Tumors with solid metabolic patterns were also separately evaluated and revealed similar results. Thirteen radiomics features that were stable and distinguishable than SUVmax in every circumstance were selected to distinguish lymphoma from glioblastoma, and they suggested that lymphoma has a higher SUV in most interval segments and is more mathematically heterogeneous than GBM. This study suggested that ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-based radiomics is a reliable noninvasive method to distinguish lymphoma and GBM.

•

¹⁸F-FDG-PET is a reliable technique to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from GBM.

•

Radiomics identify the stable and distinguishable characteristics of lymphoma and GBM.

•

¹⁸F-FDG-PET-based radiomics provide assistance to the preoperative diagnosis.

Radiomics in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Challenges Facing Clinical Implementation

Radiomics analysis has had remarkable progress along with advances in medical imaging, most notability in central nervous system malignancies. Radiomics refers to the extraction of a large number of quantitative features that describe the intensity, texture and geometrical characteristics attributed to the tumor radiographic data. These features have been used to build predictive models for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Such models are being combined with clinical, biological, genetics and proteomic features to enhance reproducibility. Broadly, the four steps necessary for radiomic analysis are: (1) image acquisition, (2) segmentation or labeling, (3) feature extraction, and (4) statistical analysis. Major methodological challenges remain prior to clinical implementation. Essential steps include: adoption of an optimized standard imaging process, establishing a common criterion for performing segmentation, fully automated extraction of radiomic features without redundancy, and robust statistical modeling validated in the prospective setting. This review walks through these steps in detail, as it pertains to high grade gliomas. The impact on precision medicine will be discussed, as well as the challenges facing clinical implementation of radiomic in the current management of glioblastoma.

Evaluation of tumor shape features for overall survival prognosis in glioblastoma multiforme patients

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a rapidly growing tumor associated with poor prognosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of thirteen tumor shape features for overall survival (OS) prognosis in GBM patients. Shape features were extracted from the abnormality regions of the GBM tumor visible on the fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T1-weighted contrast enhanced (T1CE) MR images of GBM patients. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate (with clinical features) Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and observed for the shape features which were found to be significant from the Cox regression analysis. Three 3D shape features: Bounding ellipsoid volume ratio (BEVR), sphericity and spherical disproportion, computed from both the abnormality regions were found to be significant for OS prognosis in GBM patients.

Information-Based Medicine in Glioma Patients: A Clinical Perspective

Glioma constitutes the most common type of primary brain tumor with a dismal survival, often measured in terms of months or years. The thin line between treatment effectiveness and patient harm underpins the importance of tailoring clinical management to the individual patient. Randomized trials have laid the foundation for many neuro-oncological guidelines. Despite this, their findings focus on group-level estimates. Given our current tools, we are limited in our ability to guide patients on what therapy is best for them as individuals, or even how long they should expect to survive. Machine learning, however, promises to provide the analytical support for personalizing treatment decisions, and deep learning allows clinicians to unlock insight from the vast amount of unstructured data that is collected on glioma patients. Although these novel techniques have achieved astonishing results across a variety of clinical applications, significant hurdles remain associated with the implementation of them in clinical practice. Future challenges include the assembly of well-curated cross-institutional datasets, improvement of the interpretability of machine learning models, and balancing novel evidence-based decision-making with the associated liability of automated inference. Although artificial intelligence already exceeds clinical expertise in a variety of applications, clinicians remain responsible for interpreting the implications of, and acting upon, each prediction.

Novel Radiomic Features Based on Joint Intensity Matrices for Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Survival Time

This paper presents a novel set of image texture features generalizing standard grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) to multimodal image data through joint intensity matrices (JIMs). These are used to predict the survival of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients from multimodal MRI data. The scans of 73 GBM patients from the Cancer Imaging Archive are used in our study. Necrosis, active tumor, and edema/invasion subregions of GBM phenotypes are segmented using the coregistration of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1) images and its corresponding fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Texture features are then computed from the JIM of these GBM subregions and a random forest model is employed to classify patients into short or long survival groups. Our survival analysis identified JIM features in necrotic (e.g., entropy and inverse-variance) and edema (e.g., entropy and contrast) subregions that are moderately correlated with survival time (i.e., Spearman rank correlation of 0.35). Moreover, nine features were found to be associated with GBM survival with a Hazard-ratio range of 0.38-2.1 and a significance level of p < 0.05 following Holm-Bonferroni correction. These features also led to the highest accuracy in a univariate analysis for predicting the survival group of patients, with AUC values in the range of 68-70%. Considering multiple features for this task, JIM features led to significantly higher AUC values than those based on standard GLCMs and gene expression. Furthermore, an AUC of 77.56% with p = 0.003 was achieved when combining JIM, GLCM, and gene expression features into a single radiogenomic signature. In summary, our study demonstrated the usefulness of modeling the joint intensity characteristics of CE-T1 and FLAIR images for predicting the prognosis of patients with GBM.

Quantification of glioblastoma mass effect by lateral ventricle displacement

Mass effect has demonstrated prognostic significance for glioblastoma, but is poorly quantified. Here we define and characterize a novel neuroimaging parameter, lateral ventricle displacement (LVd), which quantifies mass effect in glioblastoma patients. LVd is defined as the magnitude of displacement from the center of mass of the lateral ventricle volume in glioblastoma patients relative to that a normal reference brain. Pre-operative MR images from 214 glioblastoma patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were segmented using iterative probabilistic voxel labeling (IPVL). LVd, contrast enhancing volumes (CEV) and FLAIR hyper-intensity volumes (FHV) were determined. Associations with patient survival and tumor genomics were investigated using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Glioblastoma patients had significantly higher LVd relative to patients without brain tumors. The variance of LVd was not explained by tumor volume, as defined by CEV or FLAIR. LVd was robustly associated with glioblastoma survival in Cox models which accounted for both age and Karnofsky's Performance Scale (KPS) (p = 0.006). Glioblastomas with higher LVd demonstrated increased expression of genes associated with tumor proliferation and decreased expression of genes associated with tumor invasion. Our results suggest LVd is a quantitative measure of glioblastoma mass effect and a prognostic imaging biomarker.

Predicting survival time of lung cancer patients using radiomic analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the prediction of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient survival outcomes based on radiomic texture and shape features automatically extracted from tumor image data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis involves CT scans of 315 NSCLC patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). A total of 24 image features are computed from labeled tumor volumes of patients within groups defined using NSCLC subtype and TNM staging information. Spearman's rank correlation, Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank tests were used to identify features related to long/short NSCLC patient survival groups. Automatic random forest classification was used to predict patient survival group from multivariate feature data. Significance is assessed at P < 0.05 following Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Significant correlations between radiomic features and survival were observed for four clinical groups: (group, [absolute correlation range]): (large cell carcinoma (LCC) [0.35, 0.43]), (tumor size T2, [0.31, 0.39]), (non lymph node metastasis N0, [0.3, 0.33]), (TNM stage I, [0.39, 0.48]). Significant log-rank relationships between features and survival time were observed for three clinical groups: (group, hazard ratio): (LCC, 3.0), (LCC, 3.9), (T2, 2.5) and (stage I, 2.9). Automatic survival prediction performance (i.e. below/above median) is superior for combined radiomic features with age-TNM in comparison to standard TNM clinical staging information (clinical group, mean area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUC)): (LCC, 75.73%), (N0, 70.33%), (T2, 70.28%) and (TNM-I, 76.17%).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative lung CT imaging features can be used as indicators of survival, in particular for patients with large-cell-carcinoma (LCC), primary-tumor-sizes (T2) and no lymph-node-metastasis (N0).