Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful total hip arthroplasty: a comparative multi-institutional analysis

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty

This article reviews evidence for performing various imaging studies in patients with total hip prostheses. Routine follow-up is generally performed with radiography. Radiographs are also usually the initial imaging modality for patients with symptoms related to the prosthesis. Following acute injury with pain, noncontrast CT may add information to radiographic examination regarding the presence and location of a fracture, component stability, and bone stock. Image-guided joint aspiration, noncontrast MRI, and white blood cell scan and sulfur colloid scan of the hip, are usually appropriate studies for patients suspected of having periprosthetic infection. For evaluation of component loosening, wear, and/or osteolysis, noncontrast CT or MRI are usually appropriate studies. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for identifying adverse reaction to metal debris related to metal-on-metal articulations. For assessing patients after hip arthroplasty, who have trochanteric pain and nondiagnostic radiographs, ultrasound, or MRI are usually appropriate studies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

SPECT/CT of Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Use of SPECT/CT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography) is increasing providing additional information in patients with inconclusive clinical examination and unremarkable imaging findings presenting with chronic pain after total ankle arthroplasty. To differentiate the cause of pain after total ankle arthroplasty can be challenging. SPECT/CT combines structural and metabolic imaging as a hybrid tool leading to higher specificity and overall diagnostic accuracy presumably in cases of gutter impingement, prosthetic loosening, and osteoarthritis of adjacent joints. Moreover, SPECT/CT can complement diagnostic work up in periprosthetic joint infections. Basal tracer enhancement has to be considered for the interpretation of imaging findings.

A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and SPECT-CT Imaging in Complex Spine Pathology: Does SPECT-CT Provide Additional Diagnostic Information Over Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is often regarded as the gold standard for spinal pathology, as it provides good structural visualisation. SPECT-CT, however, provides combined structural and functional information. There is a paucity of literature comparing SPECT-CT with MRI in the spine. Our aim was to determine whether SPECT-CT provides additional information to MRI in individuals with complex spinal pathology, including deformity, which altered management.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all individuals seen at our tertiary spinal unit that were investigated with both MRI and SPECT-CT of the spine between 2007-2020. We reviewed imaging reports, and collated diagnoses, surgical treatment and the relative contributions of MRI and SPECT-CT to management decisions.

RESULTS

104 individuals identified, with a mean age of 30 years (89 females and 15 males). Diagnostic categories were adolescent, adult, and congenital deformity, degenerative pathology, and miscellaneous pathology. MRI returned positive findings in 58 (55.8%), and SPECT-CT in 41 (39.4%) cases. SPECT-CT identified 10 cases of facet joint degeneration, 5 of increased uptake around metalwork suggestive of loosening, 1 pseudoarthrosis, 1 partial failure of fusion and 1 osteoid osteoma which were not reported on MRI, all in individuals who had previously undergone spinal instrumentation. Despite this, SPECT-CT only altered management for 6 individuals (5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is less useful in the setting of previous instrumentation due to metal artefact. Where MRI is inconclusive, particularly in individuals with previous spinal instrumentation, SPECT-CT may provide a diagnosis, but is not recommended as primary imaging.

Molecular Imaging of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Infection is an infrequent complication of lower extremity prosthetic joint surgery. Approximately one third develop within 3 months (early), another third within 1 year (delayed), and the remainder more than 1 year (late) after surgery. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection is not always straightforward. Pain, the most common symptom, is present in 90%-100% of patients. The presence of fever is more variable, ranging from less than 5% to more than 40% of patients with infection. Erythema and joint swelling are often present in acute infections, but are less common in chronic infections. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels are useful "rule out" tests, while peripheral blood leukocyte count and serum tumor necrosis factor α are not helpful. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection often requires a combination of blood, synovial fluid, and tissue sample tests, as well as imaging. Plain radiographs lack sensitivity and specificity. Molecular imaging is useful for evaluating painful joint replacements. Bone scintigraphy is most useful as a screening test. If it is negative then infection and aseptic loosening are unlikely. Combined labeled leukocyte/bone marrow imaging is a very specific test for diagnosing lower extremity joint arthroplasty infection; sensitivity is more variable. Despite more than two decades of investigation, there still is no consensus on the value of ¹⁸F-FDG for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. Differing test probabilities, an inability to discriminate between infection and inflammation secondary to physiologic reactions, and lack of standardized interpretative criteria are obstacles to incorporating ¹⁸F-FDG into the routine diagnostic imaging workup of periprosthetic joint infection. Preliminary results for gallium-68 citrate, fluorine-18, and technetium-99m labeled antimicrobial fragments are encouraging but no large scale trials with these agents have been conducted. Limited data suggest that labeled leukocyte/bone marrow SPECT/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT are specific but not sensitive for diagnosing periprosthetic infection of shoulder arthroplasties. There are minimal data on molecular imaging for monitoring treatment response in periprosthetic infections.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot): 2022 Update

Musculoskeletal infections involve bones, joints, and soft tissues. These infections are a common clinical scenario in both outpatient and emergent settings. Although radiography provides baseline findings, a multimodality approach is often implemented to provide more detailed information on the extent of infection involvement and complications. MRI with intravenous contrast is excellent for the evaluation of musculoskeletal infections and is the most sensitive for diagnosing osteomyelitis. MRI, CT, and ultrasound can be useful for joint and soft tissue infections. When MRI or CT is contraindicated, bone scans and the appropriate utilization of other nuclear medicine scans can be implemented for aiding in the diagnostic imaging of infection, especially with metal hardware and arthroplasty artifacts on MRI and CT. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

The prevalence and risk factors of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of dislocation and risk factors following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Retrospective analysis was done on the clinical data of 441patients with primary total hip arthroplasty who were admitted to our hospital between May 2018 and early December 2020. A total of 294 patients without posterior soft tissue repair were included as control group, and a total of 147 patients with repair of the short external rotator muscle and joint capsule were assigned to the repair group. All operated patients were observed to analyze the occurrence and risk of early postoperative dislocation. Within 6 months after hip arthroplasty, the early hip dislocation rate in the repair group was 0.68%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.78%) (P < 0.05). The results of multifactorial analysis showed that age ≥75 years, combined limb or mental illness, artificial femoral head diameter <30 mm, posterolateral approach and prosthesis placement outside the safety zone, and improper handling were risk factors for dislocation (P < 0.05); The incidence of re-dislocation was lower in the targeted intervention group (P < 0.05). The occurrence of dislocation after THA is related to age, gender, and type of orthopedic disease. The risk factors should be explored to develop targeted intervention protocol, decreasing the dislocation rate and improving the prognosis.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy

Hip arthroplasty (HA) is a frequently used procedure with high success rates, but 7% to 27% of the patients complain of persistent postsurgical pain 1 to 4 years post-operation. HA complications depend on the post-operative delay, the type of material used, the patient’s characteristics, and the surgical approach. Radiographs are still the first imaging modality used for routine follow-up, in asymptomatic and painful cases. CT and MRI used to suffer from metallic artifacts but are nowadays central in HA complications diagnosis, both having their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging workup for HA complication diagnosis, which may have an impact on patient management. After a brief reminder about the different types of prostheses, this article reviews their normal and pathologic appearance, according to each imaging modality, keeping in mind that few abnormalities might be present, not anyone requiring treatment, depending on the clinical scenario. A diagnostic imaging workup is also discussed, to aid the therapist in his imaging studies prescription and the radiologist in their practical aspects.

The Role of Nuclear Medicine Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT, Combined 111In-WBC/99mTc-Nanocoll, and 99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronic Problems after TKA or THA in a Prospective Study

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic value of nuclear imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (FDG PET/CT), combined ¹¹¹In-WBC/^99mTc-Nanocoll, and ^99mTc-HDP SPECT/CT (dual-isotope WBC/bone marrow scan) for patients with chronic problems related to knee or hip prostheses (TKA or THA) scheduled by a structured multidisciplinary algorithm. Materials and Methods: Fifty-five patients underwent imaging with ^99mTc–HDP SPECT/CT (bone scan), dual-isotope WBC/bone marrow scan, and FDG PET/CT. The final diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and/or loosening was based on the intraoperative findings and microbiological culture results and the clinical follow-up. Results: The diagnostic performance of dual-isotope WBC/bone marrow SPECT/CT for PJI showed a sensitivity of 100% (CI 0.74–1.00), a specificity of 97% (CI 0.82–1.00), and an accuracy of 98% (CI 0.88–1.00); for PET/CT, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100% (CI 0.74–1.00), 71% (CI 0.56–0.90), and 79% (CI 0.68–0.93), respectively. Conclusions: In a standardized prospectively scheduled patient group, the results showed highly specific performance of combined dual-isotope WBC/bone marrow SPECT/CT in confirming chronic PJI. FDG PET/CT has an appropriate accuracy, but the utility of its use in the clinical diagnostic algorithm of suspected PJI needs further evidence.

Diagnostic Performance of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Aseptic Loosening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value and clinical applicability of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in aseptic loosening (AL) of prostheses by meta-analysis.

METHOD

Literature on the diagnostic value of SPECT/CT in AL of prostheses was obtained by computer and manual review. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Quality Assessment Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and other indicators were calculated, and a forest map and summary receiver operating characteristic were drawn to calculate the area under the curve. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity and corresponding subgroup analysis was performed. A Fagan plot, likelihood ratio point plot, and Deek's funnel plot were drawn and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of aseptic prosthetic loosening were 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.90-0.96) and 0.89, 95% CI (0.78-0.95), respectively while the pooled positive likelihood ratio and pooled negative likelihood ratio were 8.65, 95% CI (4.18-17.90) and 0.07, 95% CI (0.04-0.11), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 130.36, 95% CI (45.18-376.19), and the area under the curve was 0.97, 95% CI (0.95-0.98).

CONCLUSION

As a diagnostic method for AL, SPECT/CT has high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as high diagnostic efficiency. It has good clinical application value and should be a primary choice in the diagnosis of AL after joint replacement.

Nuclear Medicine Scans in Total Joint Replacement

»

A 3-phase bone scan is a potential first-line nuclear medicine study for pain after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) when there is concern for periprosthetic joint infection or aseptic loosening.

»

In patients who have a positive bone scintigraphy result and suspected infection of the joint, but where aspiration or other studies are inconclusive, labeled leukocyte scintigraphy with bone marrow imaging may be of benefit.

»

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while not a nuclear medicine study, also shows promise and has the advantage of providing information about the soft tissues around a total joint replacement.

»

Radiotracer uptake patterns in scintigraphy are affected by the prosthesis (total knee arthroplasty [TKA] versus total hip arthroplasty [THA]) and the use of cement.

»

Nuclear medicine scans may be ordered 1 year postoperatively but may have positive findings that are due to normal physiologic bone remodeling. Nuclear studies may be falsely positive for up to 2 years after TJA.

»

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography (CT) (SPECT/CT), fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and MRI show promise; however, more studies are needed to better define their role in the diagnostic workup of pain after TJA.

Diagnostic Value of MRI Lamellated Hyperintense Synovitis in Periprosthetic Infection of Hip

Objective

To investigate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lamellated hyperintense synovitis and periprosthetic infection of hip arthroplasty and estimate its value in the diagnosis of infection after hip replacement.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 50 patients who underwent MRI from January 2016 to June 2019 after hip replacement was performed. The MRI scanning was performed with a 1.5T clinical imaging unit using SEMAC protocols. A total of 25 patients (cohort 1) showed infected total hip arthroplasty, and 25 patients had non‐infected arthroplasty as controls (cohort 2). Two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the clinical diagnosis, reviewed all the images for the presence of lamellated hyperintense synovitis independently. The cases were rereviewed by each reader after 2 weeks. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using the first reads. The Kappa statistic was used to assess inter‐observer and intra‐observer reliability.

Results

The incidence of lamellated hyperintense synovitis was 76%–88% in the experimental group and 8%–16% in the control group. The sensitivity of lamellated hyperintense synovitis for infection was 0.80–0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.59 – 0.97), the specificity was 0.84~0.92 (95% CI: 0.64  –0.99), the positive predictive value 0.83–0.92 (95% CI: 0.67 – 0.98), the negative predictive value 0.81 – 0.88 (95% CI: 0.65 – 0.96). The agreement between two readers was substantial (Kappa = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58 – 0.94, P < 0.05). There were moderate inter–observer agreements for both readers, reader 1 (Kappa = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.23 – 0.72, P < 0.05) and reader 2 (Kappa = 0.44，95% CI: 0.19 – 0.69, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In this cohort, the presence of lamellated hyperintense synovitis in the MRI of hip arthroplasty showed high sensitivity and specificity for infection. This sign had substantial intra‐observer reliability and moderate inter‐observer reliability in the classification of the synovial pattern.

Performance of radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in painful total hip arthroplasty and impact on arthroplasty survival

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful hip arthroplasty regarding loosening and arthroplasty survival.

METHODS

Radiography and SPECT/CT reports of 249 painful hip arthroplasties of 191 patients were reviewed. Positive imaging was defined if loosening, infection, and polyethylene wear were found, indicating the need for arthroplasty exchange. Median time from radiograph to operation or last follow-up was 41.3 months (range 0.3-118.4 months). In 67 patients, the performance of radiographs and SPECT/CT regarding loosening was compared with an intraoperative reference standard. The time point of arthroplasty exchange was compared with imaging diagnosis and evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Exchange of cup, shaft, or both was performed in 76 of 249 arthroplasties. Main diagnoses on SPECT/CT were loosening (n = 94), infection (n = 5), and polyethylene wear (n = 15). In total, 104 patients were SPECT/CT positive compared to 84 patients on radiography. Five-year survival of arthroplasties for radiograph positive and negative arthroplasties was 41.5%/83.4% and 39.3%/90.7% for SPECT/CT, respectively. Prognostic impact regarding arthroplasty exchange was highest in radiograph and SPECT/CT concordant positive patients (hazard ratio 19.7 as compared to radiograph and SPECT/CT negative patients). Sensitivity and specificity in 67 operated patients regarding shaft loosening were 59.4%/80.0% with radiography, 90.6%/68.6% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.002 for sensitivity and P = 0.29 for specificity), and for cup loosening 47.4%/89.6% with radiography and 63.2%/85.4% with SPECT/CT (P = 0.51, respectively, P = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

In patients with painful hip arthroplasty, positive radiography, and SPECT/CT are associated with poorer arthroplasty survival. Performance regarding loosening is slightly better with SPECT/CT.

Computed Tomography (CT) Protocols Associated with Cardiac and Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/CT (SPECT/CT) in Korea

PURPOSE

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is an advanced hybrid nuclear medicine technology that generates both functional and anatomical images in a single study. As utilization of SPECT/CT in Korea has been increasing, the purpose of this study was to survey its application of cardiac and skeletal SPECT/CT imaging for protocol optimization.

METHODS

We surveyed CT protocols established for cardiac and skeletal SPECT/CT. We searched the guidelines for the CT protocols for SPECT/CT and reviewed the literature recently published.

RESULTS

Among 36 hybrid SPECT scanners equipped with four or more multi-channel detector CTs (MDCTs), 18 scanners were used to perform cardiac studies at both very low current CT (30-80 mA; 11.1%) and ultra-low current CT (13-30 mA; 88.9%). Among the 33 canners, very low current (≤ 80 mA) CT or low current CT (80-130 mA) was used in 23.5%, and 41.8% for spine disorders, and in 36.4% or 30.3% for foot/ankle disorders, respectively. In the CT reconstructions, slice thickness of 5 mm for cardiac studies was most commonly used (94.4%); thinner slices (0.6-1.0 mm) for spine and foot/ankle studies were used in 24.2% and 45.5%, respectively. We also reviewed the international guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The results and current recommendations will be helpful for optimizing CT protocols for SPECT/CT. Optimization of SPECT/CT protocols will be required for generating the proper strategy for the specific lesions and clinical purpose.